Tag Archives | church

On Orthodox Theology

Today, I finished reading A Basic Guide to Eastern Orthodox Theology by Dr. Eve Tibbs. Published by Baker Academic in 2021 (ISBN: 9781540960719), this book provides a structured and patristically rooted presentation of the theological foundations of the Orthodox Christian Church. It is neither a Western-style systematic theology nor written as a comparative polemic against other traditions. Rather, it is a faithful distillation of the Orthodox phronema (φρόνημα), the Church’s spiritual mindset, conveyed for the benefit of a Western audience yet consciously avoiding Western categories, formulations, and doctrinal methods. As such, it functions not as an apologetic but as a catechetical introduction, embedded within the historical and liturgical life of the Church, echoing the voice of the Fathers and conciliar witness.

Dr. Tibbs, a theologian within the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, serves both as an academic and an ecclesial catechist. Her work draws from Scripture, the conciliar tradition, patristic texts, and liturgical praxis, and it seeks to communicate Orthodoxy on its own terms. This review proceeds chapter by chapter, preserving the Eastern theological message of the book.

Chapter 1: The Orthodox Vision of Reality

Dr. Eve Tibbs begins her theological exposition by clarifying that the foundation of Orthodox theology is not merely a doctrinal system or a set of propositional truths, but a worldview—a holistic, theocentric mode of perceiving and living in the world. This worldview is rooted in communion with the Triune God and made manifest through the liturgical, sacramental, and ecclesial life of the Church.

“Returning” to the Ancient Church

Tibbs opens by addressing the increasing interest in the Eastern Orthodox Church, particularly among Western Christians seeking to reconnect with the Church of the early centuries. However, she cautions against the misconception that one can extract teachings or liturgical practices from the early Church and transplant them into modern Western Christianity. The Orthodox Church does not seek to reconstruct antiquity—it is the living continuation of the apostolic and patristic Church. As such, Orthodox theology must be encountered within the life of the Church, rather than being dissected or abstracted from it.

This point is central to the Orthodox phronema: theology is not conceived in the abstract, but always within the experience of ecclesial life. The Church is not an optional context for theology—it is the only proper context.

East and West: A Distinct Approach

Tibbs clearly explains that Orthodox theology is not simply a variant of Western theology with Eastern flavoring, but rather a distinct mode of doing theology. She refrains from polemics, but notes that Orthodoxy has a fundamentally different starting point: rather than focusing on the rational explanation of doctrine (as in Western scholasticism), Orthodox theology arises from the liturgical experience of God in worship and prayer. It is doxological, not speculative.

Whereas Western theology has historically emphasized reason, systematization, and legal categories (particularly since Augustine and Anselm), Orthodox theology emphasizes mystery, participation, and transformation. The goal is not merely to understand God, but to be united with Him in theosis (2 Peter 1:4).

Tibbs affirms that this is not to suggest that Orthodox theology lacks intellectual rigor, but that its method is grounded in encounter rather than analysis. One comes to know God through prayer, fasting, sacramental life, and humility, not merely through study. This approach finds its roots in the Fathers, particularly in figures such as St. Gregory of Nyssa, St. Maximus the Confessor, and St. Gregory Palamas.

The Primacy of Worship

A key element in the Orthodox worldview is that theology is inseparable from worship. Dr. Tibbs notes that in the Orthodox tradition, worship is the highest expression of theology, because it is there that the faithful encounter God most fully. The Divine Liturgy is not merely a religious service—it is a mystical participation in the heavenly worship, as described in Hebrews 12:22–24 and Revelation 4–5.

Quoting the early Fathers and reflecting the mind of the Church, she affirms the ancient dictum:

Lex orandi, lex credendi—the law of prayer is the law of belief.

This means that theology is embedded in the Church’s prayer life. The words sung, chanted, and proclaimed in the Liturgy are themselves theological statements, and the faithful are formed by them over time. For instance, the Trisagion hymn—“Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us”—proclaims the holiness and mystery of God in a way more profound than mere definition.

Therefore, the Orthodox worldview sees all of life as oriented toward worship, and worship as theology in action. The Liturgy is the primary theological school, not the classroom.

Doing Theology in the Orthodox Manner

In this section, Tibbs explains how theology is practiced in the Orthodox Church. She makes a critical distinction: theologian, in Orthodox usage, is not simply someone who studies theology, but someone who knows God. The word is reserved for the saints—those who have been transfigured by grace.

She quotes or paraphrases the famous saying of Evagrius of Pontus:

“If you are a theologian, you will pray truly. And if you pray truly, you are a theologian.”

Therefore, theology is not a career or academic field, but an existential participation in divine truth. This is why Orthodoxy places such high importance on asceticism—purification of the heart is a prerequisite to seeing God (cf. Matthew 5:8). Sin darkens the nous, the spiritual faculty by which one knows God, and it is only by repentance, humility, and sacramental life that the theologian is prepared to contemplate divine mysteries.

Orthodox theology is thus not only about God, but from God, and with God.

The Incompatibility of Innovation

Dr. Tibbs notes that, from the Orthodox perspective, doctrinal innovation is not development—it is deviation. The Orthodox Church seeks to preserve the apostolic faith without alteration or diminishment. This fidelity is not static repetition but dynamic continuity—living in the same Spirit as the apostles and saints.

She observes that, in contrast to many contemporary Christian traditions that have adjusted doctrine to accommodate cultural changes, the Orthodox Church holds that the deposit of faith (cf. 2 Tim. 1:14; Jude 1:3) has been handed down once for all and must be safeguarded.

This is not a reactionary position, but a theological one. The Orthodox Church is not interested in adapting truth to the modern world, but in calling the world to repentance and participation in divine life. This makes the Orthodox worldview fundamentally eschatological—it looks not to adjust to the present age, but to be transformed by the age to come.

Participatory Knowledge: A Mystical Epistemology

Tibbs emphasizes that knowledge of God in Orthodox theology is participatory, not observational. God is not the object of study but the subject who reveals Himself. This aligns with the distinction made by St. Gregory Palamas between the essence of God (which remains unknowable) and the energies of God (by which He makes Himself known).

Thus, theology is the fruit of communion with God, not its precondition. As she writes, “To do theology is to participate in the divine life of the Church.” Scripture supports this mystical epistemology:

  • John 14:21: “He who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will manifest Myself to him.”
  • 1 Corinthians 2:14: “The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God… they are spiritually discerned.”
  • Psalm 34:8: “Taste and see that the Lord is good.”

This biblical orientation undergirds Orthodox theology: it is not merely belief in God, but participation with God in the divine mystery.

Conclusion: A Way of Life

Dr. Tibbs closes the chapter by restating that the Orthodox worldview is not merely theological—it is liturgical, ascetical, and sacramental. It is a way of life, ordered toward divine communion. The Church is not a voluntary society of believers, but the very Body of Christ, filled with the Holy Spirit, worshiping the Father, and inviting all into the joy of the Kingdom.

Orthodoxy does not view theology as an academic discipline to be mastered, but as a sacred trust to be entered into through humility, obedience, and prayer. Therefore, the Orthodox worldview is not merely one option among many—it is a comprehensive vision of reality, shaped by the experience of the saints, safeguarded by the Church, and always centered in the mystery of the incarnate Word of God.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

2 Timothy 1:14 – Guard the deposit through the Holy Spirit.
John 1:14 – “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”
Hebrews 12:22–24 – Worship in the heavenly Jerusalem.
Revelation 4–5 – The pattern of heavenly worship.
1 Corinthians 2:14 – Spiritual discernment through the Spirit.
2 Peter 1:4 – Participation in the divine nature.
Jude 1:3 – Contend for the faith once for all delivered.

Chapter 2: One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic

In this chapter, Dr. Tibbs treats the nature and identity of the Orthodox Church, not as an abstract or invisible concept, but as a concrete, living organism: the Body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:27), divinely instituted, sacramentally constituted, and eschatologically oriented. She begins by carefully distinguishing Orthodox ecclesiology from both Roman Catholic institutionalism and Protestant ecclesial pluralism, not by argumentation or refutation, but by presenting the Orthodox self-understanding of the Church as communion (koinonia) in Christ, through the Holy Spirit.

The chapter asserts that the Orthodox Church does not merely possess truth—it is the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Tim. 3:15), because it is the mystical Body of Christ in the world. This identity is not established by human decision or doctrinal agreement, but by its organic continuity with Christ’s own life, death, resurrection, and Pentecostal outpouring. As Tibbs notes, “The Orthodox Church does not claim to be one denomination among many; rather, it sees itself as the same Church established by Christ and revealed in the book of Acts.”

The Church’s nature is therefore ontological and sacramental, not voluntary or conceptual. It is not a human assembly of the like-minded, but a divine-human organism into which one is incorporated by baptism and chrismation (cf. Acts 2:38, Rom. 6:3–5, 1 Cor. 12:13). This incorporation is not symbolic—it effects real participation in Christ, as taught by St. Cyril of Jerusalem: “We become Christ-bearers by partaking of His Holy Body and Blood” (Mystagogical Catecheses, 4.3).

Where Is the Church? What Is the Church?

Tibbs rejects the notion that the Church is fundamentally invisible or spiritually conceptual. She affirms that the Church is “a visible community,” with real continuity in time and space. She references the local Eucharistic community as the full manifestation of the universal Church (cf. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8.2), echoing the Orthodox view that “the whole Church is present in each Eucharistic assembly where the bishop presides.”

The Orthodox Church is not one part of a larger “invisible church.” Rather, it sees itself as the Church established by Christ and preserved by the Holy Spirit, in continuity with the apostles, martyrs, saints, and holy Fathers. Apostolic succession is not merely an historical claim, but the sacramental and pneumatic continuity of the same life of Christ in each generation (cf. 2 Tim. 2:2).

She emphasizes that the Orthodox Church does not make exclusive truth claims out of triumphalism but out of fidelity to her unbroken Eucharistic, doctrinal, and hierarchical life. In this sense, the Church is not a theological theory but a spiritual and liturgical reality—a mystery rooted in divine condescension and grace.

Ecclesial Unity

Dr. Tibbs dedicates significant attention to explaining what Orthodox Christians mean by the term “One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic”—the four marks of the Church, as confessed in the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD).

  • One: The unity of the Church is not institutional or legal but spiritual and ontological. The unity is in Christ Himself (John 17:21). The Church is one because her Head is one, and because the Holy Spirit gathers all into one Eucharistic communion.
  • Holy: The Church is holy not because all her members are free from sin, but because she is the Body of Christ, sanctified by the Holy Spirit and made holy by her sacraments, Scripture, and prayers. The holiness is intrinsic and sacramental, not moralistic.
  • Catholic: The term catholic does not mean “universal” in a merely geographical or numerical sense. It refers to wholeness and fullness—each local church, when gathered around its bishop in Eucharistic celebration, is fully the Church. As St. Ignatius wrote, “Wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church” (Smyrnaeans 8.2).
  • Apostolic: Apostolicity is not only about unbroken succession of bishops, though that is necessary. More deeply, it means fidelity to the apostolic faith, worship, and ethos (cf. Acts 2:42). The Orthodox Church sees herself as preserving the faith of the apostles without addition or subtraction, in doctrine, liturgy, and life.

Tibbs is careful to note that apostolic succession, while often described in terms of episcopal lineage, must also be understood in its full sacramental and doctrinal dimension. The bishops are successors to the apostles not because they simply inherit an office, but because they faithfully transmit and guard the apostolic deposit (cf. Jude 1:3, 1 Tim. 6:20).

Primacy in the Church

In a brief but substantive section, the chapter addresses the question of primacy. The Orthodox Church recognizes primacy of honor (πρωτεῖον τιμῆς) among bishops—historically assigned to the Bishop of Rome, then Constantinople—but rejects any form of universal jurisdiction. The model is conciliar, not monarchical, with all bishops being equal in sacramental authority. Canon 34 of the Apostolic Canons and Canon 6 of Nicaea I are cited in this regard.

Thus, ecclesial governance in Orthodoxy is conciliar, synodal, and grounded in mutual accountability. No bishop has authority above the synod; no synod above the faith of the Church as preserved by the Spirit.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

  • 1 Corinthians 12:12–27 to illustrate the organic unity of the Church as Christ’s body;
  • Ephesians 4:4–6 to show that there is “one Lord, one faith, one baptism”;
  • Acts 2:42–47 to demonstrate the essential features of apostolic life—teaching, fellowship, Eucharist, and prayer;
  • 1 Timothy 3:15 as a declaration of the Church’s divine authority.

She also cites from early sources such as:

St. Irenaeus of Lyons, particularly his insistence that the truth is preserved in the Church through apostolic succession (Against Heresies 3.3.1). St. Ignatius of Antioch: Whose letters underscore episcopal unity, Eucharistic centrality, and the Catholicity of the Church.

Chapter 3: God Made Known in Communion

This chapter addresses a foundational question in Orthodox theology: How is divine truth revealed, preserved, and participated in by the Church? Dr. Eve Tibbs here presents a distinctly Orthodox understanding of revelation—not as a collection of propositions handed down once and for all, nor as private spiritual insight, but as the dynamic life of communion in God, realized through the Church in the power of the Holy Spirit. Her treatment is deeply patristic, liturgical, and ecclesial, aligning consistently with the mind of the early Fathers and the conciliar tradition.

Tibbs explains that revelation in Orthodoxy is not primarily a body of information but a participation in divine life. The Church receives revelation in the same way that it receives grace and holiness—not as a created object, but as a living encounter with the uncreated God. This view corresponds to the biblical witness of divine self-disclosure: not a book, but a face (cf. Ex. 33:11; John 1:14–18). Revelation, therefore, is personal, Trinitarian, and relational.

Communion as the Context of Revelation

Tibbs begins by situating revelation within the greater context of communion (κοινωνία). Revelation is not abstractly given to individuals in isolation, but to the Church in communion, through the Holy Spirit. As she writes, “The life of the Church is the context in which God’s self-revelation is preserved and faithfully transmitted.”

This understanding is drawn directly from the Scriptures:

  • In John 16:13, Christ promises the Spirit of truth will guide the disciples into all truth—implying a communal guidance rooted in apostolic life.
  • Acts 2:42 demonstrates that the early Church “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in the prayers.” This is not a list of separate activities, but a vision of integrated life in Christ, where truth is known by participation, not just intellectual apprehension.

Holy Tradition: Revelation Lived and Preserved

The heart of this chapter is the Orthodox doctrine of Holy Tradition (ἱερὰ παράδοσις), which is neither a secondary source alongside Scripture, nor a mutable collection of customs. Rather, it is the life of the Holy Spirit in the Church, preserving and manifesting the same apostolic truth through all generations. It is not “extra-biblical material,” but the lived and safeguarded truth of Scripture itself, as understood, prayed, and enacted in the Church.

Tibbs draws upon the teaching of the Seventh Ecumenical Council (Nicaea II, 787), which affirmed:

“We keep without innovations all the ecclesiastical traditions handed down to us, whether written or unwritten.”

This reflects the teaching of St. Basil the Great, who distinguished between written and oral apostolic teachings and affirmed the authority of both (On the Holy Spirit, ch. 27). Thus, Holy Tradition includes:

  • The canonical Scriptures,
  • The Nicene Creed,
  • The decisions of the Seven Ecumenical Councils,
  • The writings of the Church Fathers,
  • The liturgical life of the Church (especially the Divine Liturgy),
  • The iconographic tradition,
  • And the lived ascetic and spiritual wisdom of the saints.

Tradition, then, is not “what people used to do.” It is the continual work of the Holy Spirit guiding the Church, in fulfillment of Christ’s promise in John 14:26: “But the Comforter, the Holy Spirit… shall teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.”

Tibbs is clear: the Orthodox Church does not place Tradition over Scripture, nor does it oppose them. Rather, the two are inseparable, like breath and voice. Scripture is the heart of Tradition, and Tradition is the proper context in which Scripture is faithfully understood.

Scripture in the Life of the Church

The chapter includes a sustained reflection on Holy Scripture and its role within Orthodox theology. Scripture is honored as divinely inspired (θεόπνευστος, 2 Tim. 3:16), but its interpretation is not left to private opinion or modernist exegesis. Instead, the Scriptures belong to the Church and must be read within the liturgical, ascetical, and sacramental life that produced them.

Tibbs explains that:

  • The canon of Scripture was not determined in isolation but discerned within the Eucharistic life of the Church. She affirms that the Orthodox canon of the Old Testament includes several books regarded as deuterocanonical, consistent with the Septuagint, the version used by the apostles themselves (cf. Rom. 3:12 referencing Ps. 14 LXX).
  • Scripture is always interpreted in the light of Christ, who is both its fulfillment and its central subject (cf. Luke 24:27).
  • The liturgical use of Scripture is emphasized: The Divine Liturgy is saturated with Scripture, and every service is built around the psalms, the epistles, and the Gospels. In this, Scripture is not merely read—it is sung, venerated, and enacted.

The Orthodox Church, Tibbs insists, does not engage in sola scriptura (“Scripture alone”), but rather affirms Scripture in Tradition, Scripture as received, interpreted, and preserved in the Church through the Spirit.

The Role of Icons in Revealed Truth

In a seamless transition, Tibbs introduces the subject of Holy Icons, presenting them as visual theology and instruments of revelation. This is not a separate topic but flows directly from the doctrine of the Incarnation. Since “the Word became flesh” (John 1:14), it is possible—and necessary—to depict Him.

Tibbs follows the defense of icons given by St. John of Damascus, who wrote in his Apologia Against Those Who Decry Holy Images:

“I do not worship matter, I worship the Creator of matter who became matter for my sake.”

The Seventh Ecumenical Council (787) declared the veneration of icons to be a legitimate and necessary affirmation of Christ’s true humanity. To deny icons is to deny the Incarnation. Icons are not decorative—they are manifestations of divine presence, windows into heaven, and means of catechesis and transformation.

Furthermore, Tibbs underscores that icons belong to the stream of Tradition and are themselves canonical expressions of the Church’s faith. They are not “extra-biblical” but are grounded in the Gospel: Christ is depicted as He appeared, the Theotokos is honored as the true bearer of God (cf. Luke 1:43), and the saints are shown transfigured by grace.

Revelation Is the Life of the Church

Tibbs concludes the chapter by reiterating that revelation is not static, nor is it purely historical. It is the living presence of the Triune God in the Church. The Word of God is a Person (John 1:1), not a book. The Orthodox Church, filled with the Holy Spirit, is the womb of revelation, preserving and transmitting the faith once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3).

In Orthodox theology, the question is not “What does this verse mean to me?” but rather “How has the Church understood this through the ages?” The standard is not novelty, but fidelity. Revelation is therefore the property of the whole Church, not of scholars or hierarchs alone. It is experienced in the sacraments, sung in the hymns, meditated in the icons, and preserved in the common mind (phronema) of the Church through the Spirit.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

Jude 1:3 – “Contend for the faith once for all delivered to the saints.”
John 1:14 – “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”
John 14:26 – “The Holy Spirit will teach you all things.”
John 16:13 – “The Spirit of truth will guide you into all truth.”
Luke 24:27 – Christ reveals Himself in the Scriptures.
Acts 2:42 – The Church continues in apostolic teaching and fellowship.
2 Timothy 3:16 – “All Scripture is God-breathed.”

Chapter 4: Shepherds and Servants

This chapter addresses the nature, structure, and purpose of ecclesiastical leadership within the Orthodox Church. Dr. Eve Tibbs avoids approaching ministry in terms of sociological function or administrative authority. Rather, she frames the question theologically: What is the Church’s understanding of the priesthood and leadership as instituted by Christ, revealed in Scripture, and preserved in the apostolic and conciliar life of the Church? The answer is sacramental and hierarchical, grounded in service, humility, and fidelity to apostolic tradition.

The Royal Vocation of All People

Tibbs begins with the affirmation that all baptized Christians share in the priestly calling of Christ. She appeals to 1 Peter 2:9:

“You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people.”

This universal priesthood (baptismal priesthood) is not symbolic. It signifies real participation in the priesthood of Christ (Heb. 4:14–5:10), especially through the sacramental and liturgical life of the Church. Yet, this priesthood does not negate the need for an ordained or ministerial priesthood, which is distinct in its function and sacramental grace.

Tibbs emphasizes that the Orthodox Church does not adopt a dichotomy between clergy and laity in terms of dignity or holiness. Both are integral parts of the one Body of Christ (cf. 1 Cor. 12:4–31). The distinction lies not in superiority but in function and calling. She affirms that every baptized believer is called to offer spiritual sacrifices and to participate in the Church’s mission of sanctifying the world—but only those set apart by ordination serve in the sacramental and teaching offices of the Church.

First Among Equals (Primus Inter Pares)

Next, Tibbs addresses the principle of ecclesiastical primacy. Within Orthodoxy, all bishops are equal in sacramental authority. Yet among them, certain bishops hold primacy of honor (πρωτεῖον τιμῆς), not of jurisdiction. This principle—first among equals—preserves the conciliar and collegial nature of Orthodox leadership while acknowledging a canonical order.

For example, in the ancient Church, the Bishop of Rome held primacy in the West, while the Bishop of Constantinople came to hold primacy in the East (especially after the Council of Constantinople I in 381 and the Council of Chalcedon in 451, canon 28). However, this primacy is not interpreted as universal supremacy. Tibbs is clear that no single bishop, including the Ecumenical Patriarch, holds unilateral authority over the entire Orthodox Church.

The Church is governed synodally, following the precedent set in Acts 15, where apostolic deliberation took place in council. Each bishop is accountable to his brother bishops and ultimately to the Holy Spirit who guides the Church into all truth (John 16:13). This structure reflects Christ’s own example of humility and shared life among the apostles.

The Three Orders of Clergy

Dr. Tibbs then turns to the traditional tripartite hierarchy of clergy in the Orthodox Church: bishop (ἐπίσκοπος), presbyter (πρεσβύτερος), and deacon (διάκονος). These three orders are not later developments; they are apostolic in origin and have been preserved from the earliest Christian communities (cf. Phil. 1:1; 1 Tim. 3; Titus 1:5–9).

a. Bishops

The bishop is the chief shepherd of a local diocese and holds the fullness of the priesthood. He is the guardian of apostolic doctrine and the celebrant of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist. As successors to the apostles, bishops maintain the integrity of the faith and preserve the unity of the Church through the laying on of hands (cf. 2 Tim. 1:6; Acts 20:28).

Tibbs reiterates that every valid ordination requires episcopal consecration, and thus apostolic succession is not a historical chain alone, but a sacramental and doctrinal continuity.

b. Presbyters

Presbyters, or priests, serve under the bishop and assist in the pastoral and sacramental ministry of the Church. While they may consecrate the Eucharist, they do so in the name and authority of the bishop, whose presence is signified by the antimension on the altar—a cloth signed by the bishop permitting liturgical celebration. This underscores that the Eucharist is never divorced from episcopal oversight.

The priest is a father, teacher, and spiritual guide. His authority is pastoral and sacramental, not autonomous or legislative. He represents both Christ and the bishop in the parish setting.

c. Deacons

Deacons serve as ministers of liturgy and charity. Their primary role is liturgical: proclaiming the Gospel, leading prayers, assisting the bishop and priest at the altar. Their office was established in Acts 6:1–6 and remains vital in the Church’s life.

Deacons do not celebrate sacraments but facilitate their celebration. Their ordination is a sacred office, not a stepping stone to priesthood. Tibbs affirms that the diaconate is its own vocation with theological and pastoral dignity.

Ordination of Women

Tibbs addresses the subject of women in ordained ministry with careful clarity. She affirms the Church’s unbroken practice of ordaining only men to the orders of bishop and priest, consistent with the example of Christ and the apostolic community. The Orthodox Church does not interpret this as a judgment on the worth or spiritual capacity of women but as faithfulness to the received apostolic tradition.

She notes that women have always played crucial roles in the life of the Church—most especially the Theotokos, the Mother of God, who is the highest of all creatures. Women saints, martyrs, ascetics, and theologians abound in Orthodox history, but their roles have not included sacramental priesthood.

Tibbs also notes the historical presence of ordained deaconesses in the early Church. Their function was primarily pastoral and liturgical, not sacramental. While some Orthodox theologians today advocate for the restoration of this order in limited ways, the Church as a whole has not reached consensus. Any such development must be received synodally, with fidelity to Tradition and without imitation of contemporary Western agendas.

Apostolic Succession

The chapter concludes with a firm affirmation of apostolic succession, not merely as a historical chain of ordinations, but as a living transmission of sacramental grace, doctrinal fidelity, and ecclesial unity. The Orthodox Church believes that only those bishops who maintain the true faith and remain in the Eucharistic communion of the Church possess valid apostolic succession.

Tibbs cites early Fathers such as St. Irenaeus, who in Against Heresies (3.3.1) insisted that the truth is preserved in the episcopal succession from the apostles. She also references St. Ignatius of Antioch, who exhorted believers to remain close to the bishop as to Christ Himself (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8:1–2).

Scripturally, apostolic succession is evident in:

  • Acts 1:20–26 – Matthias is chosen to succeed Judas as apostle.
  • 2 Timothy 2:2 – “What you have heard from me… entrust to faithful men.”
  • Titus 1:5 – Paul commands Titus to appoint elders in every town.

This succession is not mechanical—it is recognized by the continuity of faith and sacramental life, safeguarded by the Holy Spirit working in the Church (cf. John 16:13).

Conclusion: Hierarchy as Service

Tibbs concludes the chapter by affirming that hierarchy in the Church exists not for domination but for service and protection of the flock. The model is Christ Himself, who came not to be served but to serve (Matt. 20:28). Bishops, priests, and deacons are not rulers but stewards. Their authority derives from faithfulness to the apostolic tradition, and their effectiveness is measured not by charisma or power, but by humility, sacrificial love, and liturgical faithfulness.

In the Orthodox vision, leadership is not administrative but sacramental. Ministry is not management but manifestation of Christ’s own priesthood, entrusted to His Body for the salvation of the world.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

  • Matthew 20:26–28 – Leadership as servanthood.
  • 1 Peter 2:9 – The royal priesthood of all believers.
  • 1 Corinthians 12:4–31 – Unity and diversity in the Body of Christ.
  • Acts 6:1–6 – Establishment of the diaconate.
  • Acts 1:20–26 – Apostolic replacement by ordination.
  • Titus 1:5, 1 Timothy 3, 2 Timothy 2:2 – Episcopal oversight and succession.

Chapter 5: The Person of the Incarnate Word

In Chapter 5, Dr. Eve Tibbs provides a comprehensive and historically grounded summary of Christology as understood by the Orthodox Church. This doctrine is not approached as a scholastic subject of interest but as the living truth of salvation, revealed through the Person of Jesus Christ—the eternal Logos who became man, suffered, rose, and reigns in glory. The chapter gives due attention to the scriptural foundations of Orthodox Christology, the doctrinal clarifications provided by the early Ecumenical Councils, and the liturgical and hymnic expressions through which the Church continues to confess Christ.

The Word of God Is a Person

Tibbs begins by insisting on a fundamental truth: the Word of God is not a concept or set of teachings, but a divine Person—Jesus Christ. Quoting John 1:1–14, she affirms that the Logos is preexistent, consubstantial with the Father, and became incarnate in time:

“The Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14).

Orthodox theology begins here—not with abstractions about divine attributes but with the reality of the Incarnation. The Word of God is the image of the invisible God (Col. 1:15), the radiance of divine glory (Heb. 1:3), and the ultimate revelation of the Father. The Orthodox Church insists that to know Christ is to know the fullness of God (cf. John 14:9).

The Incarnation is not a temporary appearance or a means to a moral example. It is the hypostatic union: the eternal Son of God became fully human, without ceasing to be fully divine. The Orthodox confession is unequivocal: Jesus Christ is one Person (ὑπόστασις) in two natures (φύσεις), divine and human, united without confusion, without change, without division, and without separation.

Who Is Jesus?

Tibbs then develops the biblical and creedal presentation of the person of Christ. Drawing from the Gospels and the Epistles, she affirms that Christ is:

  • True God, eternally begotten of the Father (John 1:1–3, Phil. 2:6–11),
  • True Man, born of the Virgin Mary (Luke 1:35), tempted in every way as we are, yet without sin (Heb. 4:15).

She emphasizes the scriptural continuity of the Orthodox Christological proclamation: Christ is not a mere prophet or moral exemplar, but the unique God-man (θεάνθρωπος), whose two natures are united in the one hypostasis of the divine Word. The key Christological affirmations of the early Church—especially those codified in the Nicene Creed (325 and 381)—are not speculative constructs, but exegetical conclusions drawn from divine revelation.

Tibbs is careful to state that Orthodox Christology is not a theology “about” Jesus, but a confession of Jesus, rooted in the life of the Church and articulated in the conciliar tradition.

Early Challenges to Christology

The Church’s understanding of Christ did not arise without controversy. Dr. Tibbs gives a clear and accessible summary of the major Christological heresies that threatened the Church’s faithful confession and the corresponding councils that addressed them.

a. Arianism

Arius, a priest of Alexandria in the early 4th century, denied the full divinity of the Son, claiming He was a creature, created before time but not co-eternal with the Father. The response was the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea (325 AD), which affirmed that the Son is “begotten, not made, of one essence (ὁμοούσιος) with the Father.”

Key Scripture:

  • John 1:1 – “The Word was God.”
  • John 10:30 – “I and the Father are one.”
  • Col. 2:9 – “In Him the fullness of Deity dwells bodily.”

b. Apollinarianism

This view, attributed to Apollinaris of Laodicea, denied the fullness of Christ’s humanity by claiming that the divine Logos replaced the rational human soul in Jesus. This was rejected because it implied that Christ was not fully human and therefore could not redeem human nature in its entirety.

Council Response: First Council of Constantinople (381 AD) – affirmed that Christ is fully human with a rational soul.

c. Nestorianism

Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople, sought to preserve the distinction between Christ’s two natures, but his theology separated the divine and human persons, leading to the denial of the Theotokos (God-bearer) title for Mary. This undermined the unity of Christ’s person.

Council Response: Council of Ephesus (431 AD) – affirmed that the Virgin Mary is rightly called Theotokos because the one born from her is truly God incarnate. Christ is one Person with two natures.

d. Eutychianism/Monophysitism

Eutyches taught that Christ’s human nature was absorbed into His divinity, resulting in a fusion that created a third kind of nature (a mono-physis). This was rejected for compromising the integrity of Christ’s humanity.

Council Response: Council of Chalcedon (451 AD) – defined the doctrine of the two natures in one Person, “without confusion, without change, without division, without separation.”

The Rule of Truth: Conciliar Christology

Tibbs emphasizes that the first four Ecumenical Councils are foundational to Orthodox Christology. These councils were not mere gatherings of theologians, but of bishops speaking in the name of the Church, guided by the Holy Spirit. Their declarations are not optional opinions but binding doctrinal definitions.

Orthodoxy does not entertain speculation or novelty in Christology. Rather, it receives the conciliar faith and confesses it in continuity with the Fathers. The Dogma of Chalcedon (451) remains the definitive articulation of the Incarnation and serves as the Christological standard.

Singing Theology: Liturgical Christology

One of the most beautiful aspects of this chapter is Tibbs’s treatment of hymnography as theological confession. In Orthodoxy, theology is not merely written—it is sung. The Church’s liturgical hymns proclaim the truths of the Incarnation with doctrinal precision and spiritual fervor.

Examples include:

  • The Kontakion for Nativity:
    “Today the Virgin gives birth to the transcendent One…”
  • The Paschal Troparion:
    “Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death…”

These hymns are not poetic adornments. They are authoritative articulations of the Church’s faith, sung by the faithful as a participation in the mystery they confess. As Tibbs rightly states, liturgical texts form the faithful theologically, embedding doctrinal truth into the memory and prayer of the Church.

This method reflects the early Church’s reliance on doxology as the context for theology. As Basil the Great said, “We confess our faith in the words we sing and the mysteries we celebrate.”

Christology as the Foundation of Salvation

Though Tibbs does not offer a developed soteriology here (that is addressed more fully in Chapter 6), she makes it clear that Orthodox Christology is soteriological at its core. The Incarnation is not merely a revelation of who God is—it is the means by which humanity is saved.

Drawing on the patristic consensus, she includes the classic formula of St. Athanasius the Great:

“God became man so that man might become god.”
(On the Incarnation, §54)

This statement does not imply ontological equality with God, but participation in divine life through the Incarnate Son. As Christ took on our nature, He healed and restored it, offering deification (theosis) to all who are united to Him.

Conclusion: The Living Confession of Christ

Dr. Tibbs concludes this chapter by emphasizing that Orthodox Christology is not speculative theology—it is the living confession of the Church, expressed in her Scriptures, Councils, Liturgy, and Saints. The Orthodox Church holds fast to the faith that has been once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3), not as a relic of the past, but as the ever-living truth of the risen Lord.

This Christology is not negotiable. It is the doctrinal heart of Orthodoxy and the measure of all ecclesial fidelity. In Christ, the fullness of divinity and humanity is united for our salvation. To confess Christ rightly is to belong to the Church, and to worship Him in spirit and truth.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

  • John 1:1–14 – The Word made flesh.
  • Colossians 1:15–20 – The image of the invisible God.
  • Philippians 2:6–11 – Christ’s humility and exaltation.
  • Hebrews 1:1–3 – The radiance of divine glory.
  • Hebrews 4:15 – Fully human yet without sin.
  • Luke 1:35, Matthew 1:23 – The virgin birth and divine identity.
  • 2 Peter 1:4 – Participation in the divine nature.

Chapter 6: Our Purpose in the Divine Plan

This chapter begins by establishing the Orthodox Church’s understanding of human nature and its ultimate purpose: communion with God. Orthodox anthropology does not begin with sin, nor with legal categories of guilt and punishment, but with the high calling of the human person created in the image and likeness of God (Gen. 1:26–27). According to Dr. Eve Tibbs, the human being is a liturgical, spiritual, and communal being, made not merely to live morally, but to be deified (θεοποίησις)—that is, to partake of the divine nature (2 Pet. 1:4).

The question “Who are we?” is answered not through psychology or cultural reflection, but through the Church’s revealed understanding of human purpose in light of Christ, the perfect image of the invisible God (Col. 1:15). Christ reveals not only God to humanity but humanity to itself.

Created for Communion

Tibbs begins with the doctrine of creation, emphasizing that human beings are created in the image (εἰκών) and after the likeness (ὁμοίωσις) of God. These terms, though sometimes used interchangeably, are understood distinctly in Orthodox tradition:

  • Image (eikōn): that which all humans possess by nature—rationality, free will, the capacity for love, and the relational orientation toward God.
  • Likeness (homoiosis): not a static trait, but the dynamic goal of human life—the attainment of holiness, virtue, and union with God through grace.

This distinction, drawn from patristic sources such as St. Irenaeus and St. Gregory of Nyssa, means that human beings are created with potential, not in a state of finished perfection. Adam and Eve were innocent, not glorified. Their calling was to grow into the likeness of God by cooperating with divine grace.

Tibbs affirms that humanity’s created state was relational and communal, not individualistic. Adam and Eve lived in harmony with God, each other, and creation—a state depicted in Genesis 2:25 as one of nakedness without shame, because there was no alienation or disintegration.

Tragedy in the Garden

The fall, for the Orthodox Church, is not interpreted through juridical or penal models of inherited guilt. Tibbs carefully explains that the Orthodox doctrine of ancestral sin (προπατορικὸν ἁμάρτημα) differs from original guilt as taught in certain Western traditions.

When Adam and Eve chose disobedience (Gen. 3), they turned away from communion with God, and the consequence was death, corruption, and a darkening of the mind (νοῦς). Sin is not inherited as guilt but as mortality, corruption, and an inclination toward sin. All humans are born into a fallen condition, not by legal sentence, but because they inherit a broken world and wounded nature (cf. Rom. 5:12–21).

Tibbs explains that the fall introduced alienation between man and God, man and man, man and creation, and man and his own self. Shame, fear, death, and division entered the human condition, but human nature itself was not destroyed—it remained wounded, not totally depraved.

This distinction is crucial. Human beings still bear the image of God after the fall (cf. Gen. 9:6, James 3:9), and thus retain the capacity to respond to grace.

Being Saved

Salvation, in Orthodox theology, is not defined as forensic justification or as a single moment of decision. Instead, Tibbs presents salvation as a transformational process, initiated by God and entered into freely by the person, in and through the Church. The goal is not just forgiveness, but healing, restoration, and ultimately theosis.

She summarizes salvation as having three interrelated aspects:

  1. Liberation from death and sin, through Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection.
  2. Restoration to communion with God, through baptism, chrismation, Eucharist, and ongoing life in the Church.
  3. Transformation into the likeness of God, through repentance, ascetic struggle, and divine grace.

Salvation is therefore ontological, not merely legal or emotional. It is about the renewal of human nature in Christ, who is both fully God and fully man. By uniting with Christ, human beings are united to the divine life that heals, sanctifies, and glorifies.

In the common tradition of salvation in the Orthodox Christian East, Tibbs presents five foundational truths that work together:

  1. The fall transmitted death and corruption, not guilt
    – Humanity inherited the consequences of ancestral sin (mortality and decay), not Adam’s personal guilt.
  2. Human nature is fundamentally good
    – It is not totally depraved or intrinsically corrupt.
  3. Free will remains operative
    – Even after the fall, human beings retain the capacity to choose and respond to God.
  4. Salvation is a process
    – It is not a one-time event but a continual journey of healing, growth, and transformation.
  5. Salvation is a free gift that must be lived out
    – Grace is not earned, but must be exercised through faithful action:
    “Faith without works is dead” (James 2:26).

Tibbs cites Romans 6:3–5—“Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?”—to illustrate how participation in Christ’s death and resurrection is the foundation of salvation. It is not metaphorical but actual, occurring in the sacraments and deepened through the Christian life.

Theosis

Perhaps the most distinctive element in Orthodox soteriology, theosis is treated by Tibbs with appropriate reverence and clarity. She explains that theosis is not the absorption of the person into God (as in pantheism), nor is it a moral imitation of God’s attributes. Rather, it is a real participation in the uncreated energies of God, whereby the person is made godlike by grace, without becoming divine by nature.

The classic patristic expression—quoted in this chapter—is again from St. Athanasius the Great:

“God became man so that man might become god” (On the Incarnation, §54).

Scriptural support for theosis is not lacking:

  • 2 Peter 1:4 – “That you may become partakers of the divine nature.”
  • John 17:21–23 – “That they may be one, even as we are one.”
  • 1 John 3:2 – “We shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is.”

Theosis occurs not by effort alone, but through grace-filled cooperation with God. It requires synergy—the free cooperation of human will with divine initiative. The Church, as the Body of Christ, is the locus where theosis occurs—through prayer, fasting, almsgiving, repentance, the sacraments, and spiritual discipline.

All Creation Rejoices

Tibbs does not limit salvation to individual human transformation. She affirms the cosmic dimension of salvation, rooted in Romans 8:19–22, which teaches that “creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay.”

The fall affected not only human beings but the whole created order. Thus, the redemption wrought by Christ is not anthropocentric but cosmocentric. Christ is the Second Adam (1 Cor. 15:45), who recapitulates all things in Himself (Eph. 1:10). He is the restorer of the cosmos, not just the forgiver of sins.

Liturgically, this truth is celebrated especially at the Feast of the Nativity, where even nature—the cave, the animals, the star—bears witness to the Incarnation. This reflects the Orthodox conviction that salvation is sacramental and material, not spiritualistic or gnostic. The created world becomes a means of grace and participation in God.

Humanity, We Have a Problem

Tibbs includes a section acknowledging the persistent reality of human sin, even after baptism. She emphasizes the ongoing need for repentance, not as legal restitution, but as continual reorientation of the heart toward God. This is in accord with Isaiah 30:15: “In returning and rest you shall be saved.”

She also addresses the mystery of suffering and evil, without attempting to explain it away. The Orthodox Church does not offer easy answers but points to the Cross and Resurrection as the ultimate response to human brokenness. Suffering is not meaningless; it is transfigured in Christ, who suffered and overcame death.

The Cross and Resurrection

The culmination of this chapter is the Paschal Mystery—the death and resurrection of Christ. Tibbs explains that Christ assumed fallen human nature and voluntarily entered into death so that He might destroy it from within. His resurrection is not simply proof of divinity but the first fruits of the new creation (1 Cor. 15:20–23).

Orthodox theology sees the Cross and Resurrection not as separate events, but as one redemptive act. Christ is the Paschal Lamb (1 Cor. 5:7), whose blood brings life, not merely pardon. The Resurrection is victory, not escape—He tramples down death by death, as sung in the Paschal troparion.

Thus, salvation is the re-creation of humanity and the cosmos through the victorious love of the Crucified and Risen Lord.

Conclusion: The Human Vocation in Christ

In closing, Tibbs reiterates that Orthodox anthropology is fundamentally Christocentric. Jesus Christ is not only the Redeemer but the pattern of true humanity. To be human is to be in communion with God, and salvation is the restoration of that communion through the Incarnation, the Cross, the Resurrection, and the life of the Church.

This is not a static state but a journey of growth in holiness, culminating in the vision of God. As St. Gregory of Nyssa says:

“Man’s true life is the perpetual progress toward God.”

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

  • Genesis 1:26–27 – Creation in the image and likeness of God.
  • Romans 5:12–21 – Death through Adam, life through Christ.
  • Romans 6:3–5 – Union with Christ in baptism and resurrection.
  • 2 Peter 1:4 – Partakers of the divine nature.
  • 1 Corinthians 15:20–23, 45 – Christ as the second Adam.
  • John 17:21–23 – Unity with God through Christ.
  • Romans 8:19 22 – Cosmic redemption.
  • Isaiah 30:15 – Return and rest in salvation.
  • 1 John 3:2 – “We shall be like Him.”

Chapter 7: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit

In this chapter, Dr. Eve Tibbs sets forth the Orthodox doctrine of the Holy Trinity, not as an abstract metaphysical formula but as the central and ultimate mystery of Christian faith, worship, and life. The triune nature of God is not deduced by human speculation, but revealed through the history of salvation—particularly in the Incarnation of Christ and the sending of the Holy Spirit. The doctrine is preserved by the Church in her Scriptures, the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, the liturgy, and the writings of the Fathers—especially the Cappadocian Fathers and St. Athanasius.

The chapter is organized around the revealed nature of the Trinity, the relation between the divine persons, and the ecclesial and theological consequences of that revelation.

The Revealed Trinity

Tibbs affirms that God is ultimately incomprehensible, beyond all created categories of being, time, and thought. Yet God is not unknowable. He freely chooses to reveal Himself—not in definitions, but personally, through divine self-disclosure. This revelation reaches its fullness in the Incarnation of the Son and the sending of the Holy Spirit.

The Old Testament hints at the plurality within God (e.g., Gen. 1:26, “Let us make man”), but this mystery was not made fully known until the New Testament, where the voice of the Father, the person of the Son, and the descent of the Spirit are seen together, most clearly at Christ’s baptism (Matt. 3:16–17) and in His final command to baptize “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19).

The Trinity is therefore not a speculative inference, but a revealed reality—made manifest in the divine economy of salvation and confessed liturgically in the life of the Church.

Trinitarian Taxis (Order and Relationality)

Tibbs introduces the Greek term τάξις (taxis), which denotes the order and relation within the Trinity. In Orthodox theology, the divine persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—are co-eternal, co-equal, and consubstantial (ὁμοούσιοι). They are distinct hypostases (persons), but of one ousia (essence or nature).

  • The Father is the source (ἀρχή) and cause (αἰτία) of the other two persons—not in time, but in eternal relational order.
  • The Son is begotten of the Father.
  • The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26).

The eternal relationships among the persons are not hierarchical in dignity or power, but are the eternal modes of divine existence. This teaching is known as the Monarchy of the Father—a key principle in Eastern Trinitarian theology. The Father is the sole source of divinity, not in essence but in personhood.

This taxis is not a sequence in time, nor is it an ontological ranking. It is the manner in which the one God eternally exists as three. This insight, preserved by the Cappadocians, especially St. Basil the Great, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory the Theologian, safeguards both unity and distinction without confusion.

The Cappadocian Settlement

Tibbs provides an account of the fourth-century Trinitarian debates, culminating in what she calls the Cappadocian Settlement. During the Arian controversy, the Church was forced to clarify the language of person (hypostasis) and essence (ousia) to affirm the full divinity of the Son and the Spirit.

Key doctrinal conclusions:

  • There is one essence (Godhead), shared by all three Persons.
  • There are three hypostases—Father, Son, and Spirit—each fully God, yet not three Gods.

This formula—μία οὐσία, τρεῖς ὑποστάσεις (one essence, three persons)—is foundational to Orthodox theology and is enshrined in the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD), which is still recited at every Divine Liturgy.

Tibbs underscores the role of St. Gregory Nazianzen (Theologian), who famously declared:

“No sooner do I conceive of the One than I am illumined by the splendor of the Three; no sooner do I distinguish them than I am carried back to the One.”

This both/and structure—the unity of essence and the distinction of persons—is a hallmark of Orthodox Trinitarianism and resists all modalism, subordinationism, and tritheism.

The Holy Spirit

In this section, Tibbs gives focused attention to the Person of the Holy Spirit, a subject often misunderstood or diminished in Western theology. She affirms that the Spirit is not an impersonal force or the bond between the Father and the Son, but a divine Person, equal in glory and majesty to the other two.

The Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26), not from the Son—an important point in Orthodox theology. The Filioque clause (“and the Son”) added later to the Latin Creed is rejected by the Orthodox Church, not simply because it was added unilaterally, but because it distorts the eternal taxis of the Trinity.

The Orthodox Church believes that the Father is the sole cause (μοναρχία) within the Trinity. The eternal procession of the Spirit is from the Father alone. This is maintained to preserve the integrity of divine personal distinctions and the balance of Trinitarian theology.

Dr. Tibbs notes that the Holy Spirit’s mission in the economy (i.e., in time) includes:

  • inspiring the prophets,
  • overshadowing the Virgin Mary (Luke 1:35),
  • descending at Pentecost (Acts 2),
  • sanctifying the sacraments,
  • indwelling the faithful,
  • guiding the Church into all truth (John 16:13).

The Spirit is the one who makes Christ present to the Church and empowers the faithful for the life of holiness, prayer, and mission.

The Church as an Icon of the Trinity

Tibbs concludes this chapter with a profound theological and ecclesial truth: the Church is an icon of the Trinity. Just as the three divine persons exist in eternal communion, so the members of the Church are called into unity without uniformity.

Quoting John 17:21, Christ’s high-priestly prayer—“that they may all be one, even as you, Father, are in me and I in you”—is seen as the model for ecclesial and spiritual life. The Church’s unity is not based on external conformity but on participation in the life of the Trinity.

The communal, conciliar, and Eucharistic life of the Church is a reflection of Trinitarian reality. The Church is not an institution, primarily, but a communion (koinonia) in the Spirit, with the Son, to the glory of the Father.

This understanding permeates Orthodox spirituality and liturgy:

  • Every prayer begins and ends in the name of the Trinity.
  • The Creed is Trinitarian in structure.
  • Baptism initiates one into the Trinitarian life (Matt. 28:19).
  • The doxology—“Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit”—resounds constantly in all services.

Thus, the Christian life is inherently Trinitarian. It is not merely belief in God, but life in God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

  • Genesis 1:26 – “Let us make man in our image.”
  • Matthew 3:16–17 – Theophany: Father speaks, Son is baptized, Spirit descends.
  • Matthew 28:19 – The Trinitarian baptismal formula.
  • John 1:1–14 – The eternal Word made flesh.
  • John 14:16–17, 26; 15:26 – The Spirit sent by the Father.
  • John 16:13–15 – The Spirit will glorify Christ and guide into truth.
  • John 17:21–23 – The unity of believers reflecting the unity of the Godhead.
  • Acts 2 – The descent of the Spirit at Pentecost.
  • 2 Corinthians 13:14 – Apostolic blessing invoking all three Persons.

Conclusion

Dr. Tibbs’s treatment of the Trinity is theologically faithful. She does not approach the doctrine as an intellectual puzzle but as the living mystery of God, revealed in Christ, confirmed by the Spirit, and experienced in the life of the Church.

Her approach follows the Eastern patristic tradition: theology is doxology, and Trinitarian faith is not deduced, but confessed. The mystery of the Trinity is not solvable—it is worshiped, encountered, and entered into.

As St. Gregory the Theologian proclaimed:

“It is more important to remember God than to breathe; and it is more blessed to know the Trinity than to possess all things.”

Chapter 8: The Liturgical Life of the Church

Heaven on Earth: The Liturgical Revelation of God and the Life of the Church

Dr. Eve Tibbs concludes her theological presentation by turning to the center of Orthodox life and identity: worship, specifically liturgical worship, which for Eastern Orthodoxy is not merely the external form of religion, but the primary mode through which truth is revealed, salvation is received, and communion with God is realized. This chapter articulates the foundational Orthodox conviction that worship is theology, and that everything the Church believes is expressed in—and inseparable from—its liturgical life.

Worship in the Orthodox Church is not entertainment, nor moral exhortation, nor merely congregational response. It is a participation in the eternal worship of the heavenly hosts, made possible by Christ and manifest in the sacramental life of the Church.

Liturgy: Heaven on Earth

Tibbs begins by affirming that Orthodox worship is heavenly, eschatological, and sacramental. The Divine Liturgy is not a dramatization of historical events; it is a real, mystical participation in the eternal worship of the heavenly kingdom. She draws from Hebrews 12:22–24, which describes the Church as having come to “Mount Zion… to innumerable angels in festal gathering… and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant.”

In the Liturgy, time and space are transcended. The faithful are joined to the angels and saints, and the once-for-all sacrifice of Christ is made present—not repeated, but mystically actualized (cf. Heb. 9:24–28). This is why Orthodox churches are adorned with icons and filled with chant, incense, candles, and procession—these are not embellishments but signs of the invisible reality in which the Church participates.

The Liturgy is the theophany—the manifestation of God’s glory. It is, as the Byzantine hymn says, “the mystical supper of the Son of God,” where the faithful are not spectators but partakers.

Relevant and Ancient

Tibbs addresses the frequently asked question: how can Orthodox worship, which is so ancient in form and language, be relevant to modern people? Her answer is theological: relevance is not measured by cultural adaptability but by transcendence. The Liturgy is not meant to mirror the world, but to transform those within it by lifting them into the presence of the Triune God.

She observes that Orthodox worship remains largely unchanged since the early centuries—not out of archaism or resistance to change, but because the Liturgy is received, not invented. It is not subject to innovation because it belongs to the Church as Tradition, not as optional expression.

Quoting the 6th-century Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, she demonstrates that every element—from the Trisagion to the Anaphora—is drawn from Scripture and the theological experience of the Church. The priest prays:

“Thou it is who offerest and art offered, who receivest and art distributed, O Christ our God.”

Thus, the Liturgy expresses Orthodox Christology and soteriology, not as theological theory, but in the lived mystery of worship.

The Holy Mysteries (Sacraments)

Tibbs presents a sacramental worldview as essential to Orthodox theology. The term “mystery” (μυστήριον) is preferred over “sacrament,” not to obscure meaning, but to emphasize that God’s grace is incomprehensibly real, not subject to mechanistic explanation.

The Orthodox Church traditionally recognizes seven principal Mysteries:

  1. Baptism
  2. Chrismation
  3. Eucharist
  4. Confession (Penance)
  5. Marriage
  6. Holy Orders
  7. Unction (Anointing of the Sick)

However, the Church does not rigidly limit God’s action to these seven. All life in the Church is mysterial—sanctified by the presence of the Holy Spirit. For example, the blessing of water, icons, homes, and monastic tonsure are also means by which grace is imparted.

The sacraments are not symbols in the modern sense. They are real, material means of participation in divine life. The Eucharist is not a remembrance or metaphor but the true Body and Blood of Christ (cf. John 6:53–56; 1 Cor. 10:16). Baptism is not a sign of an inward change—it is the death and resurrection of the person in Christ (Rom. 6:3–5).

The Mysteries are personal, ecclesial, and transformative. They must be received in faith, within the communion of the Church.

Sin, Confession, and Reconciliation

Tibbs devotes particular attention to the Mystery of Repentance (Confession), emphasizing its therapeutic and restorative character. In Orthodox theology, sin is not primarily law-breaking, but a rupture in communion. Confession is therefore not juridical but healing—a return to God and restoration of life in Christ.

She presents confession as a meeting between the penitent and Christ Himself, through the presence of the priest, who acts not as a judge but as a spiritual physician and witness. The priest does not speak on behalf of God, but as a servant of Christ and steward of His mysteries (1 Cor. 4:1), pronouncing the absolution that Christ alone grants.

This mystery is practiced in the context of spiritual guidance, where the penitent is directed not merely to renounce sin, but to grow in virtue and discernment.

Tibbs also explains that asceticism—fasting, prayer, and watchfulness—is not punishment, but the necessary discipline for purifying the heart, so that one may see God (Matt. 5:8).

Participation and Transformation

The final section of the chapter and book reiterates the Orthodox understanding that worship is not passive. The faithful are not consumers of religious content, but participants in divine life. Every aspect of the Liturgy—from the singing of the Psalms to the lighting of candles—is part of an ascent toward God.

This participatory ethos includes the whole person—body and soul. Worship involves physical gestures (crossing oneself, bowing, kissing icons), auditory engagement (chanting, hearing Scripture), and inward attention. These are not external formalities but sacramental acts, uniting the person to the mystery of Christ.

Tibbs affirms that transformation occurs not only through moral effort but through being drawn into Christ. The Liturgy shapes the soul by exposing it to divine beauty, truth, and love. The Church’s worship is, in the words of St. Maximus the Confessor, “the presence of the age to come.”

The ultimate goal of Orthodox worship is not subjective inspiration, but theosis—union with God. The Liturgy is the foretaste of the heavenly kingdom, the true meaning of human life.

Conclusion

In closing, Dr. Tibbs reiterates that Orthodox worship is the manifestation of all theology, the source and summit of Christian life, and the ongoing revelation of the living God. Through the sacraments, the Church offers participation in Christ’s death and resurrection. Through the Liturgy, the faithful are transfigured into the likeness of the One they behold.

Worship is not an activity of the Church—it is the life of the Church, and through it, the Church becomes what she is: the Body of Christ, united to her Head, by the power of the Holy Spirit, to the glory of God the Father.

Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied

  • Matthew 5:8 – “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”
  • Hebrews 12:22–24 – Worship with angels in heavenly Zion.
  • Matthew 28:19 – Trinitarian baptism.
  • John 6:53–56 – Eating Christ’s flesh and drinking His blood.
  • Romans 6:3–5 – Baptism as union with Christ’s death and resurrection.
  • 1 Corinthians 10:16, 11:23–26 – The Eucharist as communion in the Body and Blood.
  • John 20:22–23 – Apostolic authority to forgive sins.

Appendices and Glossary

Dr. Tibbs includes primary source excerpts from early Fathers, such as St. Ignatius and St. Irenaeus, as well as the full text of the Didache. These inclusions ground the book in the authentic voice of the early Church, preserving the unbroken continuity claimed by Orthodoxy.

The glossary is a valuable tool for those new to terms such as theosis, iconostasis, phronema, and epiclesis.

Dr. Eve Tibbs has provided a reliable, accessible, and thoroughly Orthodox introduction to theology as it is understood within the Eastern Church. Her work remains within the Orthodox framework of conciliar, liturgical, and patristic theology. No attempt is made to reconcile or reinterpret Orthodox teaching through Western scholasticism, individualism, or juridical categories. Rather, the book is shaped by the principle articulated by St. Vincent of Lérins: quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est (“what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all”).

It is a faithful catechetical companion for those seeking to understand the living tradition of the Orthodox Church and a commendable summary of Orthodox theology, neither over-simplified nor scholastically dissected, but presented as a holistic and worship-rooted path toward communion with God.

Recommended For:

  • Catechumens and inquirers in the Orthodox Church
  • Theological students unfamiliar with Eastern Christianity
  • Clergy and lay educators seeking a primer grounded in patristic sources

Primary Sources Cited in Book:

  • The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom
  • The Didache
  • St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letters to the Smyrnaeans, Philadelphians
  • St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies
  • St. Athanasius, On the Incarnation
  • St. John of Damascus, On the Divine Images
  • Nicene and Post-Nicene Councils (I–VII)
  • Holy Scripture (LXX and NT texts)

Scriptural Themes:

  • John 1:14
  • Acts 2:42–47
  • 2 Peter 1:4
  • 1 Timothy 3:15
  • Hebrews 12:22–24
  • Matthew 28:19
  • Ephesians 4:4–6
  • Revelation 4–5

Book Summary

This book is a theologically grounded and liturgically faithful introduction to Eastern Orthodox theology, written by Dr. Eve Tibbs with clarity, reverence, and fidelity to the mind of the Church. Rather than offering a systematized doctrine, the book presents theology as the Church lives it: doxologically, sacramentally, and in continuity with the apostolic tradition. Beginning with the Orthodox worldview, Tibbs explains that theology is not speculative theory but a lived experience of God, rooted in worship, the life of the Church, and communion with the Trinity. The Church is not a human institution but the Body of Christ, one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—an eschatological community sanctified by the Holy Spirit. The sources of theology are not confined to Scripture alone, but also include Holy Tradition, which encompasses the conciliar teachings, liturgy, iconography, and patristic witness, preserved in the life of the Church.

As the book unfolds, Tibbs explores the Orthodox understanding of the Incarnation and the person of Christ, articulated through the Ecumenical Councils and hymnography, affirming Him as fully divine and fully human in one hypostasis. Human beings, made in the image of God, are called not merely to ethical living but to real participation in the divine nature through Christ’s death and resurrection. The Trinity is presented not as a concept, but as the revealed life of God, eternally shared between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and reflected in the communal and conciliar nature of the Church. All of this finds its climax in Orthodox worship, especially the Divine Liturgy, which is heaven on earth—where the faithful are transfigured, the mysteries impart divine grace, and they are united to Christ and to one another. In essence, Tibbs reveals Orthodox theology as the embodied expression of divine truth—an invitation to enter the mystery of God’s uncreated grace, encountered and received in the worshipping Church, where human beings are transfigured into participants in the life of the Holy Trinity.

Continue Reading ·

Deep Anglicanism

I finished all of Deep Anglicanism by Gerald McDermott today, at just under 400 pages. Every word. The book offers a thorough and thoughtful overview of the Anglican tradition. It highlights both the common ground Anglicanism shares with Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox churches and what sets it apart in its practice and theology. Anglicanism doesn’t claim to be the one true Church unlike Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy. However, it strongly affirms the authority of Scripture and the importance of the sacraments, grounded in the teachings of the early Church Fathers. The author presents Anglicanism as both catholic and reformed, with its identity particularly rooted in the English Reformation. The book paints a compelling picture of what the Anglican Church can and should be, especially regarding its biblical foundation, liturgical worship, and sacramental life. While generally supportive of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), the author expresses serious concerns about its current direction, warning that it may be on a path similar to that of the Church of England and its demise in recent years.

The book Deep Anglicanism serves as a reference text, comprehensively exploring Anglican thought, faith, and practice. It is a necessary resource for the Church as a whole, addressing topics highly relevant to congregants, clergy, and the broader world. For readers seeking to understand Anglicanism’s background, history, and theological convictions—including its perspectives on doctrine, culture, social turmoil, and ecumenical positioning—this book provides basic biblically centered insights. McDermott’s thoughts rest firmly on the supreme authority of Scripture, interpreted according to the intent of its biblical authors, making it a critical guide for those who wish to engage with Anglicanism authentically and deeply.

Author Gerald McDermott highlights Anglicanism’s roots in the teachings of the patristic fathers, reformed and renewed during the 16th century. He explains how the Reformation corrected errors and abuses within the Roman Catholic Church, influencing churches in Canterbury, Constantinople, Rome, Geneva, and Wittenberg. Although Reformers, Puritans, and Anglicans were labeled “Protestant” as a pejorative, they aimed to recover biblical imperatives for faith and practice. According to McDermott, Anglicanism remains firm when correctly applying Scripture to doctrines like soteriology (sola fide), Christology, and ecclesiology while honoring its tradition.

The author organizes the book around essential segments that he believes are paramount to understanding Anglicanism. He covers topics like liturgy, the Book of Common Prayer (BCP), Anglican spirituality, the sacraments, marriage, death, and how the Anglican tradition compares to others like Lutheranism, Presbyterianism, Roman Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy. The book isn’t trying to be an exhaustive history but rather offers a focused look at how Anglicanism can be understood as part of the broader catholic tradition. Throughout, McDermott encourages readers to think carefully and biblically about Anglican identity and how it is lived out.

As the chapters unfold, McDermott unpacks Anglican practices like prayer and worship, especially as shaped by the Book of Common Prayer. He shows how Anglicanism seeks to hold together Scripture, tradition, and ecclesiology in a way that’s faithful to the creeds and teachings of the English Reformers and the Anglo-Catholic tradition. He also takes on modern theological trends, challenging what he sees as distortions of the faith disguised as social justice. In particular, he critiques liberation theology and individualistic expressions of Christianity, tracing their roots to thinkers like Schleiermacher and arguing that they stray from biblical teaching.

While he doesn’t dwell extensively on harmful ideologies like feminism or egalitarianism, McDermott grounds his discussion in a vision of Anglicanism as a visible expression of God’s Kingdom on Earth. His attention to the Book of Common Prayer is especially prominent, and he explores how its development has shaped Anglican theology and practice.

According to McDermott, the BCP—especially Cranmer’s original version from 1549—was meant to unify the English Church around a common, vernacular liturgy rooted in Scripture. It replaced the Latin Sarum Rite with services people could understand and participate in. He explains how it preserved the sacramental structure of earlier worship but with a clearer focus on the authority of Scripture. The BCP blends prayer, Scripture reading, sacraments, and traditional forms of worship into a cohesive structure that reflects both Reformation priorities and ancient Christian practice.

Historically, the BCP became central to Anglican life and identity, anchoring worship practices in biblical theology while preserving the Church’s link to the catholic tradition. McDermott contrasts the God-centered orientation of the BCP with modern ideologies that, in his view, attempt to weaken biblical authority. He sees the BCP not just as a liturgical tool but as a theological and spiritual foundation for the Anglican way of life.

In specific chapters—such as 6, 10–12, 27, and 30—McDermott goes deeper into Anglicanism’s history, theology, and worship, paying particular attention to the Daily Office and the influence of major theologians. He presents Anglican spirituality as shaped by the Bible and the early Church, as well as the devotional movements of the medieval period and the theological insights of the Reformation. He discusses how Anglicanism navigates between sola scriptura and prima scriptura and how it approaches doctrines like hell.

On the Daily Office, McDermott explains its roots in early Christian monasticism, which itself drew on Jewish prayer traditions. The Benedictine Rule provided a framework for regular prayer, which was later adapted in England through the Sarum Rite. Cranmer’s reforms in the 16th century condensed these hours into Morning and Evening Prayer, making daily worship accessible to all Christians, not just monks. Morning Prayer combined Matins, Lauds, and Prime into a single service focused on thanksgiving, confession, and Scripture. Evening Prayer drew from Vespers and Compline, emphasizing reflection and gratitude. These services structured the day around Scripture and prayer, connecting modern believers to an ancient pattern of devotion.

The 2019 BCP, issued by the Anglican Church in North America, reflects a return to these older traditions while addressing the needs of the contemporary Church. Unlike the 1979 Episcopal version, which included various liturgical experiments, the 2019 edition restores Cranmer’s vision of clear, Scripture-based worship. Its layout—from the Daily Office to the Psalter and lectionary—aims to root Anglican spirituality in Scripture and tradition.

Cranmer’s initial 1549 Prayer Book was itself a careful reform. Drawing from early Christian theologians like Augustine and Basil and monastic traditions like Benedict’s, Cranmer sought to create a common worship life that emphasized order, grace, and Scripture. McDermott highlights how this reform retained sacramental depth while grounding services in the Bible.

He also draws attention to the influence of figures like Augustine, Benedict, and Anselm on Anglican spirituality. Augustine’s theology of grace, Benedict’s focus on disciplined prayer, and Anselm’s blending of devotion and reason all helped shape Anglicanism’s spiritual landscape. These influences were later developed by thinkers like Martin Thornton, who saw Anglican spirituality as a balance of corporate worship, structured devotion, and thoughtful theology.

Medieval English mystics such as Richard Rolle, Walter Hilton, and Julian of Norwich also left their mark on Anglican devotion. In the post-Reformation period, divines like Lancelot Andrewes, Richard Hooker, and Jeremy Taylor continued this tradition, each emphasizing different aspects of sacramental theology, liturgy, and spiritual formation. Hooker, in particular, helped define the Anglican “middle way”—a theology that holds together Protestant and Catholic elements.

McDermott discusses how Anglicanism relates to the principle of sola scriptura. While holding Scripture as the final authority, he argues that Anglicanism traditionally affirms prima scriptura, meaning Scripture is best interpreted within the context of Church tradition and reason. This approach allows Anglican theology to be biblically faithful while engaging the wisdom of the historic Church.

He also explores changing views on the doctrine of hell within Anglicanism. He traces the idea of universal salvation back to Origen, noting its resurgence in modern theology. He outlines three dominant views: eternal conscious torment, annihilationism, and universalism. While the Thirty-Nine Articles affirm the reality of hell, contemporary Anglican thinkers debate its nature and duration. McDermott presents these positions clearly, offering both traditional and alternative interpretations within the bounds of Anglican theological discourse.

On the sacraments, he highlights that they are a visible image or a reflection of the sacred that is itself invisible. A sacred signum, for example, is baptism as a cleansing from sin. The bread and wine represent the sacred signum as the actuality of the body and blood of Christ. As such, these are visible signs of an invisible grace. These are the means by which salvation is made possible to humanity and made real to believers in Christ. The sacraments are the work of Christ himself, and they are independent of the worthiness of the minister serving them. Moreover, according to Aquinas, they are made present to us as it is necessary to know them through our senses (Summa Theologica III.60.I). As the hearts of people are darkened by sin (Romans 1:21), Christ makes holy His people through His grace via the sacraments while He is bodily absent. The sacraments, in this way, are a means of grace.

With more specifics, McDermott informs readers that sacraments inform us about what they do as a means of Christ’s grace. That they are re-enactments of Christ’s passion applied to us as believers. They are lived out within each person as they have a direct bearing and action upon those who live, suffer, and die as Christ did. They apply to us as if we had suffered and died. Similarly, Aquinas wrote that the sacraments cause divine realities to happen where Christ is brought as gifts to the present as his love is communicated to His family. The sacraments are sacred actions that change participants’ lives. They possess a hidden power as they show invisible evidence where they appear in additional things like the Lord’s Prayer and the creeds.

The book Deep Anglicanism covers many topics pertaining to the Anglican tradition and expression of faith. Taken together, McDermott’s work presents a picture of Anglicanism as a tradition grounded in Scripture, shaped by history, and capable of addressing modern challenges without losing its core identity. His writing encourages a deeper appreciation for Anglican worship and spirituality as a living inheritance that continues to speak to today’s Church.

Continue Reading ·

The Waters of Convergence

This post aims to offer detailed thoughts about various perspectives concerning ministry types that operate among churches. Some churches will have these functions, while others will have a limited subset not covered here. Over several weeks, I have viewed numerous interviews and read through various texts and articles about ministry as an outpouring of effort in obedience to God’s compassion and love for people to bring about spiritual renewal and reconciliation to Him. First, this paper gets an up-close look at a personal philosophy of ministry derived from a compilation of ministry types. The common thread among them is the biblical standard to which they exist and operate.

Philosophy of Ministry

Ministry types covered here include preaching, worship, counseling, missions, and various others to get a firm grip on a cross-section of ministries common among churches. None of these carry more weight and importance as compared to others. However, some are subordinate in terms of authority and function.

Preaching

Exegetical preaching is working from the Word of God to convey His message to people. As God is the author of the Word, the Holy Spirit and Christ speak to the church through His Word. Whether positive or negative, preaching the Word involves rightly dividing Scripture. Where every piece or passage is cut straight or interpreted correctly, it’s to feed the flock of God from the Word of God. Topical preaching by exposition involves using various Scripture texts that converge on a subject. Comparatively, charismatic or mystical preaching can be subjective and impulse-based. Sentimental preaching is between charismatic and exegetical preaching as it appeals to emotion where sinners are made to feel good about themselves. It attempts to bridge the offense of biblical preaching concerning sin, humanity’s condition, and God’s justice.

The purpose of informing people of the entire counsel of God includes pointing out sin among people. The point of telling people about sin is to direct them to God for mercy, grace, and renewal. People will be offended, but the preacher must attend to the truth out of love for a person’s soul. It is an act of integrity, and to not preach the truth is a betrayal of the conviction about that truth. The preacher is speaking for an audience of one as God is honored. The text of Scripture is made clear during the course of preaching. As the conscience either excuses or accuses, it is the preacher’s responsibility to herald the truth as the correctly interpreted meaning of Scripture brings out a response or action from it.

Every sermon is a monologue as an argument or effort to convince a listener about what is true. The preacher uses the Scripture because it possesses authority beyond himself. The preacher’s method of discourse is to hold the argument to a conclusion consistent with the intended meaning of Scripture. This would involve the logical flow, original language, and other passages reinforcing the message. The path to persuasion through argumentation isn’t sentimental, but it’s to convince a listener of what is necessary to conclude. Teaching is to inform, and preaching is to proclaim.

The preacher speaks to the most biblically astute without being too profound or simplistic. Settling a message to the lowest common denominator of learners accedes to the people who do not love the Word the most. Preaching to the more astute learners pulls up the congregation, where the rest in attendance are informed about where they need to be. It is necessary to backfill what resources are necessary for the discipleship of people who hunger for God and His Word just as well. It is necessary to hold a high standard as people are spiritually developed within the church. Set expectations within the church to feed the continuous hunger among people where everyone is pulled up to a growing or increasing development in their walk with Christ. It follows that the congregation’s richness in worship derives from the theology they’ve learned.

Flexibility around responsibilities is necessary as it is on a path toward spiritual growth. As there is an emphasis on delivering messages from the leader’s or preacher’s gifts, there is a pressing need to train people toward leadership. Where men, women, and volunteers are developed to serve in ministry as necessary. As a pastor, there are two areas of focus and prevalent concern. First to the duties of preaching, and second to the teaching responsibility. The other responsibilities that follow are secondary and tertiary.

The life of the church is to exalt the Lord Jesus Christ. The purpose of the pastor is to feed the sheep. Feeding the flock of God is accomplished through the implanting of the Word. The primary purpose of the church isn’t to evangelize or entertain. Congregants of the church gather together to feed on the Word of God and, in response, worship Him. The goal of the church is Godward. God is the audience as worship in prayer, singing, service, listening, giving, obeying, and loving are fruits of people spiritually regenerated and filled to abide in Him. So, putting God on display is through His Word with theological truths and principles necessary for worship in spirit and truth as an immediate interest within the church.

The church’s ultimate purpose is to go out and live Godly, Christ-exalting, biblically clear lives in the world for evangelistic purposes. An untransformed and entertained group of people who attend church will not make the gospel believable. People have to be transformed. The church gathers to be edified, worship, and then scatters to evangelize. Shepherds don’t have sheep. Sheep have sheep. Shepherds shepherd the sheep, and the sheep reproduce.

Structurally, God delivered his revelation in 66-books. Sequential teaching from beginning to end is the method a preacher generally follows. In preparation, the preacher has read the passage numerous times to get the content in-depth. Further efforts are applied to the background and cultural issues about the passage to go through the book. The effort isn’t to wing it or pick passages at random and speak to them. The effort is thematic and contextual while consulting commentaries during preparation before delivery of a message to a congregation. Doctrinal truths reinforced by cross-references are an integral part of message preparation and delivery. Notes from research and study are then compiled into message delivery from the pulpit while the preacher is spiritually affected by the meaning of truth passages.

As there are many ways to translate a verse, it is better to avoid using other translated words to get at biblical meaning. Going back to the words of Scripture from original root manuscripts provides better meaning within the original context of the biblical writers. Authorial use of original words across Scripture is informative to get further precision about meaning as bible translations are updated to get scripture into the vernacular. Bringing the Bible into a post-modern worldview can introduce errors as it is necessary to place people into the times of Scripture. What a verse a passage meant when it was written is what it means now. Changing the words from translations dilutes meaning, so returning to original languages helps. Relying upon older commentators who are adept at original languages further reinforces intended understanding.

The Old Testament is divine revelation and a book of examples that illustrates God’s attitudes about righteousness and sin. The whole redemptive old covenant story foreshadows the mysteries of the new covenant. The whole counsel of God includes both the Old and New Testaments. So, it’s necessary to draw from the Old Testament to get to the significance and meaning of the New Testament. The New Testament reveals Old Testament mysteries and truths now fulfilled and made evident and preaching and teaching from such a perspective is necessary. Platitudes of Christian living without the appropriate contexts between Old and New Testament revelation are unhelpful.

Clarity of the message is a primary concern. The pastor needs to understand Scripture very well to speak on it and clearly deliver its meaning. If a pastor is not clear to congregants, that probably means the message or communication is not clear to the pastor. Preaching from the intensity of the heart as truth and meaning has a stronger grip on the pastor. A message and its preparation must be poured through the pastor’s soul. An abbreviated, automated, or outsourced approach is not acceptable, and slowing down the sermon preparation process to internalize everything is necessary. By the time the pastor gets to the pulpit, it has to be a message that has to be unloaded. The message has to capture the heart, and it has to take time.

Reading theology, biographies, and monographs serve as models or examples of spiritual development that translates to congregations. By comparison, culture or social-based messages do not offer the substance necessary for the spiritual growth of groups or individuals. Joel R. Beeke, who wrote Reformed Preaching: Proclaiming God’s Word from the Heart of the Preacher to the Heart of His People, is recommended reading as it concerns historical perspectives from prominent preachers (Crossway, 2018, ISBN: 978-1-4335-5927-3).

Preachers must be explicit on sin issues and seek unity, but unity in truth. Truth does not give way to unity. This way, preaching must be bold and loving, and repetition is necessary for retention. Preaching biblical truth is essential but must be varied and fresh to prevent familiarity from breeding contempt. Friendships and congregants who hold high expectations of pastors as preachers are necessary. Preachers let the Bible do its work, and while understanding the church is a long process, it is imperative to be very loving and patient. Pastors must try to ram through changes. Change is a life-long process; much more is accomplished if God’s Word is taught lovingly and faithfully while loving people through the process of change. So, do not make demands and do not force change. Just show people the Word of God, love them as they are, and in the process, change will come. Remain biblical in all that is done as a pastor. Become saturated with Scripture and know what Christ expects, the church, and the ministry. Be faithful to the work given.

Worship

What a person does in corporate worship is a continuation of what happens during private worship. Church worship time is compressed during worship service; if Scripture reading is abbreviated during service, it will be abbreviated in private life. Corporate worship is a model for congregants about what personal worship should be. Regardless of personal mood or someone’s attitude at the time, worship is essential because of who God is and what He does. Considering the magnificence of creation, God is more than worthy of worship at any time and under any circumstances.

Hebrews 10:19 presents to believers the reality and severity of God’s holiness. Yet, with the believer, there is confidence in Christ to approach Him in worship. To approach God requires preparation because of His holiness and where He is. Therefore, daily confession, repentance, or purging of sin is necessary before God in preparation for worship. It is in the individual worshiper’s interest to offer God a pure heart as He is approached. People are to present themselves in worship toward Him with a proper heart attitude (John 4:23-24).

Personal confession is fundamentally essential to prepare before worship. As some high churches are cold and sterile, there is still respect for who God is. And it can be extra challenging to worship in a setting that is not conducive to an environment of silence or reverence. So it is essential to remain in prayer and speak with God while before Him in worship while enduring an unfamiliar or difficult situation. There is no compartmentalization in worship, and worship is a 168-hour-a-week vocation. It is continuous in all facets of life, about who you believe God is and how you worship Him. The priority is God, and the worship offered is directed toward Him and not only what He has done for the worshiper. As it is suggested that worship is boasting in God, according to the Westminster Confession of Faith, “the chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.”

As the Psalms clearly indicate, God is the direction of personal worship (Ps. 145:1, Ps. 45:11, Ps. 99:5). Everything we see in culture, to the contrary, leads to self-worship. Self-adulation is all about “me” to indicate an incorrect direction of worship. Worship is not for self-amusement or entertainment in its cultural format (marketing, commercials, news, media, etc.) and cannot represent our worship experience. God is the only audience in our worship. He is the focus of the worshiper. Worship is what you give to the effort. Not what you are receiving or getting out of it. As echoed by Jesus, “Peter, do you love me?”, “Peter, do you love me?”, “Peter, do you love me?” God’s people are to love Him with their whole hearts. It’s not enough to merely like Him. Worship is an attitude of the heart.

How God’s people prepare for worship correlates to their attitude toward God. If a person is of a pure and willing heart, prepared to worship in spirit and truth, worship is acceptable to God by grace as a person presents him or herself as they are. Before God in praise, singing, presence, prayer, or benediction, insofar as it is up to the worshiper, let him or herself appear in attire better than loose casual wear. The worshiper’s opportunity to present cleanliness as they appear before God is a time of honor and fresh appearance. Washing up and dressing nicely is an expression of preparation. A good night’s sleep and rest before worship, along with eating for energy, adds to the longevity and vitality of worship with time before God.

As the pastor is the worship leader, the music pastor or director assures that worship is theologically correct and biblically rooted during song, prayer, and material reading. Worshipers wash their hearts through the reading of God’s word. While reading out loud, music is to assist in prayer and Scripture reading. Theologically correct music, whether as hymns or contemporary expressions, sets the mood with the occasion. Worship music is music that demands spiritual attention. As spiritually meaningful worship music is theologically deep with lyrical content, it supports deeper engagement by personal expression. If the text of Scripture, doctrine, or confessional subject matter are essential, they must be married to the mind through melody. Harmony makes the message and melody stronger. Rhythm is what ties everything together as music.

In church, the most important piece of worship music is the lyrics. Music is what makes the lyrics stronger. Music is the servant of our faith. The rule is that in corporate worship, the lyrics are most important, and the lyrical value is reduced if the harmony, melody, rhythm, or method of performance becomes most prominent. From the lyrics’ primary use and purpose, the music’s theology supports what is preached and taught. Admonishing, encouraging, and warning are throughout Scripture. The Psalm is exciting because of its meaning and range of substance in worship. The psalter tells us why we worship. It is an offering, and it is a communion and prayer. It’s a reiteration of Scripture.

Counseling

The notion that biblical counseling is a type of discipleship was a different way of looking at the practice. Compared to the conventional way of living out a person’s life as a disciple of Christ, believers are expected to do what Christ instructed by how He defined discipleship in Scripture. Biblical counseling within a church is a ministry, but the character development and correction that happens through ministering the Bible to people with real problems can have therapeutic value. Helping people who want counseling by getting into their lives involves specific one-to-one interest that requires a detailed understanding of a person and the issues faced. Targeted discipleship includes biblical counseling.

To further understand the meaning of biblical counseling, it would be helpful to understand how it is characterized with a description of the practice and distinctions about what it does compared to secular counseling. Interpersonal counsel occurs between people with regularity as an informal type of ministry or discipleship. Still, the formal practice of biblical counseling should have a purpose where further levels of care by qualified counselors can offer more meaningful help to those with more deeply rooted issues. There are various clinical methods of help, but biblical counselors within the church are better supported among the leadership as God’s people. And how Scripture ministers to people at a more personal level does not include dispensing biblical truth through its use by counsel that instead involves more careful attention unique to individual circumstances.

While problem resolution at individual granularity is unpleasant, it’s a vital function of church shepherds who helps people who undergo hardships. Counselors minister to people not as a professional pursuit but as a ministry that reaches people to help solve problems that cause them to seek lasting change. Educated and qualified people who serve as counselors support churches as they minister to people. Still, vetting individuals for soul work should involve more than a standard background check among leaders. There are widespread abuse claims against leaders among churches that generally happen through counseling sessions that take advantage of the vulnerable. Counseling that occurs among elders and congregation members must involve much more than trust, but a high degree of certainty that there could not be undue social repercussions or stigma that follows without consequences to counselors. Confidentiality is of utmost importance as morally, ethically, and legally permitted.

Both public and private proclamation of God’s word is supported through Scripture, as explained by Acts 20:20. Meeting with people privately is a more direct and intimate way of getting at impediments to sanctification as believers mature in Christ. Compared to a public proclamation in the church where exhortations and corrective measures are not specific to a person, pastoral and elder messages are informative and potentially result in heart change among congregants. Individual and private sessions are more kinetic as they produce work within the believer to effect restoration or perspective among hardships. Pastoral counseling is one-to-one with people, as was Apostle Paul’s work and Christ himself. Shepherds of the church should do likewise. Pastors and elders are not to be isolated from church members and are integral to counseling efforts that occur with regularity involving elders, certified counselors, Stephen ministers, and the like. Biblical counseling takes persistence with people, and insights into the human heart, including a deeper understanding of Scripture. Bringing both together for the work of ministry as a biblical counselor is an integral and Scriptural approach to discipleship that honors God.  

Administration

The growth of a church involves the development of a scalable body of believers within an organization structured around people, processes, and systems. It consists of managers and directors who focus on the church as an organization to achieve its objectives coherently. Foundational are the competencies of individuals who fit the organization by requirements defined by a job description involving duties, roles, and responsibilities. Its practices conform to the church’s goals, and its objectives match its leaders’ capabilities to assure performance in accordance with its mission and vision. While the focus of the church organization is coherent with its people, processes, and systems, there is a corresponding recognition that resources are necessary to suit its continued interests. Namely, staffing, budgets, capital, legal support, payroll, human resources, insurance, inventory, administration, and revenues such as fundraising, donations, and giving to function where growth is supported or scaled to desired attendance. 

Pastors and church leaders answer questions about the background and operating characteristics of the church organization. The recruitment and selection process of staff members within the church organization involves spiritual gifts, skills, and talents among qualified people who satisfy eligibility requirements and maximize the likelihood of meeting the organization’s objectives through performance. Pastors and leaders who manage volunteers are responsible for the frontline delivery of ministry functions that satisfy congregants toward their continued spiritual formation and well-being for growth and retention.

People who donate time, energy, and skills are situated among church attendees who seek fellowship, biblical instruction, and growth in sanctification. Whether as musicians, nursery volunteers, parking attendants, and media techs, labor is donated by volunteers who help people within a managed framework of attaining an ongoing return on effort. Volunteers serve God through the church and the community toward organizations and individuals regardless of locale or status. The conduit of spiritual development is often solely through small groups with leadership-prescribed social interests that yield specific topical benefits, aside from pulpit messages that occur each week. Without careful attention, formal discipleship in biblical form rarely propagates through structured means under such a conduit. Discipleship and volunteer work through small groups are not mutually exclusive.

 While carefully listening to the details about a church fraught with unreachable expectations, organizational warning signs, divergent personal aspirations, and off-mission objectives, that church will be strained to make a meaningful contribution or difference in people’s lives. The heaviness or burden of circumstances through undue hardship can appear disheartening and worrisome as pastors and leaders are expected to become insular at some level to “win.” If the church is occupied by functional managers first with pragmatic expectations at every turn, then that is a church that will have limited spiritual reach. Such conditions set an environment of one-upmanship. The church isn’t a veneer of a corporate organization with a business model that serves a community of people to gather in a safe social place with a distant focus on the biblical mandate of spiritual growth, instruction, and what God intended for His church.

The size of the church and the risk of knowing people with needs isn’t a cloak to keep pastors and leaders from common church congregants. If not everyone, at least some, to get a deeper and broader understanding of people’s hearts beyond what they’re informed about from staff and volunteers.

Conflict

The ministry of peacemaking is a desperate area of ministry abundantly needed within the church. While making peace is one thing, achieving reconciliation through peacemaking is different. Relationally, people in opposition to one another become separated by differing views and interests that conflict and could involve resolution or escalation as disputes or animosity remain present and affect others. As believers are people of faith and obedience, it is often of mutual interest to mediate impasses that adversely affect the spiritual health of those involved. People offended or harmed by others who withdraw or hold resentments can become burdened with resentments that bear out as unforgiving in contradiction to biblical exhortations given by Jesus and apostle Paul, “forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive” (Matt 6:15, Luke 6:37, Col 3:13, Eph 4:32).

While under relational distress or hardships, believers do not always live out what they say they believe. That produces incongruent thinking that is impossible to reconcile with the word of God. And that, in turn, produces anxiety in the believer who would rather avoid such circumstances. The peacemaker’s role is thus to facilitate restoring relationships among people and with people in their relationship with God to let go of unforgiveness, bitterness, or resentment. Through confession, humility, and repentance, the change of heart occurs more congruent within a biblically guided framework. Ephesians 4 and various additional passages of Scripture offer beneficial aids to get through interpersonal difficulties. Numerous theological and doctrinal concerns immediately affect how and why reconciliation occurs.

Conflict resolution involves deeper disputes involving mediation. Apparently, as an advanced form of biblical counseling, conflict resolution spans a range of difficulties that could involve intense emotions or eventual legal claims counseled against Scripture. For reasons concerning escalation, retaliation, or further damages (emotional or otherwise), mediators would likely have to secure waivers against liability in the unforeseen event that may become a broader problem. In this regard, liability insurance and certifications that protect biblical mediators and their associated ministry are an assumed necessity. Biblical mediation is to reconcile people for restorative purposes without lingering animosity since forgiveness is expected through the process.

The method by which conflict resolution happens is through a careful mediation process that is guided by a period of one-to-one party counseling where biblical and theological principles are discussed to facilitate humble perspectives, confession, and a willingness to forgive. A process that could involve the absorption of pain by one or both individuals (or parties) may involve emotional distress inflicted on a counselor. Still, as God has permitted His name to be disparaged among unbelievers or believers for redemptive and sanctification purposes, the risk of encountering verbal hardship is what it is to be a peacemaker. During the reconciliation process, where biblical principles are learned with emotional and interpersonal pain absorbed, sessions that resolve disputes serve as a life experience with a significant spiritual value that carries over to other areas of problems that could otherwise surface. In this way, the character and interpersonal development that takes place is regarded as a form of discipleship as it becomes clear what it is to understand mercy, grace, and forgiveness with a willingness to live by it.

People who are called to a conflict resolution ministry are those who are willing to be Christlike. Peacemakers are those who can minister the word of God. They are gentle and meek and are not abrasive. They have a calming demeanor with a deep conviction for truthfulness and peace. These are people of love to resolve issues for the compelling beauty of reconciliation. They are foot washers in the ultimate sense as they wipe away unwanted mud, dirt, and stains that negatively affect the testimony of the gospel among believers. As mediators get to the heart of disputes and help people understand false beliefs about fears and the felt needs for security and significance, they offer biblical clarity about where true peace, rest, belonging, and value are in our relationship with God and each other through Christ Jesus.  

Outreach

 As the topic of outreach and missions is more fully considered, various factors can be considered as an approach to the gospel and the great commission. Evangelism and mission are framed as a lifestyle integral to the kingdom worldview attributed to every Christian. Whether locally in a personal or professional context or from more elaborate and well-developed geographical involvement, the practice of developing relationships spans across cultures, languages, and time zones. More narrowly, to “love your neighbor,” the formation of relationships bears the fruit of friendships and an eventual sharing of who we are as believers through the good news of Christ. Our transformed lives in Christ become integral to who we are as people fully invested in others. Contrary to a programmatic approach to outreach, missions, and the gospel, there is an embodiment of continued and persistent interest in others to reach people toward reconciliation and fulfillment in Christ.

 A template or spray-and-pray approach to evangelism and outreach is largely ineffective. As unbelieving people take notice of their sincere and meaningful relationships with believers and the differences in their beliefs, confidence, and perspectives, there is a deeper and more personal impact of the gospel and the offer of reconciliation, security, and purpose. There is a place for evangelism through various means that don’t involve direct personal relationships, but the outreach of that approach, by definition, is limited. Outreach and missions per se are longer-term endeavors that require the fully Christ-saturated person to walk the gospel and speak its meaning into the lives of people who need it. The person who lives the gospel for continued purposes of outreach derives their identity around what it is to be an ambassador of Christ (2 Cor 5:20).

There is an intentionality to the practice of outreach as a lifestyle. There is a prevalent mindset about it when interacting with people. Through authentic friendships, there is a mutual sharing of interests and values, where there is no place for a bait-and-switch way of living out faith among people we love. The preparatory efforts in relationship building as an integral approach to outreach are necessary without strings attached or a fear of losing a friendship over disagreements or rejection of the gospel. During relationship development, when people need support and friendship, it is of utmost value to be a friend to confide in and hear how believers cope and place their faith and hope in Christ.

While thinking through the interactions among unbelieving friends, coworkers, and acquaintances, there is an expected and intentional perspective a believer in Christ should have about their standing before God. More than what is valued about them and how productive our relationships are, a necessary focus is needed to develop better quality and deeper relationships that last. Living the better version of oneself in what is said and done among others within an authentic context of friendship situates friends in a position of mutual compatibility as conversations happen favorable to the purposes of an unbeliever’s interest in the gospel. Not out of overt persuasion as if a person is a project, but to share the heart about matters of life pertinent to the relationship. The overflow of any relationship with Christ Jesus that makes an impression is worth building upon toward an authentic love and interest that the unbelieving friend perceives.

An introverted and analytical person is not usually inclined to be immersed in the lives of a range of people, so it is necessary to be receptive to what God would want about how people become involved with one another. With the intentional perspective of forming relationships for the central purpose of outreach and spiritual reconciliation through the gospel.

Missions

The recruitment, vetting, and equipping processes of mission functions within the church involve mission workers’ successful placement and effectiveness. The coordination and management of numerous individuals, agencies, and local churches that together provide a conduit of ministry is an orchestrated endeavor with many moving parts. How mission workers are placed into the field for ongoing kingdom work is very involved, and the administration and management of individuals or teams in the field involve careful attention to detail. Close interaction with people vested in the physical and spiritual well-being of mission workers requires a long-term commitment, whether mission work is long-term or short-term, across various individuals or teams. The heart of a sending church is not only concerned with the missions in which they serve but also with the people who serve in such a capacity. There is an underlying assumption that the Lord is at work with the people prepared and appointed for the sacred work of the mission field. And the total outreach effort of the sending church between local areas or abroad is not mutually exclusive but a matter of sorting through available resources and priorities. The mandate to take the gospel and discipleship to the world is clear. Choices surrounding mission initiatives are not exclusionary in this regard.

Outreach among local communities and regions further afield includes short-term and long-term mission endeavors, including occupational insertion of people within community groups, work, or social settings. This effort may or may not involve a church planting effort based upon the spiritual need, interests, and or criteria of the sending church and supporting agencies. With church planting initiatives with long-term outcomes and results, the prospect of discipleship and spiritual formation becomes a scalable outreach proposition as others in the field can multiply for added longevity—the logistics and support needs of mission partners in the field are a function of objectives, location, and duration of stay.

For field workers involved in outreach as long-term missions and church planting, there are various means by which support is lined up and sustained. Clear lines of support and authority, well-connected communication, field resources, home facilities, transportation, close family-church inclusion, and periods of rest are all integral to well-developed missions programs from churches that sponsor and charter outreach for lasting impact. To optimize mission work, there are suggested areas of concern about the selection, equipping, and preparation of would-be missionaries. The people skills, biblical literacy, and flexibility of people who prepare and become deployed are necessities for mission objectives and success.

Interpersonal capabilities to form and maintain relationships and resolve disputes are the first of all skills necessary. While mission workers can have a reputation for not working well with one another in the field, short-term missions to develop interpersonal capabilities are an indispensable value toward long-term missions to avoid undue loss of time, money, and resources. The second point of interest includes a lack of biblical depth concerning faith and practice. Principles of discipleship, doctrinal beliefs, and defense of the faith across cultural settings are necessary for a rooted means toward biblical convictions, spiritual formation, discipline, and practice. Finally, it is necessary to develop and maintain a posture of flexibility regarding placement and field objectives during selection, preparation, and deployment. Mission worker candidates must demonstrate commitment, background, preparation, and flexibility in processes, methods, and interdependent relationships among people.

Renewal and Longevity

It is a grace and mercy that people who return to Christ Jesus as the vine (John 15:5) and the source of living water remain with Him. God, through His word, is an unending source of nourishment as His people are trees planted by streams of living water. Renewal by Christ Jesus through His Word produces fruits of the Spirit as believers again drink from streams of life to attain spiritual health and peace. More specifically, cultivating joy that renders deep faith and practice is necessary for continued nourishment, spiritual peace, and mental well-being. As necessary for challenges in life, that joy as a fruit of the trees comes from the inhabited Spirit who is a conduit for others blessed and comforted through their sanctification and sufferings. There are various fruits of the Spirit, as articulated in Galatians 5:22.

Living from the well of life apart from God is to forsake Him (Jer 2:13). Instead of drawing from the spring of living water from God, believers who live by their own will and interests do so from broken cisterns that cannot hold water. Accordingly, setting out on one’s own isn’t sustainable or long-term viable to draw from outside fellowship with God. The fruits of the Spirit spoken as truth are united with His life-giving power from a daily encounter with God. Life-giving nourishment of the Spirit comes from time alone with God through His Word. As Christ Jesus modeled for us, while people were among Him in desperation for teaching, truth, and healing, He withdrew from them to draw close to Father God in prayer (Luke 5:15-16). His time with God was a crucial source of intimacy even with the pressures of ministry among people who wanted to hear Him and be healed of their infirmities.

The two threats that have the potential to separate believers from the intimate connection with God are distraction and self-dependence. In alignment with Matthew 13, Jesus spoke of the parable of the Sower to make clear what chokes out, inhibits, or removes the Word from a person’s life. Valuing the wrong things over Christ Jesus and His Word takes our focus, priority, and intentionality elsewhere. As given by the example in Luke 10:38-42 with Mary and Martha, Jesus spoke of the necessity of choosing the good portion of fellowship with Him and intimacy with God over the busyness of daily necessities. Mary chose not to forfeit the most essential thing with Jesus as compared to Martha attending their gathering with the well-intentioned nobility of hospitality. A believer’s proper perspective about personal identity in Christ is best understood as the branch and vine analogy that He spoke about (John 15:5).

The warning signs about a believer disconnected from the vine include one or more of the following:

  1. Absence of fruit of Spirit
  2. Lack of margin, patience, humility, and charity
  3. Presence of pride, self-interest, defensiveness
  4. Fleshly interests and carnality, or appetites too fleshly
  5. Emotional fatigue and tense attitude of the heart from the grind of work

While circumstances and incident-driven occurrences give temporary rise to these conditions, they cannot be permitted to remain in place. The overwhelming pattern in the life of a believer must be personal time alone in prayer, in God’s Word (the Holy Bible), and worship. In truth and purity, believers shall abide in Christ to regain and sustain the spiritual nourishment essential to walk in the Spirit. Remaining in despair, discouragement, and distress indicates that a believer is disconnected from the vine or drinking from a broken cistern. A pattern and practice of these categories is the absence of margin and joy in a believer’s life.

While doing work unto the Lord, it is with the engine and furnace of the Spirit of God within. Passion, focus, and joy contribute to attitude as a source of fruitful energy that comes from time with God alone. Sin breaks fellowship. Willfulness can break fellowship. Self-interest (sin) breaks fellowship, so there is a need to be in daily immersion in God’s Word. Without the continuous renewal of the Spirit, burnout and fatigue can begin to take hold. Some evident attitudes that point to the onset of burnout include the following:

  1. You think you can fix everyone’s problems
  2. You have to fix everything right now
  3. You are responsible for everything that goes on in the church
  4. You can control everything in the church
  5. You have the answers to everything
  6. You can never show any weakness and need for growth

These attitudes are contradictory to truth statements of Scripture. To remain in proper perspective, intake of the whole counsel of God grows through time alone with Him. Absorption of God’s Word is an intentional, persistent, and conscious effort that requires reserved time (scheduled time) with God first at the beginning of each day, as He matters most. Priorities drive schedule, and emphatic yeses set priorities with non-negotiable noes. So, if priorities are not on your schedule, they’re not as important. The danger of the best is not the bad, it is the good.

Preparation to serve God’s people begins with inner joy and spiritual nourishment. This position of spiritual health derives from a consistent daily time in the Word and prayer while remaining in truth and purity. Believers will be held accountable for their spouses and the spiritual well-being of their families. Most immediate relationships among others before God is what matters most over all other endeavors. The source of life to support a family’s spiritual well-being comes from meditation on God’s Word. Ongoing intentional interaction with God’s Word is necessary to experience an inner life of peace and joy from the spring of living water. So, as a matter of process, some suggested methods of Scripture immersion include the following:

  1. Before sleep, meditate on a Psalm or passage of interest for five minutes to set God’s Word as the last thing on your conscious mind.
  2. In the morning, attempt to memorize a corresponding verse while in the restroom and preparing for the day. Have a verse pack on the go in the bathroom at the sink and shower.
  3. Once ready for the day, evaluate mediated Word in an expanded way through devotion to evaluate meaning and implication further.
  4. Pray the passage of interest at lunch – a cadence of attention to his Word is characterized by a time of personalization throughout the day.
  5. Draw or visualize compelling imagery about the time of contemplation to work out the truth of the verse or passage.
  6. Share the experience in the Word with family, friends, and others. Talk it out to learn it.
  7. Apply it – Not just to know it, but to do it.

Accountability and close personal relationships to encourage and exhort believers are necessary to assure personal alone time with God. However, close and careful attention must be paid to who a believer confides in (Prov 20:6) about passages meditated upon as a matter of reflection and application. Long-term relationships are often betrayed by unfaithful men or women who abandon confidentiality and cause undue harm for intentional or unintentional reasons. If someone reveals to a believer another person’s private life, renewal, and reflection experiences in the Word of God, it can be assured that the person is doing the same with others. Whether in an immediate context or later, the believer must know who is reliable to trust.

Leadership Qualifications

The biblical qualifications for spiritual leadership within the church are extensive, involving various character attributes suitable for people who serve and worship God in a holy congregation. When apostle Paul wrote to Timothy concerning the qualifications of elders within the church, he did so with explicit detail that leaves no question about eligibility requirements. Consistent with biblical writers elsewhere, Paul reinforces the required standards by which leaders serve with baseline character traits suitable and appropriate for the care of people in the first-century church as well as today. These traits complement one another to serve as a model and example of conduct for those in the church. Leadership that attempts to perform its shepherding duties with flaws in character in any of these areas presents problems to the church that ultimately affect congregants.

A leader with a reputation, social status, charisma, and wealth who has impeccable qualifications for leadership in a secular context doesn’t render that person suitable for leadership in the church. Godly character over functional capabilities prevails as qualifying attributes as described in 1 Timothy 3. Each specific qualifying attribute parsed and defined serves as an individually identified requirement with explicit meaning. These attributes, separately or combined, are not guidelines to loosely follow but specify what requirements must be met to serve as an elder or pastor of a church. These requirements are not optional or subject to cultural conditions within secular society that have a bearing on governance and commerce or impose contradictory regulatory requirements. God’s Word through the Apostle Paul has the greatest authority.

This table closely corresponds to Paul’s epistle to Timothy with explanatory descriptions of the root meaning of the biblical text. No consideration was given to church denominations that hold to contradictory traditions or social considerations involving cultural pressures.

QualificationsDefinitions and DescriptionsReferences
BlamelessAbove reproach and not deserving or worthy of rebuke or criticism1 Tim 3:2,
1 Tim 5:7
Husband of One WifeMale, married only once, monogamous, and moral.1 Tim 5:9-15
TemperateNot given to excess or extremes in behavior1 Tim 3:2,11,
Titus 2:2
Sober-MindedSelf-disciplined and wisely keeping self-control over passions and desires1 Tim 3:2,
Titus 1:8,
Titus 2:2,5
Good BehaviorOrganized with admirable propriety and moderation1 Tim 2:9,
1 Tim 3:2
HospitableDisposed to treat guests and strangers with cordiality and generosity1 Tim 3:2,
Titus 1:8,
1 Pet 4:9
Able or Apt to TeachAbility to impart skills or knowledge to people and do it well1 Tim 3:2,
2 Tim 2:24
Not a DrunkardNot a drunkard who is especially predisposed to wine beverages1 Tim 3:3,
Titus 1:7
Not Violent but GentleNot a fighter, bully, or a cruel, violent, and brutal person1 Tim 3:3,
Titus 1:7
PatientLenient and easily pardons human failure – merciful or tolerant of slight deviations from moral or legal rectitude1 Tim 3:3,
Titus 3:2,
Jas 3:17,
1 Pet 2:18
Not A BrawlerNot quarrelsome – Inclined and disposed to peace1 Tim 3:3,
Titus 3:2
Not Greedy
(aischrokerdēs)
Not fond of dishonest gain – being so desirous of acquiring wealth that it brings disgrace and shame on a person1 Tim 3:3,8,
Titus 1:7
Not Covetous
(aphilargyros)
Not a lover of money – not characterized by an immoderate desire to acquire wealth1 Tim 3:3,
Heb 13:5
Manages Household of Children WellManages a Godly family household in an exemplary manner1 Tim 3:4-5,
1 Thess 5:12
Not a Recent ConvertA mature believer in Christ1 Tim 3:6
Well Thought of By OutsidersA confirmed testimony and witness of a person’s good character within the community1 Tim 3:7

The spiritual capacity of leadership is largely contingent upon its reputation, training, and maturity to satisfy biblical requirements and its character obligations. People who obtain a calling of leadership are not to enter ministry lightly. It is a sacred responsibility to shepherd the people of God as caretakers of their faith and practice. While today, pastors and elders often carry out their responsibilities at a distance from the flock, they too often function with partial eligibility among closer relationships within smaller concentric circles of influence and accountability. Elders or bishops and deacons that see to the affairs of the church aside from pastoral work maintain their duties in ministry according to what they are gifted to perform and accomplish. Their reach within the church should encompass the entire flock as shepherds who oversee congregants and never permit the loss of even a single sheep. Each person’s sanctification is precious before God, and the shepherd’s responsibility is to care for His flock to the last person.

Conclusion

The call to ministry is a sacred privilege and a responsibility of enormous gravity. It is a manner in which gifted believers in Christ serve the church and people of various geographies to love and support communities to advance the Kingdom of God. The various areas in which ministry is carried out are numerous. Formal ministry through the local church or informal ministry of individuals among family, friends, and neighbors must be according to spiritual gifts given by God for His church. The work of Creation is to glorify God, and people who serve in ministry participate in what it means to do that. In the numerous forms of ministry, either formal or informal, sanctioned by the local church or not, the ways in which believers express worship, love, and support for people are according to the spiritual and physical needs of others wherever they are.


Continue Reading ·

The Sanctuary of Solemn Regard

A body of believers in Christ Jesus is rightfully viewed as an anatomy of a church. It consists of a skeletal structure, internal organs or systems, muscles, and the head. Specifically, as described throughout the book The Master’s Plan for the Church by John MacArthur, various characteristics and performative attributes are associated with the body. From the individual to subgroups of people, together they comprise functions that carry out God’s will for His people and the world. Through effective leadership, maturity, and experience, the church is guided by doctrines and principles centered upon the authority of Scripture. Scripture is the weight by which the church collective is obedient, unified, faithful, and disciplined in truth and righteousness. Among various additional attributes, such as humility, gratitude, accountability, and flexibility, the church’s abiding fruits produce spiritually healthy members to glorify God with outreach, missions, and community well-being.

The Skeletal Structure

There is an interdependence among these attributes that complement one another toward intended and proper functioning order. To meet its objectives and commissioning requirements of Christ, it consists of gifted or obedient people willing to serve in both love and honor. Unpolluted by sin and pervasive self-interest, the internal commitments of the church concerning Scripture, prayer, fellowship, worship, outreach, sacraments, giving, and discipleship are among its chief functions. The church exists with its skeletal structure to understand it as having a framework to include a foundation, specifically around its absolute commitment to sound doctrine, a high view of God, authoritative Scripture, personal holiness, and the supreme authority of Christ. These anatomical elements support the body of the church to perform its functions and achieve its objectives.

The underlying recognition and emphasis that God is the supreme point of attention and authority within the church are of vital necessity. Too often, the church is horizontally focused on community activities or social endeavors that don’t satisfy the church’s vertical purpose and mission. To look at church bulletins with week-by-week events having nothing to do with its purpose and functions dilute its effectiveness and marks congregations as social clubs with a weekly Tedtalk about better living. Churches loaded with bingo gatherings, bowling nights, and sewing events, among others, miss out on God’s plan for the church without paying as much attention to their purpose and mission. Elaborate youth programs that place incidental attention upon instruction, discipleship, or evangelism further indicate the priorities of a church with a low view of God. While social gatherings have their place, small groups for home bible studies are often little more than family or home fellowships without prayer, accountability, learning, time in the Word, etc. Small group gatherings become movie nights, trip planning efforts, or a single speaker-led point of social interest without discussion or God-centered objectives.

The church that supplants the authority of God for its interests instead is a church that at times abuses Scripture to drive outcomes and leverage social capital toward its ability to retain members or sustain economic prosperity or viability. Expositional preaching is a rarity, and there is very little structure around necessary doctrines about core beliefs such as justification, sanctification, holy living, sin, hell, condemnation, service, worship, and so forth. Shallow theology leads to shallow devotion, shallow worship, and shallow instruction. Leaders that set up churches as a source of entertainment to attract members run the risk of producing pleasure-oriented social clubs errant toward self-worship. Some churches seek to eject biblically oriented persons with a high view of God and His interests.

MacArthur writes, “One final component of the skeletal structure of a church is spiritual authority. A church must understand that Christ is the Head of the church (Eph. 1:22; 4:15) and that He mediates His rule in the church through godly elders (1 Thess. 5:13–14; Heb. 13:7, 17)” to stress that the church must accede and operate to the authority of Christ. If the church is a non-praying church, it’s because it has elders that are not praying. If the church is non-biblical, the elders and leadership are not in the Word or don’t accept its authority. The instructions that Christ gave to the church through His apostles are not the primacy of the church. They’re the supremacy of the church. Holy Spirit operates through the Word of God, and the church must abide by what is written in His holy Word.

As a follower of Christ, it is my solemn responsibility to share what I’ve learned and the grace I’ve been given. The abundance of mercy and patience I’ve been given is a model to follow as an instrument of God’s abiding love and grace. While I’m active online in sharing the gospel and biblical principles I’ve learned, I also write quite a lot to cover book reviews and topics of inspiration centered upon Scripture. As the church framework is entirely suitable and necessary for forming the body of Christ, it overlaps with the direct and extended family as a smaller body of believers. I pray and desire that the material I learn through studying church formation and function would lead to personal improvements toward readiness and more meaningful contributions among family, friends, and church members over time.

The Internal Systems

The internal systems of the church represent the various fruits of the Spirit (Gal 5:19-25) that correspond to the attitudes of its members. Conversely, as the church is metaphorically viewed as an anatomical body with a skeletal structure, muscles, and head, it also consists of internal systems such as organs to sustain life. These correspond to some behaviors that characterize people of God who live by the Spirit and produce purposeful behaviors as active and conscious efforts stemming from internal predispositions and mindsets. A range of character and behavior attributes operate within a congregation and distill to each individual living in a functional way. The range of internal systems is an organic set of virtues and behaviors predicated upon the attitudes listed within The Master’s Plan for the Church. With varying support from Scripture concerning the internal attitudes, the list is as follows:

The internal attitudes of the church listed represent a weight of obligation or ideal characteristics associated with a biblical body of believers. As the book was published in 1991, it still holds valid, relevant, and of significant necessity or merit, but it is by no means current or exhaustive. The onslaught of cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, and post-modern inclinations of society that plague the church is widespread across all denominations and traditions throughout Christendom. For example, MacArthur mentions the necessity of adherence to truth in a few places, but it isn’t highlighted as a pressing concern. Numerous church attendees today are given to the affirmation of lifestyles that Scripture clearly forbids.

ItemAttitudeDescriptionReference
1.ObedienceThe church does what God says to do.1 Sam 15:22
2.HumilitySet yourself below others.Phil 2:3-4
3.LoveApply biblical love to meet needs.1 Cor 13:4-7
4.UnityAbsence of contention and division.John 17:21
5.Willingness to ServeAbilities actively applied to others.1 Cor 4:1-2
6.JoyOutward exuberance of the heart, soul, and mind.Rom 14:17
7.PeaceInward contentment of the heart, soul, and mind.John 14:27
8.ThankfulnessThe continuous attitude of gratitude.1 Thess 5:18
9.Self-DisciplinePersons with persistent truth and righteousness.Phil 4:8
10.AccountabilityHelping each other overcome sin.Rom 7:15
11.ForgivenessForgive others as God has forgiven you.Matt 6:12-15
12.DependenceAttitude of personal insufficiency toward God.Deut 6:10-11
13.FlexibilityAbsence of stubborn thoughts and practices.Matt 15:1-39
14.Desire for GrowthPersistent interest in feeding on God’s Word.1 Pet 2:2
15.FaithfulnessLong-term reliable attendants, servants, worship1 Cor 4:2
16.HopeConfidence in future security and eternal lifeRom 12:12

Table – MacArthur’s View of Necessary Internal Attitudes of the Church
Published in 1991 with an update in 2008.

Moreover, the rise of pluralistic thought among people significantly infects the church as it concerns various biblical claims of exclusivity. The church isn’t called to be a social activist group, and it can not tolerate harmful and errant ideologies that run counter to the gospel and the purpose of the church. The church’s commitment to truth as a subordinate matter of self-discipline (Phil 4:8) is a weak defense or posture against unwanted influences that degrade its effectiveness. Churches that compromise on truth and biblical principles often become something other than an authentic church, or it dies off by attrition through a loss of people who stop attending or forsake fellowship. Consequently, church leaders who succumb to the short-term confused interests of society and academia can face undue hardships to which there is no viable remedy.

As The Master’s Plan for the Church is a compilation of teachings, it offers a listed means of a well-formed church that isn’t meant to be fully explanatory. Through various specific church stories and lessons learned, biblical principles are explained and reinforced to guide the reader toward circumstances that positively affect individuals and the body as a whole. At times, the term “gift” arises to lead, support, or contribute to the church in a uniquely intended way. Not where service is a chore or the arbitrary efforts of volunteers, but according to what people are good at doing. Paul wrote of gifts in Romans 12:6-8 and 1 Corinthians 7:7 to underscore the spiritual nature of their purpose.

The idea of “just jumping in and doing something” is counter-productive unless a person is entirely flexible and open to serving in any capacity possible. However, suppose church leadership or administration offers opportunities to serve in a group capacity. In that case, that is often a rewarding and productive endeavor (e.g., short-term poverty relief, homeless veteran aid, etc.). Volunteer efforts that support the community through the church to achieve Kingdom objectives by loving people well is an entirely meaningful way to go; however, if it is quid-pro-quo for profit or partnership with a municipality that sets up an interdependency, unwanted entanglements are sure to follow.

Gifts given to people are meant to fulfill the functions of the body as a church to serve God, glorify Him, and satisfy the needs of people. Churches that broadcast to congregations opportunities to meet specific needs leave individuals to assess suitability as relevant. By contrast, spiritual gifts can involve competencies, skills, or talents that accompany people for a spiritual purpose. A close look at the “gift” term Paul uses in Romans 12:6 specifies a uniquely intended purpose supported by the authority of Scripture for the church (Rom 12:4-5).

Gift: χάρισμα, ατος, τό (χαρίζομαι)
that which is freely and graciously given, favor bestowed, gift [1]

of special gifts of a non-material sort, bestowed through God’s generosity on individual Christians 1 Pt 4:10; 1 Cl 38:1.
•  Of spiritual gifts in a special sense (Just., D. 82, 1 and Iren. 5, 6, 1 [Harv. II 334, 2] προφητικὰ χ.; Orig., C. Cels. 3, 46, 12; Hippol., Ref. 8, 19, 2) Ro 12:6; 1 Cor 12:4, 9, 28, 30, 31.[2]

The gifts of grace (Rom 12:3-8) do not correspond to free labor with “no experience required” toward service projects for profit as “doing ministry.” Contributions to the church involving spiritual gifting are not homogenous; as Paul wrote, “members do not all have the same function.” In this sense, service projects that operate as a business from labor or services are not specifically ministry, per se. The intended meaning of Paul’s message indicates that ministry or service to the church comes by grace and the gifts given to people for a specific spiritual purpose.

The church does not bestow gifting. God does this through various means unique to each person. The church adheres to the internal systems developed toward satisfying its purpose. MacArthur wrote, “There are many other areas of ministry a person can get involved in. Cultivate the giftedness that God has given you and become active in whatever ministry God leads you to.” Appropriately, this corresponds to Paul’s instructions to the first-century church of Rome.

The Head

Continuing the body analogy of the Church, “The Head” of the Church is the Lord Jesus Christ. As Paul wrote, “Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love” (Eph 4:15-16), Christ Jesus operates having four functions of the Church as a body. Christ is the Savior, Shepherd, Sovereign, and Sanctifier, where they are a wholly exceptional yet a composite of His perfect Lordship as Messiah, Priest, and King. Together each has immeasurable value to the body of believers and right to each person who consists of that body.

As Savior, Jesus saves people from their sins (Matt 1:21). His very name is “Jehovah saves.” His name represents His identity as Mediator through His sacrificial blood given to satisfy the justice required to atone for sin and forgive them (Heb 9:22, 13:20). He was the perfect sacrifice for the sins of many who would turn to Him under a New Covenant of redemption (Matt 26:28). The New Covenant established by Christ’s sacrifice produced the “blood of the everlasting covenant” and it was full effectual once for all those being sanctified (Heb 10:14). Not as a temporary covenant, or a partially effective covenant. Still, a perfect sacrifice that by His blood of perfect offering sin is forgiven, and people are freed from sin.

His redemptive work on the cross pleased God that He returned Christ from the dead. To reiterate the astonishing biblical fact, God the Father approved Christ’s sacrifice to such an extent that He resurrected Him back to bodily life. With Christ Jesus risen and alive again, He became the great Shepherd to rule and teach His Church. Through His authority and Word (2 Tim 3:16), the teaching, correction, reproof, and training in righteousness represent His workmanship within the Church. From individual persons to the Church body itself, Christ reigns to accomplish His work so that every believer in God may be complete in Him.

Reiterating Christ Jesus’s authority as Head of the Church is necessary. The Church belongs to Him (Matt 16:18). As Shepherd, He leads the Church, but He also rules the Church through discipline and correction for it to accomplish His will. To instruct and guide the Church to abide by His interests as made evident through His Word within Scripture. As the Spirit speaks to the believer to convict, correct, and comfort, the believer is guided by His Word to bear fruit and live toward continual sanctification. To build His Church, individuals, or the Church itself could undergo sanctification toward greater righteousness pleasing to God.

By application, the Church does well to recognize that it is Christ who is head of the body of believers and the authority of church leadership is subordinate to Him. Christ’s plan and spoken intentions for the church must prevail over the plans and programs of the church for His kingdom. Projects not aligned with Christ’s interests for the church can dilute its effectiveness and purpose. This reading is a reminder about the prevailing and supreme authority of Christ over the Church as a body. I intend to become outspoken about the necessity of abiding in Christ as the head of the Church should circumstances present themselves in terms of initiatives to time spent on incidental endeavors.

I completely agree with the principles that Dr. MacArthur wrote about concerning Christ as the head of the Church. Moreover, the categories of Christ’s Lordship over the church are more than mere leadership. His position, status, and ownership of the Church bring any believer to obedience and submission as His authority comes from who He is and what He has accomplished. Believers in the Church are obligated to apply this truth as His obedient body.

The Muscles

The third chapter of The Master’s Plan for the Church covers in some depth the church’s various functions that correspond to the muscles of a body. As the previous two chapters of the book cover the skeletal structure and internal systems of the body, it is natural to view the functions or practices of the church with its behaviors. A range of inward and outward exertions of effort characterize a church as a means of strength, just as the muscles of a body spend energy to perform work. As individuals perform consistent acts of personal devotion and discipleship, the church applies effort to accomplish specific and repetitive tasks for the body’s spiritual development. Collectively, there are functions of worship, prayer, training, fellowship, outreach, missions, and more unique to the body as its various members constitute and extend its capabilities to fulfill its biblical charter.

The sections of this chapter read as a guidebook that serves as a reference for believers and churches who want to refer to the book as an operating guide. To form policy and develop processes or guidelines centered around a healthy congregation with proper attitudes, internal systems, and organizational structures in place. While there are no specific indications of relative priority, weights of concentrative effort, or distributed points of focus, numerous principles direct a church grounded in Scripture and the ministry of the Spirit. The functions of the church are identified and biblically described but without prescriptive one-size-fits-all techniques. The functions of preaching, teaching, shepherding, evangelism, and so forth are covered with the principles about how and what to do with some rationale about why. Much of the subject matter is about Grace Community Church, which stands as a model to emulate.

Some of the various topics within the text overlap or work together as adjacent and related functions toward individual believers or groups responsible for specific ministry areas. For example, both worship and giving are related. Or as teaching and training for instruction and application of discipleship functions such as prayer, fellowship, worship, and Scripture to remain obedient to the lordship of Christ. The degree to which impediments exist can be related to individual levels of sanctification or maturity in Christ. As there are areas of group weaknesses or unhelpful patterns of neglect or diverging interests among believers, the formation, character development, and growth of its members grow toward God’s intended purpose of the church nonetheless.

As a matter of personal interest, the “Building up Families” section has direct applicability. As MacArthur wrote, “In many Sunday school classes, people don’t learn much about the Bible, and they guess about what it teaches,” I continue to see this as a pressing area that needs attention. Especially within my family, there is an opportunity to better invest in bible reading time with my children. To build more Scripture instruction with my family to understand its truths and know God in a more productive or fruitful way. To apply what the functions of the church does, it is of high interest to spend personal prayer and bible time with my family as it also supports the church. Intentionally scheduling a periodic time to further grow in the Word of God separate from what does is sure to produce a valuable return on our efforts. As the church ministers to numerous people, we together haven’t reached sufficient range or depth to serve as a foundation for a lifetime.

A fully functional church requires its members to perform as it should as a body. If there is one single area that isn’t where it could be, there are limitations to its effectiveness that may inhibit its ability to love or serve Christ and His people well.

The Pattern of the Early Church

The first part of The Master’s Plan for the Church covered relevant topics about the church that functions as an anatomical body, and the second section pertains to the dynamic church. More specifically, the pattern of the early Church is examined from its founding to the ministry that grew within the first century. MacArthur makes connections between early churches in Jerusalem and Asia-Minor to churches today that involved formation, how they operated and their characteristics. The early church patterns and distinctions that shaped their founding included the roles of people, locale, governance, doctrine, and pronounced growth. As compared to today, the early church wasn’t fragmented by denominations. There was a unity within the church guided by the Holy Spirit and rooted in doctrines that propelled it well into enormous growth for decades and centuries into the future.

As the purity of the church supported convictions around truth, faith, and practice, it was situated to build its presence within secular societies in the form of ministries. Within the early church, there was a concentrated effort to protect new believers from false teaching and instead provide instruction on sound doctrine. Apostle Paul further supported the continuous effort to assure the doctrinal integrity of the church in his letters to the church. It was especially concerning conduct, organization, scriptural principles, and theological truths as written by the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit was actively involved in the incubation and development of the early church both directly and through people to render and permanent and lasting understanding of what it means to exist and function within the Kingdom of God on Earth. Paul wrote passages of significant relevance to Timothy about the purpose of Scripture, service, and responsibility (2 Tim 2:1-2, 15, 24-25, 3:14-17, 4:1-2).

Further comparisons between early and modern churches are made concerning leadership. Paul guided New Testament church leadership formation to serve specific purposes according to gifts given to people. Functions, duties, and responsibilities were defined around pastors, deacons, elders, overseers, teachers, and evangelists to provide clarity about leadership and its framework. The early church was unified in its direction as its decision-making, defense, and discipline situated it to accomplish its mission and objectives. The church was rendered stable for organic and geometric growth through direct involvement from the Holy Spirit’s use of Paul.

Paul’s letters to the early church were directed to individuals and congregations susceptible to the influences of secular society (Greco-Roman culture and Judaism) and paganism. It was necessary to align new believers to correct doctrines through the teaching authority of leaders with decision-making capacity (1 Tim 5:17). Consensus among men to arrive at decisions through the study of Scripture, prayer, counsel, and fasting were able to solve church issues and keep it on its intended path. Where or when it was necessary to refute individuals or groups about false instructions or guidance for monetary gain or contradictory interest, a sound and fortified defense was necessary (Titus 1:9-11). Finally, errant individuals who were disruptive to the church were to be disciplined or ejected to protect a vulnerable congregation (1 Tim 1:20).

As the head of the Church is Christ Jesus, His leaders appointed to shepherd it are responsible for its care, feeding, guidance, and protection. The fulfillment of their duties is a privilege but also a divine appointment that brings joy and hardship through the service and obedience of leadership as it is answerable to Jesus Christ. Qualified and blameless leaders who are saturated in the Word of God and indwelt by the Holy Spirit are responsible for its ministry.

Elders, Deacons, Other Church Members

Church leadership is further examined by additional roles within the church. Beginning with the first-century churches in Asia Minor, Paul writes of leadership positions and responsibilities to explain qualifications and eligibility. For a growing church it was necessary to assure order and protection from false teachers and believers, so to prepare the church for unwanted and destructive influences, leadership stability was a high interest. With pervasive secular, pagan, or cultural influences, leadership must be installed and maintained according to the teachings of the apostles. Where the formation of doctrines is upheld and followed with the guidance and enforcement of appropriate leadership with strength and will. Unencumbered by social or cultural influences that advocate for special interests aside from the gospel, discipleship, and the life of the church.

When Elders are selected and placed into positions of authority, that occurs from God according to His word. Not according to what someone’s interests are to suit a specific organization for contradictory purposes. God’s word is the criteria for selection as His word is the method by which leaders are chosen. Selected elders are not chosen from the relationships that exist with leaders already present within the church, nor are they selected as most loyal to a church’s vision, or operating objectives. If an elder is selected and serves as a leader conducive to expected performance requirements, duties, and responsibilities, the church or leaders who choose a leader that way is off course and does not abide by the authority of Scripture. Performance, duties, and responsibilities are not mutually exclusive, but the requirements for eligibility to serve in key functions, as prescribed by Scripture, take an overriding concern and prevail regardless of other factors.

According to Scripture, elders are excluded from positions of leadership from a variety of conditions. In Paul’s letters to Timothy and the Corinthians, he outlines specific requirements concerning leadership (1 Tim 3:1-2). Furthermore, elders, or bishops, are to possess numerous character traits that render them blameless or of a background with a major impediment to leadership, or the church. The leader is to be faithful, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, prepared to teach and share his faith, not given to alcohol, not violent, or a hot-head, not greedy, and someone who manages his home well (1 Tim 3:2-7). While today, this is a tall order, given the seasoned background of everyone, the prospects of leadership are very limited. Generally, everyone has baggage involving weaknesses or a history that brings pause.

Paul’s intent, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, is to set leadership in place with continuity across the geographic locations. A standard to which there are consistent expectations about how leadership is to serve in the church. Deacons among those locations who serve as another functional level of leadership have specific requirements concerning qualifications, too. Proven leaders within the church and home, deacons are given delegated authority in positions of leadership to functionally guide the church and perform duties concerning its mission and purpose. Deacons are placed into positions of leadership with the authority necessary to accomplish tasks that render other leaders available to complete their primary duties. Elders and deacons who add formal organizational structure to the church provide the means by which men and women congregants work and care for one another.

Paul instructs the churches about suitable conduct befitting men and women within the church. As people minister to one another, they are given expectations concerning conduct according to male and female distinctions, authority, faith, and practice.

A Look at the Thessalonian Model

When apostle Paul wrote to the church in Thessalonica, he presented to readers down through the centuries essential attributes of the church. MacArthur originates categories to sort through the attributes and partition their meaning to bring understanding about the church is formed and how it functions. More specifically, there are several descriptive titles that are helpful to parse while, taken together, rendering a coherent view of what the biblical church is.

  • A Saved Church
    A church of individuals regenerated by the Holy Spirit who believed the gospel and placed their faith in Christ (1 Thess 1:5)
  • A Surrendered Church
    The pursuit of Christlike behavior is evident among individuals within the church. To Paul’s written testimony, the church of Thessalonica imitated Paul, Silas, and Timothy as models of faith and practice (1 Thess 1:6).
  • A Suffering Church
    The saved and the surrendered church is going to bring consternation to the world. With that will come persecution (1 Thess 2:14-16) and suffering. As the world hated Jesus, it will hate and persecute the church (John 15;18,20).
  • A Soul-Winning Church
    The church is characterized by outreach, missions, and the spread of the gospel. By living Godly and fruitful lives, the church becomes noticed and of appeal to some (1 Thess 1:7-8).
  • A Second-Coming Church
    Anticipation of the return of Christ is a source of motivation for believers within the church. Christ Jesus’ promise to return is deliverance from wrath as He gathers His church awaiting His return (1 Thess 1:10).
  • A Steadfast Church
    Even through affliction and distress by the faith of the Thessalonians, they remained persistent in their commitment and love of one another. They stood firmly on the Word of God and in the gospel (1 Thess 3:7-8).
  • A Submissive Church
    The church’s obedience to Christ and His word isn’t contentious, nor does it question the instructions of the biblical writers among believers concerning faith and practice (1 Thess 1:6, 2:13, 4:1).

All features of the church present a portrait of a model congregation that is modeled after the church pleasing to God and His apostolic servants. Through culture and secular society from this generation extending back to the first century, the aspirational characteristics carry the same weight. Departure from these principles is to depart from the biblical model of how the church is dispositioned and operates within the Kingdom. Christian unity is predicated upon these biblical principles to assure growth and effective use of Christ for His purposes.

As long as the church and its leadership are adherent to the Word of God as properly interpreted, then its congregants, followers, volunteers, and staff have an obligation to accept instruction and obey. A pastor’s perspectives incongruent or contradictory to biblical principles have no place in the lives of believers. The Word of God is not an instrument to compile verses to leverage authority and accomplish objectives and projects on interest outside the core principles of the biblical model. A church diluted in its effectiveness is a church that doesn’t abide by the new covenant structure given by the Holy Spirit through the biblical writers.

Marks of an Effective Church

From the first century to today, there is a marked contrast beyond the early church. Factors inherent within an effective church are widespread concerning its activity, leadership, and trajectories. Regarding its place in the world and its objectives, MacArthur derives biblical principles that cross a spectrum of pillars involving the authority and focus of leaders and believers within the church. The practices of those within an effective church live out their faith through people who are willing to change, have concern for one another, and bear a devotion to God and family to impact loved ones and the local community. To achieve its goals and objectives, the church reaches its functional imperatives through outreach and discipleship, while faith, sacrifice, and worship are at the heart of the church.

Marks of an Effective Church
Godly Leaders
Functional Goals and Objectives
Discipleship
Community Penetration
Active Church Members
Concern for One Another
Devotion to the Family
Bible Teaching and Preaching
Active Church Members
Concern for One Another
Devotion to the Family
Bible Teaching and Preaching
A Willingness to Change

The church is not a reckless assortment of programs that suit the interests of social culture through the local manifestation of the community. Kingdom objectives shall prevail at every turn and have their way through the Holy Spirit whether the local church organization cooperates or not. God assures that His people are brought to His kingdom and instructed to serve His interests. And He uses His church, large or small, to accomplish what He decreed necessary to build His Kingdom of people. God uses the work of the people within the church to meet His objectives as they have concern for one another and love God by doing what He has instructed by His word through the patriarchs, prophets, poets, and apostles.

There are numerous ways in which people show care for one another, as made clear from God’s words to the church. The stirring up of God’s people that his great commission becomes met involves the spiritual health and well-being of individuals committed to Him and each other through various means. It is among these means that God accomplishes what He intends to do through His church. MacArthur lists these in an integrated manner.

Passage“One Another” Description
James 5:16We are to confess our sins one to another.
Col 3:13We are to forgive one another.
Gal 6:2We are to bear one another’s burdens.
Titus 1:13We are to rebuke one another.
1 Thess 4:18We are to comfort one another.
Heb 10:25We are to exhort one another.
Rom 4:19We are to edify one another.
Rom 15:14We are to admonish one another.
James 5:16We are to pray for one another.

By fellowship and unity, as God’s people are gathered together in His name, He is among them (Matt 18:20). As believers conform to the Word of God, He works with them and through them. Churches recognized as “great” are effective according to a relative perspective from history, culture, society, or criteria established through the Word. Accordingly, as a Venn diagram would indicate overlapping characteristics to indicate relative levels of emphasis, there are weights and concentrations of effort and outcomes more suitable to where a church is appointed. All churches are not homogenously even in terms of strengths and what ministries or programs characterize their posture toward believers internal to a specific church. Among all the marks that identify an effective church, those marks bear descriptions of internal practices, whether present or at varying levels of capability and strength.

As church leaders evaluate its condition and effectiveness, these marks may also serve to recognize gaps and prayerfully gauge where to focus corrective action. It simply must be clear what biblical principle(s) to be effective about. Shaping what a church does to build its effectiveness would involve careful attention to what areas of shortcomings exist to develop a way forward. Attainment of goals and objectives that originate from the execution of a strategy assumes there are existing capabilities, capacity, and resources to bring together the initiatives that lead to fulfilling the biblical principles MacArthur outlines.

The Calling of the Church

While it is essential to understand how to recognize an effective church, apostles Peter and Paul make clear what the church is called to do. More specifically, a church can effectively accomplish its objectives and not Kingdom objectives if it sets its own course absent of what God’s word instructs. However, a church that abides by Scripture and obeys its instructions will meet the Kingdom objectives that God requires. A church can certainly meet objectives for social, economic, and community gain, but not for the Kingdom according to what God has given by His word. The calling of the saints as an assembly within the church is to attain states of position and action according to how the early church was instructed (Rom 1:6-7, 1 Cor 1:2, 26, Eph, 4:1-4, 1 Thess 2:12, 2 Tim 1:9, 1 Pet 5:10).

The calling of the authentic Christ-centered church is directional. Before its inception, it was elected and set to exist for God’s sovereign purpose. It is an eternal reality present before God along a corridor of time to accomplish what He knows and forms as an everlasting enteral now. The election of the church begins from its perspective the eternal calling to accomplish what God decreed. A sequence of states, events, and actions that follow from God’s created order bring within His Kingdom people for an everlasting fellowship. Created for His purposes and good pleasure, people who freely choose Him and the existence of a reality He has brought together.

The process in which people are created and brought together involves their redemption from a fall into sin that God foreknew in advance from a historical perspective of humanity. As a theodicy that involved humanity succumbing to evil and subsequent suffering to emerge within creation, His people who chose Him through redemption were appointed before time began. The purpose of redemption is to recover lost humanity and render to God a Kingdom of contingent beings. Beings who desire Him and each other for a purpose independent of time and free of disorder and decay.

As dross is melted away from precious metal, the church is called to sanctification and live in holiness as God is holy (1 Pet 1:16). Set apart from the world living under common grace, sanctification is an instrument by which God’s Kingdom of people are called out from it. Through its consecration, it is sorted and removed from the profane. A spiritual reality separated from the deeds of the flesh (Gal 5:16-25, Col 3:5), God’s sanctified people are separated from the world (2 Cor 6:17) to live holy lives. To live in the world, but not of the world, God’s people are not to love the world as that would set them in enmity with Him (Jas 4:4). Especially relevant to leadership in the church, but also to congregants who are willing and obedient to the Word concerning discipleship, where there is no culture and church staff inclination to become self-insulated.

A church in the Word with a high view of it as a treasure abides by its meaning. It is never neglected but relied upon with deep conviction that it communicates the voice of God about how it should live and what it must do. It isn’t enough to speak from platitudes to inform people of principles, guidance, and messages from the pulpit. It must be lived. The church must be shepherded where new and seasoned believers are encouraged and motivated in the Word, prayer, fellowship, worship, and evangelism. A church about the business of entertainment and social interest that sets a detached environment by which the laity self develops its spiritual formation only through small groups and church programs is utterly unacceptable. The core and peripheral interests that God wants, as made clear by His word, are the given necessities to live by. The pastorate and equipped leaders of the church must be attuned and engaged to the church’s unique needs for its sanctification and to reach its God-given objectives through outreach and biblical discipleship.

The vision of the church must be called to the glory of God. As the affections of the saints within the church are upon God and His interests, there is a separation between them and the world. The citizens of the Kingdom of heaven (Phil 3:20) are the believers among congregations throughout the church. The Lord and King of a different realm that require the loyalty and obedience of people who belong to Him involves a mutually exclusive relationship as biblically stipulated. The glorification of God by people who love Him is most satisfying and pleasing through worship where His people enjoy Him forever (WSC, Question 1; 1 Cor 10:31, Rom 11:36, Ps 73:24-26, John 17:22,24).            

Finally, among all points of calling pertaining to the church, it is to proclaim the Kingdom of God and what it entails. As Christ Jesus proclaimed repentance and the Kingdom of Heaven at hand (Matt 4:17), so are His saints to do the same. The Kingdom of God proclaimed involves the gospel, public, private and corporate worship, and all matters pertaining to life and godliness. The whole counsel of God from His word is shared with the community and the world for His glory and the edification of the saints as the Kingdom grows for His good pleasure.

The Lord’s Work in the Lord’s Way

As the church and people of God set about doing the Lord’s work, there are biblical examples of how that is done. With purpose and intent, the worker doing the Lord’s work is doing what God has appointed through various means to accomplish specific objectives. The examples of apostle Paul’s work as he fulfilled his efforts to form and build the early church are readily apparent through specific instructions in his letters. However, his work’s nature is highlighted through his travels from city to city and among fellow workers. The Holy Spirit guided the circumstances in which he made a lasting difference as opportunities were opened and seemingly appropriate courses of action were blocked or closed. An apparent area of the Lord’s work can get redirected, or directions from the Lord can be held or set aside as “no,” or “yes, but not now.” MacArthur wrote that what seems to be less substantive spiritual material as scripture concerning the apostles’ activity and the early church is very informative about how the Lord’s work is done in the Lord’s way. It certainly appears that the Lord used letters to instruct and develop the church to intentionally inform believers about the meta details concerning Kingdom advancements to follow (1 Cor 16:5-12, 2 Cor 1:5-16, Phil 2:30).

MacArthur also writes about strategic thinking Paul which originates from a visionary perspective. A critical point he makes concerns the preparation and timing of what a worker does to make himself ready to pursue an opportunity God opens. Working now and in the present to prove ourselves useful to the Kingdom enables or supports our readiness for opportunities that should arise. The preparation specifics revolve around planning, setting a vision, and developing a strategy to accomplish the Lord’s work. Concurrent with the development of spiritual gifts, a worker’s ministry is intentional and of deliberate effort in terms of contribution and what the Lord has given. A passive approach to ministry involvement or pursuit is not the biblical model workers are given to undertake and complete the Lord’s work.

As given by the apostle’s work, what they set about to do was organic in nature. Their approach to ministry wasn’t mechanistic, haphazard, or rigidly structured, but persistently successive through the Spirit’s leading. While somewhat event-driven, any pressing circumstances or conditions in the field were of paramount concern. Paul demonstrated malleability in planning and where he would visit cities and towns as the network of churches formed in Asia minor. The methods by which Paul accomplished his work were marvelous examples of geographic growth, but his work was spectacular regarding the depth and range of his discipleship among believers. As churches were formed with the fellowship of believers, leaders would assume responsibility for the continuation of congregations. The Kingdom of God formed in the hearts of people who were together made alive in Christ and held loyalty and love among each other for retention in the Holy Spirit and what He was to accomplish.

MacArthur’s startling assertion is that “if you want God to use you in the future, you need to be ministering in the present.” Without elaboration, the point is that a worker must be committed to service in the present as there are expectations of service in the future. Workers involved in the Lord’s work must always be active in what the Lord can accomplish through them (1 Cor 15:58). This could include family ministry, evangelism, personal outreach, counseling, service projects, writing, encouragement, care for the poor and afflicted, or some combination of numerous possibilities. The workers’ efforts are an outworking of their spiritual gifts to serve the Lord and people for ministry work.

It must be understood and accepted that there will be opposition to ministry work. Both spiritual and natural impediments to equipping the saints and the development of the church are an expected challenge. From examples given in Paul’s work and those of the early church disciples, it is easy to understand the types of opposition that will arise (2 Cor 1). From private persons, businesses, and government, the world and its systems will take an interest in the soft and hard persecution of the saints and the church. Civic, cultural, and economic opposition to the saints and their objectives stem from conflicts of interest that are ultimately spiritual. Moreover, the church itself can run counter to what believers do to accomplish the Lord’s work as biblically described and expected (2 Cor 4:10). With the comfort of Paul’s letter to the church at Corinth, workers of Christ are encouraged to take up the work in such opposition even when the burdens are overwhelming because of the fellowship promised with the King we love (1 Cor 1:8-9). There will be church failures, individual abandonment, and apostasy among people who become adversaries to the gospel and workers of the Kingdom.

As evident through Scripture, various people contributed to the Lord’s work in a synergistic and coherent way. Specifically, by name, a growing number of people were together focused on the commission of Christ Jesus to take the gospel to the world and build His church. The living faith of people involved an interdependency in accomplishing ministry objectives and simply loving and supporting each other well. While there are levels of maturity and authority in the church, there are also, within reason, shared responsibilities that involve all people of the church without regard to any claim of status. Leadership within the church involves delegation of responsibilities as it did in the early church by appointing elders and those who would care for congregants. However, ongoing responsibilities are shared to minister the gospel and the Word of God among people who are being reached and sanctified. The authority and maturity of believers in the church who attain status and privilege do not supersede what responsibilities remain according to the spiritual gifts given among individuals.

A significant point MacArthur makes about leadership involves the dominant role of the Holy Spirit. While an assertive and driven leader presses to meet Kingdom objectives, yielding to the Spirit and not dominating a team is necessary. The Spirit of God works among people who seek His will for their efforts. The work of the Spirit overrides the intent, plans, and directions of a ministry and His workers as gains are produced according to what work God has established. A thorough understanding of what occurred in the book of Acts and from Paul’s letters to the saints provides meaningful guidance today about understanding the Spirit methods of early church development. Corresponding principles applicable today require at the very least a sensitivity to the Spirit’s leading.

Understanding the Seducing Spirit

The subject of “Seducing Spirits” is evaluated at length when considering the qualities of an excellent servant from MacArthur’s perspective. The subject of spiritual seduction centers upon the falling away of people from the faith. To understand apostasy, it is necessary to define it and recognize its predictability, chronology, source, character, and teachings. To grasp the meaning of it as a profound error, apostasy has a common thread of misunderstanding and denial around the goodness of creation and God’s desire for gratitude and worship.

Long ago, during the growth and development of the early church, Paul warned Timothy about people who would leave the faith (1 Tim 4:1-3). In later times, without specificity, Paul characterized desertion by people who would become “devoted to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons.” People seduced away from the faith and who becomes devoted to false teaching are lured away by demonic spirits through the human agency of false teachers (MacArthur, 160).

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.” – 1 Timothy 4:1

People who become apostates will be lured away by deceitful and spiritually fierce predators (Acts 20:29-30) who desire to follow deceptive ideas about truth, God’s word, and the gospel. Some who leave the faith make an intentional effort to deconstruct learned principles and specifics concerning Scripture as revealed divine truth and doctrines of spiritual formation that represent the whole counsel of God.

Apostasy is expected as the Spirit has informed prophets (Deut 13:12-15, 32:15-18, Dan 8:23-25). Where the specific cause is demonic deception, there is certain destruction to those who depart from the truth of God’s word and what He has revealed through the patriarchs, prophets, poets, and apostles. Christ Jesus also warned of people who would depart from the faith. There are very many who will choose to abandon their faith or who will be led away.

Identity of ApostatesReference
“For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray. “Matthew 24:5
“For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect.”Mark 13:22
“Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction”2 Thessalonians 2:3
“knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires.”2 Peter 3:3
“Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.”1 John 2:18-19

There is a certain condition and trajectory of people who eventually fall away from the faith. The characterization of people who lose faith and abandon the “word of the kingdom” (gospel) is given by Christ Jesus’ explanation of His parable of the sower (Matt 13:18-23). To fulfill prophetic utterance, Christ spoke in parables about many subjects, but His parable of the sower has significant meaning about the states in which people have the word of the kingdom stolen from them, choked out, or pressured away by hardship and persecution.

Characteristics of people who receive God’s word and accept and understand it are those who bear fruit according to individual potential. All other conditions by which the word of the kingdom is received reveal an absence of understanding, shallow-rooted acceptance by the hardness of heart, and the possession of worldly distractions that remove further ability to yield fruit. The word of God heard and understood is meant to bear fruit within a person saved by faith. It is not by happenstance that Jesus spoke of the parable of the weeds (Matt 13:24-30, 36-43) after the parable of the sower (Matt 13:1-9, 18-23) to warn that apostates shall be gathered by the angels and destroyed (Matt 13:42). The loss of faith among people who encounter the word of the kingdom isn’t only by circumstance. There is malevolent intentionality against fields of people who would receive and accept seeds of the kingdom and bear fruit as evidence of salvation.

Jesus spoke of the parable of the weeds to verbally illustrate the presence of Satan (powers of demonic deception), who implants tares (Matt 13:25) among seeds that bear the fruit of wheat. For the ultimate glory of YHWH, the Lord lets the wicked temporarily remain among people of faith and believers while there is risk and occurrence of deception and apostasy. The Lord’s people of the kingdom are retained by understanding and faith while there are demonic influences present among them with evil intent. People who succumb to distractions, hardships, the choking out of the Word, and false teaching will eventually apostatize to bear status as tares or weeds, which are gathered, bound up in bundles, and burned.

In the latter times of this church age initiated by the messianic era, apostasy is to be expected. During this period, people susceptible to false doctrines or contradictions to the truth of God’s word become lured away. More specifically, while the Holy Spirit guides believers into truth (John 16:13), deceitful spirits and false teachers lead people into error. Even in a church or spiritually pure context, the “doctrines of demons” are carried and spread by human agents who communicate lies (1 Tim 4:2). The errors people commit by thoughts, words, and actions are measured by the standard of what God reveals in Scripture. Contradictions to the Word of God originate from a spirit of error (1 John 4:6) compared to those who listen to the spirit of truth. Specifically, the Apostle John wrote to inform the church that those who listen to him by what he spoke and wrote are those who know God and are from Him. Refusal to listen to God’s biblical writers constitutes the error of apostates.

The spirit of apostasy is evident throughout scripture. Both in the Old and New Testaments, people who stop listening to God, or contradict His word, are those who no longer follow Him in truth. Examples of apostatized people throughout old and new covenant history who set their course do so from a posture of disobedience as they are often seduced away from faith and relationship with God toward His kingdom interests. To see who apostates were and how they became distant and alienated from God, it is helpful to understand how and why they were seduced to correlate the same outcomes among believers today. To both guard your heart and mind and warn people of false teaching, it is of utmost necessity to remain close to God’s word and the doctrines originating from the biblical writers.

Understanding the Duties of Ministry

A broad spectrum of activity appears entirely overwhelming on its surface to recognize and understand the “duties” of a minister. With biblical support to indicate how Paul instructed the early church, we get a limited sense of scope about what the work of ministry involves. There are standards and responsibilities inferred beyond the specifics of Paul’s guidance. To focus on a narrow segment of Paul’s letter to Timothy (1 Tim 4), we learn much about the duties of a minister to understand piecemeal what disposition and actions are becoming a servant of Christ.

Minister Duties and AttributesReferences
Warns People of Error1 Tim 4:6, Acts 20:29-32, Eph 4:14, 1 John 2:13-14, 2 Cor 11:14-15, Ezek 3:17-18, Heb 13:17
Expert Student of Scripture1 Tim 4:6, 2 Tim 4:3, 1 Pet 2:2, 2 Tim 2:15, Eph 6:17, Col 3:16, 2 Tim 3:16-17
Avoids Influence of Unholy Teaching1 Tim 4:7, 2 Tim 4:4, 1 Tim 1:4
Disciplined in Personal Godliness1 Tim 4:7, 1 Cor 9:27, 2 Tim 2:3-5, Titus 3:8, 1 Tim 6:3, 5-8, 11, 2 Pet 1:3, 2 Tim 3:12
Committed to Hard Work1 Tim 4:10-11, 1 Cor 3:11-15, 9:26-27, 2 Cor 5:9, 11:24-27, Acts 17:25,28, 27:34, Jas 5:15, Col 1:28
Teaches with Authority1 Tim 4:11, Acts 17:30, Matt 7:28-29, 1 Tim 1:3, 5:7, 20, 6:17, Titus 2:15, Matt 17:5
Models Spiritual Virtue1 Tim 4:12, 1 Cor 4:16, 10:31, 33, 11:1, Phil 3:17, 4:9, 1 Thess 1:5-6, 2 Thess 3:7,9, 2 Tim 1:13
In WordMatt 12:34, 37, Eph 4:25, Col 4:6, 29
In Conduct 
In Love1 Thess 2:7-12, Phil 2:27-30
In Faith1 Cor 4:2, Col 1:7, 4:7
In Purity 
Has a Thoroughly Biblical Ministry1 Tim 4:13
ReadingNeh 8:8
Exhortation 
Doctrine (didaskalia; teaching)1 Tim 3:2, 5:17
Fulfills Ministry Calling1 Tim 4:14, Rom 12, 1 Cor 12, Eph 4, 1 Pet 4, 2 Tim 4:5, Acts 16:1-5
Diligent and Immersed in MinistryPhil 2:25-27, 2 Tim 4:2
Continuous Spiritual Growth1 Tim 4:15, Phil 3:12, 14, Acts 23:1-5

There is an even greater running set of activities that give a better sense of scope concerning ministers of the church today. Ministers support and administer sacraments of marriage, baptism, communion, and others, models faith practices, reproduce Godly leaders, set the environment and standards of fellowship, develop the gifts of others, set expectations, evaluate individual and ministry contributions and effectiveness, protect believers from corruptive influences, monitors and sustains the health of the church, sets the conditions to which the church makes disciples, equips believers for mission work and outreach, contributes to the greater ecclesiological efforts of the community, performs chaplain responsibilities, contributes to church culture of “loving your neighbor,” supervises theology of continuing worship activity, assures church leadership’s fidelity to biblical doctrine, counsels trusted peers and subordinates, shepherds people during times of crisis, and various other duties and responsibilities measured to standards of excellence. The weight of work upon a servant of Christ can be overwhelming with a considerable depth of attention.

The leadership of a shepherd is the most significant responsibility of assuring biblical faith and practice among believers in the church. It is not enough to be a pulpit speaker at a Sunday service each week. That is not what constitutes what Paul wrote to Timothy, nor is it an acceptable approach to what it is to speak a sermon or live as a sermon among people within the church. Leadership involves the initiative to perform what Paul wrote and what Christ Jesus spoke but to develop the same among others. It is of high value to zoom in on the cafeteria of attributes that make an “excellent servant.” Still, there must be an overarching guiding principle by which further imperatives are derived. A coherent sense of purpose around kingdom objectives concerning God’s interests overlays what occurs in a connected fashion. Where synergies, cooperation, and work of the Holy Spirit integrate as intended, there is scalability and longevity to support the spiritual development among new and seasoned believers. The “duties” of an excellent minister are useful to understand, but they are simply integral to a job description by which performance is measured.

Ministers who have defined duties and responsibilities help to clearly define expectations. The points to which measured performance is attained are wide and not easily remembered as a concentrated whole. As a balance of ongoing effort, the framework in which a minister performs duties is biblically structured around lifestyle and work with attention to individual potential and capacity. There is otherwise just too much to remember for consistent practice. Even if a minister is fully absorbed in his work, there are limits to individual capacity without attention to occupational efforts to earn a living (such as tent-making or carpentry) in the event there is insufficient monetary support available or possible from a church. Excellence as a modern notion of understanding infers the highest quality delivered with the least amount of resources necessary. Maximum value as a proposition toward ministry is sometimes a balance of effort by necessity. The idea or definition of excellence isn’t from subjective opinion. It comes with a recognition of quality workmanship, empathy, responsiveness, and assurance toward tangible and effective attributes. The various attributes to remember and put into practice take time and persistence. At times efforts will fall out of balance, and some attributes will go unattended as the minister performs duties in an inferior way. A dull tool is not always a completely ineffective tool. If the instrument is entirely broken and rendered inoperable, it will get attention around where a defect is present without the need for complete renewal from wear or aging. Diligence and persistence are marks of a servant of Christ. With continued attention to areas of concern, where leaders are undergoing development, growth in Christ is the means of workmanship they should walk by (Eph 2:10).

Shepherding the Flock of God

The final chapter, Shepherding the Flock of God, extensively covers the roles of church leadership in terms of biblical duties and responsibilities. The shepherd is metaphorically used throughout the Bible and ancient near eastern literature to identify a person as more than a leader, teacher, guide, counselor, or person with initiative. The title of shepherd denotes an overall set of functions to more fully capture a person’s role as caretaker with authority across a broader range of more significant responsibilities. The categories of duty and care by which shepherds perform their duties involve function by necessity due to the nature of people as a flock within the Church. In secular contexts, the notion of shepherding has become common in everyday use to portray a deeper or closer sense of responsibility of leaders among people.

In this final chapter of MacArthur’s book on the Church, he identifies several fundamental areas of attention about what shepherds do. Shepherds are rescuers, leaders, guardians, protectors, and comforters with the Church, as there are numerous correlating principles, biblical passages, and observations about how shepherds think and operate as driven by circumstances and conditions evident among people as sheep. The categories altogether describe the behavioral conditions associated with people who need very close attention and guidance due to vulnerability, helplessness, ineptitude, and pronounced inclination to error. Sheep need shepherds to survive and exist to serve their purpose in creation. Left to their own, sheep are prey to predators and susceptible to harm due to an absence of behaviors necessary for self-preservation. Within the context of the Church, people as sheep need to be guarded and protected from spiritual and cultural sources of destruction that are both external and self-inflicted.

A time of close observation of sheep’s behavior and innate disposition reveals a lot about the nature and behavior of people. There are numerous comparative attributes between people and sheep as one learns a lot about sheep’s inclination to wander or become incapacitated from an inability to attend to their well-being. As with people, sheep are messy and unable to take too much risk. They are easily disoriented and confused as they wander astray from others who together provide some limited measure of comfort and safety. On their own, sheep are defenseless, just as people need spiritual protection. People and sheep require shepherds to watch over them, care for them, guide them, protect them, and comfort them.

As the shepherds of the authentic Church watch over its congregations of sheep, they’re guarded and protected from all sources of harm, while the chief shepherd, Christ Jesus, keeps watch over them all. Through direct involvement among individuals and groups within the Church, elders and pastors are charged with the spiritual care of people they’re entrusted to keep. Vulnerable people are susceptible to the harmful influences of secular society and the culture in decay. And shepherds are accountable for the hearts and minds of believers who rely upon the Church and one another for safety and well-being. If sheep are harmed or lost, the shepherd takes the loss too. Shepherds, as leaders of the Church who neglect people by insulating themselves or setting themselves at a distance, do not escape the weight of responsibility they bear. The methods by which shepherds care for their sheep are developed through the equipping of discipleship and character development. The organizational leadership of pastors and elders must be structured and thoroughly girded with biblical principles and specifics about how congregants are led, guarded, protected, comforted, and, at times, rescued. They are to work together synergistically as people of God rely upon Him for ongoing relationships.

Appendices

As both church discipline and restoration are integral to the church’s life, it is important to understand what both involve from a biblical perspective. First, principles concerning church discipline are outlined as the six P’s of sequence in an effort to frame its practice and meaning topically. As the practice of discipline is consistently and equally carried out while subject to all members regardless of status or influence, the work of the church in this regard has a cleansing effect on congregations for purposes of protection and sanctification. Individuals confronted, corrected, or set outside the church for inwardly and outwardly unrepentant behaviors have restorative value to people who otherwise continue. Beginning with leadership with the clearest and most thorough standards brought into biblical and doctrinal focus, influential individuals must first be subject to uniform standards regarding morality and conduct within congregations.

The six P’s of church discipline are as follows:

The Place of DisciplineThe Provocation of Discipline
The Purpose of DisciplineThe Process of Discipline
The Person of DisciplineThe Power of Discipline

As a pastoral theology from the early 1990s, the book offers perspectives on how to apply a court of believers within the church. From one-to-one accountability that involves a directed confrontation aimed at an individual’s repentance to a group setting that provides specifics concerning biblical offenses such as moral violations and sinful behaviors. Discipline must be defined by Scripture around the areas of sin and repentance and not the preferences of leaders or people within the church who are displeased with interpersonal style, strict adherence to tradition, or socioeconomic status to form the type of fellowship or environment that matches the church vision and objectives.

There are further subcategories of instruction about what discipline is, where it can occur, and its purpose to fully understand MacArthur’s views about the biblical principles around the practice. For example, four more P’s are subordinate points to form a framework for understanding The Purpose of Discipline. Those elements are “Privacy,” “Permissiveness,” “Pride,” and “Persecution,” involving his personal experience of MacArthur to describe the specifics of what each point entails. As a reader fully grasps what biblical church discipline looks like from MacArthur’s perspective, the process as it is applied is formulaic. The Process of Discipline involves four steps to describe the sequential order by which a person under discipline becomes confronted until put out of the church or rejected from participation in the fellowship of believers. To MacArthur’s words, “You put such a person out for the purity of the church, but you keep calling him back as well.” – A practice that intuitively appears perilous among many believers today, especially those in leadership, who have questionable (at best) internal holiness to the kind of sanctification by comparison that warrants such authority.

Therefore, I would add that such a process should involve a vetting or check to determine if anyone should execute such discipline. The person and associated believers involved before implementation should then undergo a review to determine if the same condition doesn’t exist among them, either externally or internally. I only add this as a step because the widespread and demonstrable hypocrisy in the church is stratospheric. Moreover, suppose a person is subject to disciple for cause in one area of sinful practice (e.g., drunkenness), yet its leadership and congregation continue to practice and support the sin of another type (e.g., homosexuality or same-sex “marriage”). In such cases, any “discipline” subject to an offender against church purity is meaningless and without merit. The biblical standards and authority for discipline are rooted in divine justice revealed by God through correctly interpreted Scripture.

 The Power of Discipline is effective in bringing about repentance and restoration. It is not enough to simply welcome someone back into fellowship after repentance from an offender. Suppose someone is substance addicted or in need of therapy. In that case, restorative efforts are necessary to return to order someone captive in sin and toward a renewed trajectory of continued sanctification. When reading through the appendix concerning the restoration of “a sinning brother,” it is apparent the principle concerns overt external sin practiced where the circumstances negatively affect the church. “Pick him up,” “Hold him up,” and “Build him up” are further instructions in procedural format sequenced for qualified and eligible believers to follow as the restoration process should advance to closure.

The substantive efforts involved in restoration must involve sustained immersion in the Word of God for the Holy Spirit to continue working in the heart of a believer. Coupled with encouragement and continued accountability, leadership and congregants should show continued care and attention to anyone restored to have their burdens and struggles now shared. The biblical character development toward maturity and deeper sanctification transpire through the sharpening of the mind, growth in faith, and continued edification where spiritual stability is sustained and achieved.

The standards to which believers are restored involve external behaviors and internal holiness that are “beyond reproach” (1 Tim 3:2, Titus 1:7). Aside from outward behaviors aligned with the conduct becoming of a pastor or elder, the fruits of the Spirit must be testable, consistently present, authentic, and thoroughly apparent both in public and private life.

The biblical qualifications for spiritual leadership within the church are extensive, involving various character attributes suitable for people who serve and worship God in a holy congregation. When apostle Paul wrote to Timothy concerning the qualifications of elders within the church, he did so with explicit detail that leaves no question about eligibility requirements. Consistent with biblical writers elsewhere, Paul reinforces the required standards by which leaders serve with baseline character traits suitable and appropriate for the care of people in the first-century church as well as today. These traits complement one another to serve as a model and example of conduct for those in the church. Leadership that attempts to perform its shepherding duties with flaws in character in any of these areas presents problems to the church that ultimately affect congregants.

A leader with a reputation, social status, charisma, and wealth who has impeccable qualifications for leadership in a secular context doesn’t render that person suitable for leadership in the church. Godly character over functional capabilities prevails as qualifying attributes as described in 1 Timothy 3. MacArthur’s views in this appendix align with the intended meaning of how qualifications are explicitly transmitted to the early church as well as it is today. Each specific qualifying attribute parsed and defined serves as an individually identified requirement with explicit meaning. These attributes, separately or combined, are not guidelines to loosely follow but specify what requirements must be met to serve as an elder or pastor of a church. These requirements are not optional or subject to cultural conditions within secular society that have a bearing on governance, and commerce or impose contradictory regulatory requirements. God’s Word through the Apostle Paul has the greatest authority.

In comparison to MacArthur’s written views concerning the qualifications of the church, I traced his interpretation of each attribute. I compared all terms and phrases to the original manuscripts of the text to get the highest clarity about the expected qualifications of those who are to enter or maintain leadership roles in the church as either pastors or elders. This table closely corresponds to Paul’s epistle to Timothy and MacArthur’s interpretive and explanatory views. No consideration was given to church denominations that hold to contradictory traditions or social considerations involving cultural pressures.

QualificationsDefinitions and DescriptionsReferences
BlamelessAbove reproach and not deserving or worthy of rebuke or criticism1 Tim 3:2, 1 Tim 5:7
Husband of One WifeMale, married only once, monogamous, and moral.1 Tim 5:9-15
TemperateNot given to excess or extremes in behavior1 Tim 3:2,11,
Titus 2:2
Sober-MindedSelf-disciplined and wisely keeping self-control over passions and desires1 Tim 3:2, Titus 1:8, Titus 2:2,5
Good BehaviorOrganized with admirable propriety and moderation1 Tim 2:9, 1 Tim 3:2
HospitableDisposed to treat guests and strangers with cordiality and generosity1 Tim 3:2, Titus 1:8, 1 Pet 4:9
Able or Apt to TeachAbility to impart skills or knowledge to people and do it well1 Tim 3:2, 2 Tim 2:24
Not a DrunkardNot a drunkard who is especially predisposed to wine beverages1 Tim 3:3, Titus 1:7
Not Violent but GentleNot a fighter, bully, or a cruel, violent, and brutal person1 Tim 3:3, Titus 1:7
PatientLenient and easily pardons human failure – merciful or tolerant of slight deviations from moral or legal rectitude1 Tim 3:3, Titus 3:2, Jas 3:17, 1 Pet 2:18
Not A BrawlerNot quarrelsome – Inclined and disposed to peace1 Tim 3:3, Titus 3:2
Not Greedy
(aischrokerdēs)
Not fond of dishonest gain – being so desirous of acquiring wealth that it brings disgrace and shame on a person1 Tim 3:3,8,
Titus 1:7
Not Covetous
(aphilargyros)
Not a lover of money – not characterized by an immoderate desire to acquire wealth1 Tim 3:3, Heb 13:5
Manages Household of Children WellManages a Godly family household in an exemplary manner1 Tim 3:4-5,
1 Thess 5:12
Not a Recent ConvertA mature believer in Christ1 Tim 3:6
Well Thought of By OutsidersA confirmed testimony and witness of a person’s good character within the community1 Tim 3:7

There is no single denomination in Western evangelicalism that holds to these requirements. There are individual churches within some denominations that are faithful to these requirements, but not many. While I don’t think it is possible to sustain 100% consistency among all pastors and elders in all areas of eligibility in the life of the mind of leaders, there are gaps in character and performance in this regard that will surface. MacArthur makes it clear that none of these attributes are negotiable. And he is correct; however, maintaining this standard of qualification without a lapse into sinful and flawed conduct is unattainable. If leaders could disqualify themselves over a lifetime of leadership, they would. There must be room for brief incidents with immediate recovery and repentance while serving in leadership. Provided there isn’t a pattern of disqualifying conduct, attitudes, or violations of requirements given in 1 Timothy 3, shepherds of the church have the grace necessary to recover without negatively affecting the flock’s health. The spiritual capacity of leadership is largely contingent upon its reputation, training, and maturity to satisfy biblical requirements and its character obligations. People who obtain a calling of leadership are not to enter ministry lightly. It is a sacred responsibility to shepherd the people of God as caretakers of their faith and practice. While today, pastors and elders often carry out their responsibilities at a distance from the flock, they do function with partial eligibility among closer relationships within smaller concentric circles of influence and accountability. Elders or bishops and deacons that see to the affairs of the church aside from pastoral work maintain their duties in ministry according to what they’re gifted to perform and accomplish. Their reach within the church should encompass the entire flock as shepherds who oversee congregants never permit the loss of even a single sheep. Each person’s sanctification is precious before God, and the shepherd’s responsibility is to care for His flock to the last person.

The final reading of The Master’s Plan for the Church includes subject matter about elders and deacons. Questions about their definition and qualifications around the gender of people as male and female are answered from a biblical approach to understand church leadership further. The general reading of Scripture to understand Apostle Paul’s writing about Elders and Deacons, whether male or female, serves as a codified spiritual authority concerning the health and development of the church. The details concerning elders and deacons revolve around their responsibilities and functions. As their relationships with one another are understood, boundaries are set to which church leaders conform to a biblical leadership model consistent with God’s interests for his people. The eligibility of leaders as elders and deacons is subject to a grounding of who they are as male or female. Two genders are explicitly and biologically formed and created as defined by Creator God according to the authority of His word through the biblical authors throughout the canon of holy Scripture.

In narrative form, Paul wrote to his disciple Timothy about the role of an elder. It is not an outline or a list of requirements but a descriptive letter with a rationale about their responsibilities. Specifically, elders possess the authority to oversee the affairs of the local church. As described before, the spiritual qualifications of elders are described in 1 Timothy 3:2, while 1 Timothy 5:17 clearly articulates their functions to include teaching and preaching. While these are performative functions, MacArthur observes that the remaining qualifications are related to individual character traits. There are subordinate activities to teaching and preaching that are instructive, and what elders do as a matter of faith and practice includes prayer and study. Without direct inference to worship, fellowship, or outreach and evangelism, elders appear to concentrate on these two areas of teaching and preaching as an outflow of prayer and study. Inherent among the responsibilities of an elder include the formation of policy and allocation of resources (Acts 15:22) while serving as caretakers who oversee the church (Acts 20:28). While serving as shepherds, elders rule over the church (1 Tim 5:17) and ordain people to service while carrying out interpersonal responsibilities that involve exhortation, refutation, and rebuke those who contradict biblical doctrine (Titus 1:9).

MacArthur’s views about the qualifications of men who exclusively serve as elders in the church align with what Paul explicitly wrote. Without specific Scriptural or principled reference, he asserts that men as elders manage their “household” well (1 Tim 3:5), including the “extended family, servants, lands, possessions, many in-laws, and other relatives.” Furthermore, MacArthur wrote, “If he is in debt, if his children are rebellious, or if his business affairs are not above reproach, he cannot be an elder.”1 Whereas by this standard, nearly every elder serving in the evangelical church today is not qualified to serve in such as capacity. For example, male leaders as elders who hold positions of authority cannot service a mortgage, and by extension, neither can a church itself finance its interests to operate. To this standard, those who have paid off mortgages or paid for their homes are suitable as elders. To hold to this standard would without question shrink the number of churches and their size throughout all traditions of Christendom today.

Further elaboration on MacArthur’s views could be helpful about “if his children are rebellious” as a disqualifier. All children are rebellious—some more than others. Whether internally, externally, or both, during spiritually formative years, youth in adolescence infers that parents who guide their children to faith cannot serve as elders. Or parents with children who have disabilities are not qualified to serve, either, as children must somehow show verifiable and authentic faith. John Piper is a board member of Desiring God Ministries and The Gospel Coalition. At the same time, his son Abraham Piper, John Piper’s son, is an avowed atheist in spiritual rebellion against his father’s household, extended or otherwise. John Piper is a speaking participant in the forthcoming Puritan conference at Grace Community Church. There are literally millions of additional examples among local evangelical and reformed churches and, more broadly, various organizations and institutions led by admired and faithful shepherds (such as John Piper). Further Scriptural rationale and support are necessary to understand better and accept qualifications in this regard from a biblical perspective (such as Levitical principles of the old covenant that extends to the church under grace by the new covenant). In everything, biblical adherence to faith and practice is necessary from root meaning as intended.

The remainder of the reading within The Master’s Plan for the Church includes sections about deacons. As deacon responsibilities are a subset of elders, there are personal and spiritual characteristics that describe and overlap what their qualifications are. Personal character traits of a deacon include a dignified stature (venerable, honorable, reputable, grave, serious, and stately), temperate, consistent, and righteous communication, and sober while unattracted to the pursuit of wealth.

Spiritually, four qualification areas are biblically defined through Paul’s instructions to the early church. First, a deacon understands and accepts the truth of Scripture and applies it to daily life. Second, deacons must be beyond reproach. Third, deacons must be morally pure to exclusively Scriptural standards. Finally, a deacon must manage their children and own households well (1 Tim 3:12). Not marginally with equivocation but managed well.

Apostle Paul wrote that female deacons are scripturally permitted within the church. By inference and examples of historical figures who served in that capacity, it is recognized that deaconesses who serve without the authority of overseers or teachers with instructional authority can serve in positions of value within the church. The Scriptural standards of leadership within the church are very high as pioneered by the early church formed throughout early Christianity. As the ministry of leadership is a high calling, the sanctification and spiritual development of God’s people must be shepherded by people who are wholly eligible and qualified according to what God has decreed through His biblical writers.

____________________
[1] William Arndt et al., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 1081.
[2] Ibid. Cl 1 Cl = 1 Clement—List 1, Just. Just(in) , II a.d.—List 5, Iren. Iren. = Irenaeus, Haereses, II a.d.—List 5, Harv. Harv. = WHarvey; s. Iren.—List 5, Orig Orig , var. works, II–III a.d.—List 5, Hippol Hippol , II–III a.d.—List 5.
[3] John F. MacArthur Jr., The Master’s Plan for the Church (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2008), 212-214.


Continue Reading ·

Framework of Prototypical Intent

When following the apostle Paul in the book of Acts during his journeys to Asia Minor, it became apparent there were numerous synagogues he visited. Well before that, extending back into the intertestamental period and through the life of Christ, the synagogues of second-temple Israel were among Jewish populations throughout Mediterranean territories. They were gathering locations formed to provide various functions in the delivery of community services rooted in Judaism. The structure and organization of the synagogue were roughly common regardless of its geographical position as its purpose and similarities were centered on relationships among Jewish and God-fearing people. Moreover, the relationship of the Jewish members of a local synagogue appears to be deeply grounded in devotion to Yahweh according to tradition and covenant responsibilities as given by the Torah, the prophets, the writings, wisdom literature, and historical predecessors of influence within Judaism.

Functions

Activities surrounding the functional purpose of a synagogue were numerous. A synagogue operates as a Judaic community center that provides religious instruction with two areas of primary activity. Scripture reading and prayer together constituted the communicative activity between Yahweh and His people. Whether through Scripture by scrolls kept at a synagogue or from prayers, benedictions, and maledictions that were offered together before Yahweh, the Jewish people were socially together in congregations of fellowship and common belief.

Depending upon respective areas of concentration, a synagogue served as a site that operated as a Judaic community center. From the intertestamental period to first-century Judea and beyond, it was of significant influence as it continued to operate in service of Jewish communities. It served as an institution for religious instruction, it operated as a facility for meetings, and it functioned as a court for judgment and discipline. The local synagogue hosted students for academic work and school life.

Synagogue Recitals of Blessings & Woe

The Eighteen Tefillah of Shemoneh Esre (Amidah)

  1. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, Our God and God of our fathers, God of Abraham, God of Isaac, and God of Jacob, the great, mighty, and revered God, God Most High, who art the Creator of heaven and earth, our Shield and the Shield of our fathers, our confidence from generation to generation. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, the Shield of Abraham!
  2. Thou art mighty, who bringest low the proud, strong, and He that judgeth the ruthless, that liveth forever, that raiseth the dead, that maketh the wind to blow, that sendeth down the dew; that sustaineth the living, that quickeneth the dead; in the twinkling of an eye Thou makest salvation to spring forth for us. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who quickenest the dead!
  3. Holy art Thou and Thy Name is to be feared, and there is no God beside Thee. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, the holy God!
  4. O favor us, our Father, with knowledge from Thyself and understanding and discernment from Thy Torah. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who vouchsafest knowledge!
  5. Cause us to return, O Lord, unto Thee, and let us return anew [in repentance] in our days as in the former time. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who delightest in repentance.
  6. Forgive us, our Father, for we have sinned against Thee; blot out and cause our transgressions to pass from before Thine eyes, for great is Thy mercy. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who dost abundantly forgive!
  7. Look upon our affliction and plead our cause, and redeem us for the sake of Thy Name. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, the Redeemer of Israel!
  8. Heal us, O Lord our God, from the pain of our heart; and weariness and sighing do Thou cause to pass away from us; and cause Thou to rise up healing for our wounds. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who healest the sick of Thy people Israel!
  9. Bless for us, O Lord our God, this year for our welfare, with every kind of the produce thereof, and bring near speedily the year of the end of our redemption; and give dew and rain upon the face of the earth and satisfy the world from the treasuries of Thy goodness, and do Thou give a blessing upon the work of our hands. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who blessest the years!
  10. Blow the great horn for our liberation, and lift a banner to gather our exiles. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who gatherest the dispersed of Thy people Israel!
  11. Restore our judges as at the first, and our counselors as at the beginning; and reign Thou over us, Thou alone. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who lovest judgment!
  12. For apostates let there be no hope, and the dominion of arrogance [Rome] do Thou speedily root out in our days; and let the Nazarenes [Christians] and the heretics perish as in a moment, let them be blotted out of the book of the living and let them not be written with the righteous. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who humblest the arrogant!
  13. Towards the righteous proselytes may Thy tender mercies be stirred; and bestow a good reward upon us together with those that do Thy will. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, the trust of the righteous!
  14. Be merciful, O Lord our God, in Thy great mercy towards Israel Thy people, and towards Jerusalem Thy City, and towards Zion the abiding place of Thy glory, and towards Thy glory, and towards Thy temple and Thy habitation, and towards the kingdom of the house of David, Thy righteous anointed one. Blessed art Thou, O God, God of David, the Builder of Jerusalem!
  15. Hear, O Lord our God, the sound of our prayer and have mercy upon us, for a God gracious and merciful art Thou. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who hearest prayer!
  16. Accept us, O Lord our God, and dwell in Zion; and may Thy servants serve Thee in Jerusalem. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, whom in reverent fear we serve!
  17. We give thanks to Thee, who art the Lord our God and the God of our fathers, for all the good things, the lovingkindness, and the mercy which Thou hast wrought and done with us and with our fathers before us: and if we said, Our feet slip, Thy lovingkindness, O Lord, upheld us. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, unto whom it is good to give thanks!
  18. Bestow Thy peace upon Israel Thy people and upon Thy city and upon Thine inheritance and bless us, all of us together. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, who makest peace!

Services

The influence a local synagogue had on Jewish life was most pronounced through its formation, activity, and how it was organized. Members of the synagogue were members of the community who also had social and market influence. Their attendance and participation had a bearing on trade, work, and daily life within the community. Their interpersonal and social obligations originated from principles taught and heard through the reading of Scripture within the local synagogue, and certainly more contemporary at the time through instruction whether oral or written. The study of Scripture and its audible intake made a lasting impression to inform beliefs and daily conduct. The absorption of God’s instructions through the Torah and other books of the Old Testament also shaped member’s views, adorations, and petitions as uttered by their prayers to Yahweh.

____________

  1. Everett Ferguson, Backgrounds of Early Christianity, Third Edition. (Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2003), 578–579.

Continue Reading ·