Tag Archives | calvin

The Institutes: Prolegomena

In the turbulent backdrop of the 16th-century Reformation, a profound voice emerged that would shape the contours of Protestant theology for generations to come. In his seminal work “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” John Calvin (1509–1564) embarked on an ambitious journey to elucidate the Christian faith in its entirety. “Institutes of the Christian Religion” is Calvin’s magnum opus and represents one of the most comprehensive and systematic presentations of Protestant theology during the Reformation. Initially published in 1536, Calvin revised and expanded it in several editions, with the final version appearing in 1559.

Introduction

The narrative of the “Institutes” begins with the human quest for knowledge. Calvin underscores that knowledge of oneself and knowledge of God are intertwined. But how can finite humans comprehend the infinite? The magnificence of creation, for Calvin, acts as a mirror, reflecting the divine attributes of the Creator. Yet, this reflection is marred by humanity’s fallen state. Sin clouds our natural faculties, leading us to suppress or distort this knowledge. Still, Calvin delves into the profound tragedy of the Fall. Adam and Eve’s rebellion in the Garden of Eden plunged humanity into a state of total depravity. Every facet of the human being—mind, will, emotions—is now tainted by sin. We are alienated from God, ensnared by death, and incapable of achieving righteousness by our efforts.

But the story doesn’t end in despair. Into this bleak tableau enters Jesus Christ—the Redeemer. Calvin paints Christ as the mediator, bridging the Holy God and sinful humanity. Christ atones for sin, defeats death, and offers reconciliation through His sacrificial death on the cross and triumphant resurrection. It’s a cosmic redemption story where love, justice, and mercy converge. So how does one partake in this redemptive act? Calvin emphatically speaks of faith – Not just intellectual assent, but a deep, heartfelt trust in Christ’s redemptive work. It’s through faith that we are justified—declared righteous before God. This is the heart of Calvin’s soteriology: justification by faith alone, apart from works. Yet, faith isn’t stagnant; it’s the starting point of sanctification—the lifelong process where believers gradually conform to Christ’s image.

Calvin’s work ventures into the communal dimension of faith. For Calvin, faith isn’t merely an individual endeavor; it thrives within the community of believers—the Church. Described as the body of Christ, the Church is where the Word of God is proclaimed, and the sacraments (baptism and the Lord’s Supper) are celebrated. These sacraments act as visible signs of invisible grace, anchors that tether believers to the promises of God. So as the believer journeys through life, Calvin emphasizes the importance of prayer as a means of communion with God. Moreover, he acknowledges the challenges and tribulations that believers often face. However, with the assurance of God’s providence, believers can navigate these challenges, confident that everything, even suffering, is under God’s sovereign control.

The narrative concludes with a reflection on the Christian’s role in society. While church and state are distinct realms, both are divinely instituted. The Christian, therefore, has duties toward both. Calvin envisions a harmonious relationship between the two, with civil government maintaining societal order and the church nurturing spiritual life. So, in the vast tapestry of the “Institutes,” Calvin weaves a grand narrative of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation. Through meticulous exegesis and profound theological insights, he invites readers on a transformative journey to the heart of the Christian faith—a journey that transcends the annals of history and beckons souls toward eternity. Through the “Institutes,” Calvin didn’t merely pen a theological treatise; he crafted a narrative that encapsulates the Christian odyssey from the depths of sin to the heights of glory. Its echoes of grace continue to resonate in the corridors of time, beckoning every reader to the boundless love of God.

Background

Born Jean Cauvin in Noyon, France, Calvin grew up in a devout Catholic family. He was initially groomed for a career in the Church and went on to study Latin and humanities at the Collège de la Marche in Paris. Later, Calvin shifted his focus to law at the behest of his father, studying in Orléans and Bourges. While in Paris, Calvin was introduced to Renaissance humanism, which emphasized the value of classical learning and the study of the original biblical texts.

John Calvin’s father, Gérard Cauvin, was an attorney and a notary who worked for the local cathedral in Noyon, France. Gérard played a pivotal role in Calvin’s early education, intending for John to enter into the priesthood. He secured a chaplaincy for his young son, which funded John’s education. However, due to a conflict with the local bishop, Gérard advised John to study law instead of theology. Calvin’s mother, Jeanne le Franc, was known for her piety. Little is documented about her, but she bore several children before her premature death. John was very young at the time of her death, and the loss may have profoundly impacted him.

While John Calvin had several brothers and sisters, a few are noteworthy here. Charles Cauvin, one of Calvin’s brothers, followed a career in the church but faced excommunication due to his alignment with Protestant beliefs. He died in 1537. Another brother, Antoine Cauvin, joined John in Geneva and played a supportive role in his life. He worked in various capacities in the city, including as a clerk. While not much is known about Calvin’s sisters, it’s known that Marie Cauvin, one of his sisters, took refuge in Geneva following the rise of Protestant persecution in France.

In 1540, after residing in Strasbourg, Calvin married Idelette de Bure, a widow with children from her first marriage. Idelette was originally an Anabaptist but converted to Calvin’s Reformed theology. Their marriage was described as affectionate and supportive, with Idelette often aiding refugees and being actively involved in the life of the church. The couple had one child together, but the child died in infancy. Idelette’s passing in 1549 deeply affected Calvin, and he never remarried. While the exact number of Idelette’s children from her first marriage is not well-documented, it’s known that she had children from her first marriage, whom Calvin adopted as his own after their union.

Understanding Calvin’s familial ties and personal relationships offers a more holistic view of the man. His relationships, particularly the deaths of close family members, may have shaped his theological understanding of suffering, God’s providence, and the human condition. Although often overshadowed by his public persona, Calvin’s family and personal life provide a poignant backdrop against which his immense theological contributions can be more deeply understood.

In the early 1530s, Calvin was forced to flee Paris due to rising anti-Protestant sentiment in France. After a brief stay in Basel, Switzerland, Calvin intended to settle in Strasbourg. However, political and military obstacles led him to Geneva. In Geneva, Calvin was soon recruited by local reformer Guillaume Farel to assist in the city’s nascent Protestant Reformation. Though Calvin initially resisted, he eventually agreed and quickly became a leading figure in the movement. His time in Geneva was not without challenges. Differences in religious and social views led to Calvin’s expulsion from the city in 1538. However, he returned in 1541 and remained there for the rest of his life, during which he established a theocratic governance system.

Calvin’s influence persisted long after his death. The Reformed churches and various Protestant denominations can trace their roots to his teachings. Though often associated primarily with his doctrine of predestination, Calvin’s thought encompasses a wide range of theological, ecclesiastical, and social issues, making him one of the most influential Christian theologians in history.

Roman Catholicism

The Christian reform movement in the 16th century challenged the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrines and practices. Calvin’s thoughts on theology, ecclesiology, and social issues have profoundly influenced Protestantism, shaping a tradition known as Reformed theology. And by the mid-1530s, Calvin experienced what he described as a “sudden conversion.” The exact nature of this conversion remains a matter of debate among historians, but its result was clear: Calvin embraced the Protestant cause, distancing himself from the Roman Catholic Church. His theological views, crystallized in his magnum opus, “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” placed him squarely at odds with Catholic doctrine. Theological disagreements on topics like the nature of the Eucharist, the role of Church tradition, the authority of the Pope, and the doctrine of justification, to name a few, were foundational to his break with the Church.

Calvin’s association with the city of Geneva exemplified his definitive break from the Roman Catholic Church. In Geneva, Calvin aimed to create a godly city-state where every aspect of life, both public and private, aligned with Scriptural teachings. His ecclesiastical ordinances instituted a form of church government and discipline sharply distinct from the Catholic model. Calvin’s rigorous moral and doctrinal standards sometimes put him at odds even with the city’s residents, but they unmistakably distinguished Genevan Protestantism from Roman Catholicism.

Throughout his ministry, Calvin engaged in polemical writings against the Catholic Church. He criticized what he viewed as superstitious practices, corrupt clergy, and erroneous doctrines. His stance made him a significant target for Catholic apologists. The Council of Trent (1545-1563), the Catholic Church’s answer to the Reformation, denounced several Protestant teachings, including many of Calvin’s key doctrines. Calvin, not one to remain silent, responded with his writings, defending the Reformed faith against Catholic hostilities. Calvin’s relationship with the Roman Catholic Church was undoubtedly adversarial. Yet, viewing it within the broader context of the 16th-century religious upheaval is essential. To Calvin, his disagreements with the Church were not about mere theological nitpicking; they were about the essence of the Gospel and the salvation of souls. The Roman Catholic Church, on the other hand, viewed Calvin (and other Reformers) as schismatics, challenging the unity of Christendom and leading many astray with their teachings.

In the end, John Calvin’s status with the Roman Catholic Church can be summarized as that of a profound reformer, a staunch critic, and an unwavering advocate for what he believed was the pure, apostolic Christianity—a Christianity he argued had been obscured by the Roman Catholic Church of his day.

Eastern Orthodoxy

In contrast to Calvin’s historical background with the Roman Catholic Church, his relationship with the Eastern Orthodox Church (often called the Orthodox Church) is less pronounced in his writings and actions. The Protestant Reformation primarily unfolded in Western Europe, where the Roman Catholic Church dominated. Eastern Orthodoxy was primarily in the eastern regions of Europe and the Near East. Thus, there was less direct contact between Reformation leaders like Calvin and the Orthodox Church than the Roman Catholic Church.

Calvin and the Orthodox Church had some overlapping criticisms of the Roman Catholic Church, especially concerning certain late medieval practices and the role of the papacy. While both Calvin and the Orthodox tradition held a high view of the early church councils and the Nicene Creed, there were still significant theological differences. The Orthodox Church did not adhere to the Reformed emphases on doctrines like predestination or sola scriptura in the way Calvin articulated them. Also, the nature of the Eucharist, liturgical practices, and church governance would have been points of divergence.

Calvin’s writings contain relatively few explicit references to the Eastern Orthodox Church. Where references exist, they are often lumped in with broader discussions about the “ancient church” or early church fathers rather than a distinct engagement with Orthodoxy as a separate tradition. It’s worth noting that later Reformed theologians and representatives interacted with the Orthodox Church. For instance, in the early 17th century, Cyril Lucaris, the Patriarch of Constantinople, showed a strong interest in Reformed theology. However, his views and subsequent declarations were highly controversial within the Orthodox context and were ultimately condemned by the Orthodox Church.

While Calvin’s primary theological and ecclesiastical engagements were with the Roman Catholic Church and other Protestant groups, his relationship with the Eastern Orthodox Church was more peripheral. His limited engagement with Orthodoxy was a function of geography, historical context, and the pressing religious debates of his day.

Prefatory Address – 1536

In the opening to Calvin’s “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” he wrote an address to King Francis I of France in 1536. This introductory letter is more than just a simple introduction; it is a profound defense of the Reformed faith and an appeal for religious tolerance. In its historical context, the address should be understood against the backdrop of the religious tensions of the time. The Protestant Reformation had been spreading rapidly across Europe, and in France, those who subscribed to Reformed views (often pejoratively called “Huguenots”) faced severe persecution. King Francis I, while initially showing some leniency towards the Lutherans, began to take a harder stance against Protestantism as the movement grew in influence and as political pressures mounted.

Calvin’s primary aim in writing to Francis I was twofold. First to defend the Reformed faith against accusations of heresy and sedition, and second to appeal to the king for protection and fair treatment of the French Protestants. As the purpose of his appeal was comprehensive, he wrote of specifics concerning various misunderstandings, the true church, the authority of Scripture, accusations against believers in Christ, religious tolerance, and personal respect.

Calvin expressed concern that the king had been misinformed about the beliefs and intentions of the Reformed believers. He sought to clear up misunderstandings and to counteract the negative propaganda spread by their adversaries. Calvin asserted that the true Church is where the Word of God is rightly preached and the sacraments are rightly administered. By this definition, he argued, the Reformed believers should be recognized as a legitimate part of the Church, not as heretics. A cornerstone of Calvin’s argument is the supreme authority of Scripture. He emphasized that the doctrines he and other Reformers teach are rooted in the Bible, not innovations. This was in contrast to the Roman Catholic Church, which Calvin argued had deviated from scriptural truths.

Calvin refuted accusations of sedition and political revolt. He emphasized that the Reformed faith teaches obedience to rulers and authorities, and the goal of the Reformers is spiritual reformation, not political upheaval. So Calvin implored Francis I to show leniency and protect the Protestants from unjust persecutions. He argues that the use of force in matters of faith contradicts the spirit of Christianity and appeals to the king’s sense of justice. Throughout the address, Calvin maintained a tone of respect for the king. While he firmly defended the Reformed faith, he acknowledged Francis I’s authority and position. While Calvin’s appeal was eloquent and impassioned, it did little to change the immediate situation for French Protestants. Persecutions continued, and the divide between the Roman Catholic Church and the burgeoning Reformed movement in France deepened. However, from a broader historical perspective, Calvin’s address to Francis I stands as a testament to the Reformers’ commitment to their faith and their willingness to defend their beliefs before the highest earthly authorities. It’s a snapshot of the larger struggles of the Reformation era, encapsulating the courage, convictions, and challenges of those tumultuous times.

Epistle to the Reader – 1539

In 1539, John Calvin prepared a new edition of his Institutes. This edition was more extensive than the first, representing a significant expansion and restructuring of his initial ideas. To introduce this work, Calvin wrote an “Epistle to the Reader,” which serves as an introduction to his expanded work and a summary of his theological aims and intentions. The “Epistle to the Reader” is Calvin’s introduction and contextualizes the revised “Institutes.” Having released the first edition of the Institutes in 1536, just three years prior, Calvin had already seen the need for more comprehensive teaching due to feedback and the further clarification he believed was necessary to counter various misunderstandings about Protestant beliefs.

Calvin wrote of the “Institutes,” even in its 1536 version, as a work of extensive labor. And it was not a hastily prepared document but was a product of careful reflection and engagement with Scripture. Aware of the myriad misconceptions and misrepresentations of Protestant doctrine, Calvin emphasized that a principal motive behind the revision was to clarify and systematically present the faith. His effort aimed to benefit those curious about Protestant beliefs and those who might be hostile to the Reformation. Calvin underscored that the “Institutes” was intended to be a comprehensive summation of the Protestant faith, an organized presentation of doctrines drawn from and aligned with the Bible. It wasn’t just about highlighting disagreements with the Roman Catholic Church but more about affirming a positive, scripturally-grounded theology.

Throughout the “Epistle,” Calvin alluded to the many accusations and misrepresentations about the Reformers. He hoped that this clarified and expanded edition would serve as a defense against such charges, demonstrating the scriptural fidelity and intellectual rigor of Reformed beliefs. Beyond just theological precision, there’s a pastoral undertone in Calvin’s letter. He expressed a deep concern for the spiritual well-being of his readers. Calvin desired that through understanding the true Christian doctrine, believers would grow in their faith and draw closer to God.

John Calvin's Church in Geneva Switzerland - St. Pierre Cathedral
John Calvin’s Church in Geneva Switzerland – St. Pierre Cathedral

In summary, John Calvin’s 1539 “Epistle to the Reader” is a window into the Reformer’s heart and mind as he presented a more mature version of his Institutes. It reflects Calvin’s dedication to Scripture, his desire for clarity in presenting the gospel, his defense against misconceptions, and, importantly, his pastoral concern for his readers’ spiritual health and growth. The “Epistle” sets the stage for the reader, preparing them for the deep theological exploration that follows in the body of the “Institutes.”

Preface to the French – 1545

John Calvin’s 1545 preface to the French edition of the Institutes is a particularly notable piece of Reformation literature. This preface is often referred to as the “Dedication to King Francis I” or simply the “Preface to King Francis,” as it is directed towards the King of France. This preface is different from the original one penned in the 1536 Latin edition, and its significance lies not just in its theological exposition but also in its political and cultural implications. In the mid-16th century, Protestants in France, who came to be known as Huguenots, were experiencing increasing persecution. King Francis I, initially somewhat tolerant of Protestant views due to political reasons, began taking a harder stance against them as they grew in influence. This preface can be seen as Calvin’s attempt to advocate for French Protestants, seeking a reprieve from their mistreatment.

In defense of the Protestant faith,Calvin again asserted that the beliefs of the French Protestants were neither seditious nor heretical. He emphasizes the Biblical foundation of their doctrines and disputes the charges of novelty frequently levied against them. He recognized that the king had been surrounded by advisors who maligned the Protestants, and Calvin endeavored to correct the misconceptions. He argued against the idea that the Reformers were stirring up political rebellion or that their teachings were radically new or dangerous. While he acknowledged the king’s authority in civil matters, Calvin subtly challenged the idea that civil rulers should control individual consciences or dictate religious beliefs.

One of the primary aims of this preface was to urge King Francis I to show leniency to the Protestants. Calvin made a case for religious freedom, implying that threats or violence could not force true faith. Despite his disagreements and implicit criticisms, Calvin maintained a respectful tone. He again addressed the king with deference, recognizing his authority and hoping to sway him through reasoned argument rather than confrontation. In addressing the king, Calvin also offered a brief overview of Protestant beliefs. This served as a defense and an evangelistic effort, hoping perhaps to convince the monarch of the truth of the Reformed faith.

The 1545 preface to the French edition of the “Institutes” is a masterful blend of theology, apologetics, and diplomacy. While Calvin’s immediate plea for tolerance was not heeded (persecutions continued and even intensified), this document remains a testament to the Reformers’ commitment to their faith, their willingness to defend their beliefs even before the highest earthly authorities, and their passion for the clarity and truth of the Gospel.

Epistle to the Reader – 1559

John Calvin’s 1559 “Epistle to the Reader” is his final and most comprehensive edition of the “Institutes.” By this time, the “Institutes” had become not only the foundational text for Reformed Protestantism but also one of the most significant theological works of the Protestant Reformation. This final version is more extensive, detailed, and polished than the preceding versions.

Calvin acknowledged how the Institutes have grown over the years. Initially intended as a basic manual for those unfamiliar with the faith, it transformed into a thorough compendium of Reformed doctrine. Calvin spoke about the multiple editions and expansions, with the 1559 version culminating his efforts. His ongoing objective was to elucidate the beliefs of the Reformation in contrast to the misunderstandings and misconceptions propagated against them. By 1559, the Institutes had become an exhaustive defense and exposition of Reformed beliefs rooted in Biblical interpretation. Calvin consistently reflected upon pastoral concerns throughout his writings. His primary goal was always the spiritual edification of his readers. He wanted Christians to deeply understand their faith, leading to a closer relationship with God. This pastoral impulse is evident in the 1559 “Epistle,” where he underscores the practical application of theology.

The 1559 edition was carefully structured to provide a more systematic presentation of Reformed theology. Calvin highlighted this structure, guiding the reader through the logical progression of topics, which mirrors the Apostle’s Creed’s structure. This structure comprises knowledge of God the Creator, knowledge of God the Redeemer in Christ, the means of receiving Christ’s grace, and the effects of Christ’s redemption. Calvin wrote in this “Epistle” that the 1559 edition was the final version of the Institutes. While he never ceased studying and reflecting on God’s Word, this edition represented his mature and considered theology. Throughout his ministry, Calvin faced opposition from various quarters, including Catholics, Anabaptists, and other Protestant factions. The Institutes, particularly this final edition, served as a robust defense of Reformed doctrine against these detractors.

The 1559 epistle encapsulated Calvin’s purpose and hopes for the Institutes. While he was a systematic theologian of the highest order, Calvin was also a pastor at heart, deeply concerned with the spiritual well-being of Christians. This dual focus on rigorous theology and pastoral concern is evident throughout the Institutes, and the epistle serves as a fitting introduction to this monumental work. Calvin’s dedication to clarity, Biblical fidelity, and the edification of the Church has ensured that the Institutes remains a significant theological work to this day.

Credal Alignment

As John Calvin’s “Institutes” underwent several editions during his lifetime, the final and most comprehensive edition was published in 1559. This edition was systematically structured to mirror the Apostles’ Creed, which is a concise statement of the Christian faith. Calvin didn’t necessarily intend for the “Institutes” to be a direct commentary on the Apostles’ Creed, but the thematic connection is clear. A prominent Reformed theologian, Caspar Olevianus (or Olevian), recognized this structural alignment with the Apostles’ Creed in Calvin’s “Institutes.”

To understand the alignment, let’s first look at Calvin’s organizational structure:

  1. Book I – The Knowledge of God the Creator
  2. Book II – The Knowledge of God the Redeemer in Christ, First Disclosed to the Fathers Under the Law, and Then to Us in the Gospel
  3. Book III – How We Receive the Grace of Christ: What Benefits Come to Us from It, and What Effects Follow
  4. Book IV – The External Means or Helps by Which God Invites Us Into the Society of Christ and Holds Us Therein

Now, aligning this with the Apostles’ Creed:

  1. “I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth.” This corresponds with Book I of the “Institutes,” focusing on the knowledge of God as Creator.
  2. “And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary,” And so on through the sections on Christ’s death, resurrection, and ascension – This can be seen in Book II, which concentrates on Christ as Redeemer.
  3. “I believe in the Holy Spirit,” Leading into the benefits of Christ’s work – This aligns with Book III, exploring how believers receive the grace of Christ and its benefits.
  4. “The holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting.” This fits with Book IV, which deals with the external means (like the Church and sacraments) that God employs to keep believers in communion with Christ.

While Calvin didn’t write the “Institutes” as a direct exposition of the Apostles’ Creed, the alignment is evident. Olevianus, familiar with the “Institutes” and the Creed, would have recognized this thematic and structural parallelism. This observation is crucial because it illustrates how Reformed theology, as articulated by Calvin, was deeply rooted in the broader Christian tradition. The Creed served as a foundational touchstone of orthodoxy, and Calvin’s alignment with it in the “Institutes” underscores his commitment to the essential truths of Christianity.

The Plight of Linearity

The meaning of the sovereign redemption of humanity by YHWH through His Son Jesus the Messiah originates from Scripture. Among various Christian doctrinal systems or denominations, we are today more aware of the differences between monergism and synergism which explains how and who God chooses people for honor and some for dishonor. This post concerns the TULIP acronym that briefly explains the scriptural rationale of Calvinists.

T- Total Depravity

(Total Inability)

Total Depravity is probably the most misunderstood tenet of Calvinism. When Calvinists speak of humans as “totally depraved,” they make an extensive, rather than an intensive statement. The effect of the fall upon man is that sin has extended to every part of his personality — his thinking, his emotions, and his will. Not necessarily that he is intensely sinful, but that sin has extended to his entire being.

The unregenerate (unsaved) man is dead in his sins (Romans 5:12). Without the power of the Holy Spirit, the natural man is blind and deaf to the message of the gospel (Mark 4:11f). This is why Total Depravity has also been called “Total Inability.” The man without a knowledge of God will never come to this knowledge without God’s making him alive through Christ (Ephesians 2:1-5).

U- Unconditional Election

Unconditional Election is the doctrine that states that God chose those whom he was pleased to bring to a knowledge of himself, not based upon any merit shown by the object of his grace and not based upon his looking forward to discovering who would “accept” the offer of the gospel. God has elected, based solely upon the counsel of his own will, some for glory and others for damnation (Romans 9:15,21). He has done this act before the foundations of the world (Ephesians 1:4-8).

This doctrine does not rule out, however, man’s responsibility to believe in the redeeming work of God the Son (John 3:16-18). Scripture presents a tension between God’s sovereignty in salvation, and man’s responsibility to believe which it does not try to resolve. Both are true — to deny man’s responsibility is to affirm an unbiblical hyper-Calvinism; to deny God’s sovereignty is to affirm an unbiblical Arminianism.

The elect is saved unto good works (Ephesians 2:10). Thus, though good works will never bridge the gulf between man and God that was formed in the Fall, good works are a result of God’s saving grace. This is what Peter means when he admonishes the Christian reader to make his “calling” and “election” sure (2 Peter 1:10). Bearing the fruit of good works is an indication that God has sown seeds of grace in fertile soil.

L- Limited Atonement

(Particular Redemption)

Limited Atonement is a doctrine offered in answer to the question, “for whose sins did Christ atone?” The Bible teaches that Christ died for those whom God gave him to save (John 17:9). Christ died, indeed, for many people, but not all (Matthew 26:28). Specifically, Christ died for the invisible Church — the sum total of all those who would ever rightly bear the name “Christian” (Ephesians 5:25).

This doctrine often finds many objections, mostly from those who think that Limited Atonement does damage to evangelism. We have already seen that Christ will not lose any that the Father has given to him (John 6:37). Christ’s death was not a death of potential atonement for all people. Believing that Jesus’ death was a potential, symbolic atonement for anyone who might possibly, in the future, accept him trivializes Christ’s act of atonement. Christ died to atone for specific sins of specific sinners. Christ died to make holy the church. He did not atone for all men, because obviously all men are not saved. Evangelism is actually lifted up in this doctrine, for the evangelist may tell his congregation that Christ died for sinners and that he will not lose any of those for whom he died!

I- Irresistible Grace

The result of God’s Irresistible Grace is the certain response by the elect to the inward call of the Holy Spirit, when the outward call is given by the evangelist or minister of the Word of God. Christ, himself, teaches that all whom God has elected will come to a knowledge of him (John 6:37). Men come to Christ in salvation when the Father calls them (John 6:44), and the very Spirit of God leads God’s beloved to repentance (Romans 8:14). What a comfort it is to know that the gospel of Christ will penetrate our hard, sinful hearts and wondrously save us through the gracious inward call of the Holy Spirit (I Peter 5:10)!

P- Perseverance of the Saints

Perseverance of the Saints is a doctrine that states that the saints (those whom God has saved) will remain in God’s hand until they are glorified and brought to abide with him in heaven. Romans 8:28-39 makes it clear that when a person truly has been regenerated by God, he will remain in God’s stead. The work of sanctification that God has brought about in his elect will continue until it reaches its fulfillment in eternal life (Phil. 1:6). Christ assures the elect that he will not lose them and that they will be glorified at the “last day” (John 6:39). The Calvinist stands upon the Word of God and trusts in Christ’s promise that he will perfectly fulfill the will of the Father in saving all the elect.