Upon completion of the book O Sacred Head, Now Wounded, it has been about four months of liturgy in a structured format, the same as followed with the books O Come, O Come, Emmanuel, and Be Thou My Vision. Just as the other books published by Crossway are devotional compilations of materials of common form, they are thoroughly helpful in enriching prayer, worship, instruction, and immersion into Scripture. This book, like the others, is a work of beautiful material that brings together liturgical content and interest from various Patristic, Puritan, Reformed, and Baptist traditions. The book is 484 pages in length, and it’s meant for daily use over a period of 48 days.
The book O Sacred Head, Now Wounded is ordered so that a believer delves into areas of seasonal interest. More specifically, the subject matter goes beyond standard evangelical reading, as more attention is paid to daily worship from Pascha to Pentecost.
Introduction
As with Be Thou My Vision and O Come, O Come Emmanuel, the point of the liturgy in this text is to engage in the material, not as a passive reading for contemplation and understanding, but to engage in areas given to include the following:
Worship
Adoration
Reading of the Law
Confession of Sin
Assurance of Pardon
Recitation of Creeds
Praise
Catechism
Prayer for Illumination
Scripture Reading
Prayer for Intercession
Further Petition
The Lord’s Prayer
In order, each meaning is not strictly ritualistic but complementary to what private or personal connection is made to God as a believer in Christ Jesus. It invites the participant to learn and follow as a disciple devoted to God by the Spirit. This is not ritualism. It is an ordered way of daily worship, instruction, prayer, and spiritual formation. As an instrument of sanctification, consistent immersion in devotion by this form aids in personal spiritual development directed to the glory of God. As a God-centered devotional, personal experience for comfort, satisfaction, and confidence is a secondary benefit.
Worship & Adoration
The distinction between worship and adoration is between scripture and prayer. The call to worship is hearing God’s summons to you through His Word. In this way, the Psalms, or scripture passages that magnify God’s glory, are followed by ready exultation of who He is and what He has done. While adoration is a heart proclamation by the prayers of saints, historical church fathers, Patristics, and Puritans, including the Book of Common Prayer, the devotional participant enters into prayer with them to propagate the adoration through prayers day by day.
Reading of the Law, Confession & Pardon
To acknowledge and confess personal sin, it is necessary to be specific about it. The frame of reference is the standards, requirements, and the law of God as given in the Old and New Testaments. To recognize one’s personal sin, the reading of the law from scripture must be followed and accepted to facilitate confession and repentance. With this confession, scripture reading is followed concerning the assurance of pardon. These are words of comfort received from God.
The Creeds
The Apostles’ Creed, Athanasian Creed, and Nicene Creed are recited to confess orthodox views and proclamations of the Christian faith. The creeds from many centuries ago are read out loud to express belief in what God revealed in His Word, holy scripture. Within the book O Sacred Head, Now Wounded, the creeds are alternated and repeated to verbalize them for mental and spiritual intake each day to reinforce scripturally grounded understanding and acceptance of doctrine and orthodoxy to keep from falling into error or heresy.
Praise & Catechism
Once this far along in the daily devotion, the believer’s attention is turned to singing or verbal utterance of praise to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This is the Gloria Patri from the 3rd-5th century for the believer each day as affections are proclaimed with regular attendance from the heart. From earlier worship, adoration, and now praise with confession and reading in between, the spirit within is brought close to God in His presence for continued devotion. After this point, the heart and mind of the believer are directed to the catechism of the catholic and reformed faith. The Heidelberg and Westminster Shorter Catechisms (1647) are read in a sequence of questions and answers corresponding to faith and practice. In alignment with scripture and proper theological doctrines, a few questions are answered for weeks over time to intake morsels of truth for overall certainty and retention. The originates from the canon of biblical truth.
Prayer for Illumination
Prayer for an enlightened heart and mind is repeated each day in a structured way. Only from the words of historical figures Godly by the testimony of their lives and historical work. These are the prayers of people. Saints and divines who lived long ago by the grace of God to encourage, instruct, and abide in Christ among fellow believers. These prayers also come from the ancient Book of Common Prayer, where the plea for illumination remains in continuity to prior days in a structured way. This area of prayer further supports and reinforces personal prayer to ensure your thoughts and words correspond to scripture and the petitions of Godly orthodox people before modernity.
Scripture Reading
From 1835 to 1843, Robert M’Cheyne, a minister from the church of Scotland, prepared a bible reading plan that orients personal exposition through the New Testament and the Psalms twice a year and the Old Testament once yearly. While this plan includes four chapters per day, this liturgical book offers a reading from a smaller reference passage within an appendix. The M’Cheyne plan places believers within reading across New Testament and Old Testament genres to deepen and widen personal immersion within God’s Word. While this passage in the devotional corresponds to the daily time with the Lord in the M’Cheyne bible plan, you can substitute the reading plan of your choice instead.
Prayer of Intercession & Petition
To begin the prayer for personal interest and attention, this area of prayer begins with historical church fathers and prayers from a range of traditions involving Augustine, Anselm, Kempis, Chrysostom, and various others. As a prayer of intercession begins from ancient writings, the reader is invited to pray for personal needs and interests, the church, and the world. I’ve found that working from a short set of notes or a prayer list is helpful for this time within the liturgy. And if it’s not a distraction, a time of personal petition in this way set to music with incense adds to the time of intimacy. This is an ideal time to pray for your family, friends, church, and the community and widen the scope to include what’s on your heart afterward.
The Lord’s Prayer
The final area of the liturgy is the “Our Father” (the Lord’s Prayer). To be read to yourself, verbalized out loud in remembrance of how Jesus teaches us to pray. To close the liturgy speaking this prayer, not by empty utterance, but by a heart intent of love and loyalty. If you do this on your knees or bow before Him in His presence, even better.
Our Father in Heaven, hallowed be your name; your kingdom come; your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
The book Be Thou My Vision is a devotional compilation of materials structured in liturgical form. The book’s substance is ordered so that a believer delves into areas of pertinent interest. The book is 345 pages long and goes well beyond standard evangelical reading, including guided subject matter, the Word, and prayer. Over the last 31 days, I gave attention each morning to the material and immersed myself in the various segments of the liturgy as a renewed means of devotion.
Introduction
The point of the liturgy is to engage in the material, not as a passive reading for contemplation and understanding, but to engage in areas given to include the following:
Worship
Adoration
Reading of the Law
Confession of Sin
Assurance of Pardon
Recitation of Creeds
Praise
Catechism
Prayer for Illumination
Scripture Reading
Prayer for Intercession
Further Petition
The Lord’s Prayer
In order, each meaning is not strictly ritualistic but complementary to what private or personal connection is made to God as a believer in Christ Jesus. It invites the participant to learn and follow as a disciple devoted to God by the Spirit. This is not ritualism. It is an ordered way of daily worship, instruction, prayer, and spiritual formation. As an instrument of sanctification, consistent immersion in devotion by this form aids in personal spiritual development directed to the glory of God. As a God-centered devotional, personal experience for comfort, satisfaction, and confidence is a secondary benefit.
Worship & Adoration
The distinction between worship and adoration is between scripture and prayer. The call to worship is a hearing of God’s summons to you through His Word. In this way, the Psalms, or scripture passages that magnify God’s glory, are followed by ready exultation of who He is and what He has done. While adoration is a heart proclamation by the prayers of saints, historical church fathers, Patristics, and Puritans, including the Book of common prayer, the devotional participant enters into prayer with them to propagate the adoration through prayers day by day.
Reading of the Law, Confession & Pardon
To acknowledge personal sin and confess it, it is necessary to be specific about it. The frame of reference is the standards, requirements, and the law of God as given in the Old and New Testaments. To recognize one’s personal sin, the reading of the law from scripture must be followed and accepted to facilitate confession and repentance. With this confession, scripture reading is followed concerning the assurance of pardon. These are words of comfort received from God.
The Creeds
The Apostles’ Creed, Athanasian Creed, and Nicene Creed are recited to confess orthodox views and proclamations of the Christian faith. The creeds from many centuries ago are read out loud to express belief in what God revealed in His Word, holy scripture. Within the book, Be Thou My Vision, the creeds are alternated and repeated to verbalize them for mental and spiritual intake each day to reinforce scripturally grounded understanding and acceptance of doctrine and orthodoxy to keep from falling into error or heresy. To read the creeds, I have assembled and posted their statements and historical formation here.
Praise & Catechism
Once this far along in the daily devotion, the believer’s attention is turned to singing or verbal utterance of praise to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This is the Gloria Patri from the 3rd-5th century for the believer each day as affections are proclaimed with regular attendance from the heart. From earlier worship, adoration, and now praise with confession and reading in between, the spirit within is brought close to God in His presence for continued devotion. After this point, the heart and mind of the believer are directed to the catechism of the catholic and reformed faith. The Westminster Shorter Catechism (1647) is read in a sequence of questions and answers corresponding to faith and practice. In alignment with scripture and proper theological doctrines, a few questions are answered sequentially across 31 days to intake morsels of truth for overall certainty and retention. It originates from the canon of biblical truth.
Prayer for Illumination
Prayer for an enlightened heart and mind is repeated each day in a structured way. Only from the words of historical figures Godly by the testimony of their lives and historical work. These are the prayers of people. Saints and divines who lived long ago by the grace of God to encourage, instruct, and abide in Christ among fellow believers. These prayers also come from the ancient Book of common prayer, where the plea for illumination remains in continuity to prior days in a structured way. This area of prayer further supports and reinforces personal prayer to assure your thoughts and words correspond to scripture and the petitions of Godly orthodox people before modernity.
Scripture Reading
From 1835 to 1843, Robert M’Cheyne, a minister from the church of Scotland, prepared a bible reading plan that orients personal exposition through the New Testament and the Psalms twice a year and the Old Testament once yearly. While this plan includes four chapters per day, this liturgical book offers a reading from a smaller reference passage within an appendix. The M’Cheyne plan places believers within reading across New Testament and Old Testament genres to deepen and widen personal immersion within God’s Word. While this passage in the devotional corresponds to the daily time with the Lord in the M’Cheyne bible plan, you can substitute the reading plan of your choice instead.
Prayer of Intercession & Petition
To begin the prayer for personal interest and attention, this area of prayer begins with historical church fathers and prayers from a range of traditions involving Augustine, Anselm, Kempis, Chrysostom, and various others. As a prayer of intercession begins from ancient writings, the reader is invited to pray for personal needs and interests, the church, and the world. I’ve found that working from a short set of notes or a prayer list is helpful for this time within the liturgy. And if it’s not a distraction, a time of personal petition in this way set to music with incense adds to the time of intimacy. This is an ideal time to pray for your family, friends, church, and the community and widen the scope to include what’s on your heart afterward.
The Lord’s Prayer
The final area of the liturgy is the “Our Father” (the Lord’s Prayer). To be read to yourself, verbalized out loud in remembrance of how Jesus teaches us to pray. To close the liturgy speaking this prayer, not by empty utterance, but by a heart intent of love and loyalty. If you do this on your knees or bow before Him in His presence, even better.
Our Father in Heaven, hallowed be your name; your kingdom come; your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
Today, I finished reading A Basic Guide to Eastern Orthodox Theology by Dr. Eve Tibbs. Published by Baker Academic in 2021 (ISBN: 9781540960719), this book provides a structured and patristically rooted presentation of the theological foundations of the Orthodox Christian Church. It is neither a Western-style systematic theology nor written as a comparative polemic against other traditions. Rather, it is a faithful distillation of the Orthodox phronema (φρόνημα), the Church’s spiritual mindset, conveyed for the benefit of a Western audience yet consciously avoiding Western categories, formulations, and doctrinal methods. As such, it functions not as an apologetic but as a catechetical introduction, embedded within the historical and liturgical life of the Church, echoing the voice of the Fathers and conciliar witness.
Dr. Tibbs, a theologian within the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, serves both as an academic and an ecclesial catechist. Her work draws from Scripture, the conciliar tradition, patristic texts, and liturgical praxis, and it seeks to communicate Orthodoxy on its own terms. This review proceeds chapter by chapter, preserving the Eastern theological message of the book.
Chapter 1: The Orthodox Vision of Reality
Dr. Eve Tibbs begins her theological exposition by clarifying that the foundation of Orthodox theology is not merely a doctrinal system or a set of propositional truths, but a worldview—a holistic, theocentric mode of perceiving and living in the world. This worldview is rooted in communion with the Triune God and made manifest through the liturgical, sacramental, and ecclesial life of the Church.
“Returning” to the Ancient Church
Tibbs opens by addressing the increasing interest in the Eastern Orthodox Church, particularly among Western Christians seeking to reconnect with the Church of the early centuries. However, she cautions against the misconception that one can extract teachings or liturgical practices from the early Church and transplant them into modern Western Christianity. The Orthodox Church does not seek to reconstruct antiquity—it is the living continuation of the apostolic and patristic Church. As such, Orthodox theology must be encountered within the life of the Church, rather than being dissected or abstracted from it.
This point is central to the Orthodox phronema: theology is not conceived in the abstract, but always within the experience of ecclesial life. The Church is not an optional context for theology—it is the only proper context.
East and West: A Distinct Approach
Tibbs clearly explains that Orthodox theology is not simply a variant of Western theology with Eastern flavoring, but rather a distinct mode of doing theology. She refrains from polemics, but notes that Orthodoxy has a fundamentally different starting point: rather than focusing on the rational explanation of doctrine (as in Western scholasticism), Orthodox theology arises from the liturgical experience of God in worship and prayer. It is doxological, not speculative.
Whereas Western theology has historically emphasized reason, systematization, and legal categories (particularly since Augustine and Anselm), Orthodox theology emphasizes mystery, participation, and transformation. The goal is not merely to understand God, but to be united with Him in theosis (2 Peter 1:4).
Tibbs affirms that this is not to suggest that Orthodox theology lacks intellectual rigor, but that its method is grounded in encounter rather than analysis. One comes to know God through prayer, fasting, sacramental life, and humility, not merely through study. This approach finds its roots in the Fathers, particularly in figures such as St. Gregory of Nyssa, St. Maximus the Confessor, and St. Gregory Palamas.
The Primacy of Worship
A key element in the Orthodox worldview is that theology is inseparable from worship. Dr. Tibbs notes that in the Orthodox tradition, worship is the highest expression of theology, because it is there that the faithful encounter God most fully. The Divine Liturgy is not merely a religious service—it is a mystical participation in the heavenly worship, as described in Hebrews 12:22–24 and Revelation 4–5.
Quoting the early Fathers and reflecting the mind of the Church, she affirms the ancient dictum:
Lex orandi, lex credendi—the law of prayer is the law of belief.
This means that theology is embedded in the Church’s prayer life. The words sung, chanted, and proclaimed in the Liturgy are themselves theological statements, and the faithful are formed by them over time. For instance, the Trisagion hymn—“Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us”—proclaims the holiness and mystery of God in a way more profound than mere definition.
Therefore, the Orthodox worldview sees all of life as oriented toward worship, and worship as theology in action. The Liturgy is the primary theological school, not the classroom.
Doing Theology in the Orthodox Manner
In this section, Tibbs explains how theology is practiced in the Orthodox Church. She makes a critical distinction: theologian, in Orthodox usage, is not simply someone who studies theology, but someone who knows God. The word is reserved for the saints—those who have been transfigured by grace.
She quotes or paraphrases the famous saying of Evagrius of Pontus:
“If you are a theologian, you will pray truly. And if you pray truly, you are a theologian.”
Therefore, theology is not a career or academic field, but an existential participation in divine truth. This is why Orthodoxy places such high importance on asceticism—purification of the heart is a prerequisite to seeing God (cf. Matthew 5:8). Sin darkens the nous, the spiritual faculty by which one knows God, and it is only by repentance, humility, and sacramental life that the theologian is prepared to contemplate divine mysteries.
Orthodox theology is thus not only about God, but from God, and with God.
The Incompatibility of Innovation
Dr. Tibbs notes that, from the Orthodox perspective, doctrinal innovation is not development—it is deviation. The Orthodox Church seeks to preserve the apostolic faith without alteration or diminishment. This fidelity is not static repetition but dynamic continuity—living in the same Spirit as the apostles and saints.
She observes that, in contrast to many contemporary Christian traditions that have adjusted doctrine to accommodate cultural changes, the Orthodox Church holds that the deposit of faith (cf. 2 Tim. 1:14; Jude 1:3) has been handed down once for all and must be safeguarded.
This is not a reactionary position, but a theological one. The Orthodox Church is not interested in adapting truth to the modern world, but in calling the world to repentance and participation in divine life. This makes the Orthodox worldview fundamentally eschatological—it looks not to adjust to the present age, but to be transformed by the age to come.
Participatory Knowledge: A Mystical Epistemology
Tibbs emphasizes that knowledge of God in Orthodox theology is participatory, not observational. God is not the object of study but the subject who reveals Himself. This aligns with the distinction made by St. Gregory Palamas between the essence of God (which remains unknowable) and the energies of God (by which He makes Himself known).
Thus, theology is the fruit of communion with God, not its precondition. As she writes, “To do theology is to participate in the divine life of the Church.” Scripture supports this mystical epistemology:
John 14:21: “He who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will manifest Myself to him.”
1 Corinthians 2:14: “The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God… they are spiritually discerned.”
Psalm 34:8: “Taste and see that the Lord is good.”
This biblical orientation undergirds Orthodox theology: it is not merely belief in God, but participation with God in the divine mystery.
Conclusion: A Way of Life
Dr. Tibbs closes the chapter by restating that the Orthodox worldview is not merely theological—it is liturgical, ascetical, and sacramental. It is a way of life, ordered toward divine communion. The Church is not a voluntary society of believers, but the very Body of Christ, filled with the Holy Spirit, worshiping the Father, and inviting all into the joy of the Kingdom.
Orthodoxy does not view theology as an academic discipline to be mastered, but as a sacred trust to be entered into through humility, obedience, and prayer. Therefore, the Orthodox worldview is not merely one option among many—it is a comprehensive vision of reality, shaped by the experience of the saints, safeguarded by the Church, and always centered in the mystery of the incarnate Word of God.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
2 Timothy 1:14 – Guard the deposit through the Holy Spirit. John 1:14 – “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” Hebrews 12:22–24 – Worship in the heavenly Jerusalem. Revelation 4–5 – The pattern of heavenly worship. 1 Corinthians 2:14 – Spiritual discernment through the Spirit. 2 Peter 1:4 – Participation in the divine nature. Jude 1:3 – Contend for the faith once for all delivered.
Chapter 2: One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic
In this chapter, Dr. Tibbs treats the nature and identity of the Orthodox Church, not as an abstract or invisible concept, but as a concrete, living organism: the Body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:27), divinely instituted, sacramentally constituted, and eschatologically oriented. She begins by carefully distinguishing Orthodox ecclesiology from both Roman Catholic institutionalism and Protestant ecclesial pluralism, not by argumentation or refutation, but by presenting the Orthodox self-understanding of the Church as communion (koinonia) in Christ, through the Holy Spirit.
The chapter asserts that the Orthodox Church does not merely possess truth—it is the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Tim. 3:15), because it is the mystical Body of Christ in the world. This identity is not established by human decision or doctrinal agreement, but by its organic continuity with Christ’s own life, death, resurrection, and Pentecostal outpouring. As Tibbs notes, “The Orthodox Church does not claim to be one denomination among many; rather, it sees itself as the same Church established by Christ and revealed in the book of Acts.”
The Church’s nature is therefore ontological and sacramental, not voluntary or conceptual. It is not a human assembly of the like-minded, but a divine-human organism into which one is incorporated by baptism and chrismation (cf. Acts 2:38, Rom. 6:3–5, 1 Cor. 12:13). This incorporation is not symbolic—it effects real participation in Christ, as taught by St. Cyril of Jerusalem: “We become Christ-bearers by partaking of His Holy Body and Blood” (Mystagogical Catecheses, 4.3).
Where Is the Church? What Is the Church?
Tibbs rejects the notion that the Church is fundamentally invisible or spiritually conceptual. She affirms that the Church is “a visible community,” with real continuity in time and space. She references the local Eucharistic community as the full manifestation of the universal Church (cf. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8.2), echoing the Orthodox view that “the whole Church is present in each Eucharistic assembly where the bishop presides.”
The Orthodox Church is not one part of a larger “invisible church.” Rather, it sees itself as the Church established by Christ and preserved by the Holy Spirit, in continuity with the apostles, martyrs, saints, and holy Fathers. Apostolic succession is not merely an historical claim, but the sacramental and pneumatic continuity of the same life of Christ in each generation (cf. 2 Tim. 2:2).
She emphasizes that the Orthodox Church does not make exclusive truth claims out of triumphalism but out of fidelity to her unbroken Eucharistic, doctrinal, and hierarchical life. In this sense, the Church is not a theological theory but a spiritual and liturgical reality—a mystery rooted in divine condescension and grace.
Ecclesial Unity
Dr. Tibbs dedicates significant attention to explaining what Orthodox Christians mean by the term “One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic”—the four marks of the Church, as confessed in the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD).
One: The unity of the Church is not institutional or legal but spiritual and ontological. The unity is in Christ Himself (John 17:21). The Church is one because her Head is one, and because the Holy Spirit gathers all into one Eucharistic communion.
Holy: The Church is holy not because all her members are free from sin, but because she is the Body of Christ, sanctified by the Holy Spirit and made holy by her sacraments, Scripture, and prayers. The holiness is intrinsic and sacramental, not moralistic.
Catholic: The term catholic does not mean “universal” in a merely geographical or numerical sense. It refers to wholeness and fullness—each local church, when gathered around its bishop in Eucharistic celebration, is fully the Church. As St. Ignatius wrote, “Wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church” (Smyrnaeans 8.2).
Apostolic: Apostolicity is not only about unbroken succession of bishops, though that is necessary. More deeply, it means fidelity to the apostolic faith, worship, and ethos (cf. Acts 2:42). The Orthodox Church sees herself as preserving the faith of the apostles without addition or subtraction, in doctrine, liturgy, and life.
Tibbs is careful to note that apostolic succession, while often described in terms of episcopal lineage, must also be understood in its full sacramental and doctrinal dimension. The bishops are successors to the apostles not because they simply inherit an office, but because they faithfully transmit and guard the apostolic deposit (cf. Jude 1:3, 1 Tim. 6:20).
Primacy in the Church
In a brief but substantive section, the chapter addresses the question of primacy. The Orthodox Church recognizes primacy of honor (πρωτεῖον τιμῆς) among bishops—historically assigned to the Bishop of Rome, then Constantinople—but rejects any form of universal jurisdiction. The model is conciliar, not monarchical, with all bishops being equal in sacramental authority. Canon 34 of the Apostolic Canons and Canon 6 of Nicaea I are cited in this regard.
Thus, ecclesial governance in Orthodoxy is conciliar, synodal, and grounded in mutual accountability. No bishop has authority above the synod; no synod above the faith of the Church as preserved by the Spirit.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
1 Corinthians 12:12–27 to illustrate the organic unity of the Church as Christ’s body;
Ephesians 4:4–6 to show that there is “one Lord, one faith, one baptism”;
Acts 2:42–47 to demonstrate the essential features of apostolic life—teaching, fellowship, Eucharist, and prayer;
1 Timothy 3:15 as a declaration of the Church’s divine authority.
She also cites from early sources such as:
St. Irenaeus of Lyons, particularly his insistence that the truth is preserved in the Church through apostolic succession (Against Heresies 3.3.1). St. Ignatius of Antioch: Whose letters underscore episcopal unity, Eucharistic centrality, and the Catholicity of the Church.
Chapter 3: God Made Known in Communion
This chapter addresses a foundational question in Orthodox theology: How is divine truth revealed, preserved, and participated in by the Church? Dr. Eve Tibbs here presents a distinctly Orthodox understanding of revelation—not as a collection of propositions handed down once and for all, nor as private spiritual insight, but as the dynamic life of communion in God, realized through the Church in the power of the Holy Spirit. Her treatment is deeply patristic, liturgical, and ecclesial, aligning consistently with the mind of the early Fathers and the conciliar tradition.
Tibbs explains that revelation in Orthodoxy is not primarily a body of information but a participation in divine life. The Church receives revelation in the same way that it receives grace and holiness—not as a created object, but as a living encounter with the uncreated God. This view corresponds to the biblical witness of divine self-disclosure: not a book, but a face (cf. Ex. 33:11; John 1:14–18). Revelation, therefore, is personal, Trinitarian, and relational.
Communion as the Context of Revelation
Tibbs begins by situating revelation within the greater context of communion (κοινωνία). Revelation is not abstractly given to individuals in isolation, but to the Church in communion, through the Holy Spirit. As she writes, “The life of the Church is the context in which God’s self-revelation is preserved and faithfully transmitted.”
This understanding is drawn directly from the Scriptures:
In John 16:13, Christ promises the Spirit of truth will guide the disciples into all truth—implying a communal guidance rooted in apostolic life.
Acts 2:42 demonstrates that the early Church “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in the prayers.” This is not a list of separate activities, but a vision of integrated life in Christ, where truth is known by participation, not just intellectual apprehension.
Holy Tradition: Revelation Lived and Preserved
The heart of this chapter is the Orthodox doctrine of Holy Tradition (ἱερὰ παράδοσις), which is neither a secondary source alongside Scripture, nor a mutable collection of customs. Rather, it is the life of the Holy Spirit in the Church, preserving and manifesting the same apostolic truth through all generations. It is not “extra-biblical material,” but the lived and safeguarded truth of Scripture itself, as understood, prayed, and enacted in the Church.
Tibbs draws upon the teaching of the Seventh Ecumenical Council (Nicaea II, 787), which affirmed:
“We keep without innovations all the ecclesiastical traditions handed down to us, whether written or unwritten.”
This reflects the teaching of St. Basil the Great, who distinguished between written and oral apostolic teachings and affirmed the authority of both (On the Holy Spirit, ch. 27). Thus, Holy Tradition includes:
The canonical Scriptures,
The Nicene Creed,
The decisions of the Seven Ecumenical Councils,
The writings of the Church Fathers,
The liturgical life of the Church (especially the Divine Liturgy),
The iconographic tradition,
And the lived ascetic and spiritual wisdom of the saints.
Tradition, then, is not “what people used to do.” It is the continual work of the Holy Spirit guiding the Church, in fulfillment of Christ’s promise in John 14:26: “But the Comforter, the Holy Spirit… shall teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.”
Tibbs is clear: the Orthodox Church does not place Tradition over Scripture, nor does it oppose them. Rather, the two are inseparable, like breath and voice. Scripture is the heart of Tradition, and Tradition is the proper context in which Scripture is faithfully understood.
Scripture in the Life of the Church
The chapter includes a sustained reflection on Holy Scripture and its role within Orthodox theology. Scripture is honored as divinely inspired (θεόπνευστος, 2 Tim. 3:16), but its interpretation is not left to private opinion or modernist exegesis. Instead, the Scriptures belong to the Church and must be read within the liturgical, ascetical, and sacramental life that produced them.
Tibbs explains that:
The canon of Scripture was not determined in isolation but discerned within the Eucharistic life of the Church. She affirms that the Orthodox canon of the Old Testament includes several books regarded as deuterocanonical, consistent with the Septuagint, the version used by the apostles themselves (cf. Rom. 3:12 referencing Ps. 14 LXX).
Scripture is always interpreted in the light of Christ, who is both its fulfillment and its central subject (cf. Luke 24:27).
The liturgical use of Scripture is emphasized: The Divine Liturgy is saturated with Scripture, and every service is built around the psalms, the epistles, and the Gospels. In this, Scripture is not merely read—it is sung, venerated, and enacted.
The Orthodox Church, Tibbs insists, does not engage in sola scriptura (“Scripture alone”), but rather affirms Scripture in Tradition, Scripture as received, interpreted, and preserved in the Church through the Spirit.
The Role of Icons in Revealed Truth
In a seamless transition, Tibbs introduces the subject of Holy Icons, presenting them as visual theology and instruments of revelation. This is not a separate topic but flows directly from the doctrine of the Incarnation. Since “the Word became flesh” (John 1:14), it is possible—and necessary—to depict Him.
Tibbs follows the defense of icons given by St. John of Damascus, who wrote in his Apologia Against Those Who Decry Holy Images:
“I do not worship matter, I worship the Creator of matter who became matter for my sake.”
The Seventh Ecumenical Council (787) declared the veneration of icons to be a legitimate and necessary affirmation of Christ’s true humanity. To deny icons is to deny the Incarnation. Icons are not decorative—they are manifestations of divine presence, windows into heaven, and means of catechesis and transformation.
Furthermore, Tibbs underscores that icons belong to the stream of Tradition and are themselves canonical expressions of the Church’s faith. They are not “extra-biblical” but are grounded in the Gospel: Christ is depicted as He appeared, the Theotokos is honored as the true bearer of God (cf. Luke 1:43), and the saints are shown transfigured by grace.
Revelation Is the Life of the Church
Tibbs concludes the chapter by reiterating that revelation is not static, nor is it purely historical. It is the living presence of the Triune God in the Church. The Word of God is a Person (John 1:1), not a book. The Orthodox Church, filled with the Holy Spirit, is the womb of revelation, preserving and transmitting the faith once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3).
In Orthodox theology, the question is not “What does this verse mean to me?” but rather “How has the Church understood this through the ages?” The standard is not novelty, but fidelity. Revelation is therefore the property of the whole Church, not of scholars or hierarchs alone. It is experienced in the sacraments, sung in the hymns, meditated in the icons, and preserved in the common mind (phronema) of the Church through the Spirit.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
Jude 1:3 – “Contend for the faith once for all delivered to the saints.” John 1:14 – “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” John 14:26 – “The Holy Spirit will teach you all things.” John 16:13 – “The Spirit of truth will guide you into all truth.” Luke 24:27 – Christ reveals Himself in the Scriptures. Acts 2:42 – The Church continues in apostolic teaching and fellowship. 2 Timothy 3:16 – “All Scripture is God-breathed.”
Chapter 4: Shepherds and Servants
This chapter addresses the nature, structure, and purpose of ecclesiastical leadership within the Orthodox Church. Dr. Eve Tibbs avoids approaching ministry in terms of sociological function or administrative authority. Rather, she frames the question theologically: What is the Church’s understanding of the priesthood and leadership as instituted by Christ, revealed in Scripture, and preserved in the apostolic and conciliar life of the Church? The answer is sacramental and hierarchical, grounded in service, humility, and fidelity to apostolic tradition.
The Royal Vocation of All People
Tibbs begins with the affirmation that all baptized Christians share in the priestly calling of Christ. She appeals to 1 Peter 2:9:
“You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people.”
This universal priesthood (baptismal priesthood) is not symbolic. It signifies real participation in the priesthood of Christ (Heb. 4:14–5:10), especially through the sacramental and liturgical life of the Church. Yet, this priesthood does not negate the need for an ordained or ministerial priesthood, which is distinct in its function and sacramental grace.
Tibbs emphasizes that the Orthodox Church does not adopt a dichotomy between clergy and laity in terms of dignity or holiness. Both are integral parts of the one Body of Christ (cf. 1 Cor. 12:4–31). The distinction lies not in superiority but in function and calling. She affirms that every baptized believer is called to offer spiritual sacrifices and to participate in the Church’s mission of sanctifying the world—but only those set apart by ordination serve in the sacramental and teaching offices of the Church.
First Among Equals (Primus Inter Pares)
Next, Tibbs addresses the principle of ecclesiastical primacy. Within Orthodoxy, all bishops are equal in sacramental authority. Yet among them, certain bishops hold primacy of honor (πρωτεῖον τιμῆς), not of jurisdiction. This principle—first among equals—preserves the conciliar and collegial nature of Orthodox leadership while acknowledging a canonical order.
For example, in the ancient Church, the Bishop of Rome held primacy in the West, while the Bishop of Constantinople came to hold primacy in the East (especially after the Council of Constantinople I in 381 and the Council of Chalcedon in 451, canon 28). However, this primacy is not interpreted as universal supremacy. Tibbs is clear that no single bishop, including the Ecumenical Patriarch, holds unilateral authority over the entire Orthodox Church.
The Church is governed synodally, following the precedent set in Acts 15, where apostolic deliberation took place in council. Each bishop is accountable to his brother bishops and ultimately to the Holy Spirit who guides the Church into all truth (John 16:13). This structure reflects Christ’s own example of humility and shared life among the apostles.
The Three Orders of Clergy
Dr. Tibbs then turns to the traditional tripartite hierarchy of clergy in the Orthodox Church: bishop (ἐπίσκοπος), presbyter (πρεσβύτερος), and deacon (διάκονος). These three orders are not later developments; they are apostolic in origin and have been preserved from the earliest Christian communities (cf. Phil. 1:1; 1 Tim. 3; Titus 1:5–9).
a. Bishops
The bishop is the chief shepherd of a local diocese and holds the fullness of the priesthood. He is the guardian of apostolic doctrine and the celebrant of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist. As successors to the apostles, bishops maintain the integrity of the faith and preserve the unity of the Church through the laying on of hands (cf. 2 Tim. 1:6; Acts 20:28).
Tibbs reiterates that every valid ordination requires episcopal consecration, and thus apostolic succession is not a historical chain alone, but a sacramental and doctrinal continuity.
b. Presbyters
Presbyters, or priests, serve under the bishop and assist in the pastoral and sacramental ministry of the Church. While they may consecrate the Eucharist, they do so in the name and authority of the bishop, whose presence is signified by the antimension on the altar—a cloth signed by the bishop permitting liturgical celebration. This underscores that the Eucharist is never divorced from episcopal oversight.
The priest is a father, teacher, and spiritual guide. His authority is pastoral and sacramental, not autonomous or legislative. He represents both Christ and the bishop in the parish setting.
c. Deacons
Deacons serve as ministers of liturgy and charity. Their primary role is liturgical: proclaiming the Gospel, leading prayers, assisting the bishop and priest at the altar. Their office was established in Acts 6:1–6 and remains vital in the Church’s life.
Deacons do not celebrate sacraments but facilitate their celebration. Their ordination is a sacred office, not a stepping stone to priesthood. Tibbs affirms that the diaconate is its own vocation with theological and pastoral dignity.
Ordination of Women
Tibbs addresses the subject of women in ordained ministry with careful clarity. She affirms the Church’s unbroken practice of ordaining only men to the orders of bishop and priest, consistent with the example of Christ and the apostolic community. The Orthodox Church does not interpret this as a judgment on the worth or spiritual capacity of women but as faithfulness to the received apostolic tradition.
She notes that women have always played crucial roles in the life of the Church—most especially the Theotokos, the Mother of God, who is the highest of all creatures. Women saints, martyrs, ascetics, and theologians abound in Orthodox history, but their roles have not included sacramental priesthood.
Tibbs also notes the historical presence of ordained deaconesses in the early Church. Their function was primarily pastoral and liturgical, not sacramental. While some Orthodox theologians today advocate for the restoration of this order in limited ways, the Church as a whole has not reached consensus. Any such development must be received synodally, with fidelity to Tradition and without imitation of contemporary Western agendas.
Apostolic Succession
The chapter concludes with a firm affirmation of apostolic succession, not merely as a historical chain of ordinations, but as a living transmission of sacramental grace, doctrinal fidelity, and ecclesial unity. The Orthodox Church believes that only those bishops who maintain the true faith and remain in the Eucharistic communion of the Church possess valid apostolic succession.
Tibbs cites early Fathers such as St. Irenaeus, who in Against Heresies (3.3.1) insisted that the truth is preserved in the episcopal succession from the apostles. She also references St. Ignatius of Antioch, who exhorted believers to remain close to the bishop as to Christ Himself (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8:1–2).
Scripturally, apostolic succession is evident in:
Acts 1:20–26 – Matthias is chosen to succeed Judas as apostle.
2 Timothy 2:2 – “What you have heard from me… entrust to faithful men.”
Titus 1:5 – Paul commands Titus to appoint elders in every town.
This succession is not mechanical—it is recognized by the continuity of faith and sacramental life, safeguarded by the Holy Spirit working in the Church (cf. John 16:13).
Conclusion: Hierarchy as Service
Tibbs concludes the chapter by affirming that hierarchy in the Church exists not for domination but for service and protection of the flock. The model is Christ Himself, who came not to be served but to serve (Matt. 20:28). Bishops, priests, and deacons are not rulers but stewards. Their authority derives from faithfulness to the apostolic tradition, and their effectiveness is measured not by charisma or power, but by humility, sacrificial love, and liturgical faithfulness.
In the Orthodox vision, leadership is not administrative but sacramental. Ministry is not management but manifestation of Christ’s own priesthood, entrusted to His Body for the salvation of the world.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
Matthew 20:26–28 – Leadership as servanthood.
1 Peter 2:9 – The royal priesthood of all believers.
1 Corinthians 12:4–31 – Unity and diversity in the Body of Christ.
Acts 6:1–6 – Establishment of the diaconate.
Acts 1:20–26 – Apostolic replacement by ordination.
Titus 1:5, 1 Timothy 3, 2 Timothy 2:2 – Episcopal oversight and succession.
Chapter 5: The Person of the Incarnate Word
In Chapter 5, Dr. Eve Tibbs provides a comprehensive and historically grounded summary of Christology as understood by the Orthodox Church. This doctrine is not approached as a scholastic subject of interest but as the living truth of salvation, revealed through the Person of Jesus Christ—the eternal Logos who became man, suffered, rose, and reigns in glory. The chapter gives due attention to the scriptural foundations of Orthodox Christology, the doctrinal clarifications provided by the early Ecumenical Councils, and the liturgical and hymnic expressions through which the Church continues to confess Christ.
The Word of God Is a Person
Tibbs begins by insisting on a fundamental truth: the Word of God is not a concept or set of teachings, but a divine Person—Jesus Christ. Quoting John 1:1–14, she affirms that the Logos is preexistent, consubstantial with the Father, and became incarnate in time:
“The Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14).
Orthodox theology begins here—not with abstractions about divine attributes but with the reality of the Incarnation. The Word of God is the image of the invisible God (Col. 1:15), the radiance of divine glory (Heb. 1:3), and the ultimate revelation of the Father. The Orthodox Church insists that to know Christ is to know the fullness of God (cf. John 14:9).
The Incarnation is not a temporary appearance or a means to a moral example. It is the hypostatic union: the eternal Son of God became fully human, without ceasing to be fully divine. The Orthodox confession is unequivocal: Jesus Christ is one Person (ὑπόστασις) in two natures (φύσεις), divine and human, united without confusion, without change, without division, and without separation.
Who Is Jesus?
Tibbs then develops the biblical and creedal presentation of the person of Christ. Drawing from the Gospels and the Epistles, she affirms that Christ is:
True God, eternally begotten of the Father (John 1:1–3, Phil. 2:6–11),
True Man, born of the Virgin Mary (Luke 1:35), tempted in every way as we are, yet without sin (Heb. 4:15).
She emphasizes the scriptural continuity of the Orthodox Christological proclamation: Christ is not a mere prophet or moral exemplar, but the unique God-man (θεάνθρωπος), whose two natures are united in the one hypostasis of the divine Word. The key Christological affirmations of the early Church—especially those codified in the Nicene Creed (325 and 381)—are not speculative constructs, but exegetical conclusions drawn from divine revelation.
Tibbs is careful to state that Orthodox Christology is not a theology “about” Jesus, but a confession of Jesus, rooted in the life of the Church and articulated in the conciliar tradition.
Early Challenges to Christology
The Church’s understanding of Christ did not arise without controversy. Dr. Tibbs gives a clear and accessible summary of the major Christological heresies that threatened the Church’s faithful confession and the corresponding councils that addressed them.
a. Arianism
Arius, a priest of Alexandria in the early 4th century, denied the full divinity of the Son, claiming He was a creature, created before time but not co-eternal with the Father. The response was the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea (325 AD), which affirmed that the Son is “begotten, not made, of one essence (ὁμοούσιος) with the Father.”
Key Scripture:
John 1:1 – “The Word was God.”
John 10:30 – “I and the Father are one.”
Col. 2:9 – “In Him the fullness of Deity dwells bodily.”
b. Apollinarianism
This view, attributed to Apollinaris of Laodicea, denied the fullness of Christ’s humanity by claiming that the divine Logos replaced the rational human soul in Jesus. This was rejected because it implied that Christ was not fully human and therefore could not redeem human nature in its entirety.
Council Response: First Council of Constantinople (381 AD) – affirmed that Christ is fully human with a rational soul.
c. Nestorianism
Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople, sought to preserve the distinction between Christ’s two natures, but his theology separated the divine and human persons, leading to the denial of the Theotokos (God-bearer) title for Mary. This undermined the unity of Christ’s person.
Council Response: Council of Ephesus (431 AD) – affirmed that the Virgin Mary is rightly called Theotokos because the one born from her is truly God incarnate. Christ is one Person with two natures.
d. Eutychianism/Monophysitism
Eutyches taught that Christ’s human nature was absorbed into His divinity, resulting in a fusion that created a third kind of nature (a mono-physis). This was rejected for compromising the integrity of Christ’s humanity.
Council Response: Council of Chalcedon (451 AD) – defined the doctrine of the two natures in one Person, “without confusion, without change, without division, without separation.”
The Rule of Truth: Conciliar Christology
Tibbs emphasizes that the first four Ecumenical Councils are foundational to Orthodox Christology. These councils were not mere gatherings of theologians, but of bishops speaking in the name of the Church, guided by the Holy Spirit. Their declarations are not optional opinions but binding doctrinal definitions.
Orthodoxy does not entertain speculation or novelty in Christology. Rather, it receives the conciliar faith and confesses it in continuity with the Fathers. The Dogma of Chalcedon (451) remains the definitive articulation of the Incarnation and serves as the Christological standard.
Singing Theology: Liturgical Christology
One of the most beautiful aspects of this chapter is Tibbs’s treatment of hymnography as theological confession. In Orthodoxy, theology is not merely written—it is sung. The Church’s liturgical hymns proclaim the truths of the Incarnation with doctrinal precision and spiritual fervor.
Examples include:
The Kontakion for Nativity: “Today the Virgin gives birth to the transcendent One…”
The Paschal Troparion: “Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death…”
These hymns are not poetic adornments. They are authoritative articulations of the Church’s faith, sung by the faithful as a participation in the mystery they confess. As Tibbs rightly states, liturgical texts form the faithful theologically, embedding doctrinal truth into the memory and prayer of the Church.
This method reflects the early Church’s reliance on doxology as the context for theology. As Basil the Great said, “We confess our faith in the words we sing and the mysteries we celebrate.”
Christology as the Foundation of Salvation
Though Tibbs does not offer a developed soteriology here (that is addressed more fully in Chapter 6), she makes it clear that Orthodox Christology is soteriological at its core. The Incarnation is not merely a revelation of who God is—it is the means by which humanity is saved.
Drawing on the patristic consensus, she includes the classic formula of St. Athanasius the Great:
“God became man so that man might become god.” (On the Incarnation, §54)
This statement does not imply ontological equality with God, but participation in divine life through the Incarnate Son. As Christ took on our nature, He healed and restored it, offering deification (theosis) to all who are united to Him.
Conclusion: The Living Confession of Christ
Dr. Tibbs concludes this chapter by emphasizing that Orthodox Christology is not speculative theology—it is the living confession of the Church, expressed in her Scriptures, Councils, Liturgy, and Saints. The Orthodox Church holds fast to the faith that has been once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3), not as a relic of the past, but as the ever-living truth of the risen Lord.
This Christology is not negotiable. It is the doctrinal heart of Orthodoxy and the measure of all ecclesial fidelity. In Christ, the fullness of divinity and humanity is united for our salvation. To confess Christ rightly is to belong to the Church, and to worship Him in spirit and truth.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
John 1:1–14 – The Word made flesh.
Colossians 1:15–20 – The image of the invisible God.
Philippians 2:6–11 – Christ’s humility and exaltation.
Hebrews 1:1–3 – The radiance of divine glory.
Hebrews 4:15 – Fully human yet without sin.
Luke 1:35, Matthew 1:23 – The virgin birth and divine identity.
2 Peter 1:4 – Participation in the divine nature.
Chapter 6: Our Purpose in the Divine Plan
This chapter begins by establishing the Orthodox Church’s understanding of human nature and its ultimate purpose: communion with God. Orthodox anthropology does not begin with sin, nor with legal categories of guilt and punishment, but with the high calling of the human person created in the image and likeness of God (Gen. 1:26–27). According to Dr. Eve Tibbs, the human being is a liturgical, spiritual, and communal being, made not merely to live morally, but to be deified (θεοποίησις)—that is, to partake of the divine nature (2 Pet. 1:4).
The question “Who are we?” is answered not through psychology or cultural reflection, but through the Church’s revealed understanding of human purpose in light of Christ, the perfect image of the invisible God (Col. 1:15). Christ reveals not only God to humanity but humanity to itself.
Created for Communion
Tibbs begins with the doctrine of creation, emphasizing that human beings are created in the image (εἰκών) and after the likeness (ὁμοίωσις) of God. These terms, though sometimes used interchangeably, are understood distinctly in Orthodox tradition:
Image (eikōn): that which all humans possess by nature—rationality, free will, the capacity for love, and the relational orientation toward God.
Likeness (homoiosis): not a static trait, but the dynamic goal of human life—the attainment of holiness, virtue, and union with God through grace.
This distinction, drawn from patristic sources such as St. Irenaeus and St. Gregory of Nyssa, means that human beings are created with potential, not in a state of finished perfection. Adam and Eve were innocent, not glorified. Their calling was to grow into the likeness of God by cooperating with divine grace.
Tibbs affirms that humanity’s created state was relational and communal, not individualistic. Adam and Eve lived in harmony with God, each other, and creation—a state depicted in Genesis 2:25 as one of nakedness without shame, because there was no alienation or disintegration.
Tragedy in the Garden
The fall, for the Orthodox Church, is not interpreted through juridical or penal models of inherited guilt. Tibbs carefully explains that the Orthodox doctrine of ancestral sin (προπατορικὸν ἁμάρτημα) differs from original guilt as taught in certain Western traditions.
When Adam and Eve chose disobedience (Gen. 3), they turned away from communion with God, and the consequence was death, corruption, and a darkening of the mind (νοῦς). Sin is not inherited as guilt but as mortality, corruption, and an inclination toward sin. All humans are born into a fallen condition, not by legal sentence, but because they inherit a broken world and wounded nature (cf. Rom. 5:12–21).
Tibbs explains that the fall introduced alienation between man and God, man and man, man and creation, and man and his own self. Shame, fear, death, and division entered the human condition, but human nature itself was not destroyed—it remained wounded, not totally depraved.
This distinction is crucial. Human beings still bear the image of God after the fall (cf. Gen. 9:6, James 3:9), and thus retain the capacity to respond to grace.
Being Saved
Salvation, in Orthodox theology, is not defined as forensic justification or as a single moment of decision. Instead, Tibbs presents salvation as a transformational process, initiated by God and entered into freely by the person, in and through the Church. The goal is not just forgiveness, but healing, restoration, and ultimately theosis.
She summarizes salvation as having three interrelated aspects:
Liberation from death and sin, through Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection.
Restoration to communion with God, through baptism, chrismation, Eucharist, and ongoing life in the Church.
Transformation into the likeness of God, through repentance, ascetic struggle, and divine grace.
Salvation is therefore ontological, not merely legal or emotional. It is about the renewal of human nature in Christ, who is both fully God and fully man. By uniting with Christ, human beings are united to the divine life that heals, sanctifies, and glorifies.
In the common tradition of salvation in the Orthodox Christian East, Tibbs presents five foundational truths that work together:
The fall transmitted death and corruption, not guilt – Humanity inherited the consequences of ancestral sin (mortality and decay), not Adam’s personal guilt.
Human nature is fundamentally good – It is not totally depraved or intrinsically corrupt.
Free will remains operative – Even after the fall, human beings retain the capacity to choose and respond to God.
Salvation is a process – It is not a one-time event but a continual journey of healing, growth, and transformation.
Salvation is a free gift that must be lived out – Grace is not earned, but must be exercised through faithful action: “Faith without works is dead” (James 2:26).
Tibbs cites Romans 6:3–5—“Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?”—to illustrate how participation in Christ’s death and resurrection is the foundation of salvation. It is not metaphorical but actual, occurring in the sacraments and deepened through the Christian life.
Theosis
Perhaps the most distinctive element in Orthodox soteriology, theosis is treated by Tibbs with appropriate reverence and clarity. She explains that theosis is not the absorption of the person into God (as in pantheism), nor is it a moral imitation of God’s attributes. Rather, it is a real participation in the uncreated energies of God, whereby the person is made godlike by grace, without becoming divine by nature.
The classic patristic expression—quoted in this chapter—is again from St. Athanasius the Great:
“God became man so that man might become god” (On the Incarnation, §54).
Scriptural support for theosis is not lacking:
2 Peter 1:4 – “That you may become partakers of the divine nature.”
John 17:21–23 – “That they may be one, even as we are one.”
1 John 3:2 – “We shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is.”
Theosis occurs not by effort alone, but through grace-filled cooperation with God. It requires synergy—the free cooperation of human will with divine initiative. The Church, as the Body of Christ, is the locus where theosis occurs—through prayer, fasting, almsgiving, repentance, the sacraments, and spiritual discipline.
All Creation Rejoices
Tibbs does not limit salvation to individual human transformation. She affirms the cosmic dimension of salvation, rooted in Romans 8:19–22, which teaches that “creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay.”
The fall affected not only human beings but the whole created order. Thus, the redemption wrought by Christ is not anthropocentric but cosmocentric. Christ is the Second Adam (1 Cor. 15:45), who recapitulates all things in Himself (Eph. 1:10). He is the restorer of the cosmos, not just the forgiver of sins.
Liturgically, this truth is celebrated especially at the Feast of the Nativity, where even nature—the cave, the animals, the star—bears witness to the Incarnation. This reflects the Orthodox conviction that salvation is sacramental and material, not spiritualistic or gnostic. The created world becomes a means of grace and participation in God.
Humanity, We Have a Problem
Tibbs includes a section acknowledging the persistent reality of human sin, even after baptism. She emphasizes the ongoing need for repentance, not as legal restitution, but as continual reorientation of the heart toward God. This is in accord with Isaiah 30:15: “In returning and rest you shall be saved.”
She also addresses the mystery of suffering and evil, without attempting to explain it away. The Orthodox Church does not offer easy answers but points to the Cross and Resurrection as the ultimate response to human brokenness. Suffering is not meaningless; it is transfigured in Christ, who suffered and overcame death.
The Cross and Resurrection
The culmination of this chapter is the Paschal Mystery—the death and resurrection of Christ. Tibbs explains that Christ assumed fallen human nature and voluntarily entered into death so that He might destroy it from within. His resurrection is not simply proof of divinity but the first fruits of the new creation (1 Cor. 15:20–23).
Orthodox theology sees the Cross and Resurrection not as separate events, but as one redemptive act. Christ is the Paschal Lamb (1 Cor. 5:7), whose blood brings life, not merely pardon. The Resurrection is victory, not escape—He tramples down death by death, as sung in the Paschal troparion.
Thus, salvation is the re-creation of humanity and the cosmos through the victorious love of the Crucified and Risen Lord.
Conclusion: The Human Vocation in Christ
In closing, Tibbs reiterates that Orthodox anthropology is fundamentally Christocentric. Jesus Christ is not only the Redeemer but the pattern of true humanity. To be human is to be in communion with God, and salvation is the restoration of that communion through the Incarnation, the Cross, the Resurrection, and the life of the Church.
This is not a static state but a journey of growth in holiness, culminating in the vision of God. As St. Gregory of Nyssa says:
“Man’s true life is the perpetual progress toward God.”
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
Genesis 1:26–27 – Creation in the image and likeness of God.
Romans 5:12–21 – Death through Adam, life through Christ.
Romans 6:3–5 – Union with Christ in baptism and resurrection.
2 Peter 1:4 – Partakers of the divine nature.
1 Corinthians 15:20–23, 45 – Christ as the second Adam.
John 17:21–23 – Unity with God through Christ.
Romans 8:19 22 – Cosmic redemption.
Isaiah 30:15 – Return and rest in salvation.
1 John 3:2 – “We shall be like Him.”
Chapter 7: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit
In this chapter, Dr. Eve Tibbs sets forth the Orthodox doctrine of the Holy Trinity, not as an abstract metaphysical formula but as the central and ultimate mystery of Christian faith, worship, and life. The triune nature of God is not deduced by human speculation, but revealed through the history of salvation—particularly in the Incarnation of Christ and the sending of the Holy Spirit. The doctrine is preserved by the Church in her Scriptures, the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, the liturgy, and the writings of the Fathers—especially the Cappadocian Fathers and St. Athanasius.
The chapter is organized around the revealed nature of the Trinity, the relation between the divine persons, and the ecclesial and theological consequences of that revelation.
The Revealed Trinity
Tibbs affirms that God is ultimately incomprehensible, beyond all created categories of being, time, and thought. Yet God is not unknowable. He freely chooses to reveal Himself—not in definitions, but personally, through divine self-disclosure. This revelation reaches its fullness in the Incarnation of the Son and the sending of the Holy Spirit.
The Old Testament hints at the plurality within God (e.g., Gen. 1:26, “Let us make man”), but this mystery was not made fully known until the New Testament, where the voice of the Father, the person of the Son, and the descent of the Spirit are seen together, most clearly at Christ’s baptism (Matt. 3:16–17) and in His final command to baptize “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19).
The Trinity is therefore not a speculative inference, but a revealed reality—made manifest in the divine economy of salvation and confessed liturgically in the life of the Church.
Trinitarian Taxis (Order and Relationality)
Tibbs introduces the Greek term τάξις (taxis), which denotes the order and relation within the Trinity. In Orthodox theology, the divine persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—are co-eternal, co-equal, and consubstantial (ὁμοούσιοι). They are distinct hypostases (persons), but of one ousia (essence or nature).
The Father is the source (ἀρχή) and cause (αἰτία) of the other two persons—not in time, but in eternal relational order.
The Son is begotten of the Father.
The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26).
The eternal relationships among the persons are not hierarchical in dignity or power, but are the eternal modes of divine existence. This teaching is known as the Monarchy of the Father—a key principle in Eastern Trinitarian theology. The Father is the sole source of divinity, not in essence but in personhood.
This taxis is not a sequence in time, nor is it an ontological ranking. It is the manner in which the one God eternally exists as three. This insight, preserved by the Cappadocians, especially St. Basil the Great, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory the Theologian, safeguards both unity and distinction without confusion.
The Cappadocian Settlement
Tibbs provides an account of the fourth-century Trinitarian debates, culminating in what she calls the Cappadocian Settlement. During the Arian controversy, the Church was forced to clarify the language of person (hypostasis) and essence (ousia) to affirm the full divinity of the Son and the Spirit.
Key doctrinal conclusions:
There is one essence (Godhead), shared by all three Persons.
There are three hypostases—Father, Son, and Spirit—each fully God, yet not three Gods.
This formula—μία οὐσία, τρεῖς ὑποστάσεις (one essence, three persons)—is foundational to Orthodox theology and is enshrined in the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD), which is still recited at every Divine Liturgy.
Tibbs underscores the role of St. Gregory Nazianzen (Theologian), who famously declared:
“No sooner do I conceive of the One than I am illumined by the splendor of the Three; no sooner do I distinguish them than I am carried back to the One.”
This both/and structure—the unity of essence and the distinction of persons—is a hallmark of Orthodox Trinitarianism and resists all modalism, subordinationism, and tritheism.
The Holy Spirit
In this section, Tibbs gives focused attention to the Person of the Holy Spirit, a subject often misunderstood or diminished in Western theology. She affirms that the Spirit is not an impersonal force or the bond between the Father and the Son, but a divine Person, equal in glory and majesty to the other two.
The Spirit proceeds from the Father (John 15:26), not from the Son—an important point in Orthodox theology. The Filioque clause (“and the Son”) added later to the Latin Creed is rejected by the Orthodox Church, not simply because it was added unilaterally, but because it distorts the eternal taxis of the Trinity.
The Orthodox Church believes that the Father is the sole cause (μοναρχία) within the Trinity. The eternal procession of the Spirit is from the Father alone. This is maintained to preserve the integrity of divine personal distinctions and the balance of Trinitarian theology.
Dr. Tibbs notes that the Holy Spirit’s mission in the economy (i.e., in time) includes:
inspiring the prophets,
overshadowing the Virgin Mary (Luke 1:35),
descending at Pentecost (Acts 2),
sanctifying the sacraments,
indwelling the faithful,
guiding the Church into all truth (John 16:13).
The Spirit is the one who makes Christ present to the Church and empowers the faithful for the life of holiness, prayer, and mission.
The Church as an Icon of the Trinity
Tibbs concludes this chapter with a profound theological and ecclesial truth: the Church is an icon of the Trinity. Just as the three divine persons exist in eternal communion, so the members of the Church are called into unity without uniformity.
Quoting John 17:21, Christ’s high-priestly prayer—“that they may all be one, even as you, Father, are in me and I in you”—is seen as the model for ecclesial and spiritual life. The Church’s unity is not based on external conformity but on participation in the life of the Trinity.
The communal, conciliar, and Eucharistic life of the Church is a reflection of Trinitarian reality. The Church is not an institution, primarily, but a communion (koinonia) in the Spirit, with the Son, to the glory of the Father.
This understanding permeates Orthodox spirituality and liturgy:
Every prayer begins and ends in the name of the Trinity.
The Creed is Trinitarian in structure.
Baptism initiates one into the Trinitarian life (Matt. 28:19).
The doxology—“Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit”—resounds constantly in all services.
Thus, the Christian life is inherently Trinitarian. It is not merely belief in God, but life in God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
Genesis 1:26 – “Let us make man in our image.”
Matthew 3:16–17 – Theophany: Father speaks, Son is baptized, Spirit descends.
Matthew 28:19 – The Trinitarian baptismal formula.
John 1:1–14 – The eternal Word made flesh.
John 14:16–17, 26; 15:26 – The Spirit sent by the Father.
John 16:13–15 – The Spirit will glorify Christ and guide into truth.
John 17:21–23 – The unity of believers reflecting the unity of the Godhead.
Acts 2 – The descent of the Spirit at Pentecost.
2 Corinthians 13:14 – Apostolic blessing invoking all three Persons.
Conclusion
Dr. Tibbs’s treatment of the Trinity is theologically faithful. She does not approach the doctrine as an intellectual puzzle but as the living mystery of God, revealed in Christ, confirmed by the Spirit, and experienced in the life of the Church.
Her approach follows the Eastern patristic tradition: theology is doxology, and Trinitarian faith is not deduced, but confessed. The mystery of the Trinity is not solvable—it is worshiped, encountered, and entered into.
As St. Gregory the Theologian proclaimed:
“It is more important to remember God than to breathe; and it is more blessed to know the Trinity than to possess all things.”
Chapter 8: The Liturgical Life of the Church
Heaven on Earth: The Liturgical Revelation of God and the Life of the Church
Dr. Eve Tibbs concludes her theological presentation by turning to the center of Orthodox life and identity: worship, specifically liturgical worship, which for Eastern Orthodoxy is not merely the external form of religion, but the primary mode through which truth is revealed, salvation is received, and communion with God is realized. This chapter articulates the foundational Orthodox conviction that worship is theology, and that everything the Church believes is expressed in—and inseparable from—its liturgical life.
Worship in the Orthodox Church is not entertainment, nor moral exhortation, nor merely congregational response. It is a participation in the eternal worship of the heavenly hosts, made possible by Christ and manifest in the sacramental life of the Church.
Liturgy: Heaven on Earth
Tibbs begins by affirming that Orthodox worship is heavenly, eschatological, and sacramental. The Divine Liturgy is not a dramatization of historical events; it is a real, mystical participation in the eternal worship of the heavenly kingdom. She draws from Hebrews 12:22–24, which describes the Church as having come to “Mount Zion… to innumerable angels in festal gathering… and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant.”
In the Liturgy, time and space are transcended. The faithful are joined to the angels and saints, and the once-for-all sacrifice of Christ is made present—not repeated, but mystically actualized (cf. Heb. 9:24–28). This is why Orthodox churches are adorned with icons and filled with chant, incense, candles, and procession—these are not embellishments but signs of the invisible reality in which the Church participates.
The Liturgy is the theophany—the manifestation of God’s glory. It is, as the Byzantine hymn says, “the mystical supper of the Son of God,” where the faithful are not spectators but partakers.
Relevant and Ancient
Tibbs addresses the frequently asked question: how can Orthodox worship, which is so ancient in form and language, be relevant to modern people? Her answer is theological: relevance is not measured by cultural adaptability but by transcendence. The Liturgy is not meant to mirror the world, but to transform those within it by lifting them into the presence of the Triune God.
She observes that Orthodox worship remains largely unchanged since the early centuries—not out of archaism or resistance to change, but because the Liturgy is received, not invented. It is not subject to innovation because it belongs to the Church as Tradition, not as optional expression.
Quoting the 6th-century Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, she demonstrates that every element—from the Trisagion to the Anaphora—is drawn from Scripture and the theological experience of the Church. The priest prays:
“Thou it is who offerest and art offered, who receivest and art distributed, O Christ our God.”
Thus, the Liturgy expresses Orthodox Christology and soteriology, not as theological theory, but in the lived mystery of worship.
The Holy Mysteries (Sacraments)
Tibbs presents a sacramental worldview as essential to Orthodox theology. The term “mystery” (μυστήριον) is preferred over “sacrament,” not to obscure meaning, but to emphasize that God’s grace is incomprehensibly real, not subject to mechanistic explanation.
The Orthodox Church traditionally recognizes seven principal Mysteries:
Baptism
Chrismation
Eucharist
Confession (Penance)
Marriage
Holy Orders
Unction (Anointing of the Sick)
However, the Church does not rigidly limit God’s action to these seven. All life in the Church is mysterial—sanctified by the presence of the Holy Spirit. For example, the blessing of water, icons, homes, and monastic tonsure are also means by which grace is imparted.
The sacraments are not symbols in the modern sense. They are real, material means of participation in divine life. The Eucharist is not a remembrance or metaphor but the true Body and Blood of Christ (cf. John 6:53–56; 1 Cor. 10:16). Baptism is not a sign of an inward change—it is the death and resurrection of the person in Christ (Rom. 6:3–5).
The Mysteries are personal, ecclesial, and transformative. They must be received in faith, within the communion of the Church.
Sin, Confession, and Reconciliation
Tibbs devotes particular attention to the Mystery of Repentance (Confession), emphasizing its therapeutic and restorative character. In Orthodox theology, sin is not primarily law-breaking, but a rupture in communion. Confession is therefore not juridical but healing—a return to God and restoration of life in Christ.
She presents confession as a meeting between the penitent and Christ Himself, through the presence of the priest, who acts not as a judge but as a spiritual physician and witness. The priest does not speak on behalf of God, but as a servant of Christ and steward of His mysteries (1 Cor. 4:1), pronouncing the absolution that Christ alone grants.
This mystery is practiced in the context of spiritual guidance, where the penitent is directed not merely to renounce sin, but to grow in virtue and discernment.
Tibbs also explains that asceticism—fasting, prayer, and watchfulness—is not punishment, but the necessary discipline for purifying the heart, so that one may see God (Matt. 5:8).
Participation and Transformation
The final section of the chapter and book reiterates the Orthodox understanding that worship is not passive. The faithful are not consumers of religious content, but participants in divine life. Every aspect of the Liturgy—from the singing of the Psalms to the lighting of candles—is part of an ascent toward God.
This participatory ethos includes the whole person—body and soul. Worship involves physical gestures (crossing oneself, bowing, kissing icons), auditory engagement (chanting, hearing Scripture), and inward attention. These are not external formalities but sacramental acts, uniting the person to the mystery of Christ.
Tibbs affirms that transformation occurs not only through moral effort but through being drawn into Christ. The Liturgy shapes the soul by exposing it to divine beauty, truth, and love. The Church’s worship is, in the words of St. Maximus the Confessor, “the presence of the age to come.”
The ultimate goal of Orthodox worship is not subjective inspiration, but theosis—union with God. The Liturgy is the foretaste of the heavenly kingdom, the true meaning of human life.
Conclusion
In closing, Dr. Tibbs reiterates that Orthodox worship is the manifestation of all theology, the source and summit of Christian life, and the ongoing revelation of the living God. Through the sacraments, the Church offers participation in Christ’s death and resurrection. Through the Liturgy, the faithful are transfigured into the likeness of the One they behold.
Worship is not an activity of the Church—it is the life of the Church, and through it, the Church becomes what she is: the Body of Christ, united to her Head, by the power of the Holy Spirit, to the glory of God the Father.
Scriptural Passages Referenced or Implied
Matthew 5:8 – “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”
Hebrews 12:22–24 – Worship with angels in heavenly Zion.
Matthew 28:19 – Trinitarian baptism.
John 6:53–56 – Eating Christ’s flesh and drinking His blood.
Romans 6:3–5 – Baptism as union with Christ’s death and resurrection.
1 Corinthians 10:16, 11:23–26 – The Eucharist as communion in the Body and Blood.
John 20:22–23 – Apostolic authority to forgive sins.
Appendices and Glossary
Dr. Tibbs includes primary source excerpts from early Fathers, such as St. Ignatius and St. Irenaeus, as well as the full text of the Didache. These inclusions ground the book in the authentic voice of the early Church, preserving the unbroken continuity claimed by Orthodoxy.
The glossary is a valuable tool for those new to terms such as theosis, iconostasis, phronema, and epiclesis.
Dr. Eve Tibbs has provided a reliable, accessible, and thoroughly Orthodox introduction to theology as it is understood within the Eastern Church. Her work remains within the Orthodox framework of conciliar, liturgical, and patristic theology. No attempt is made to reconcile or reinterpret Orthodox teaching through Western scholasticism, individualism, or juridical categories. Rather, the book is shaped by the principle articulated by St. Vincent of Lérins: quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est (“what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all”).
It is a faithful catechetical companion for those seeking to understand the living tradition of the Orthodox Church and a commendable summary of Orthodox theology, neither over-simplified nor scholastically dissected, but presented as a holistic and worship-rooted path toward communion with God.
Recommended For:
Catechumens and inquirers in the Orthodox Church
Theological students unfamiliar with Eastern Christianity
Clergy and lay educators seeking a primer grounded in patristic sources
Primary Sources Cited in Book:
The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom
The Didache
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letters to the Smyrnaeans, Philadelphians
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies
St. Athanasius, On the Incarnation
St. John of Damascus, On the Divine Images
Nicene and Post-Nicene Councils (I–VII)
Holy Scripture (LXX and NT texts)
Scriptural Themes:
John 1:14
Acts 2:42–47
2 Peter 1:4
1 Timothy 3:15
Hebrews 12:22–24
Matthew 28:19
Ephesians 4:4–6
Revelation 4–5
Book Summary
This book is a theologically grounded and liturgically faithful introduction to Eastern Orthodox theology, written by Dr. Eve Tibbs with clarity, reverence, and fidelity to the mind of the Church. Rather than offering a systematized doctrine, the book presents theology as the Church lives it: doxologically, sacramentally, and in continuity with the apostolic tradition. Beginning with the Orthodox worldview, Tibbs explains that theology is not speculative theory but a lived experience of God, rooted in worship, the life of the Church, and communion with the Trinity. The Church is not a human institution but the Body of Christ, one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—an eschatological community sanctified by the Holy Spirit. The sources of theology are not confined to Scripture alone, but also include Holy Tradition, which encompasses the conciliar teachings, liturgy, iconography, and patristic witness, preserved in the life of the Church.
As the book unfolds, Tibbs explores the Orthodox understanding of the Incarnation and the person of Christ, articulated through the Ecumenical Councils and hymnography, affirming Him as fully divine and fully human in one hypostasis. Human beings, made in the image of God, are called not merely to ethical living but to real participation in the divine nature through Christ’s death and resurrection. The Trinity is presented not as a concept, but as the revealed life of God, eternally shared between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and reflected in the communal and conciliar nature of the Church. All of this finds its climax in Orthodox worship, especially the Divine Liturgy, which is heaven on earth—where the faithful are transfigured, the mysteries impart divine grace, and they are united to Christ and to one another. In essence, Tibbs reveals Orthodox theology as the embodied expression of divine truth—an invitation to enter the mystery of God’s uncreated grace, encountered and received in the worshipping Church, where human beings are transfigured into participants in the life of the Holy Trinity.
I finished all of Deep Anglicanism by Gerald McDermott today, at just under 400 pages. Every word. The book offers a thorough and thoughtful overview of the Anglican tradition. It highlights both the common ground Anglicanism shares with Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox churches and what sets it apart in its practice and theology. Anglicanism doesn’t claim to be the one true Church unlike Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy. However, it strongly affirms the authority of Scripture and the importance of the sacraments, grounded in the teachings of the early Church Fathers. The author presents Anglicanism as both catholic and reformed, with its identity particularly rooted in the English Reformation. The book paints a compelling picture of what the Anglican Church can and should be, especially regarding its biblical foundation, liturgical worship, and sacramental life. While generally supportive of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), the author expresses serious concerns about its current direction, warning that it may be on a path similar to that of the Church of England and its demise in recent years.
The book Deep Anglicanism serves as a reference text, comprehensively exploring Anglican thought, faith, and practice. It is a necessary resource for the Church as a whole, addressing topics highly relevant to congregants, clergy, and the broader world. For readers seeking to understand Anglicanism’s background, history, and theological convictions—including its perspectives on doctrine, culture, social turmoil, and ecumenical positioning—this book provides basic biblically centered insights. McDermott’s thoughts rest firmly on the supreme authority of Scripture, interpreted according to the intent of its biblical authors, making it a critical guide for those who wish to engage with Anglicanism authentically and deeply.
Author Gerald McDermott highlights Anglicanism’s roots in the teachings of the patristic fathers, reformed and renewed during the 16th century. He explains how the Reformation corrected errors and abuses within the Roman Catholic Church, influencing churches in Canterbury, Constantinople, Rome, Geneva, and Wittenberg. Although Reformers, Puritans, and Anglicans were labeled “Protestant” as a pejorative, they aimed to recover biblical imperatives for faith and practice. According to McDermott, Anglicanism remains firm when correctly applying Scripture to doctrines like soteriology (sola fide), Christology, and ecclesiology while honoring its tradition.
The author organizes the book around essential segments that he believes are paramount to understanding Anglicanism. He covers topics like liturgy, the Book of Common Prayer (BCP), Anglican spirituality, the sacraments, marriage, death, and how the Anglican tradition compares to others like Lutheranism, Presbyterianism, Roman Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy. The book isn’t trying to be an exhaustive history but rather offers a focused look at how Anglicanism can be understood as part of the broader catholic tradition. Throughout, McDermott encourages readers to think carefully and biblically about Anglican identity and how it is lived out.
As the chapters unfold, McDermott unpacks Anglican practices like prayer and worship, especially as shaped by the Book of Common Prayer. He shows how Anglicanism seeks to hold together Scripture, tradition, and ecclesiology in a way that’s faithful to the creeds and teachings of the English Reformers and the Anglo-Catholic tradition. He also takes on modern theological trends, challenging what he sees as distortions of the faith disguised as social justice. In particular, he critiques liberation theology and individualistic expressions of Christianity, tracing their roots to thinkers like Schleiermacher and arguing that they stray from biblical teaching.
While he doesn’t dwell extensively on harmful ideologies like feminism or egalitarianism, McDermott grounds his discussion in a vision of Anglicanism as a visible expression of God’s Kingdom on Earth. His attention to the Book of Common Prayer is especially prominent, and he explores how its development has shaped Anglican theology and practice.
According to McDermott, the BCP—especially Cranmer’s original version from 1549—was meant to unify the English Church around a common, vernacular liturgy rooted in Scripture. It replaced the Latin Sarum Rite with services people could understand and participate in. He explains how it preserved the sacramental structure of earlier worship but with a clearer focus on the authority of Scripture. The BCP blends prayer, Scripture reading, sacraments, and traditional forms of worship into a cohesive structure that reflects both Reformation priorities and ancient Christian practice.
Historically, the BCP became central to Anglican life and identity, anchoring worship practices in biblical theology while preserving the Church’s link to the catholic tradition. McDermott contrasts the God-centered orientation of the BCP with modern ideologies that, in his view, attempt to weaken biblical authority. He sees the BCP not just as a liturgical tool but as a theological and spiritual foundation for the Anglican way of life.
In specific chapters—such as 6, 10–12, 27, and 30—McDermott goes deeper into Anglicanism’s history, theology, and worship, paying particular attention to the Daily Office and the influence of major theologians. He presents Anglican spirituality as shaped by the Bible and the early Church, as well as the devotional movements of the medieval period and the theological insights of the Reformation. He discusses how Anglicanism navigates between sola scriptura and prima scriptura and how it approaches doctrines like hell.
On the Daily Office, McDermott explains its roots in early Christian monasticism, which itself drew on Jewish prayer traditions. The Benedictine Rule provided a framework for regular prayer, which was later adapted in England through the Sarum Rite. Cranmer’s reforms in the 16th century condensed these hours into Morning and Evening Prayer, making daily worship accessible to all Christians, not just monks. Morning Prayer combined Matins, Lauds, and Prime into a single service focused on thanksgiving, confession, and Scripture. Evening Prayer drew from Vespers and Compline, emphasizing reflection and gratitude. These services structured the day around Scripture and prayer, connecting modern believers to an ancient pattern of devotion.
The 2019 BCP, issued by the Anglican Church in North America, reflects a return to these older traditions while addressing the needs of the contemporary Church. Unlike the 1979 Episcopal version, which included various liturgical experiments, the 2019 edition restores Cranmer’s vision of clear, Scripture-based worship. Its layout—from the Daily Office to the Psalter and lectionary—aims to root Anglican spirituality in Scripture and tradition.
Cranmer’s initial 1549 Prayer Book was itself a careful reform. Drawing from early Christian theologians like Augustine and Basil and monastic traditions like Benedict’s, Cranmer sought to create a common worship life that emphasized order, grace, and Scripture. McDermott highlights how this reform retained sacramental depth while grounding services in the Bible.
He also draws attention to the influence of figures like Augustine, Benedict, and Anselm on Anglican spirituality. Augustine’s theology of grace, Benedict’s focus on disciplined prayer, and Anselm’s blending of devotion and reason all helped shape Anglicanism’s spiritual landscape. These influences were later developed by thinkers like Martin Thornton, who saw Anglican spirituality as a balance of corporate worship, structured devotion, and thoughtful theology.
Medieval English mystics such as Richard Rolle, Walter Hilton, and Julian of Norwich also left their mark on Anglican devotion. In the post-Reformation period, divines like Lancelot Andrewes, Richard Hooker, and Jeremy Taylor continued this tradition, each emphasizing different aspects of sacramental theology, liturgy, and spiritual formation. Hooker, in particular, helped define the Anglican “middle way”—a theology that holds together Protestant and Catholic elements.
McDermott discusses how Anglicanism relates to the principle of sola scriptura. While holding Scripture as the final authority, he argues that Anglicanism traditionally affirms prima scriptura, meaning Scripture is best interpreted within the context of Church tradition and reason. This approach allows Anglican theology to be biblically faithful while engaging the wisdom of the historic Church.
He also explores changing views on the doctrine of hell within Anglicanism. He traces the idea of universal salvation back to Origen, noting its resurgence in modern theology. He outlines three dominant views: eternal conscious torment, annihilationism, and universalism. While the Thirty-Nine Articles affirm the reality of hell, contemporary Anglican thinkers debate its nature and duration. McDermott presents these positions clearly, offering both traditional and alternative interpretations within the bounds of Anglican theological discourse.
On the sacraments, he highlights that they are a visible image or a reflection of the sacred that is itself invisible. A sacred signum, for example, is baptism as a cleansing from sin. The bread and wine represent the sacred signum as the actuality of the body and blood of Christ. As such, these are visible signs of an invisible grace. These are the means by which salvation is made possible to humanity and made real to believers in Christ. The sacraments are the work of Christ himself, and they are independent of the worthiness of the minister serving them. Moreover, according to Aquinas, they are made present to us as it is necessary to know them through our senses (Summa Theologica III.60.I). As the hearts of people are darkened by sin (Romans 1:21), Christ makes holy His people through His grace via the sacraments while He is bodily absent. The sacraments, in this way, are a means of grace.
With more specifics, McDermott informs readers that sacraments inform us about what they do as a means of Christ’s grace. That they are re-enactments of Christ’s passion applied to us as believers. They are lived out within each person as they have a direct bearing and action upon those who live, suffer, and die as Christ did. They apply to us as if we had suffered and died. Similarly, Aquinas wrote that the sacraments cause divine realities to happen where Christ is brought as gifts to the present as his love is communicated to His family. The sacraments are sacred actions that change participants’ lives. They possess a hidden power as they show invisible evidence where they appear in additional things like the Lord’s Prayer and the creeds.
The book Deep Anglicanism covers many topics pertaining to the Anglican tradition and expression of faith. Taken together, McDermott’s work presents a picture of Anglicanism as a tradition grounded in Scripture, shaped by history, and capable of addressing modern challenges without losing its core identity. His writing encourages a deeper appreciation for Anglican worship and spirituality as a living inheritance that continues to speak to today’s Church.
Today, I completed the prayer book Piercing Heaven, Prayers of the Puritans, edited by Robert Elmer. It is 321 pages and was in frequent use during personal prayer from beginning to end. The book’s prayers were of various notable Puritans who lived from the 1500s through the 1700s. Much of the text was of the Puritans of England who were subjected to the Great Ejection, as 2,000 of them were removed from their churches in 1662. Beyond that period of time, there were a total of 32 authors who wrote their prayers in various forms on numerous topics.
The prayers are organized to fit an occasion, interest, or a person’s spiritual condition. Categories center around petitions, confessions, praises, gratitude, adoration, and affections. They’re a collection of prayers offering a glimpse into the devotional life and spiritual depth of the Puritan tradition. The prayers included in the book reflect the intense, heartfelt devotion and rich theological insights characteristic of the Puritans. Moreover, the book is also organized thematically, with prayers that cover a range of topics such as worship and petitions for various needs.
Elmer’s compilation aims to make these profound prayers accessible to modern readers, helping them to engage with the deep spiritual heritage of the Puritans. The language in the book has been lightly modernized in some cases to make the prayers easier to understand while retaining the original intent and depth. Piercing Heaven serves as a devotional resource for those seeking to deepen their prayer life and connect with the rich tradition of Puritan spirituality.
Some of the most prevalent authors in this collection include:
Richard Baxter – A well-known Puritan theologian and pastor, Baxter is perhaps best remembered for his book The Reformed Pastor. His prayers and writings emphasize practical piety, repentance, and living a life devoted to God.
John Owen – A leading Puritan theologian, Owen’s works reach deeply into theology, especially on topics like the nature of sin, sanctification, and the glory of Christ. His prayers reflect a deep concern for personal holiness and communion with God.
Thomas Watson – Watson was a popular Puritan preacher and author, known for his clear and practical teaching. His works, such as A Body of Divinity and The Doctrine of Repentance, are still widely read today. His prayers are known for their rich theological content and pastoral warmth.
William Gurnall – Best known for his work The Christian in Complete Armour, Gurnall’s prayers and writings focus on spiritual warfare, perseverance, and the strength that comes from God.
John Bunyan – The author of The Pilgrim’s Progress, Bunyan was a Puritan preacher who wrote extensively while imprisoned for his faith. His prayers and writings often reflect themes of the Christian journey, suffering, and the hope of heaven.
These authors, among others included were central figures in the Puritan movement and their prayers capture the depth of Puritan spirituality, characterized by a profound sense of the holiness of God, the seriousness of sin, and the transformative power of grace. The language retains the richness and intensity that marked the Puritans’ approach to communion with God. Through these prayers, readers are invited into a spiritual practice that is both rigorous and deeply personal, encouraging a heartfelt and disciplined approach to prayer.
The value of this book is in its ability to connect modern readers with the rich spiritual heritage of the Puritans while in prayer before God. The prayers serve as both a model and a guide for cultivating a deeper prayer life, emphasizing themes of repentance, humility, and dependence on God. By engaging with these prayers, readers are not only prompted to reflect on their own spiritual state but are also drawn into a more intimate relationship with God. The book offers a valuable resource for those seeking to enrich their spiritual lives, providing timeless prayers that can inspire a deeper commitment to daily devotion and a more profound experience of God’s presence in their lives.
The following assembled notes are from a beginning study of personal interest in the divine office using the Anglican Book of Common Prayer (1928), the Lectionary (1945), and the King James Bible with the Apocrypha. These notes are grouped by area of morning and evening prayer, scripture lessons, the Psalter, and various additional sections of historical and liturgical significance. These notes are meant to guide the user of the 1928 Book of Common Prayer (BCP) through the daily divine office as a personal liturgy that complements weekly Anglican worship at a local congregation. The description of the BCP from the publisher:
“The 1928 Book of Common Prayer (BCP) is in use among traditionalists throughout the United States. Unlike the 1979 book that was adopted by the Episcopal Church, the 1928 BCP stands in direct line of descent from Thomas Cranmer’s 1549 Book of Common Prayer, and as such, its Collects preserve the beauty of the Archbishop’s original prose. The Epistles and Gospels are taken from the Authorized Version, and the Psalter remains that which has been used by generations of Anglicans throughout the world, that of the Great Bible of 1539. This prayer book also includes the 1945 lectionary.”
ANGLICAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA Book of Common Prayer, The Psalter, King James Bible, Apocrypha, Catechism, Articles of Religion Notes pertaining to liturgy within and ACNA context.
The Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and Other Rites and Ceremonies of the Anglican Catholic Church. Together with The Psalter or Psalms of David.
DAILY LITURGY – MORNING AND EVENING
MORNING
Determine what day of the week it is, by season, within the ecclesiastical year.
Open to the page of “Psalms and Lessons for the Christian Year” (pgs. x – xlv) for the day found in step 1 above.
Identify the day of the week that corresponds to the Psalms reading, First Lesson, and Second Lesson for the Morning Prayer period. Then, locate the Evening Prayer period of the same day for different Psalms and the first then second lessons. These are the proper for each day.
Go to the Order for Daily Morning Prayer (pg.3). Choose one or more sentences of scripture to read. Recommended to read one for each day of the week to the extent available. Read sentences corresponding to season themes (e.g., Advent, Ascension, etc.). This is how you begin opening Morning Prayer, by saying a passage of scripture.
Go to “O Lord, open thou our lips” (pg.7 bottom) to begin verbal prayer from there. At that time, use your thumb to make a small sign of the cross over your lips. Read the whole versicle and responses (pg.8 top).
If necessary to begin with the Penitential for deeper confession and repentance (pg. 60), do so before proceeding.
Go to the top of pg.9 to the Venite (ven-ee-tay) and read all of it each day except for the days in which other canticles are appointed (except when Psalm 95 is used in its place since it’s penitential and often at Lent– first rubric on pg.8).
The Psalm grouping read in the prayer book ends with a separate reading of the Gloria Patri (pg.9 bottom). The Gloria Patri is only read and spoken after scripture, not human material such as a canticle or Apocrypha.
—- THIS ENDS THE OPENING PART OF MORNING PRAYER —-
Continue with the sequence of reading and prayer:
Read the Psalm appointed for the ecclesiastical day identified in step 3 above.
Read the first lesson appointed for the ecclesiastical day identified in step 3 above (see pg.9 bottom rubric).
Follow the rubric at the top of pg.10. Choose from one of the two shorter canticles to say or sing. Te Deum laudamus or Benedictus es, Domine. Or the third larger Benedicite (ben-eh-dee-chih-tay), omnia opera Domini (bottom pg.11, two pages). During Lent, the Benedicite is read and spoken often.
Read the second lesson appointed from the ecclesiastical day identified in step 3 above (pg.14 top rubric).
Follow the second rubric at the top of pg.14. Choose from one of the two shorter canticles to say or sing. Benedictus or Jubilate Deo.
Read the Apostle’s Creed (pg.15) on weekdays, the Nicene Creed (pg.71) on Saturday, and Church on Sunday. Or Athanasian Creed as desired. Apply the sign of the cross at the end of the recitation of the Creed.
Recite the Lord’s Prayer on pg.7 bottom.
Read the last verse and responses (pg.16 bottom).
Read the Collect for the day beginning on pg.91 (which is the Collect of Sunday, the first day of the ecclesiastical week), then the Epistle and Gospel according to the ecclesiastical Sunday of the same week. Then, the same Collect is read each day of the week until the following Sunday Collect. NOTE: Some Collect days will fall on a Fixed Holy Day (pg. xlv) and/or a commemoration day of a saint or occasion where there could be added reading (pg. xliv). You should be checking for a corresponding holy day on the calendar, and a commemoration day. Refer to an ordo calendar for supplemental reading on saints and occasions. The BCP only has biblical saints (apostles, prophets, etc.).
After the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel are read, the Collect for Grace or the Collect for Peace is read (pg.17).
Morning Prayer is ended with General Thanksgiving, the Prayer of Saint John Chrysostom, and the 2 Cor 13:14 Benediction (pgs. 19-20).
—- THIS ENDS THE ORDER OF MORNING PRAYER —-
OPTIONAL
Personal prayers (petitions, family, church, kingdom, world). To Prayers and Thanksgivings (pages 35 – 53), The Litany (pages 54 – 59), Decalogue (pg.68), and Penitential (pages 60-63).
Additional prayers of Church Fathers, Desert Fathers, Cappadocian Fathers, Patristics, or Puritans.
Additional Hymns, Antiphons, or Canon of Saints.
Begin each prayer with the Trisagion Prayer, “Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us.” Or the Jesus Prayer, “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.” Or both.
EVENING
The evening prayer is read the same way as the morning prayer except for the Venite (excluded). The format is the same. Include Examen as desired.
GENERAL NOTES
1. Morning and Evening Prayer is to be read aloud (or whispered). 2. While reading morning and evening prayers, you say prayers and responses of both. 3. You can sit, stand, or kneel. 4. Lessons can be lengthened or shortened as desired. 5. Evening prayer follows the same pattern as morning prayer (except for the Venite, one less Psalm). 6. The key is to follow the rubrics. 7. Morning and evening prayers should take about 15 minutes but extend as desired. 8. We need to be immersed in the Word of God daily (through the lessons, at a minimum, including Psalter). The lessons in the lectionary align with the church’s seasonal calendar.
DESCRIPTION
ANGLICAN PARISHES ASSOCIATION 800 TIMOTHY ROAD ATHENS, GEORGIA 30606 USA
Black Leather; lvii + 611 + 1778 pages 5 & 1/4 x 7 & 3/8 x 1 & 7/8 inches Second Printing by APA (2015). This book consists of two parts: the 1928 Book of Common Prayer and the Authorized Version of the Bible.
LEATHER BOUND ISBN 978-0-9777148-2-7 HARDBOUND ISBN 978-0-9777148-3-4
The 1928 Book of Common Prayer’s text font is 11-point Century Old Style, while the King James Version of the Bible’s font is 9-point Century Old Style.
The BCP/KJV is bound in black genuine leather. Each is bound with 6 colored ribbons for use as bookmarks. It is assembled by a library bindery, with a reinforced spine, Smyth sewn through the fold of each signature, and designed to stand up to heavy use.
A synaxarion of the Orthodox Church is a liturgical text that compiles the lives of saints, feast days, and significant events commemorated throughout the Orthodox Christian liturgical year. Derived from the Greek word “synaxis,” which means gathering or assembly, the synaxarion serves as a collection of hagiographies, providing both historical accounts and spiritual reflections on the saints and martyrs who have helped shape the faith. Each entry typically corresponds to a specific day of the year, aligning with the Church’s calendar, thereby integrating the remembrance of saints into the daily worship and devotional practices of the Orthodox faithful.
Archpriest Lawrence Farley’s Synaxarion offers readers a profound and meticulously researched account of the lives of saints celebrated within the Orthodox Christian tradition. This collection, encompassing the rich tapestry of hagiographical narratives, serves not only as a spiritual guide but also as a historical and cultural treasure trove. Farley’s work stands out for its depth, accessibility, and ability to connect contemporary readers with the timeless virtues and struggles of these holy figures.
The primary purpose of a synaxarion is to educate and edify the faithful by presenting the exemplary lives of the saints as models of Christian virtue and piety. Through these narratives, believers are offered insights into the trials, tribulations, and triumphs of those who have steadfastly followed Christ. The stories often highlight themes of sacrifice, faith, and divine intervention, aiming to inspire readers to emulate these virtues in their own spiritual journeys. By venerating the saints and reflecting on their lives, Orthodox Christians are reminded of the enduring presence and guidance of the saints within the life of the Church.
In addition to its educational role, the synaxarion holds a significant place in the liturgical life of the Orthodox Church. During services, especially the Matins (Orthros) service, readings from the synaxarion are incorporated to commemorate the saint of the day or the particular feast being celebrated. These readings serve to connect the liturgical assembly with the historical and spiritual heritage of the Church, fostering a sense of continuity and communion with the saints. This practice underscores the belief in the “communion of saints,” a fundamental aspect of Orthodox ecclesiology, wherein the faithful on earth and the saints in heaven are united in worship and intercession.
The structure of a synaxarion is typically chronological, following the order of the ecclesiastical calendar from September 1 (the beginning of the Orthodox liturgical year) to August 31. Each entry includes a concise biography of the saint or a description of the feast, accompanied by theological reflections and, often, hymns or prayers related to the commemoration. Some synaxarions are more extensive, providing detailed historical contexts and elaborate accounts of the saints’ miracles and martyrdoms, while others offer brief summaries suitable for daily liturgical use.
Overall, the synaxarion of the Orthodox Church is a vital spiritual and liturgical resource that serves to instruct, inspire, and unify the faithful. By chronicling the lives of saints and significant events in the Church’s history, it fosters a deep sense of continuity with the past and encourages a living connection with the holy men and women who have exemplified the Christian faith. Through the synaxarion, Orthodox Christians are invited to draw strength from the witness of the saints, to deepen their own spiritual lives, and to participate more fully in the liturgical and communal life of the Church.
Content & Insights
The Synaxarion is organized according to the Orthodox liturgical calendar, presenting the lives of saints in a chronological sequence that aligns with their feast days. This structure allows readers to engage with the saints’ stories in a manner that complements their spiritual journey through the year. Each entry provides a detailed biography, contextual historical background, and reflections on the saint’s enduring significance within the Church.
One of the strengths of Farley’s Synaxarion is its rich historical and cultural context. Farley delves into the historical circumstances surrounding each saint, offering insights into the societal and political environments that shaped their lives and ministries. This contextualization helps readers appreciate the saints not just as isolated figures of piety but as individuals who navigated and influenced their worlds in profound ways.
Farley’s Synaxarion is not merely a collection of biographies; it is a source of spiritual nourishment. Each entry is accompanied by reflections that highlight the saint’s spiritual journey and the virtues they embodied. These reflections serve to inspire and challenge readers to emulate the saints’ faith, perseverance, and commitment to Christ in their own lives. Farley’s ability to draw spiritual lessons from historical narratives is both insightful and deeply moving.
Liturgical Integration
Despite the depth of the Synaxarion, Farley’s writing remains accessible and engaging. He avoids overly technical language and instead adopts a narrative style that invites readers into the stories of the saints. This approach makes the Synaxarion suitable for a broad audience, from academics and theologians to lay readers seeking spiritual enrichment.
Farley’s work is deeply integrated with the practices and rhythms of Orthodox worship. The chronological arrangement of the saints’ lives according to the liturgical calendar fosters a sense of connection with the Church’s cycle of feasts and fasts. This integration helps readers to not only learn about the saints but also to participate more fully in the liturgical life of the Orthodox Church.
Illustrative Value
Farley’s Synaxarion also offers comparative insights, occasionally highlighting the differences and similarities between Eastern and Western Christian traditions regarding particular saints. This comparative approach enriches the reader’s understanding of the broader Christian tradition and fosters a sense of unity and diversity within the universal Church.
The Synaxarion is enhanced by illustrative material, including icons and historical maps, which provide visual context and aid in the readers’ engagement with the text. These visuals serve as a bridge between the written word and the rich iconographic tradition of the Orthodox Church, deepening the reader’s appreciation for the saints’ stories.
This work is an invaluable educational resource for anyone interested in hagiography, church history, or Orthodox spirituality. Farley’s meticulous research and thoughtful presentation make the Synaxarion an excellent text for both personal study and academic use. It serves as a comprehensive introduction to the lives of the saints and their enduring impact on the Orthodox Christian faith.
Conclusion
Lawrence Farley’s Synaxarion is a devotional work that brings the lives of the saints to life in a way that is both historically informative and spiritually enriching. Its combination of rigor, accessible prose, and spiritual depth makes it an essential addition to any library. Whether you are a catechumen, a devout practitioner, or someone seeking to deepen your understanding of the Christian faith, Farley’s Synaxarion offers a bountiful collection of wisdom and inspiration.
The book O Come O Come, Emmanuel is a devotional compilation of materials structured in liturgical form. It is a work of beautiful material that follows the liturgical format of Be Thou My Vision. The book’s substance is ordered so a believer delves into areas of pertinent interest. The book is 429 pages long and goes beyond standard evangelical reading, including guided subject matter, the Word, and prayer. Over the last 40 days, I gave attention each day to the material and immersed myself in the various segments of the liturgy as a renewed means of devotion.
Introduction
As with Be Thou My Vision, the point of the liturgy in this text is to engage in the material, not as a passive reading for contemplation and understanding, but to engage in areas given to include the following:
Worship
Adoration
Reading of the Law
Confession of Sin
Assurance of Pardon
Recitation of Creeds
Praise
Catechism
Prayer for Illumination
Scripture Reading
Prayer for Intercession
Further Petition
The Lord’s Prayer
In order, each meaning is not strictly ritualistic but complementary to what private or personal connection is made to God as a believer in Christ Jesus. It invites the participant to learn and follow as a disciple devoted to God by the Spirit. This is not ritualism. It is an ordered way of daily worship, instruction, prayer, and spiritual formation. As an instrument of sanctification, consistent immersion in devotion by this form aids in personal spiritual development directed to the glory of God. As a God-centered devotional, personal experience for comfort, satisfaction, and confidence is a secondary benefit.
Worship & Adoration
The distinction between worship and adoration is between scripture and prayer. The call to worship is hearing God’s summons to you through His Word. In this way, the Psalms, or scripture passages that magnify God’s glory, are followed by ready exultation of who He is and what He has done. While adoration is a heart proclamation by the prayers of saints, historical church fathers, Patristics, and Puritans, including the Book of Common Prayer, the devotional participant enters into prayer with them to propagate the adoration through prayers day by day.
Reading of the Law, Confession & Pardon
To acknowledge and confess personal sin, it is necessary to be specific about it. The frame of reference is the standards, requirements, and the law of God as given in the Old and New Testaments. To recognize one’s personal sin, the reading of the law from scripture must be followed and accepted to facilitate confession and repentance. With this confession, scripture reading is followed concerning the assurance of pardon. These are words of comfort received from God.
The Creeds
The Apostles’ Creed, Athanasian Creed, and Nicene Creed are recited to confess orthodox views and proclamations of the Christian faith. The creeds from many centuries ago are read out loud to express belief in what God revealed in His Word, holy scripture. Within the book O Come O Come, Emmanuel, the creeds are alternated and repeated to verbalize them for mental and spiritual intake each day to reinforce scripturally grounded understanding and acceptance of doctrine and orthodoxy to keep from falling into error or heresy.
Praise & Catechism
Once this far along in the daily devotion, the believer’s attention is turned to singing or verbal utterance of praise to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This is the Gloria Patri from the 3rd-5th century for the believer each day as affections are proclaimed with regular attendance from the heart. From earlier worship, adoration, and now praise with confession and reading in between, the spirit within is brought close to God in His presence for continued devotion. After this point, the heart and mind of the believer are directed to the catechism of the catholic and reformed faith. The Westminster Shorter Catechism (1647) is read in a sequence of questions and answers corresponding to faith and practice. In alignment with scripture and proper theological doctrines, a few questions are answered sequentially across 31 days to intake morsels of truth for overall certainty and retention. It originates from the canon of biblical truth.
Prayer for Illumination
Prayer for an enlightened heart and mind is repeated each day in a structured way. Only from the words of historical figures Godly by the testimony of their lives and historical work. These are the prayers of people. Saints and divines who lived long ago by the grace of God to encourage, instruct, and abide in Christ among fellow believers. These prayers also come from the ancient Book of Common Prayer, where the plea for illumination remains in continuity to prior days in a structured way. This area of prayer further supports and reinforces personal prayer to ensure your thoughts and words correspond to scripture and the petitions of Godly orthodox people before modernity.
Scripture Reading
From 1835 to 1843, Robert M’Cheyne, a minister from the church of Scotland, prepared a bible reading plan that orients personal exposition through the New Testament and the Psalms twice a year and the Old Testament once yearly. While this plan includes four chapters per day, this liturgical book offers a reading from a smaller reference passage within an appendix. The M’Cheyne plan places believers within reading across New Testament and Old Testament genres to deepen and widen personal immersion within God’s Word. While this passage in the devotional corresponds to the daily time with the Lord in the M’Cheyne bible plan, you can substitute the reading plan of your choice instead.
Prayer of Intercession & Petition
To begin the prayer for personal interest and attention, this area of prayer begins with historical church fathers and prayers from a range of traditions involving Augustine, Anselm, Kempis, Chrysostom, and various others. As a prayer of intercession begins from ancient writings, the reader is invited to pray for personal needs and interests, the church, and the world. I’ve found that working from a short set of notes or a prayer list is helpful for this time within the liturgy. And if it’s not a distraction, a time of personal petition in this way set to music with incense adds to the time of intimacy. This is an ideal time to pray for your family, friends, church, and the community and widen the scope to include what’s on your heart afterward.
The Lord’s Prayer
The final area of the liturgy is the “Our Father” (the Lord’s Prayer). To be read to yourself, verbalized out loud in remembrance of how Jesus teaches us to pray. To close the liturgy speaking this prayer, not by empty utterance, but by a heart intent of love and loyalty. If you do this on your knees or bow before Him in His presence, even better.
Our Father in Heaven, hallowed be your name; your kingdom come; your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
In the book “In The LORD I Take Refuge,” the author, Dane Ortlund, wrote a commentary alongside each chapter of the book of Psalms. As a Presbyterian pastor with a Ph.D., he offers reflections and observations of substantive value about the Psalter one chapter at a time. The book is with the ESV text of the Psalms prepared in a format where 150 devotions are presented to readers with the author’s encouragement, exhortation, rebuke, and the occasional call to repentance. He often echoes the Psalmists’ sentiments about the lovingkindness of the LORD through song and poetry. He also explores the range of literary meaning as the Psalms are sometimes imprecatory, messianic, prophetic, and musical in lyric and instruction. The range of inspired material prepared throughout the Psalms is covered in a practical way made relevant to readers immersed in everyday life.
The consistent pattern throughout the text is to bring practical application to the lives of believers. In a sense, this book is a work of ministry from the author to comfort readers, challenge them, and remind them of what God meant through the writers of Scripture. This book is not an academic work of interest but a personal journey of the heart and mind. To reflect on what God says to the reader about highly relevant and pertinent topics of interest. Praise, hardships, enmity, comfort, assurance, and promise are touched upon without scripture references elsewhere but are kept to the message within each Psalm at hand. The title chosen for the book is appropriate because it anchors the reader into the thread of meaning throughout the devotional commentary. In The LORD I Take Refuge covers a lot of ground as it is a call and response, or inform and response way to which the material is absorbed day by day. The book’s central point that the author returns to is the refuge of the LORD as the only true and lasting means of safety, protection, and peace from the issues of life with deep spiritual relevance.
The book’s title draws upon Psalm 11:1 phrase, “In the Lord I Take Refuge.” While the majority text, KJV and NKJV, reference the term “trust” instead of “refuge,” the critical text makes use of the translation rendering “refuge” from the original Hebrew Word defined as a place of safety or shelter. This poetic language brings to mind an image of withdrawal and separation to a place of security for protection. The title aligns with what the author intended to convey as he sought to capture what the Psalmists wrote as a body of work. There wasn’t attention placed on the structural or technical features of the text, as the book is intended as a daily companion of both practical and spiritual messages.
The author also uses the writings of historical figures within early Christianity, including the Reformers and the Puritans, to highlight substantive meaning about perspectives rendered by the Psalmists. In support of the author’s reading and comprehension of the subject matter, with its authoritative scriptural weight, correlating and pertinent perspectives from historical people of influence help drive home the points he continues to offer. The wide array of perspectives Ortlund presents from these historical people of God goes a long way to substantiate the credibility of his observations and perspective. The author likely has much to say about the scriptural references, prayers, and reflections of the Patristic fathers, the Reformers, and the Puritans. The wide use of influential people throughout history isn’t for analytical purposes but for their unique perspectives from a time and setting set apart from post-modern society.
As Crossway is the publisher of this devotional book (ISBN: 978-1-4335-7770-3; hardcover, 409 pages), it is suitable for use among numerous people within the Reformed and Renewed traditions of the universal church. While the reflections about each Psalm are from a Reformed perspective, it is evangelical in tone and delivery without compromising the truth and intended meaning of Scripture. While it isn’t recommended that devotional time should be dedicated exclusively to the Psalter, it is a valuable companion to Scripture during personal time in the Word, during family worship and reading, or as a component of private liturgy.