Categories Archives: Historiography

Project Babylon

A forthcoming research project about the Neo-Babylonian empire involves quite a lot of preparation. Involving valid and credible source materials that together will help piece together the details of the ancient Mesopotamian civilization that carried significant weight throughout Scripture, historical tradition, and important literary records.

Thesis

Judah’s captivity by the Neo-Babylonian empire was their return to slavery. To become again governed by a people who worshiped foreign gods just as Egypt did before Israel’s exile. Yahweh did not return His people to Egypt, as their foreign gods were defeated. He delivered them over to other people who served and worshiped other false gods. As the people of Egypt, Canaan, and now Babylon served other gods, they were given to captivity due to their idolatry and betrayal of Yahweh. This paper attempts to answer what life was like in Babylon during Judah’s captivity.

Abstract

The research paper that I intend to develop and post centers around the Neo-Babylonian empire. The society, culture, geography, literature, and spiritual conditions of ancient Babylon are of high historical interest as they represented the heartbeat and dominance of the Mesopotamian region during Israel’s captivity. I expect to find a primitive and shallow “civilization” given to social disorder, polytheism, and frequent self-interest in contradiction to the covenant obligations given by Yahweh to Israel. Babylon would gather tribute, resources, and slaves to build infrastructures such as its institutions, utilities, residences, temples, plus fortifications from numerous conquests and conflicts imposed upon surrounding vassal nations. The Neo-Babylonian empire is most relevant with this paper as it concerns the time of Judah’s captivity. Characterization of the environment in which Judah was beset was sure to be steeped in various forms of trauma. This paper explores some of the causes of Judah’s hardship as physical and spiritual trauma as an outcome of their covenant abandonment.

Framework

Background
This collapse of Assyria was caused largely by the rise of another power-Babylon. In October 626 the Chaldean prince Nabopolassar had defeated the Assyrian army outside Babylon and claimed the throne in Babylon. The kingdom he founded came to be known as the Neo-Babylonian Empire. He consolidated his empire, and by 616 he was on the march to expand his territory. The combined army of the Babylonians and Medes destroyed Nineveh in 612.

Babylon’s rise and Assyria’s collapse created a realignment of power throughout the area. Judah, under Josiah, threw off the yoke of Assyrian dominion and enjoyed a brief period of national independence. This independence was shattered, however, by events in 609 B.C.1

War
The first phase of Judah’s exile was approximately coincident with the accession of Nebuchadnezzar (605–562) to the throne of Babylon. The young prince, having engaged the Egyptians in battle at Carchemish in 605 and defeated them there, was deflected, by the untimely death of his father, from his further objective of removing them from Palestine.2

Society
They imbibed deeply of the society in which they lived, and yet they retained the cherished faith, life, and traditions of their ancestors.3

Culture
It is no coincidence that the awful judgment by God of His people and their exile from their homeland should have occurred under the Babylonians, the mightiest power on earth. Nor is it surprising that their deliverance and return should have been affected under the comparatively beneficent rule of Persia, Babylonia’s even greater successor. In both instances -captivity and return- human potentates and their gods are seen for what they really are – mere instruments in the hand of the omnipotent One who used them to accomplish His judging and saving work.4

Politics
The citizens of Jerusalem anointed Josiah’s second son Jehoahaz as king, but Neco promptly replaced him with his older brother Eliakim, assigning him a regnal name Jehoiakim (609-598 BC.) Jehoiakim tried his hand at power politics….”5

Literary
Those portions of Daniel’s prophecy which deal generally with Gentile affairs (the four kingdoms of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, the humiliation of that king in the episode of the fiery furnace and by his seven years of insanity, and also the experience of Belshazzar and Darius the Mede) were put into a linguistic medium which al the public could appreciate whether Jew or Gentile.6

Prophecy
While Jeremiah is still under house arrest, Yahweh comes to him again with a message of hope regarding future restoration.7

Timeline
Significant historical events span from 710BC at the time of Hezekiah, to the fall of Babylon to Persia in 539BC. Infrastructure development, military campaigns, and invasions, royal accessions, territorial conflict, etc.8

Religion
A Babylonian Theogony. The gods are paired, male and female, the first two being Hain, an otherwise unknown male deity, and Earth. These two brought into existence the next pair of deities, Amakandu and Sea, as well as the city, Dunnu. In the subsequent lines of the text is found the stereotyped account of how, by means of incest and murder, one divine pair succeeded another. Only the names of one more pair, Lahar99 and River, are completely preserved. The names of the male consorts of Ga’um and Ningeshtinna are missing. The dates upon which each new god took control are given and these were obviously related to important festivals of the city, Dunnu.9

Economy
The Amarna Letters (484). When I went to Hamuniri (70) because of the sons of ‘Abdu-Ashirta when they were powerful against me and there was no breath of the mouth of the king to me, then I said to my lord: “Behold our city Byblos! (City in Lebanon). There is much wealth of the king in it, the property (75) of our forefathers. If the king does not intervene for the city, all the cities of the land of Canaan will (no longer) be his. Let the king not ignore this deed!”10

The Code of Hammurabi (99): If a merchant lent money at interest to a trader for the purpose of trading [and making purchases] and sent him out on the road, the trader shall … on the road [the money which was entrusted] to him.11 Cursory summaries of Hammurabi code inscriptions with respect to trade.

Laws
ANE Legal Texts. The tablet originally contained some sixteen paragraphs, of which only nine are well preserved. Peiser suggests a date in the time of Ashurbanipal, but what he regards as the remnants of a date is unquestionably a part of the legislation in §1. However, the script, orthography, and wording, all clearly indicate a date in the Neo-Babylonian Period.12

𒄩𒄠𒈬𒊏𒁉

Citations

______________________
1. Charles H. Dyer, “Jeremiah,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck, vol. 1 (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 1125.
2. Eugene H. Merrill, Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel, Second Edition. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008), 482.
3. Eugene H. Merrill, Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel, Second Edition. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008), 484.
4. Eugene Merrill, Mark F. Rooker, Michael A Grisanti. The World and the Word: An Introduction to the Old Testament. (Nashville: B&H Academic, 2011), 412.
5. Tremper Longman III, Raymond B. Dillard. An Introduction to the Old Testament. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006), 324.
6. Gleason L. Archer,  A Survey of Old Testament Introduction. (Chicago: Moody, 2007), 371.
7. Daniel J. Hays, Tremper Longman III. The Message of the Prophets. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), 181.
8. John D. Barry et al. Faithlife Study Bible. Neo-Babylonian Empire Timeline Infographic. (Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2012)
9. James Bennett Pritchard, ed., The Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed. with Supplement. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), 517.
10. Ibid. Pritchard, 484.
11. Ibid. Pritchard, 170.
12. Ibid. Pritchard, 197.

Bibliography

Coxon, Peter. “Nebuchadnezzar’s Hermeneutical Dilemma.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 1995: 87-97.
Delorme, Jean-Philippe. “Ezekiel: Identity Construction and the Exilic Period.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 2019: 121-141.
Eugene Merrill, Mark F. Rooker, Michael A Grisanti. The World and the Word: An Introduction to the Old Testament. Nashville: B&H Academic, 2011.
Hays, J. Daniel, and Tremper Longman III. The Message of the Prophets. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010.
Lundbom, Jack R. “Builders of Ancient Babylon: Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar II.” A Journal of the BIble and Theology, 2017: 154-166.
Merrill, Eugene H. Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.
Tremper Longman III, Raymond B. Dillard. An Introduction to the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006.
Archer, Gleason L. A Survey of Old Testament Introduction. Chicago: Moody, 2007.
Coxon, Peter. “Nebuchadnezzar’s Hermeneutical Dilemma.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 1995: 87-97.
Delorme, Jean-Philippe. “Ezekiel: Identity Construction and the Exilic Period.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 2019: 121-141.
James Bennett Pritchard, ed. The Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed. with Supplement. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.
John D. Barry et al. Faithlife Study Bible. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2012.
John F. Walvoord, Roy B. Zuck. The Bible Knowledge Commentary. Wheaton: Victor Books, 1985.
Lundbom, Jack R. “Builders of Ancient Babylon: Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar II.” A Journal of Bible and Theology, 2017: 154-166.
Tremper Longman III, Raymond B. Dillard. An Introduction to the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006.

A forthcoming research project about the Neo-Babylonian empire involves quite a lot of preparation. Involving valid and credible source materials that together will help piece together the details of the ancient Mesopotamian civilization that carried significant weight throughout Scripture, historical tradition, and important literary records.


The Neo-Babylonian Empire

The purpose of this post is to bring into view the ancient Neo-Babylonian empire and its long-term permanent effect upon the people and place of both Jerusalem and Judea of the Old Testament.

Introduction

Throughout numerous literary genres within the Old Testament were continued warnings by the prophetic voice and growing geopolitical circumstances throughout the Mediterranean region. The biblical historicity of the Neo-Babylonian empire gives deep and lasting theological messaging to captivate the hearts and minds of those who want to understand what Yahweh did to accomplish His sovereign purposes as He imposed upon the people of ancient Judah and its inhabitants at the capital of Jerusalem. Before, during, and after the upheaval and trauma brought to the people of Judea, Yahweh originated and shaped an empire of extraordinary power and strength to serve Him as an instrument of judgment, destruction, and displacement upon His people (Jer 21:7).

The Neo-Babylonian empire was formed and given the power to execute judgment upon Judah after it had plunged into apostasy by rejecting Yahweh through numerous covenant violations. Specifically, the people of Yahweh became involved in the widespread practice of idolatry, social injustice, and religious ritualism.1 This paper attempts to demonstrate the outcome of covenant disobedience by describing the circumstances and conditions placed upon the people of God by the Neo-Babylonian empire. This research and analysis are an attempt to answer some questions about what life was like in Babylon. Particularly for the people of Yahweh as they went through their time of siege, captivity, and exile. The predatory nature of the Neo-Babylonian empire was a hammer on the hot iron of Israel’s history.

Background

Neo-Babylon’s rise to power was preceded by other powerful and notable historical figures, such as Hammurabi, the Amorite of ancient Old Babylonia.2 Babylon’s presence among the surrounding table of nations became prominent through its advancements in civilization, but also over its rivalries, prior to the arrival of Israel in the land of Canaan. From continents in all cardinal directions, the nations of Egypt, Assyria, Persian, Media, Anatolia, Edom, Moab, Arabia, and others along the circumference of the Mediterranean Sea were dispersed around Palestine inhabited by the nation of Israel. Whether divided or united, the Northern and Southern Kingdoms of Israel were subject to the physical and spiritual pressures of people unlike them.

The geographical, political, social, and religious topography, of the regions surrounding Judea just after the time of the divided monarchy of Israel, presented a continuously corrosive influence upon the people of God until the incremental and certain conquest of the Babylonian empire was brought upon them until their inevitable, prophesied, and collective destruction (Jer. 46-49). Replete through Jeremiah’s account are the judgments of the nations called out by name. To include Judah and Jerusalem to eventually return to Babylon itself, the anger and judgment of Yahweh were upon nations. To execute divine punishment, Yahweh chose to rise up a fierce and undefeatable army with a leader that was militarily well-developed. Nebuchadnezzar II was the King of Babylon and its military leader at the time of its campaigns across the Ancient Near Eastern nations, as specified by the prophet Jeremiah. However, before the onslaught of Babylon toward the many nations under judgment, Nebuchadnezzar’s predecessors needed to defeat Assyria and its king.

In 722 B.C., Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel (Samaria) through the leadership of Sennacherib. Assyria wiped out the Northern Kingdom of Israel and came to dominance throughout the region, while Judah progressively became further threatened and isolated until its destruction as prophesied (Isa. 39:6). The Neo-Babylonian empire would eventually confront and defeat Assyria through its rise to power until it finally collapsed in October of 626 B.C.3  

To set the stage for Neo-Babylonian dominance, Nebuchadnezzar’s father Nabopolassar needed to destroy the cities of Assyria to include Nineveh, Haran, and Carchemish, even with Egyptian support from the South. As Yahweh rose up Assyria, and its king Sennacherib, as an instrument of judgment upon the Northern Kingdom of Israel, He also prepared Babylon to do the same with the Southern Kingdom of Judah. All the while, the newly formed Babylonian empire would execute judgment upon Assyria. Yahweh put together an instrument of divine justice through which He would destroy Jerusalem, Judah, and the neighboring nations. This is the historical scene in which the deportations, exile, and life in Babylon would begin for the Lord Yahweh’s people. As the Babylonian assaults upon Jerusalem and Judah would commence, the Babylonian exile became inevitable for God’s people of Israel.

Chronology

To see the scope of Israel’s plight, it is necessary to consider the timeline before, during, and after Yahweh’s judicious use of Babylon. Moreover, by looking across the course of events, it becomes evident that the Neo-Babylonian empire’s prescribed growth was predicated upon its defined purpose as intended by Yahweh. The intervals of time across the span of Babylon’s existence highly suggest that Yahweh raised the empire to serve a sovereign purpose.

By comparison, the author of Romans wrote that Yahweh raised the pharaoh of Egypt to show His power. And for His name to become known all over all the earth (Rom. 9:17). So, it stands to reason, just as Yahweh raised up the pharaoh of Egypt to oppose the exodus of the Hebrews from Egypt, He rose Nebuchadnezzar II of the Neo-Babylonian Empire to evict Israel from Canaan, their land of promise. As a cycle of epic events at a macro level, from Egypt to Assyria and Babylon, the same theme of transition under duress occurred.

Ante Neo-Babylonian Period

After the Assyrian conquest that involved the captivity of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, there were several decades of inactivity from Babylon until Nabopolassar rebelled to eventually prevail and establish footing as a nation independent of its oppressors. Once Nabopolassar became King of Babylon, a rapid succession of events, between 612 B.C. to 597 B.C., transpired where the newly situated empire became cemented in history as the latest superpower to begin its conquests of numerous nations. Most notably beginning from the battle of Carchemish in 605 B.C., Assyria and Egypt together were defeated to assure no further opposition could impede Babylon’s raids and further territorial exploits. 4 The high concentration of activity right up to the capture of Jerusalem speaks to what the prophet Isaiah earlier foretold (Isa. 39:1-8, 2 Kgs. 20:12-18) to Hezekiah.

Post Neo-Babylonian Period

The Neo-Babylonian Empire was short-lived. From the time Nebuchadnezzar II’s father became King of Babylon in 626 B.C. to its fall to the Persians in 539 B.C. (Dan. 5:28), its dominance was a mere 87-years. As the duration of Judah’s captivity was 70-years (Dan. 9:2), the rough time alignment attests to what the purpose of the Neo-Babylonian empire was.

King Nebuchadnezzar was given rule over Babylon to prosecute conquests and develop the city into a functional state to host Judah and those of the diaspora. Nebuchadnezzar’s reign only lasted 42 years (605 – 562 B.C.).5 Moreover, Babylon became a short-term generational host until the time of the exile was fulfilled when Yahweh would again redeem Israel and bring them back into the land of Canaan (Jer. 32:15).

Once Babylon fell to the Persians in 539 B.C., the Ruler of Persia would become yet another instrument of Yahweh. Where the people of Israel would become liberated, Cyrus the Great granted the people in captivity the authorization to return to their land and resume their lives. While the historical account would make it appear that the intellectually astute King of Persia would permit the return of the Israelites, it was Yahweh all along who called and gifted Cyrus the Great.6 It was Isaiah the prophet who spoke of Cyrus as the “shepherd” of Yahweh (Isa.44:28) to subdue the nations once again as Babylon did before.

Campaigns

The first time Jerusalem’s occupants were deported to Babylon was in 605 B.C. A few years before that, Nebuchadnezzar invaded and destroyed Ashkelon of the Philistine people. Once the battle of Carchemish in Northern Mesopotamia was won, Nebuchadnezzar set out on a multi-year attack on numerous territories, including Gaza, Ekron, Egypt, Lachish, Elam, Tyre, and Anatolia, plus various others East of the Jordan river. His efforts concentrated South of the Fertile Crescent, and he invaded Jerusalem four separate times. The most significant occurrence was in 586 B.C. when Solomon’s temple was destroyed, but the people were deported for the third time. Later, in 582 B.C., Nebuchadnezzar deported Jews to Babylon a final time.

The catalog of targeted nations was historically outlined by the prophet Ezekiel comprehensively (Ezekiel 25-29). These seven nations under judgment also correspond to the prophet Jeremiah’s separate prophetic messages (Jer. 46-51). Moreover, Ezekiel made no mystery of what was to occur in Jerusalem during his ministry. Through acting out the forthcoming exile, the captivity of Judah was symbolized from his role-play by carrying baggage within sight of those with the city (Ezek 12:1-7). Ezekiel prophesied what has to befall Jerusalem and Judah by the Babylonian Empire (Ezek 12:13).

Invasion of Judah

By comparison to Jerusalem and other nations, the extent of destruction throughout Judah was relatively modest. At least archaeological research indicates discoveries that prove Nebuchadnezzar’s assault on Lachish and various other cities.7 The Lachish Ostracon IV, the Lachish letters discovered at Tell ed-Duweir in 1938 in Southern Palestine, indicates correspondence immediately before the siege of Babylonian forces at their walls.8 The devastation in Judah was of a direct bearing upon the entire land of promise. Yet, it is also of significance that Nebuchadnezzar assaulted Hazor in Northern Israel (Jer. 49:28).

As a matter of strategy, the conquests of Babylon were about the business of building an empire. Through strength and power by military force, King Nebuchadnezzar II plundered the treasures and valuables where they were searched and looted.9 Namely, of areas that possessed existing material resources, or wealth, and demonstrated an ability to pay tribute, produce labor, and assume vassal status to the formative Babylonian empire.

Siege of Jerusalem

The historical record of Nebuchadnezzar II’s siege against Jerusalem is confirmed across various passages of Scripture (2 Kgs, 24:20-25, Jer. 52:3-4, 2 Kgs 25:1, Jer. 39:1, 52:4). Israel’s reliance upon Egypt as allies to defeat the forces of Babylon proved ineffective. In fact, the Babylonian’s defeat of the Egyptians and Assyrians at Carchemish (Jer. 46:2) was a foreboding event to indicate further trouble ahead. Yahweh already foretold through His prophets that the new empire would prevail and that they would become subjugated to it (Jer. 4:16, 27). There was nothing that the leaders and occupants of Jerusalem could do to prevent the forthcoming judgment and onslaught once Yahweh’s people reached the point of no return. Jerusalem refused to repent (Jer. 5:3).

 It was apparent that the lessons of Babylon’s predecessors against Northern Israel were not enough to inform them of what would happen to Judah. Sennacherib’s military exploits that destroyed Israel only about 136 years earlier (722 B.C.) did not make it clear enough to the people of Jerusalem and Judah what devastation would come to them. Correspondingly, the people of Southern Israel knew of impending judgment and disaster. Still, they did not heed the expected loss of life, possessions, and the land of which they were blessed in exchange for their return to covenant obedience to Yahweh.

The siege of Jerusalem is recounted in 2 Kings 24:1-7. The Babylonian Chronicle itself refers to the siege of Jerusalem (B.M. 21946; Jerusalem Chronicle) to corroborate the beginning of Nebuchadnezzar’s siege upon the city.10 With limited details about siege methodology, one could conclude that the type of siege machines applied during the battles against Assyria was applied to Jerusalem in due fashion.

Deportations to Babylon

There were four total major deportations from Babylon to Jerusalem over a duration of time. The first three deportations were in succession at intervals of time that correspond to changes in kingly rule over Jerusalem before and after it was destroyed. The first deportation under king Jehoiakim, appointed by Pharoah Neco of Egypt, occurred in 605 B.C. as Judah experienced a change in its vassal status from Egypt (609-605 B.C.) to Babylon (605-598 B.C.). To further empty Jerusalem, the second major deportation occurred in 597 B.C. under the leadership of Jehoiachin (Jehoiakim’s son). To correspond to the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple, the city was further depleted of its population in 586 B.C. The fourth and final major deportation occurred in 581 B.C. (2 Kgs 25:8-21) as Judah was relegated to a dependent province under the governorship of Gedaliah (2 Kgs 25:22-26) as appointed by Nebuchadnezzar.11

Captivity and Exile to Judah

The time of Babylonian exile for the people of Israel was crucial in their history. Most especially concerning their condition and reflection upon their circumstances and punishment as a guilty people before Yahweh. While in exile, they no longer had a temple to worship within, and while in exile, they had a multitude of transgressions to contemplate (Lam. 1:5). They were guilty of Baal worship (Jer. 32:35) and oppression of the poor (Jer. 5:28-29). As the people of Yahweh, Judah was situated in a foreign place to realize that He controls empires and shapes the events of history.12

Through the prophet Jeremiah, Yahweh instructed the people of Judah to settle in and live lives of relative normalcy while in captivity. Until their return decades later, they were to integrate into Babylonian society, participate in the economy, take up employment, and become productive members of the society. In Jeremiah’s letter to the exiles (Jer. 29:1-23), Yahweh specifies the duration of their exile (70-years) and instructs His people to pursue marriage, bear offspring, and guard against the deception that could set them adrift away from their devotion to their God. The biblical and theological point of the exile was to return the people of Judah to Yahweh.

Babylonian Dominance

During the time of the exile, while the people of Israel were rehabilitated, Babylon continued its dominance throughout the regions it conquered. Through its military campaigns, infrastructure development, territorial conflicts, treaties, and political accessions, the Neo-Babylonian empire underwent an unsustainable and rapid time of prosperity and security. The fear and terror that Babylon brought upon the Mediterranean nation’s conformance to the interests of King Nebuchadnezzar II that would pass away after his death.13 The root of Neo-Babylonian’s meteoric rise was Nebuchadnezzar by the will and control of Yahweh. As confessed by Nebuchadnezzar, it was Yahweh who does according to His will. The King of Babylon recognized that Yahweh, “the Most High” and “King of Heaven,” was in control and produced the events and circumstances brought about through Babylon (Dan. 4:34-37). Through the counsel and interpretive work of the prophet Daniel, King Nebuchadnezzar came to recognize that the purpose of the empire’s existence was to serve as an instrument of punishment and justice upon the nations while functioning as a generational host to Judah.

Society

If not purely through the prophet Daniel’s encounters with Nebuchadnezzar, the people of exiled Judah knew why the Neo-Babylonian empire came to exist. Babylon wielded power and strength to judge Judah, and the nations, it all originated from Yahweh, and they knew it. This perspective while Judah was away from their homeland added weight to their interpersonal circumstances among the Babylonians. The reality was, exiled Judah came to understand in advance that their captors were temporarily in their position of authority and supremacy. Because of the kingdoms to follow, empires would rise and fall to bring about the redemptive will of Yahweh according to the prophetic voice of Daniel. Nebuchadnezzar’s kingdom was among the first to set the world stage for the rise and fall of Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, and others down through the centuries.

Until then, in the daily lives of the Jews in Babylon, they were immersed in the culture and social norms of the Mesopotamian people. At the same time, the people of Judah retained their faith, life, and traditions to honor their cherished values and ancestors.14 In general, life in the diaspora appeared bleak after the fall of Jerusalem and the exile of Judah to Babylon. The mindset of the Jews was certain to echo back to the time of Egyptian captivity, then to Assyria, and now to Babylon. To contemplate among themselves, would they ever learn and abide in Yahweh even if it were necessary to return to Him when they fall away or out of fellowship with Him. The body of Judah during and after their time in Babylon had some soul searching to do, especially in light of the evil behaviors of the historical judges that preceded them. They were sure to have a reputation among the Babylonian people and to the Mesopotamian population at large.

Culture, Politics, and Religion

It was usual for nations, kingdoms, or empires to appoint rulers and governors over vassal territories to assure sovereign continuity. To minimize conflicts of interest and maximize the likelihood of cooperation and loyalty, Nebuchadnezzar named successors to rulers, stewards, and governors of the vassal areas of Judea and Jerusalem. Just as Egypt had done before the Babylonian conquest, Pharoah Neco appointed Eliakim, given the name Jehoiakim, over Judah to serve from 609-598 B.C.15 Afterward, Jehoiakim was replaced by his son, Jehoiachin, an evil king, also known as Jeconiah (2 Chr. 36:9). Once the replacement king was confronted by Nebuchadnezzar and deported to Babylon, he was promptly replaced by Mattaniah, with an assigned name Zedekiah, under terms of an agreement in loyalty to Babylon.16

While the city of Babylon itself was sure to have its form of government under the kingship of Nebuchadnezzar, the Neo-Babylonian empire consisted of appointed or accepted rulers who were obligated to abide by terms that assured their well-being. To fund its projects, military, and infrastructure, it was necessary to keep tribute currencies and resources flowing to the Babylonian empire while securing ongoing allegiance even if under duress or threat of destruction and removal. The political conditions at the time were not merely in competition for resources or power to make policy and govern but to survive by cooperation and legal adherence to Babylonian requirements.

The social order of Babylon was held together by its veneration of Marduk. The foreign god, to the Jews, was recognized as the supreme ruler of the Mesopotamian universe.

Marduk was the god of Babylon.17 The people of Babylon associated Marduk as a political deity who was a storm god responsible for the delivery of rain and vegetation growth. From the pantheon of Old Babylonian tradition, Marduk became an amalgam of other gods as he attained their features as a form of lasting supremacy. The priests of Babylon linked Marduk to significant god activity and were akin to the god Baal of the Canaanites. Just as Baal was the storm god of the Canaanites,18 Marduk was the storm god of the Babylonians. Both were associated with the Baal cycle of Mesopotamian religious tradition.

The worship and prayer of the Babylonian people were directed to Marduk as a patron deity. Beneficial outcomes were expected from the god as a bartering matter to fulfill the needs of the people in support of water, vegetation, and agriculture. Art, gatherings, theater, education, and other cultural functions often centered around Marduk as a form of honor and community. The Babylonian people directed their hopes and aspirations to their god, Marduk.

Law and Trade

The range and methods of monetary revenue sources and barter came in the form of taxation (tribute) and redistribution of currency through labor and projects by which constructed materials were involved. The sale of primitive goods and services was abundant in support of public and private livelihoods of persons who would offer their competencies and materials. For example, stone workers, woodworkers, and carriages were typical occupations. Babylonian temples were a form of brothels as prostitutes accepted offerings from visitors or worshipers.19

Social order was often held together by a mixed and subjective type of “justice” stemming from the preferences of Nebuchadnezzar or by his decrees borne from the counsel of his officials. For example, Nebuchadnezzar “passed sentence” upon Zedekiah (Jer.52:9, 11), the last king of Judah, when he broke his sworn loyalty oath.20 In this instance and others, Nebuchadnezzar was a vicious and brutal judge and executioner without any sense of mercy whatsoever to temper the perceptions of the Babylonian citizenry. Nebuchadnezzars’ absurdity of justice was further highlighted by the incident in which he was enraged because Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego would not bow before his constructed statue set before them (Dan. 3:8-29). While the three who were subjected to the furnace, in the cause of justice, were miraculously unharmed, Nebuchadnezzar’s officials herald a legal proclamation with an explicit penalty of death bearing no objection from the King (Dan. 3:4-6).

While Nebuchadnezzar was a brilliant military commander capable of putting nations to the sword, he was an accomplished practitioner of torture and violence. All while reigning as the king of the Neo-Babylonian empire, he was fecklessly inept when it came to the justice of his people, namely the subjects of Babylon at all levels. The façade of beauty, wealth, and splendor of his empire was paper-thin by its structures, assets, and looted treasures displaced by the judgments of Yahweh. The empire, as it was meant to be, was temporal with a termination date. As the king was unpredictable and inconsistent with maintaining order within his kingdom, the Neo-Babylonian empire was secured yet unstable. It was sure to fall once he was deceased eventually. His platitudes and acknowledgments about Yahweh as Most High were only meaningful insofar as an admission before the gods and his people that Yahweh is God.

Conclusion

When taking a long and careful look at the historical reality of the Neo-Babylonian empire, one might see the mystique or intriguing nature of its place in time. Its feats, accomplishments, and innovative contributions to following generations are a false weight of comparison to that which it was. The Neo-Babylonian empire was an exceedingly evil and profane place in which the people of Judea were to reside for a fixed duration of 70-years. By the very covenant violations that got Judah into severe trouble, idolatry, and injustice, they were further steeped in it during their time of exile. As Judah was instructed to muster normalcy, the people of God were to endure their exile until their liberation before the Neo-Babylonian empire’s destruction in 539 B.C., by Yahweh, through the hands of King Cyrus the Great of Persia.21

Citations

1 Daniel J. Hays, Tremper Longman III, ed., The Message of the Prophets. A Survey of the Prophetic and Apocalyptic Books of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), 64-67.
2 Eugene H. Merrill, Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008), 46.
3 Charles H. Dyer, “Jeremiah,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck, vol. 1 (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 1125.
4 John D. Barry et al. Faithlife Study Bible. “Neo-Babylonian Empire Timeline Infographic” (Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2012).
5 Rose Book of Bible & Christian History Timelines, More than 6000 years at a glance (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2006), 7.
6 Ibid. Merrill, 503.
7 Michael A. Grisanti, “History of the Covenant People Course Notes” (unpublished course notes, TMU, 2018), 140.
8 James Bennett Pritchard, ed., The Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed. with Supplement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), 321.
9 Jack R. Lundbom, “Builders of Ancient Babylon: Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar II,” Journal of Bible and Theology, Vol.7 (2017), 160.
10 James Bennett Pritchard, ed., The Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed. with Supplement. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969), 563.
11 D. J. Wiseman, “Babylonia,” ed. D. R. W. Wood et al., New Bible Dictionary (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), 115.
12 Rainer Albertz, Israel in Exile: The History and Literature of the Sixth Century B.C.E. (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), 439.
13 David Helm, Daniel for You, ed. Carl Laferton (Surrey: The Good Book Company, 2015), 38-39.
14 Eugene H. Merrill, Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008), 484.
15 Tremper Longman III, Raymond B. Dillard. An Introduction to the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006), 324.
16 Andrew E. Hill. “Jehoiachin,” Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1988), 1102.
17 Tzvi Abusch, “Marduk,” ed. Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999), 543.
18 James R. Battenfield, “YHWH’s Refutation of the Baal Myth through the Actions of Elijah and Elisha,” in Israel’s Apostasy and Restoration Essays in Honor of Roland K. Harrison, edited by Avraham Gileadi (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1988), 26.
19 Mark W. Chavalas, “Herodotus and Babylonian Women,” in Conversations with the Biblical World, Vol. 35 (2015), 22 (Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999), 34.
20 Peter Coxon, “Nebuchadnezzar’s Hermeneutical Dilemma,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 66 (1995), 92.
21 Debra Reid, Martin H. Manser, Who’s Who of the Bible: Everything You Need to Know about Everyone Named in the Bible. Prod. Logos Systems Inc.(Oxford, England: Lion Books, 2013).

Bibliography

Abusch, Tzvi. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. 2nd. Edited by Bob Becking, Peter W. van der Horst Karel van der Toorn. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1998.
Albertz, Rainer. Israel in Exile: The History and Literature of the Sixth Century B.C.E. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003.
Archer, Gleason L. A Survey of Old Testament Introduction. Chicago: Moody, 2007.
Chavalas, Mark W. “Herodotus and Babylonian Women.” Conversations with the Biblical World 35, 2015: 22-52.
Coxon, Peter. “Nebuchadnezzar’s Hermeneutical Dilemma.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 1995: 87-97.
Debra Reid, Martin H. Manser. Who’s Who of the Bible: Everything You Need to Know about Everyone Named in the Bible. Prod. Logos Systems Inc. Oxford: Lion Books, 2013.
Grisanti, Michael A. History of the Covenant People, Course Notes. Santa Clarita, 06 02, 2021.
Hays, J. Daniel, and Tremper Longman III. ed., The Message of the Prophets. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010.
Helm, David. Daniel for You. Edited by Carl Laferton. Surrey: The Good Book Company, 2015.
Hill, Andrew E. Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1988.
James Bennett Pritchard, ed. The Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed. with Supplement. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.
Koehler, Ludwig. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. Edited by M.E.J. Richardson. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2000.
Lundbom, Jack R. “Builders of Ancient Babylon: Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar II.” A Journal of Bible and Theology, 2017: 154-166.
Merrill, Eugene H. Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.
Rose Publishing; Illustrated edition. Rose Book of Bible & Christian History Time Lines. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2006.
Tremper Longman III, Raymond B. Dillard. An Introduction to the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006.
Walvoord, John F., Zuck, Roy B. The Bible Knowledge Commentary. Wheaton: Victor Books, 1985.
Wiseman, D.J. Babylonia, New Bible Dictionary. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1996.

Topology of Israel

There are four longitudinal zones that comprise of the land of Israel. These zones run from North to South while each have an adjacent neighboring region. All four are distinct and unique from one another laterally and in elevation. Each has its own separate attributes in the composition of Israel overall. The climates among these zones range from temperate and fertile to arid, dry and barren. To highlight further differences, the topographical contour, environmental severity and scarcity of water beyond the Hill country are especially pronounced. Furthermore, among all zones within a relatively small area, Israel consists of forests, plains, valleys, mountains, hills, deserts, canyons and seacoasts. Including a large river running the length of the deep Rift Valley.

The Coastal Plain region is rich in agriculture and it provides merchants port access to the Mediterranean Sea. The Hill Country to the East of the Coastal zone serves as a watershed as it rises in elevation all the way to the edge of the Rift Valley. Still Eastward, the 10-mile wide Rift Valley below is a very large trench that extends up and down the full length of Israel. Finally, the rough and arid Transjordan Plateau is a desert high above the Rift Valley that runs contiguous with the Arabian Desert for hundreds of miles to the East.

Given the geographical variation within the area, together these zones represent a synergy of topography and natural resources. Such that their whole is greater than the sum of their parts. Largely because each together contributes to social suitability, sustenance, commerce and defense of the country in a way that suggests that the land is intentionally and providentially crafted. Each zone does not operate or exist as a free-standing entity all its own. The country as it is formed appears assembled and situated this way for a specific purpose (Ezekiel 5:5). The Holy Land is a region where Israel is strategically positioned on the world stage.

Hezekiah’s Tunnel

An ancient paleo Hebrew inscription was discovered in Hezekiah’s tunnel that gives a clear historical record of how the underground aqueduct was excavated. The Siloam Inscription, or Shiloah Inscription, was etched into the rock wall of the tunnel to describe the method by which the aqueduct was quarried. That in support of the biblical account of 2 Kings 20:20, workers thousands of years ago dug through each end of the tunnel to meet at about its center. In so doing, they navigated toward one another while digging until their breakthrough in the rock to each other. With pickaxes striking the rock wall and while calling out to one another, workers from each end dug in a coherent direction until they met together to completely open the water channel from Gihon spring to the Siloam Pool.

With successive approximation, as they dug through the tunnel’s rock walls, there were some false starts that required course correction. This is made evident from a close look at the tunnel wall contour and shallow cut-away sections of the tunnel that appear abandoned. While adjusted and continued digging advanced toward each end with reduced time and effort, workers called to one another as a sort of sounding beacon to remain on course or to return on course as necessary.

The ancient inscription translated to English reads as follows to detail the method of the dig.

The Siloam Inscription

“Behold the tunnel. This is the story of its cutting. While the miners swung their picks, one towards the other, and when there remained only 3 cubits to cut, the voices calling to his fellow was heard – for there was a resonance in the rock coming from both north and south. So the day they broke through the miners struck, one against the other, pick against pick, and the water flowed from the spring towards the pool, 1200 cubits. The height of the rock above the head of the miners was 100 cubits.”  – Translation by E. Puech [1]

With a total excavation distance of 1,750 feet, there are questions that naturally surface about what additional methods Hezekiah applied to accomplish the dig. Such as how they brought light into the tunnel, how rock debris was removed and how their axes were sharpened to drive through the tunnel. However, while their objective was to reroute the spring water from outside the city walls to within the city, Hezekiah’s leadership and support for the LORD’s people was an example of his character and stature before God. He brought living water through the living rock and overcame a seemingly insurmountable obstacle during a time of duress. That with determination and persistence, he laid preparation for a siege by the Assyrians at the time of King Sennacherib. He brought living water through the living rock to help assure the well-being and continued survival of the LORD’s people.



[1] Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, The Holy Land, An Oxford Archaeological Guide 5th Edition
(Oxford U.K., Oxford University Press) 128

Burial Location of Christ

Modern and historical rationale about why the Church of the Holy Sepulcher is preferred over the Garden Tomb appears to rest upon the type of tomb Jesus’s body was placed. While the first-century era in which the Jewish dead were traditionally buried differs from those during the first temple period (1200-586 BC), there are clear structural distinctions between the two.

The Garden Tomb is dated within the first temple period as referenced between the 9th and 7th centuries BC. By historical photographic record and visual observation, the interior of this tomb consists of a small collection area reserved for bone collection of the Jewish dead. Whereas it is suggested that the Garden Tomb bed platform is reused by the deceased while the bones of prior corpses in decay become co-mingled in an adjacent container location. Moreover, this tomb is atypical of first-century tombs by the absence of burial niches (kukhin/kokim) or arch covered burial platforms (arcosolium) hewed into a tomb wall.

The tomb of the Holy Sepulcher is of a first-century burial tradition. That is, it consists of a number of burial niches and platforms within a cave environment. That after a period of one year of corpse decay, the bones of the dead became collected and placed into an ossuary or osteophagi for separation and portability of an individual’s remains.

As a comparison between the tomb descriptions of Lazarus and Joseph of Arimathea, there is a commonality in scripture from the root Greek language of biblical text. The personal tomb reference of risen Lazarus given in John 11:38 is mnēmeion or mnēmeiou to indicate a memorial chamber sense of meaning. That is, a burial chamber constructed and marked for a person’s remembrance. The tomb of Joseph of Arimathea is given the same term in scripture (Matt 27:60, John 19:41) to indicate the type of a new tomb he constructed in a garden. Matthew 27:60 explicitly reads among various English translations that Joseph made the tomb for himself.

In reference to Luke 23:55, the same account uses the term mnēmeion as ‘tomb’ to describe how Jesus’s body was laid. Two verses prior to that in Luke 23:53, the Greek term for tomb changes to mnēma having a burial chamber sense of meaning. Different than mnēmeion which is a memorial chamber sense of meaning. Where mnēma in scripture appears closer in meaning to a sepulcher in use as a gravesite.

The Babylonian Talmud (Baba Metsia 85b; Baba Batra 58a) references this type of tomb as either ‘rock-hewn’ or a ‘natural cave’ translated to the term ‘Mearta’. Mearta translated to English is grotto. The term grotto in English is defined as a small picturesque cave, especially an artificial one in a park or garden. Furthermore, by the first-century tradition, a kukhin (kokhim), or arcosolium hewed into the wall of a Mearta suggests a more plausible account of where Jesus was interred. It is, therefore, reasoned this type of structure found in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher adds further credibility and confidence about where Jesus was buried and rose from the dead.

To summarize, comparative scriptural references and historical records both point to the tomb of Jesus as a first-century sepulcher. As through the centuries, it is recognized why the Church of the Holy Sepulcher is the preferred burial location of Jesus.

As one may conclude that Joseph of Arimathea constructed the tomb of Jesus according to first-century tradition or practices, the Garden Tomb is a wonderful and meaningful pilgrimage location for fellowship and remembrance of our LORD and King.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is HolySepulcher.jpg

Site Profile: Jericho

Jericho is among the oldest cities in the world and the first city conquered as referenced in the Old Testament. [1] As written in the book of Joshua (Joshua 6:1-27), the city was destroyed by fire with the slaughter of all its inhabitants. Jericho is referred to as the city of palm trees [2] and its place-name means “moon.” [3] In Genesis 13:10 the plains of Jericho within the south Jordan River valley are characterized as a well-watered garden. [4]

Old Testament Jericho
The site of OT Jericho is largely today subdued by erosion. Through exposure to wind and rain over the years, its location is pitted and marred by abrasion and environmental wear. While the surface area of OT Jericho is worn at its exterior due to stresses, substantial historical records were buried for discovery to reveal details about the city’s construction and layout. Specifically, records pertaining to burn sites, pottery, dwellings, and wall construction.

Two key areas of interest with OT Jericho pertain to its destruction and the account of Joshua’s scouts involving Rahab, a Canaanite prostitute resident of Jericho. With extensive archaeological research, to verify the historical validity of these biblical accounts, Jericho’s historical background is buried beneath modern-day Tel es-Sultan. Whereas the specifics about timing and method of destruction are well documented and made public by John Garstang (1930-1936), Bryant G. Wood (1990) and others.

The biblical account of Jericho’s felled wall is clearly articulated in Joshua 6:20. To validate the biblical record, historical and archaeological evidence was collected and analyzed to recognize the ceramic type in that biblical era along with the erosion and fire damage that ceramic evidence underwent.

Long after the city was burned in a fire by Joshua’s men, there were jug containers excavated from within the city. Those jugs contained grain with further archaeological evidence of fire damage. With Garstang’s discovery of fallen mud bricks from inside of the city and the presence of scorched surfaces throughout the area, the historicity of the biblical account was verified. Decades later, Bryant Wood’s successful refutation of radiocarbon-14 dating of burned grain found within the containers at Jericho resolves questions, doubt, and controversy about the timeline of the attack in the historical record. [5] The inside-outward fallen brick wall of Jericho is not just legend, but historical fact as proven by archaeological evidence across various research studies. [6]

It appears that the capstone message associated with OT Jericho is the curse that is proclaimed upon it by Joshua. Specifically, that the one who again builds or fortifies Jericho shall experience the loss of his offspring. As thereafter confirmed and fulfilled in scripture (1 Kings 16:34), Hiel of Bethel in his defiance loses all his children while building Jericho several hundred years after its destruction. The subsequent curse that fell upon him revealed the oath proclaimed by Joshua and the Israelites before the LORD (Joshua 6:26).

New Testament Jericho
A separate nearby Jericho site sometimes referred to as Herodian Jericho, underwent further development with the construction of palaces, complex buildings, swimming pools, a hippodrome, a theater and possibly a gymnasium. The area supported numerous residential dwellings during the second temple period. [7] Well after the events of OT Jericho, further biblical narratives are recorded with miracles performed by Jesus while He spent time traveling there during His ministry. [8]

While numerous New Testament Jericho locations remain in place, modern construction and dwellings prevent research or archaeological excavations.

Modern Jericho
From post-biblical Jericho through the Crusader era up to about the 1940’s, Jericho was a village of less development and notoriety. Undeveloped through hundreds of years whereas at the turn of the 20th century it was sparsely populated with mud huts. A sort of Holy Land ghetto as described by Dr. Olin who says it was the “meanest and foulest of Palestine.” [9]

In contrast to earlier decades of mud huts, today the city is rich in produce as supported by a powerful spring in the area. Jericho is on the West Bank of the Jordan river within Israel and it is populated with Palestinian peoples and a few Jewish settlements at its outskirts. The area is 80-85% Sunni Muslim [10] occupied while the city is widely irrigated for agricultural purposes. There is significant trade and tourism in the area to support Holy Land visitors from among many nations throughout the globe.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Mitzpeh-1024x575.jpg

[1] Collins Thesaurus of the Bible, A. Colin Day, Region, M Place Names Beginning J, M3a Jericho, the Place, 184
[2] Deuteronomy 34:3
[3] Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary, Jericho
[4] The Holman Christian Standard Bible, Genesis 13:10 annotated
[5] “Digging up Jericho”, Kathleen M., Kenyon (1952-1958) London: Ernest Benn, 1957
[6] Carbon 14 Dating at Jericho, Bryant G. Wood, Ph.D., “Conquest of Canaan”, 08/07/2008
https://biblearchaeology.org/research/conquest-of-canaan/4051-carbon-14-dating-at-jericho
[7] Netzer, Ehud, “Jericho, Tulul Abu El-‘Alayiq, Excavation Until 1951.” New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land 2 (1993): 682–83
[8] Matthew 20:29, Mark 10:46, Luke 10:30-37, Luke 18:35, Luke 19:1
[9] Smith’s Bible Dictionary, Jericho, https://biblehub.com/topical/j/jericho.htm
[10] CIA World Factbook, West Bank, Jericho.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html

Ancient Road Via Maris

Along Israel’s coastal plain, adjacent to the Mediterranean Sea, there is an ancient geological route formation from Egypt to Mesopotamia. A route through the Fertile Crescent and into Iraq between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers far to the North East of Israel. Placed along this route is a road recognized and entitled the “Via Maris.” The etymology of the Via Maris name comes from Latin as the “way of the sea.” This interpretation appears in both the Old and New Testament rendering of the prophecy concerning the LORD’s arrival and ministry (Isaiah 9:1, Matthew 4:15).

But there will be no more gloom for her who was in anguish; in earlier times He treated the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali with contempt, but later on He shall make it glorious, by the way of the sea, on the other side of Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles.

The people who walk in darkness
Will see a great light;
Those who live in a dark land,
The light will shine on them.

Isaiah 9:1-2

As the LORD has centered the nation of Israel upon the earth, one could surmise that He has shaped the land through natural processes over time. To position the arrival of His ministry from Galilee, where people become subject to His redemptive plan. From where “the light which will shine upon them” appears between the Mediterranean Sea and beyond the Jordan River. Through the entire length of the Israeli coast along the Via Maris, the King’s Highway, and the Ridge Route. Written in scripture, the LORD’s message and glory goes forward as the light that shines in the shadow of death (Isaiah 9:2 NKJV).

What Israel gains in terms of wealth and power through the Via Maris route and topography, the LORD’s purposes prevail. While we recognize the Via Maris as having economic and defense advantages, Israel can collect tariffs, conduct trade, and accept tribute from its citizens and visitors. Routes are controlled to direct traffic and regulate supply for military campaigns in its defense along the Via Maris.

So, it would appear under the new covenant, the strategic placement of the Via Maris is outward going and not only a source for wealth and power Israel’s prosperity and security. It is for the LORD’s purposes in support of His redemptive mission.

The Via Maris is a strategic route of geocentric convergence among nations. For His chosen people within Israel, along the Way of the Sea and outward. Beyond the Jordan by the Via Maris to the gentiles. The coming and going of people centered around the gospel and the LORD’s mission, beginning in His ministry with His Apostles.

A Roman Road
Nicolas Poussin – 1648

Satellite Atlas Videos

The Bulls of Bashan

In terms of our LORD’s mission, there are highly essential outcomes as necessary for the kingdom of God’s arrival and His redemptive work on earth. The biblical worldview of the fall of man coincides with the presence of rebellion and evil as the enemies of Yahweh and the cause of Christ. Now and before the resurrection of Christ, there is a spiritual condition upon humanity that is hostile to our Creator and His interests. People are enslaved to their sin as they live out their lives in the presence of spiritual beings that seek or contribute to their eternal demise. Not only to destroy the human soul wherever it resides but to also maintain an affront to God and His purposes.

On Mount Hermon, Jesus, our LORD transformed into a glorified state of being as recorded in Matthew 17:1-8. In His full radiant glory, His Apostles Peter, James, and John witnessed His newly formed presence as a temporary transformation while in the company of Moses and Elijah, who returned from their place in the kingdom of heaven. Both were previously deceased yet returned before Jesus’ resurrection to appear with Him on Mount Hermon in the territory of Bashan.

Geography

According to Deuteronomy 3:9, Mount Hermon is also called Mount Sirion by the Sidonians, and Mount Senir by the Amorites also referred to as Baal-Hermon (Judges 3:3, 1 Chronicles 5:23). Topographically, it is 9,232 feet above sea level in altitude and 13 miles long.1 The mountain rests at satellite coordinates 35.86 longitude and 33.42 latitude (33° 24′ 58.182″ N 35° 51′ 25.294″ E). Its base and slopes range at approximately 38.6 square miles with a limestone, sandstone, volcanic rock, and alkali basalt composition. Populated with fir trees (Ezekiel 27:5) and oaks in the surrounding Bashan area (Ezekiel 27:6), Mount Hermon is sparsely forested. The vegetation and ecology of Mount Hermon mainly consist of emmer wheat as a food staple native to the Fertile Crescent. The physical shape and contour of the mountain are carved by natural processes including tectonic movement and erosion.

Climate & Seasonality

Mount Hermon gets as much as five feet of snow each year at its upper elevations. Overall precipitation from dew, rain, and snow, is a source of water at the foot of the mountain and to the Jordan river further South. Rainfall on Mount Hermon averages about 53 inches per year, with the highest precipitation in January and February with an average of about 119 rainy days throughout the year. Daily average temperatures range from a Winter seasonal low of about 28°F to a high of 71°F in the Summer.

Regional Significance

The history of Bashan and its upper reaches of Mount Hermon is replete with cultic paganism. Where for centuries, from just before the New Testament era, the number of shrines to pagan deities or false gods is many. Excavations carried out over decades in support of archaeological research have yielded evidence of pagan worship and service.2 Artifacts, temples, pottery, coinage, pillars, capitals, altars, idol figures, and inscriptions appear in both elaborate and primitive structures on Mount Hermon.

During the Old Testament era, the territory of Bashan had a cultural reputation as the “Gates of Hell” or unholy ground. It was where the deified and dead kings of Canaan were made to dwell.3 The linguistic root of the word the land of the Rephaim is from the Ugaritic language. Pronounced and spelled “Bathan.” As eventually recognized by direct inference, Bashan, or “place of the serpent.” 4

With the separation of Samaria and Judah, many people deserted Yahweh from Samaria and began to worship false gods at the high places. Recorded in numerous areas within the Old Testament and given by example with King Ahaz (2 Kings 16:4). There were numerous others among the divided kingdoms who participated in idol worship or who tolerated that activity from within the population in general. Over time and with the comingling of Roman deity worship of Zeus and Pan in the area, it became a cesspit of worship and service to false gods.

Spiritual Significance

Because the sons of God and their demonic offspring crave worship and service of the flesh, Israel sacrificed to the demons which inhabited the idols they formed.5 As written in Deut 32:17, the demons among the elohim were worshiped and served. They were understood and recognized as “gods”, as written in Hebrew “elohim.” They were spiritual entities that were demons or “sedim” / “shedim” who became the perverse objects of their worship, bargaining, and prayers. Idolatry was not the worship of other “gods” as often mistranslated but of elohim, which does refer to spiritual beings including demons or devils translated in Deut 32:17 and elsewhere. The mindset of the biblical idolaters recognized that the gods were shedim. Those placed over the nations as elaborated further along in this written work.

Methodology & Extra-Biblical Corroboration

This effort is to thread a fabric of spiritual meaning across both the Old and New Testaments. Broadly to bring together biblical confidence about the punctuated significance of the transfiguration on Mount Hermon. As a stitching of events, or linear sequence across time, to demonstrate that the LORD’s mission was to permanently reclaim the nations and overcome spiritual darkness in a way that was striking and epic.

Along with various layman, scholarly, and historical texts in support of research, the Apocryphal books of Enoch (Aramaic) were referenced to obtain further traditional and historical information. More specifically, the Enochian books were discovered among the Dead Sea scrolls (cave 4 fragments).6

Old Testament Sequence of Events

To outline a series of events to highlight biblical and extra-biblical support for what had occurred on Mount Hermon, the reader will begin to recognize the more profound spiritual significance of what took place. The biblical back story of events that led up to the transfiguration of Hermon further serves as a body of historical evidence and archaeological discoveries that match ancient written work.

The mission and purpose of Jesus’ ministry are both conquest and liberation. First, a conquest against spiritual forces of darkness, and second liberation from those forces, sin and its consequences. The long and wide view of scripture provides the context for what Christ accomplished on Mount Hermon. This walkthrough begins with a story familiar to first-century scripture readers and biblical writers. In 1 Enoch 6-16, the 200 sons of God, often referred to as the Watchers, meet on Mount Hermon to make a pact. A curse-laden pact about their desire to marry human women and produce offspring of their own. It was here that offspring became giants within the Canaanite region of the Old Testament era. These were an abomination upon the Earth, and they were of a defiled bloodline(1 Enoch 15:1-12). Eventually, because of their lineage as corrupted and fallen angels, offspring giants formed as demonic spirits as they were killed or died out.7

Referenced in historical Mesopotamian texts as the Apkallu,8 the sons of God became understood as Watchers (Gen 6:1-7, Daniel 4). Corrupted by their consummation of human women. They were condemned and destroyed in the flood that Noah and his sons were delivered from. As prescribed by God, the biblical flood wiped out the demonic bloodline to include mankind. Their presence intermingled with humanity posed a significant strain on those who were image bearers of Yahweh. The Nephilim, the Rephaim, the Amorites, and others were of the sons of God who chose flesh over heaven in the presence of the Most-High Elohim. The offspring of the sons of God (Watchers, Apkallu), eventually began to devour men in their effort to sustain themselves.9 In a profound way, these physical beings of spiritual darkness wronged mankind (1 Enoch 10:12-15).

Once humanity recovered from the flood that wiped out nearly all living beings as written in Genesis 7, Noah and his family began fresh to set about a new life and populate their area with new peoples and tribes. Eventually, these descendants built a high skyward tower within the town of Babel as recorded within scripture (Gen 11:7-9). A tower of insolence that became an object of destruction from God whereby He scattered the people of the land and distributed them elsewhere to distant regions with new languages and cultures. God disinherits the nations and allocates them to the “sons of God” (Deut 32:8-9). The judgment of the LORD to scatter people from Babel preceded His covenant declaration with Abraham and his descendants. Yahweh seals a covenant with Abraham for him to become the Father of Israel. The LORD promises to build a nation from Abraham as His portion among the nations (Gen 12:3) governed by the sons of God.

Wholly corrupted were the peoples as given to the nations and the “sons of God” who ruled over them. The spiritually false gods behind the idols, altars, and Asherim, the people would eventually come to worship them for millennia. With the population growth of Israel and their enslavement to Pharaoh, the plagues of Egypt became directed at the “gods of Egypt” (Ex 12:12, Num 33:4). Moreover, it was Moses who, in scripture, proclaimed that Yahweh is above all other gods (Ex 15:11).

As the LORD led Israel out of captivity from Egypt and the “son of God” who it was allocated to, Joshua, the benefactor of Moses, set out to decimate the nations corrupted mainly by the sons of God. To include Og, the king of Bashan and ruler over Mount Hermon, who was a Rephaim descendant as described in Joshua 12:4-5. The Rephaim were giants along with the Nephilim who were offspring of the “sons of God,” princes of old, or Watchers as the accursed and fallen angels written about in Daniel 4:13-18 and Genesis 6:1-7.

While Bashan was recognized as the gateway to the underworld, more specifically, Canaanite hell, the lands outside of Israel belonged to other “gods” (elohim). Israel as a whole is the LORD’s territory as holy ground just as Israel was the LORD’s inheritance (Deut 4:19-20, 1 Sam 26:17-19). To demonstrate this point, the commander of the Syrian Army (Naaman) asked Elijah for dirt from Israel to carry back to his home because he recognized the one and true holy ground. Naaman wanted the holy ground to take back with him to worship Yahweh. The ground by which his people worshiped the god Rimmon was not holy ground (2 Kings 5:15-19).

It was these sons of the Most-High in His congregation who came under judgment for their injustice among nations as written in Psalm 82. They were the bulls of Bashan in the unseen realm, which, as prophesied, surrounded the messiah during his crucifixion (Ps 22:12). They were of the 200 corrupted sons of God on Bashan. The watchers, or the same stock and origin as described in Daniel 4:23.

Biblically, the dead Rephaim are understood to live in the underworld (Job 26:5-6, Ps 88:10, Prov. 21:16, Is. 14:9-15). These spirits of the dead are referred to as “repaim” in the Hebrew language or “rpum” in Ugaritic. Where both are the root of the Rephaim spirits of dead giants. 10,11 The same giants that Joshua conquered from Bashan and outward throughout Canaan. Where Yahweh conquers the demonic stronghold among nations starting in Bashan at Mount Hermon (“from on high”; Ps 68:18, Eph 4:8). A reference caparison to Jesus’ ascent to “a high mountain” in Matthew 17:1.

New Testament Sequence of Events

In numerous places throughout the gospels, Jesus refers to himself as the “Son of Man” (Mt 8:20, Mk 13:26, Lk 17:30, Jn 3:13). To call attention to the fact He wasn’t of those who were born of mixed blood from a corrupted and hybrid lineage. More specifically, through His virgin birth, He was not of a corrupted bloodline from what the sons of God did long before His arrival.

Along the course of Jesus’ ministry, He arrives at the foot of Mount Hermon within Bashan. It is there that Jesus informs Peter that the “Gates of Hell” shall not prevail against him. He was the rock on which the LORD will build His church (Mt 16:17-18). The literal sense of “Gates of Hell” was spoken here because they were in Caesarea Philippi of Northern Bashan. Both Mount Hermon and Bashan had a reputation for being an exceptionally evil place.

Upon Mount Hermon, Jesus takes His apostles Peter, James, and John into the wilderness. Before them, He becomes transformed in appearance to His glorified state. His transformation on Mount Hermon right at the heart of enemy territory was no longer of purely His flesh, but of this glorified body. It was there that in the presence of the Apostles, while with Moses and Elijah, He plunges an eternal stake into the domain of the corrupted. He has reclaimed the nations, and the Kingdom of God has arrived right on Mount Hermon. To press into Gentile areas and eventually flood the Earth with His Spirit.

East of the Jordan, into Gentile territory, Jesus and His apostles make further incursions into enemy territory (Matt 17:14, Mk 5:1). Only this time within the physical space that the LORD commands and now wholly owns according to His divine and sovereign plan. Specifically, in East Galilee, they encounter a Demoniac who was dwelling in Bashan, the abode of the dead and territory of evil spirits. It was there that the Legion of demons who possessed the ravaged man specifically said, “What have you do with us, Son of the Most-High God” (Mk 5:7)? His presence within enemy territory (the unholy ground), brought the Demoniac to Him. Whereby Legion was cast out into a herd of swine upon their appeal.

In contrast and by geological relevance, the man in the Capernaum synagogue possessed by multiple demons addressed the Messiah as “Jesus of Nazareth (Mk 1:24).” A distinction from the “Son of the Most-High God” (Mark 5:7) as compared to the demoniac from Gerasene in Gentile territory. That was a location “governed” by an entity now on notice that it has lost its territory. It was the difference between holy ground and unholy ground, or by who in the spiritual realm-controlled areas around Israel. Both locations in near proximity having this activity further suggest the area was demonically loaded, or more active with evil spiritual beings.

In due course, the LORD makes His way to Jerusalem, where He knows He will die to fulfill His mission. One could speculate that it was from the transfiguration on Mount Herman that the meeting with Moses and Elijah confirmed His mission and what was about to occur. In the presence of Father Yahweh on Mount Hermon, Jesus had just removed the sons of God’s control and ownership of nations outside Israel.

Shortly thereafter in Jerusalem, Jesus was tried and crucified. A King not of this world, He was tortured and put to death. With the oblivious, evil, and unseen bulls of Bashan surrounding Him, His mission was finished. In their bloodthirst, they had no idea what had occurred and what was shortly to befall them. The spotless lamb was crucified to provide a path for humanity to become reconciled to Yahweh. The old covenant was abolished, the law was fulfilled, and a new covenant was set in place.

Upon the death of Jesus, He descends into Hades (1 Peter 3:19) to proclaim to the non-human spirits in prison12 that He was alive and that now all of heaven and the underworld were subjected to Him. He had overcome death and the kingdom of God was reclaimed. Death in the underworld could not hold Him.

Jesus, the long-awaited messiah, resurrected from the dead.

So that all nations of men made of one blood (Acts 17:26-27) would seek the LORD and that they would find Him. As it is written in scripture, had the princes of this world, rulers of this age or the sons of God understood the mystery of Christ’s sacrifice and the wisdom of God, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory (1 Cor 2:1-8). The powers of darkness, those of the corrupt sons of God, were put to open shame (Col 2:15 ESV).

The gentiles who were in captivity are now eligible and ushered into the Kingdom of God through repentance and faith. Until their fullness has come (Rm 11:25), the Holy Spirit moves among us as the wind blows where it wishes (Jn 3:8). Beginning at the transfiguration on Mount Hermon in Bashan, within enemy territory, the sons of God were overthrown and no longer had dominion over the gentiles. The kingdom of God has come with the great commission of Jesus, our LORD. With Jesus’ mission to overcome darkness and humanity’s enslavement to sin, the table is now set. The field was now cultivated for harvest. Without any fitting claim coming from the corrupt sons of God. The bulls of Bashan, their demonic offspring, the Apkallu, or the so-called Watchers have no further place among people and, more specifically, within the Kingdom of God on Earth.

Conclusion

The whole area of Bashan, which hosts the upper reaches of Mount Hermon, is symbolic of this world that dwells in darkness. Amid the daily lives of biblical figures, there were profoundly evil entities that were spiritually active toward the deception and destruction of people and the nations in which they reside. While according to Paul, there are spiritual forces of darkness present even today (Eph 6:12), we have the triumph of Christ over these rulers and powers as the Kingdom of God is now upon us. The nations have been reclaimed for the LORD’s kingdom. Beginning with the transfiguration on Mount Hermon that took place leading to the death, burial, resurrection, and coronation of the Lord and King, Jesus our Messiah.

Citations

___________________________________
1 Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, Walter Elwell, Anson F. Rainey
2 Settlements and Cult Sites on Mount Hermon, Israel: Ituraean Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods, Shimon Dar, Israel Exploration Journal Vol. 47, No. ¾ (1997), Zvi Uri Ma’oz, pp. 279-283
3 Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, Eerdmans, G. Del Olmo Lete, 161
4 The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible, Lexham Press, Michael Heiser, 200
5 Ibid., Unseen Realm, Heiser, 35
6 Reversing Hermon: Enoch, The Watchers & the Forgotten Mission of Jesus Christ, Defender Publishing, Michael Heiser, 112-113
7
1 Enoch: A Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch, Minneapolis Fortress Press, George W.E. Nickelsburg, 267
8
Reversing Hermon: Enoch, The Watchers & the Forgotten Mission of Jesus Christ, Defender Publishing, Michael Heiser, 38-43
9
Ibid, Reversing Hermon, Heiser, 29
10 The Origin of Evil Spirits, Wright; The Waters Traditions in Enoch 6-16: “The Fall of Angels and the Rise of Demons”, The Watchers in Jewish and Christian Traditions, Kevin Sullivan (ed. Angela Harkins, Kelly Bautch, John Endres, Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2014), 91-103
11]
Dreamy Angels and Demonic Giants: The Watchers Traditions and the Origin of Evil in Early Christian Demonology”, The Watchers in Jewish and Christian Traditions, Silviu N. Bunta, (ed. Angela Harkins, Kelly Bautch, John Endres, Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2014), 116-138
12 Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, Eerdmans, G. Del Olmo Lete, 161-162