Tag Archives | atonement

The Vertical Truth

In Matthew Barrett’s book, The Doctrine on Which the Church Stands or Falls, contributing author Andrew Naselli makes a stratospherically important point about the centrality of Paul’s theology on justification. He calls attention to Luther’s notes about the matter.1 Luther wrote of Romans 3:21-26 as follows, “the chief point, and the very central place of the Epistle [to the Romans], and of the whole Bible.” Specifically, Naselli uses Moo’s observations about Martin Luther’s notes on Paul’s passage to the Romans. The passage is critical to our study of justification. The heart of the doctrine is “the righteousness of God that empowers the gospel to mediate salvation to sinful human beings.”2

So as a matter of course, this section of Romans 3:21-26 must be carefully parsed. To ruminate on it and let it saturate every part of our capacity to reason and accept truth. 

Romans 3:21-26   Justification by Faith

21 But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ 23 for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; 25 whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith. This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; 26 for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.

Parsed Outline (Naselli, 221-222)

  1. God’s righteousness is revealed from the OT law and the prophets. (Rom 3:21)
  2. All have sinned yet have access to God’s righteousness through exclusive faith in Christ. (Rom 3:22-23)
  3. Source of justification made clear through faith in Christ received as a free gift to people redeemed by His blood to satisfy God’s justice and wrath (propitiation). “In-Christ-redemption is the instrument of grace to bring about justification.… Justification occurs through in-Christ-redemption, which is the instrument of grace.” (Rom 3:24-25a)
  4. Integrity of God plus his character as righteous and just to hold back His anger to appease righteous divine wrath against sin. The just and justifier gives righteous status to people as He passed over sins committed and atoned for through the blood of Christ. So here it is revealed the gospel is an expression of God’s attributes of righteousness and justice. (Rom 3:25b-26)

Just as Luther, Moo, and many other expositors have made super clear, Naselli offers the four-point review above of what Morris called the most important single paragraph ever written.”4  

The polemic to a proper understanding and acceptance of the doctrine of justification rests upon a new covenant biblical principle of soteriological meaning.

The New Perspective on Paul (NPP) is an effort to redefine justification as made clear by the apostle Paul (Rom 3:21-26). Not so much to affect what justification does in terms of its salvific merit but to redirect it toward the interests of cultural Marxism and liberation theology. In the form of Sanders’ covenantal nomism, NPP attempts to necessitate the maintenance of salvation by orienting it toward the cultural well-being of people (a State interest). Justification becomes fundamentally about ecclesiology and not soteriology (Cara, 231). Paul has explicitly and authoritatively informed millions over thousands of years that justification is vertical, not horizontal (Romans 1:17, 3:21-26, 9:30-10:13).

NPP is an effort to detach the meaning and warnings of scripture concerning justification to suit the interests of society, culture, and the State around liberation theology. A theology of grievance concerning the “marginalized” (i.e., feminism, marriage, sex, gender, and abortion activists coupled with ethnic and racial disparities that need attention). That which divides people of truth is diabolical. That which intermingles and draws them to darkness is satanic. 

Cultural Marxists who capture and guide woke social justice ideology shape progressive Christians to form various ecclesiological efforts. Marxism pushes toward a revisionist understanding of biblical justification through cultural pressures for reparational and restorative institutional and theological “justice” to acquire its desire for power. To NPP, justification is about social order toward the interests of liberation theology advocates who want unfettered lifestyles and egalitarian insistence contradictory to explicit biblical language about what’s unacceptable and forbidden to profane the Imago Dei. 

On April 14th, 2022, Carl R. Trueman posted an article entitled “Rowan Williams and our Sentimental Age.” In this article, Trueman makes it completely clear that the esteemed academic scholar (Williams) has advocated for State mandated LGBT lifestyle acceptance within the church. The current Arch Bishop of Canterbury favors same-sex “marriage.” N.T. Wright, a prominent advocate of NPP, is a bishop of the Anglican church. Many pastors and priests across all denominations advocate for the ghetto of theological exploration to recast doctrine toward social interests. Specifically to render people susceptible or trapped by the false social doctrine of NPP.

________________
Andrew David Naselli, “The Righteous God Righteously Righteouses the Unrighteous: Justification according to Romans,” in The Doctrine on Which the Church Stands or Falls: Justification in Biblical, Theological, Historical, and Pastoral Perspective, ed. Matthew Barrett (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2019), 220–221. Here Naselli quotes Douglas Moo’s observations in the Luther Bible with Luther’s margin notes (Epistle to the Romans, 1st ed, 281n1). 
Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1996), 219.
Constantine R. Campbell, Paul and Union with Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 114. Campbell skillfully synthesizes justification and union with Christ; see 388–405.
Leon Morris, The Epistle to the Romans, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI; Leicester, England: W.B. Eerdmans; Inter-Varsity Press, 1988), 173.


The Key of Perfection

To better grasp the subject matter among the chapters in my reading this week, I went through the textbook material and watched Jobes’ companion video lectures about Hebrews scripture. I did this to get the structure and organization of the textbook and to understand the author’s views and methods. Jobes’ presentation of the subject matter in the book of Hebrews is a high-level topical survey about the core message in our reading. Meaning, she sets up a linear sequence of the more relevant Hebrews text, specifically, about the divine revelation of God the Father through Christ, the Christology of Hebrews, and salvation through Christ (soteriology). Each successive point is predicated upon another as necessary to set up and build further interest, comprehension, and acceptance. 

Jobes delivers her written and verbal material by categorical thought. She tracks the Hebrews subject matter in a way that matches what the Hebrews author intends to say to his/her readers. Jobes’ views are a walkthrough of how the surface of the English text reads.

Divine Revelation in Hebrews

What three contrasts does Hebrews make as it presents Jesus as the final revelation of God?

  • Contrast of Times – When
  • Contrast of Audience – Who
  • Contrast of Mode – How

Not concerning “what” or “why” until later in the text. Specifically about verses 1-3,

“God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.” – Heb 1:3

Contrasts in Hebrews

Contrast of Times:long agoin these last days
Contrast of Audience:to the fathersto us
Contrast of Mode of Revelation:in the prophets in many portions and in many waysin His Son

The Christology of Hebrews (Ch.3)

Which two distinctive roles of Jesus do Hebrews present, and how are they related?

  1. Jesus as Son of God
  2. The Son as Priest of God

These roles are related by how they function. Namely, as Jobes writes, Jesus’ identity as Son of God and Great High Priest bears the most significance. As a type of priest of the Old Testament tabernacle who would enter the Holy of Holies, Jesus, the Son, appeared before God the Father by His ascension (i.e., a physical movement “up” through space-time into the presence of God as God is Spirit). After His crucifixion and resurrection, Jesus as Son of God ascended to appear before the Father to offer His sacrifice as acceptable and pleasing for the satisfactory atonement and redemption of humanity. While reconciliation to God is an act of restorative creation, the Son honors the Father as He returns to His seat of power with God and as God (“right hand of God” Heb 1:3c, anthropomorphically speaking). In contrast to Jobes’ view that the coronation occurred by ascension (Jobes, 110), other research papers offer a different perspective where the Kingly accession of Christ on Earth involves His coronation before resurrection and ascension. See Brettler,1 Marcus,2 and Shelton.3

The Soteriology of Hebrews

On what basic concept is soteriology in Hebrews grounded?

Without separate reference to the ordo solutis, Jobes adheres to the method of redemption as the purification of sins written about in the Hebrews text (Heb 1:3b). The purification of sins among people redeemed is the saving work of Christ (Jobes, 118). This is the soteriology of Hebrews as Jesus is the Son of God who serves as Messianic and Kingly Priest who purifies the sins of those across covenants which are of Christ and given to the Father. More specifically, those who were “to the fathers and to us” (Heb 1:1-2).

Jobes makes reference to a paper entitled “Perfection and Eschatology in Hebrews” as it is about Christ’s role as Mediator (Heb 8:6, 9:15, 12:24). As the Son of God (Heb 1:5), Jesus became the perfect author of salvation for bringing “sons to glory” (Heb 2:10) as High Priest through His suffering. What Jesus obtained for His people (justification) is what the Spirit applies to them (sanctification). This is what Jobes meant by “pioneer” and “perfector” in reference to the Silva paper linked above. In the paper, F.F. Bruce defines “perfection” as access to God. As made possible through Christ, the perfect Mediator, but it intuitively seems that F.F. Bruce could have said “perfection” correlates to access (not defines it). My assumption was this: to make perfect means to render without blemish. However, Jesus, already perfect morally, became the perfect Mediator by role and function.

Jesus as Perfect Mediator

The purpose of Mediator is Prophet, Priest, and King. All of them together constitute Jesus as Mediator. See Galatians 3:19 as Moses was a type of mediator. After Jesus’ accession as coronated King, Jesus’ emergent status as Priest (Heb 5:6) rendered Him the perfect Mediator. The role of coronated King is subordinate to Jesus’ recognized and perfected status as Mediator (Heb 5:6) who became begotten (to become an agent or Son). So, best I can tell, while He was God with divine attributes, He became King by accession, then became High Priest through crucifixion, and thereafter became perfected Mediator by His suffering and appearance before God the Father. As Jesus was before the Father in Heaven, He functions as Mediator (High Priest, King of Kings, and Prophet). 

Where I’m puzzled by what Jobes wrote is the difference between an earthly coronation and heavenly exaltation. I’ve understood that Jesus was coronated as King (royalty over subjects) to attain rulership of the Kingdom of God (“by way of the sea”; Isa 9:1, Matt 4:15, and “repent the kingdom of Heaven is at hand”; Matt 4:17). I’m beginning to suspect that Jesus’ ascension as King of the Kingdom of God (on Earth) is a copy and shadow of His better ascension as King of the Kingdom of Heaven. 

Jesus was anointed King at John’s baptism. He then was led into the wilderness by the Holy Spirit to overcome a foe (temptation of Satan). After that, He was coronated as King and so named several times (by mockery and parody) to become ruler of the Kingdom of God on Earth (copy and shadow of Kingdom of Heaven). Remember, “my kingdom is not of this world” during the trial before Pilate. The Kingdom of God was where His people would go during the second Exodus as they were born again of the Spirit after Pentecost. These stages were the ancient Israelite tripartite pattern of accession followed by Saul, David, Solomon, and others before Christ. Through this pattern of accession, and His Priesthood, Jesus would lead His people back to the Father as Mediator, where His kingship was of integral necessity. 

Since the human status of King is inferior or subordinate to His role as Messiah, the chief office He held was as the perfect Mediator between God and humanity. He functions as Priest between God the Father and humanity as an exalted Mediator in Heaven. Jesus was coronated King of the Kingdom of God on Earth, just as He is coronated King of the Kingdom of Heaven. 

________________
Marc Zvi Brettler – God Is King: Understanding an Israelite Metaphor, vol. 76, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989), 51.
2 Joel Marcus, “Crucifixion as Parodic Exaltation” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 125, no. 1, 2006, pp. 73–87.
W. Brian Shelton, “An Ancient Israelite Pattern of Kingly Accession in the Life of Christ,” Trinity Journal 25, no. 1 (2004): 72.


Consecrating Fire

The appearance of Isaiah before God at His seat of power is an astonishing scene of awe and wonder. As recorded and narrated in chapter six of the book of Isaiah (6:1-13), this encounter was a God-appointed theophany that would inspire and inform myriads of people for generations. The witness and testimony of Isaiah concerning his vision echo among everyone who seeks to know and experience the glory and mysteries of Yahweh. Isaiah experienced God’s presence, as revealed in a glimpse of His identity, place, position, glory, and power. Among these, Isaiah perceived in limited view what the seraphim called out in the temple. That Yahweh is most holy as it was cried out to another in a magnificent way. Holy! Holy! Holy! These were their words. The angelic seraphim were in resonance with just how God’s holiness is distinct and utterly more unique and beautiful than anything or anyone. The glory of the incomparable Elohim was throughout the whole Earth as it filled the whole of His creation.

Isaiah’s encounter before Yahweh ruins him. He experienced a crisis of self-aware defilement before God. He witnessed God Most High’s being and presence. It was there that Isaiah understood the true condition of himself among people that he dwelt with and charged warnings against in the previous five chapters of his book. He was so stricken with a self-aware state of impurity and corruption that he cried out, “Woe is me! I am ruined!” He was guilty of defiled thoughts, words, and actions among his people all to separate Him from God. His God, who he honored, worshiped and served. The gravity of his conviction kept him from His God and his ability to withstand or bear God’s presence.

During this encounter, the smoke that filled the temple was probably a barrier for Isaiah to keep him safe from the effect of God’s unyielding glory. A vapor that became a veil for his spirit until he was purified and cleansed by a seraph. While amid the gathering smoke, the angelic seraph creature flew to Isaiah with a lump of burning coal taken from an altar to touch his mouth with it. To burn away the defilement and atone for his sin so he would no longer carry his guilt before God. His offenses now removed, to be of consecrated service before Yahweh as a prophet before His people.

With Isaiah in a desperate situation throughout his vision, the Lord spoke out His invitation to go to His people on behalf of Most High Elohim. “Who will go for Us?” was the call, and without any reservation, Isaiah said Him, hinneh-‘ani! slh-‘ani. Or, as we read in Scripture, “Here am I! Send Me.” — Made possible by an encounter and redemption made complete through the underlying relationship between Isaiah and his God. With the acceptance of Isaiah’s call, he was instructed to “Go, and tell these people…” to hear and to see the truth and to repent. Yet while the people were warned and persistently urged to forsake their sin and return to Yahweh, the message will bear on them to further harden their hearts and reject their God. They would become given over to judgment to include all the disasters that would become their demise.