Archive | Theology RSS feed for this section

The Story of a Soul

“Story of a Soul” (“L’Histoire d’une Âme”) is an autobiographical work by St. Thérèse of Lisieux (Marie Françoise-Thérèse Martin), a Carmelite nun and one of the most venerated figures in modern Catholicism. Thérèse The book was published posthumously in 1898, a year after her death from tuberculosis at the age of 24.

Thérèse was born on January 2, 1873, in Alençon, France, and passed away on September 30, 1897, in Lisieux, France. Compiled from manuscripts she left behind, her spiritual autobiography aims to present the ‘little way’ of Thérèse, a path to God through simplicity, humility, and a boundless trust in divine providence. This book is about the story of a little flower. A saint of the little way.

Background

Early Life and Family

Therese’s autobiography begins with an account of her early life, born to deeply devout parents in Alençon, France. She describes the religiosity of her family, her mother’s untimely death when Thérèse was just four years old, and her father’s subsequent move with the family to Lisieux. She expounds upon the deep impression her mother’s death left on her, turning her into a hypersensitive and emotionally delicate child. She is subsequently raised by her older sisters and father, who become key figures in her spiritual formation and development.

Louis Martin – Father

Louis Martin was born in Bordeaux, France, in 1823. He was a watchmaker by trade but also had a deep interest in religious life. In fact, earlier in his life, Louis aspired to become a monk, specifically an Augustinian monk, but this ambition was set aside due to his lack of proficiency in Latin, a prerequisite for monastic life during that time. Despite this, his devout Catholicism remained an integral part of his identity. Louis was a third-order lay Franciscan, meaning that he committed himself to living out the values and spiritual practices of the Franciscan order while remaining a layperson.

Zélie Guérin – Mother

Zélie Guérin was born in 1831 in Saint-Denis-sur-Sarthon, Orne, France. She too initially felt a call to religious life but was advised against it. Instead, she trained as a lacemaker and started her own business. Zélie was deeply spiritual, attending Mass daily and offering her work up as a form of prayer. She belonged to the Third Order of Mount Carmel, a lay confraternity attached to the Carmelite order.

Louis and Zélie met in 1858 and were married just three months later. They initially decided to live as “brother and sister” in a continent marriage, dedicating themselves to religious practices. However, a spiritual director advised them to have children for the glory of God, and they heeded this advice. Their union was not merely a social contract but a spiritual alliance, designed to nurture the faith within the family structure.

The couple had nine children, four of whom died in infancy. Both Louis and Zélie were deeply affected by the deaths of their young children, but they saw even these tragic events as opportunities for spiritual growth, offering their suffering as a sacrifice to God. In 1877, Zélie died of breast cancer, leaving Louis to raise their five surviving daughters. He moved the family to Lisieux to be closer to Zélie’s brother and his wife, who helped him with the children. Louis himself suffered from a series of strokes and was afflicted with cerebral arteriosclerosis, eventually leading to his death in 1894.

The exemplary faith of Louis and Zélie was officially recognized by the Catholic Church when they were canonized as saints by Pope Francis on October 18, 2015. They are the first married couple to be canonized together.

Marie – Sister

The eldest sister, Marie, assumed a maternal role for her younger sisters after their mother’s death. She was deeply religious and was the first among the sisters to enter the Carmelite convent in Lisieux. She was a formative influence on Thérèse’s understanding of religious life.

Pauline – Sister

Pauline essentially became Thérèse’s surrogate mother after Zélie’s death. It was Pauline who first nurtured Thérèse’s desire for a religious vocation. She entered the Carmelite convent before Thérèse and was later elected as Prioress, taking the name Mother Agnes of Jesus.

Léonie – Sister

Léonie was the least healthy of the Martin children and had a more difficult temperament. Despite facing multiple obstacles in her pursuit of religious life, she eventually became a nun in the Order of the Visitation of Holy Mary, taking the name Sister Françoise-Thérèse. She has been declared a Servant of God, the first stage in the process of canonization.

Céline – Sister

The sister closest in age to Thérèse, Céline played a significant role in popularizing Thérèse’s message after her death. She became a Carmelite nun like her sisters, taking the name Sister Geneviève of the Holy Face. She was the one who initially compiled and edited Thérèse’s writings, contributing greatly to her sister’s posthumous fame. The religious devotion of the Martin family deeply influenced Thérèse’s spiritual life, providing a living example of collective holiness and individual commitment to God. The family’s spirituality was rooted in daily prayer, attendance at Mass, and acts of charity, all of which were foundational in forming Thérèse’s approach to faith. This exceptional familial context forms an important backdrop to Thérèse’s own journey, which she elaborated upon in her spiritual autobiography. The Martin family thus serves as a compelling testament to the potential for deep spirituality and sanctity within the context of family life.

Childhood Conversion

A significant part of the book covers her childhood and adolescent years, where she narrates her First Communion, her eldest sister Marie’s death, and her miraculous healing from an unknown illness. Her account of Christmas Eve was most impactful when she was 14 years old. Thérèse describes this event as her “complete conversion,” when she overcomes her oversensitivity and adopts a more mature, stoic attitude, attributing this change to God’s grace.

Carmelite Life

Thérèse recounts her relentless pursuit to enter the Carmelite convent at an unusually young age of 15, overcoming numerous obstacles including her father’s initial reluctance and the Church’s age restrictions. She describes her joy at entering the cloister and her subsequent life as a nun. Despite the ascetic lifestyle and the rigors of convent life, she emphasizes her joy and contentment in serving the Lord. She writes about the challenges she faces, including her struggle with prayer and the deaths of her father and several close sisters, framing each challenge as an opportunity for spiritual growth.

The Carmelite convent in Lisieux where Saint Thérèse of Lisieux spent her religious life was home to various nuns who played significant roles in her spiritual development and daily life. It’s crucial to recognize that the Carmelite environment was designed to be a setting of intense spiritual discipline and communal living. This backdrop provided a fertile ground for Thérèse’s spiritual growth and her development of the “little way.” Here are some of the key figures in the convent during Thérèse’s time:

Pauline (Mother Agnes of Jesus) was Thérèse’s second eldest sister and became her surrogate mother after their mother’s death. She entered the Carmelite convent before Thérèse did, and her spiritual life significantly influenced her younger sister. When she became prioress, she allowed Thérèse to write her autobiography.

Marie (Sister Marie of the Sacred Heart), the eldest sister, also joined the Carmelite convent in Lisieux. After their mother’s passing, she assumed a maternal role and later took a significant role in the convent life. Her spiritual steadiness and maternal instincts often offered emotional and religious support to Thérèse.

Céline (Sister Geneviève of the Holy Face), closest in age to Thérèse, joined her sisters in the convent a few years after Thérèse’s entrance. Céline’s entrance into the Carmel was something Thérèse ardently prayed for. Céline later became instrumental in disseminating Thérèse’s teachings and compiling her writings. Marie de Gonzague, who was the Prioress of the Carmelite convent in Lisieux during part of Saint Thérèse’s time there, initially objected to Céline (Sister Geneviève of the Holy Face) entering the convent. Marie was a complex figure with a strong personality and had significant influence within the Carmelite community.

Marie de Gonzague was concerned about the growing influence of the Martin family within the convent. When Céline wished to enter, two of her sisters, Marie (Sister Marie of the Sacred Heart) and Pauline (Mother Agnes of Jesus), were already in the Carmel, along with Thérèse herself. The addition of another Martin sister was viewed as potentially problematic, raising questions about nepotism and family influence within a Catholic community that valued detachment from worldly relationships, even familial ones.

This hesitation on Marie’s part was not entirely without basis, given the structure and values of Carmelite life. Carmelites are expected to relinquish worldly attachments to pursue a life of contemplation and union with God more freely. Having many biological relatives in the same religious community could be seen as a challenge to this ideal of detachment. However, Thérèse ardently prayed for Céline’s entrance into the Carmel, seeing it as a means of spiritual support and communal growth. Thérèse’s deep spiritual insight and the apparent sincerity and vocation of Céline eventually overcame the objections. Céline entered the Carmelite convent in Lisieux in 1894, shortly after their father Louis Martin’s death. After her entrance, Céline became an integral part of the religious community and was pivotal in promoting Thérèse’s spiritual legacy after her death, including disseminating Therese’s autobiography.

The episode involving Marie de Gonzague’s objection to Céline’s entrance underscores the complexities of religious life, where spiritual ideals often intersect with human concerns and limitations. It also serves as a testament to the strength of Thérèse’s faith and the depth of her understanding of religious vocation—not as an escape from human relationships but as a transformation of them in the light of divine love. Marie de Gonzague was the prioress when Thérèse entered the Carmel and was a significant figure in Thérèse’s early years at the convent. Her leadership style was sometimes a subject of internal difficulty for Thérèse, as Marie had a complex personality and could be both affectionate and stern. However, Thérèse saw these challenges as an opportunity for spiritual growth.

Sister Marie of the Angels was a close friend of Thérèse within the convent, and she was drawn to Thérèse’s spirituality and became one of her confidantes. Thérèse in turn saw in her a soul that was naturally inclined toward friendship and emotional closeness.

Sister Saint Vincent de Paul was the novice mistress when Thérèse entered the convent. While she was strict and very traditional, her role was crucial as she was responsible for the initial religious formation of the novices, including Thérèse.

Sister Marie-Philomène had a difficult personality and was one of the sisters Thérèse found challenging to live with. Nonetheless, she became a catalyst for Thérèse’s practice of her “little way,” turning daily irritations into opportunities for demonstrating love and forbearance.

Besides the mentioned figures, the Carmelite community was composed of other sisters whose names might not be as prominently remembered but who nonetheless constituted the living, breathing community of faith that shaped Thérèse’s religious experience. These nuns lived lives of prayer, penance, and seclusion, in adherence to the Rule of Carmel.

While Thérèse’s interactions with these individuals ranged from close kinship to challenging trials, each relationship played a distinct role in her spiritual journey. The nuns, who shared her daily life, indirectly or directly contributed to shaping her “little way” of spiritual childhood, a simple yet profound path to holiness through daily acts of love and sacrifice. The collective spirituality of the Carmelite community in Lisieux was characterized by its emphasis on contemplative prayer and strict adherence to the Rule of Carmel, influenced by the writings of earlier Carmelites like St. Teresa of Ávila and St. John of the Cross. In this context, Thérèse developed her theology of the “little way,” which, although deeply personal, was also a product of her communal experience of monastic life.

Childhood Sufferings

Saint Thérèse faced a series of trials and tribulations in her early life that significantly shaped her spiritual journey. She was the youngest of nine children, four of whom died in infancy. Her family was deeply religious, anchored by her parents, Louis Martin and Zélie Guérin, who are now canonized saints. Despite the family’s devotion, or perhaps because of it, Thérèse’s early life was marked by an array of sufferings that involved separation, illness, and emotional turbulence.

Loss of Therese’s Mother

The first profound suffering that touched her life was the death of her mother, Zélie, from breast cancer when Thérèse was just four and a half years old. This loss created a void in her life, thrusting her into an early confrontation with the transient nature of human existence. The absence of maternal love became an overarching theme in her early years, contributing to her heightened sensitivity and need for affection.

Move to Lisieux

After Zélie’s death, the family moved to Lisieux to be closer to Zélie’s brother and his wife, who helped to look after the children. While this move provided some social and familial support, the absence of Thérèse’s mother became more palpable. Her father, Louis, although a loving parent, was often absorbed in his own grief and devotion, rendering him less emotionally available. Thérèse grew especially close to her sister Pauline, who became a surrogate mother to her. However, this attachment would also be a source of suffering when Pauline entered the Carmelite convent, leaving Thérèse feeling abandoned once more.

Illness and Suffering

Thérèse was often sickly as a child, and her health was a constant concern for the family. She contracted illnesses easily and also showed signs of emotional fragility. This emotional sensitivity was exacerbated by her perceived abandonment, first by her mother’s death and then by Pauline’s departure for the convent. Thérèse even experienced a debilitating nervous malady that confined her to bed for an extended period. Some biographers and spiritual writers have posited that this illness had both psychological and spiritual dimensions, marking a crisis point in her early spiritual development.

School and Scruples

School was another area of suffering for Thérèse. Due to her fragile health and emotional state, she initially received education at home. When she did enter public schooling, she was subject to ridicule and misunderstanding, partly because of her intense religiosity and shyness. She also went through a period of scrupulosity, a kind of religious OCD where she became overly concerned about the state of her soul and the morality of her actions, even when such concerns were objectively baseless. This was a form of spiritual suffering that further isolated her from her peers and added layers of internal strife.

The “Christmas Conversion”

The culmination of her early sufferings could be said to have occurred in what Thérèse described as her “Christmas conversion” at the age of 13. On Christmas Eve in 1886, after Mass, she overheard her father express annoyance at her lingering habit of expecting Christmas presents despite her growing age. Instead of responding with hurt or resentment, she experienced a sudden and profound inner transformation. The event served as a spiritual milestone where she felt herself fortified with new courage and resolve, freeing her from her excessive sensitivities and initiating a more mature phase of her spiritual life. The early life of Saint Thérèse of Lisieux was a crucible of various forms of suffering: the loss of a mother, separation from beloved siblings, physical and emotional illnesses, and spiritual anxieties. However, Each of these trials played a crucial role in shaping her spirituality and understanding of God’s love and providence. These early experiences of suffering provided her with the spiritual raw material that would later crystallize into her “little way” — a spiritual path marked by complete trust in God’s mercy and a commitment to doing small things with great love.

Formative Years

After her Christmas encounter, Thérèse’s commitment to her spiritual life deepened significantly. She became more engaged in practices of prayer, attending daily Mass, and reading spiritual books. Particularly influential were the works of St. John of the Cross, whose writings on the Dark Night of the Soul resonated deeply with her own experience of spiritual and emotional suffering. She also found herself more inclined toward self-sacrifice and small acts of charity, be it within the family context or within her broader social interactions.

The Pilgrimage to Rome

In 1887, at age 14, Thérèse embarked on a pilgrimage to Rome with her father Louis and sister Céline. This pilgrimage was transformative for her in several ways. First, it broadened her horizons beyond the sheltered environment of Lisieux. Second, it served as a testing ground for her emerging spiritual maturity. She showed remarkable self-discipline and poise during the trip, embracing the challenges and discomforts of the journey as offerings to God. Most significantly, during a papal audience with Pope Leo XIII, Thérèse asked the Pope’s permission to enter the Carmelite convent at an early age. While she did not receive a definitive answer, the Pope’s gentle response of “Well, my child, do what the superiors decide…” gave her some distress and uncertainty because her Superiors did not favor joining the convent at an early age. However, with the hope of Leo XIII’s assurance that God’s will shall be done by declaring, “Well, well! You will enter if it is God’s Will,“ her passion for entering the convent didn’t diminish, even with the disappointment of no immediate consent.

Preparations for Carmel

Upon her return from Rome, Thérèse faced administrative and familial obstacles to her desired early entrance into the convent. The local bishop initially hesitated to permit her entry at such a young age, and her uncle opposed the idea, citing her youth and fragility. Yet Thérèse remained steadfast in her commitment and continued her spiritual preparations for religious life. During this period, she lived a quasi-monastic life at home, further deepening her life of prayer and ascetic practices.

Entry into the Convent

Finally, in April 1888, at age 15, Thérèse’s request was granted, and she entered the Carmelite convent in Lisieux. This was a triumphant moment for her but also a bittersweet one, as it meant leaving behind her father, who had been a source of strength and support, and her sister Céline, who was her confidante and close friend.

So, the adolescent years of Saint Thérèse of Lisieux were marked by significant spiritual milestones that laid the groundwork for her later contributions to Christian spirituality. Her conversion heralded a newfound emotional and spiritual maturity, her pilgrimage to Rome solidified her vocation, and her final preparations and entry into the Carmelite convent realized her dream of a life devoted entirely to God. These years were a time of personal spiritual deepening and externalizing her interior life through acts of love, sacrifice, and courage, encapsulating the essential elements of her “little way.”

After her pilgrimage to Rome and subsequent petitioning of ecclesiastical authorities, Saint Thérèse of Lisieux entered the Carmelite convent in Lisieux, France, in April 1888 at the age of 15. Her time at the Carmel was marked by deep spiritual insights, growth, trials, and the development of her seminal concept known as the “little way.” Her life in the convent provides a glimpse into an interior world rich in spiritual experience but not devoid of hardship and suffering.

Adaptation and Challenges

Thérèse was initially received into the convent as a postulant and lived through the period of initial formation under the guidance of her novice mistress, Marie de Gonzague. Adapting to the austere Carmelite way of life challenged the young Thérèse. Nevertheless, her profound faith and sense of vocation propelled her to embrace the monastic rigors with a courageous heart. Thérèse also had the unique experience of being in the same convent as two of her older sisters, Pauline (Mother Agnes of Jesus) and Marie (Sister Marie of the Sacred Heart). On January 10, 1889, Thérèse officially became a novice, a period meant for more intense religious training and discernment. She took the religious name, Sister Thérèse of the Child Jesus and the Holy Face, reflecting her devotion. On September 8, 1890, Thérèse made her religious profession, solidifying her commitment to a life of poverty and obedience.

The Community and Superiors

Thérèse lived under the authority of several prioresses during her time in Carmel, including Mother Marie de Gonzague and her own sister, Pauline (Mother Agnes). Her relationship with her superiors was complex. While deeply respecting authority, she occasionally experienced different perspectives, particularly with Mother Marie de Gonzague. Despite this, Thérèse maintained her vow of obedience and carried out all tasks assigned to her, however menial or difficult they were.

The Little Way

It was during her time in Carmel that Thérèse’s view of the “little way” fully matured. Through her daily duties, personal reflections, and experiences of limitation and imperfection, Thérèse developed a spiritual approach that focused on small, everyday acts of love and kindness. In a community where all were striving for perfection and holiness, Thérèse’s “little way” was somewhat unconventional. She believed that one did not have to perform grand acts to achieve holiness; rather, it was about doing the smallest tasks with great love and surrendering all to God’s mercy. The ‘little way’ encourages souls to seek sanctity through simple acts of love and devotion, always performed with the utmost sincerity. Thérèse sees every act, no matter how mundane, as an opportunity to express love for God. She emphasizes the importance of humility, advocating for acceptance of one’s weaknesses and shortcomings as a path to divine grace.

Saint Thérèse of Lisieux’s concept of the “little way” was communicated to various members of her Carmelite community, including Mother Marie de Gonzague. The “little way” is a spiritual path characterized by humility, simplicity, and childlike trust in God. Although Thérèse articulated her spiritual insights in various contexts, including her autobiography, her letters, and her last conversations, the essence remains the same: an approach to holiness accessible to anyone, irrespective of their state in life, by doing small acts with great love and by fully trusting in God’s merciful love.

Thérèse’s relationship with Mother Marie de Gonzague was complex. While Mother Marie was a superior whom Thérèse obeyed and respected, there were times when their views on spiritual matters diverged. Nevertheless, Thérèse tried to communicate her idea of the “little way” as a means to make spiritual progress through life’s mundane and ordinary circumstances.

Thérèse conveyed that holiness did not necessarily require grandiose acts or severe penances, which were often the hallmarks of spiritual rigor in the Carmelite tradition influenced by St. John of the Cross and St. Teresa of Ávila. Rather, Thérèse emphasized that everyday acts, performed with love and a spirit of surrender to God’s will, could lead one to sanctity. Thérèse compared herself to a little child who knew that she could not ascend the staircase of heaven in one go. Instead, she would lift her arms and allow God, her heavenly Father, to pick her up.

This approach to spirituality was particularly poignant given the strict, penitential regimen of the Carmelite Order, which emphasized detachment, mortification, and deep contemplative prayer. Thérèse’s “little way” provided an alternative route to pleasing God, one that was accessible for any soul genuinely seeking union with the divine but perhaps overwhelmed by the daunting ascetic practices traditionally associated with Carmelite spirituality.

Day of Grace [2]Date
Birthday January 2, 1873
Baptism January 4, 1873
The Smile of Our LadyMay 10, 1883
First CommunionMay 8, 1884
ConfirmationJune 14, 1884
Conversion December 25, 1886
Audience with Leo XIIINovember 20, 1887
Entry into the Carmel April 9, 1888
Clothing January 10, 1889
Profession September 8, 1890
Taking of the VeilSeptember 24, 1890
Act of OblationJune 9, 1895
Entry into HeavenSeptember 30, 1897

The “little way” is a theology grounded in the New Testament, particularly in Christ’s exhortation to become like little children to enter the Kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 18:3). Its persuasion lies in its transformative simplicity: turning each moment into an opportunity for grace. Each annoyance, inconvenience, or disappointment could become a “little” offering to God. Moreover, recognizing one’s “littleness,” one’s shortcomings, and inability to be perfect leads to a fuller reliance on God’s grace and mercy.

While Marie de Gonzague had initial reservations about Céline entering the convent, possibly due to the fear of familial attachments undermining monastic detachment, Thérèse’s spirituality was in many ways an affirmation of authentic Carmelite ideals: complete surrender to God and the pursuit of divine love in every aspect of life. Although Thérèse’s “little way” did not initially gain universal acceptance within her own community, including among leaders like Marie de Gonzague, it has since been recognized as a profound expression of Christian doctrine, resulting in Thérèse being declared a Doctor of the Church by Pope John Paul II in 1997.

The “little way” as expressed to Marie de Gonzague and others, is a radical reorientation of spiritual life, focusing not on the grandeur of our actions but on the grandeur of God’s merciful love, to which we respond through simple, humble acts carried out with great love.

Vow & Act of Oblation

St. Thérèse of Lisieux, born Marie Françoise-Thérèse Martin, took a vow of “offering herself to Merciful Love” before composing her Act of Oblation to Merciful Love. The vow can be seen as a prelude or preliminary commitment that prepared her for the more elaborate and profound Act of Oblation. This vow was a personal spiritual commitment, made in the context of her Carmelite life, to offer herself entirely to the love and mercy of God. Unlike standard religious vows of poverty and obedience, which she would have taken upon entering the Carmelite order, this vow was a private one meant to deepen her relationship with God.

In taking this vow, St. Thérèse sought to become a living sacrifice to God’s merciful love, aiming to love God as He had loved her, even in her littleness and imperfections. The vow signified her total surrender to Divine Providence, an abandonment that aimed to empty her of self-love and self-will as she poured out further to love God more fully. It was a way of responding to the ineffable love she believed God had shown her, despite her unworthiness.

The vow was an extension of her “little way,” a path of spiritual childhood that emphasizes humility, simplicity, and complete trust in God. The “little way” was a theology of spiritual advancement and a disposition of the religious life, as she often discussed it in terms of spiritual childhood and the abandonment of self-will in favor of Divine Will. She believed that, like a child, she had to trust completely in God, who is all-loving and all-powerful.

St. Thérèse was greatly influenced by both the Old and New Testaments. Her theology was deeply rooted in the Bible, and she often cited various passages in her writings, notably from the Psalms and the Song of Solomon, as well as the New Testament letters and Gospels, to support her spiritual insights. Her commitment to the vow and her subsequent Act of Oblation can be viewed as a lasting effort by faith to live out Jesus Christ’s commandment of love as recorded in the Gospels (e.g., Matthew 22:37-40; John 13:34-35).

St. Thérèse’s Vow

“O Jesus, my Divine Spouse, grant that my baptismal robe may never be sullied. Take me from this world rather than let me stain my soul by committing the least wilful fault. May I never seek or find aught but Thee alone! May all creatures be nothing to me and I nothing to them! May no earthly thing disturb my peace!

“O Jesus, I ask but Peace.… Peace, and above all, Love.… Love—without limit. Jesus, I ask that for Thy sake I may die a Martyr; give me martyrdom of soul or body. Or rather give me both the one and the other. “Grant that I may fulfill my engagements in all their perfection; that no one may think of me; that I may be trodden underfoot, forgotten, as a little grain of sand. I offer myself to Thee, O my Beloved, that Thou mayest ever perfectly accomplish in me Thy Holy Will, without let or hindrance from creatures.”

September 8, 1890

Oblation means “the act of offering; an instance of offering” and, by extension, “the thing offered.” It is a term that refers to a solemn offering, sacrifice, or presentation to God, to the Church for use in God’s service, or to the faithful, such as giving alms to the poor. The Oblation to Merciful Love is one of the most significant aspects of Saint Thérèse of Lisieux’s spiritual legacy. It stands as a defining moment in her life and a crystallization of her theology, encapsulating the essence of her “little way.” The act of oblation took place on June 9, 1895, during the Solemnity of the Most Holy Trinity, and was an outpouring of her deepest spiritual convictions and aspirations.

By 1895, Thérèse had been in the Carmelite convent for seven years and had matured significantly in her understanding of God’s merciful love. She was influenced by the writings of St. John of the Cross and the teachings of the Church, but her own lived experiences of faith, hope, and charity prepared her for the Oblation. She had been grappling with the enormity of God’s love and the smallness of her own being, contemplating how she could possibly hope to love God in the way He deserved to be loved. These profound reflections would find their culmination in the Oblation.

On an especially significant Trinity Sunday, Thérèse was in the chapel with her Carmelite sisters. As the liturgy unfolded, she felt an overpowering sense of God’s presence and merciful love. Inspired by this experience and the readings of the day, she took pen and paper and wrote down her ‘Act of Oblation to Merciful Love.’ It was a prayer, but more than that, it was an offering of herself as a holocaust to God’s merciful love.

In her text, she offered herself unreservedly to God, not in the context of justice or privilege, but in the context of mercy. Thérèse acknowledged her own littleness and the impossibility of her making a worthy offering of love to God. Therefore, she asked Jesus to “drown her in Himself” so that she could become a conduit of His love. She expressed a desire for her oblation to be an act of praise, an acknowledgment of God’s all-encompassing love that takes even the smallest offerings and turns them into something grand. Importantly, she committed to letting this love shine through her in acts of kindness, patience, and humility, thereby allowing others to experience God’s love through her.

The Oblation is steeped in a rich theological vision. It embodies a theology of surrender, where Thérèse gives herself fully to the will of God. It also echoes the idea of divine filiation, as she sees herself as a child of God, relying entirely on His mercy and benevolence. Furthermore, it encapsulates her understanding of the redemptive power of suffering, as she offers not only her joys but also her sorrows for the salvation of souls. In essence, the Oblation is a bold act of faith, reiterating her belief that God’s merciful love would accept her offering and magnify it for the sake of His greater glory despite her unworthiness.

This act was not a one-time event but rather a defining commitment that shaped the remainder of her life. Thérèse sought to live out her oblation in the daily activities and trials of her Carmelite existence, in her responsibilities as a sister and later as a novice mistress, and even in her intense suffering during her final illness.

The legacy of Thérèse’s Oblation to Merciful Love continues to impact many souls. Her written account of this spiritual milestone is often read and pondered upon by people from all walks of life, and many have made similar oblations inspired by her example. In a world often focused on deeds, self-glory, and achievements, the Oblation serves as a deeply meaningful statement of the transformative power of divine mercy and unwavering faith.

St. Thérèse’s Act of Oblation

“O my Divine Master,” I cried from the bottom of my heart, “shall Thy Justice alone receive victims of holocaust? Has not Thy Merciful Love also need thereof? On all sides it is ignored, rejected … the hearts on which Thou wouldst lavish it turn to creatures, there to seek their happiness in the miserable satisfaction of a moment, instead of casting themselves into Thine Arms, into the unfathomable furnace of Thine Infinite Love.

“O my God! Must Thy Love, which is disdained, lie hidden in Thy Heart? If Thou shouldst find souls offering themselves as victims of holocaust to Thy Love, Thou wouldst consume them rapidly; Thou wouldst be well pleased to suffer the flames of infinite tenderness to escape that are imprisoned in Thy Heart. “If Thy Justice—which is of earth—must needs be satisfied, how much more must Thy Merciful Love desire to inflame souls, since “Thy mercy reacheth even to the Heavens”? O Jesus! Let me be that happy victim—consume Thy holocaust with the Fire of Divine Love!”

June 9, 1895

Thérèse’s Oblation to Merciful Love is a deeply meaningful spiritual moment that epitomized her unique theology and spirituality. It was a profound offering of her complete self—body, soul, and will—to God’s boundless, merciful love. Through this act, Thérèse deepened her relationship with God and left a spiritual legacy that continues to inspire and guide people on their journey toward holiness.        

Thérèse’s “Way of Love” is a profound spiritual pathway emphasizing humility, simplicity, and surrender to God’s Merciful Love. It challenges the conventional view that sanctity is reserved for the extraordinary and proclaims that the way to God is open to everyone in Christ through small acts performed with great love. Her spirituality remains a luminous example of Christian devotion, accessible and deeply rooted in the supremely authoritative teachings of the Bible. Her spirituality reflected the essence of the Gospel message—faith in God’s redemptive love and the call to love one’s neighbor. The Carmelite tradition, emphasizing contemplative prayer and mystical union with God, provided the means within which her spirituality grew.

Final Years & Legacy

In the final sections, the narrative turns poignant as Thérèse describes her painful battle with tuberculosis. Her suffering is severe, but she interprets it as a way to unite herself more closely with the suffering of Christ. During her illness, her spirituality matures even further, entering a state of great spiritual dryness that she endures with faith until her death.

“Story of a Soul” has profoundly impacted modern Catholic spirituality. Its widespread popularity led to her canonization by Pope Pius XI in 1925, and she was declared a Doctor of the Church in 1997, an honorific title given to individuals whose writings are deemed to have significantly impacted the formation of Christian doctrine. Thérèse’s emphasis on humility, simplicity, and love has resonated across denominational lines, becoming a source of inspiration for many beyond the confines of Catholicism.

The work engages with well-developed theological principles that resonate with Reformed and Orthodox traditions, particularly the truth of divine grace and the soul’s sanctification involving suffering and devotion. It also places a high premium on God’s Word, drawing extensively from scripture to elucidate Thérèse’s beliefs, thereby honoring the perspective of ‘Sola Scriptura,’ that the Bible is the ultimate authority in faith and practice.

Illness & Death

By 1894, Thérèse started experiencing symptoms of tuberculosis that would eventually lead to her death. Even as she faced physical deterioration, her spiritual depth seemed to grow, experiencing both a dark night of the soul—a period of spiritual dryness—and an intense closeness to God. During this time of deterioration, she was asked to write her autobiography, “The Story of a Soul,” at the behest of her sister Pauline, which later became one of the most widely read Catholic texts of modern times. Despite the hardships of illness, Thérèse took on the role of novice mistress in 1893, guiding younger nuns in their spiritual formation. Her counsel was marked by the same simplicity and love that characterized her spiritual path.

Thérèse’s health deteriorated rapidly in 1897, and she died on September 30 of the same year, at the young age of 24. In her final days, she faced extreme physical suffering and spiritual desolation but maintained her trust in God’s merciful love, offering her pains for the salvation of souls.

Legacy

The life and legacy of St. Thérèse of Lisieux stand as a testament to the enduring power of simplicity, humility, and love in the spiritual life. Born on January 2, 1873, in Alençon, France, Thérèse was the youngest of nine children in the Martin family, a devout Catholic household. She entered the Discalced Carmelites at the young age of 15 and died just nine years later from tuberculosis. Within her short life span, Thérèse left an indelible imprint on Christian spirituality that not only led to her canonization as a saint but also her designation as a Doctor of the Church—a rare and esteemed title that underscores the theological and spiritual depth of her writings.

Canonization

Thérèse’s canonization began remarkably quickly, reflecting her immediate impact on those who knew her and those who later read her autobiography. Ordinarily, the canonization process takes several decades, if not centuries, but in Thérèse’s case, the timeline was expedited. She died in 1897, and by 1914, Pope Pius X had already signed the decree for the introduction of her cause for beatification, the first step toward canonization.

In 1923, Thérèse was beatified, and just two years later, in 1925, she was canonized by Pope Pius XI. The speed of this process was unprecedented, partly because of the widespread distribution and influence of her autobiography but also due to the numerous reports of miracles attributed to her intercession. Her canonization was attended by a large international audience, attesting to the global impact she had already begun to make.

Influence and Impact

Thérèse’s influence is primarily grounded in her “little way,” a theology of spiritual childhood that emphasizes humility, simplicity, and complete trust in God. Unlike other paths to holiness that emphasize grand deeds, ascetic practices, or intense mystical experiences, Thérèse focused on everyday acts performed with love. This resonated with people from all walks of life, making her one of the most universally loved and revered saints.

Beyond the Catholic Church, Thérèse’s writings and spirituality have also found a home in various Christian denominations. Her “little way” has been seen as a practical application of the Gospel message, encapsulating the essence of Christ’s teachings in a manner that is profoundly accessible and universally applicable.

Doctor of the Church

Basilica of Sainte-Thérèse in Lisieux France

One of the most remarkable aspects of Thérèse’s legacy is her designation as a Doctor of the Church by Pope John Paul II in 1997. The title is not merely honorary; it signifies that her writings are purportedly understood as orthodox and contribute significantly to Catholic theology. She became only the fourth woman to receive this title, joining the ranks of esteemed theologians like St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Teresa of Ávila. The designation was particularly significant because Thérèse was neither a theologian in the academic sense nor someone who had lived a long life filled with grand deeds. Her “little way” offered a hopeful and biblical approach to Christian spirituality, making the pursuit of holiness accessible to everyone.

Conclusion

The legacy of Thérèse of Lisieux is a jewel in the treasury of the Catholic Church. A young Carmelite nun who lived a short, cloistered life became a highly regarded woman of holiness and a theological luminary through her love and humility. Her canonization and designation as a Doctor of the Church are acknowledgments of the extraordinary spiritual depth and theological richness contained in her simple, loving approach to God. In an age often given to the effects of post-modern inclination, Thérèse’s enduring message serves as a compelling reminder that the way to God can be as simple as a path of love, accessible to all in Christ, regardless of their state in life.

_______________________________________
1 The Story of a Soul, The Autobiography of The Little Flower (Charlotte: Saint Benedict Press, 1951, 1997, 2007, 2010)
2 Saint Thérèse of Lisieux and T. N. Taylor, The Story of a Soul (London: Burns and Oates, 1912), 319.

Continue Reading ·

All of Grace by Spurgeon

In “All of Grace,” Charles Haddon Spurgeon, the renowned 19th-century Baptist preacher, offers a timeless exploration into the heart of Christian theology: the doctrine of grace. Not merely a theoretical exposition for academic theologians, this book aims to reach the ordinary person, the doubting soul, and the skeptical mind. It offers not just theological insight, but also spiritual nourishment and existential hope. Its pages unfold as a grand narrative that tells the story of God’s unmerited favor towards humanity—His grace—and its implications for faith, repentance, and eternal life.

Introduction

Spurgeon opens this book with a dual aim. First, he seeks to explicate the doctrine of grace in a way that is accessible, relatable, and deeply rooted in Scripture. Second, he wishes to guide the reader toward a personal experience of that grace. The heart of his message is simple yet profound: Salvation is a free gift from God, extended to all, regardless of their moral, social, or spiritual status. It’s a gift that can be accepted or rejected, but one that requires no prerequisites other than a sincere and humble heart.

As one of the most influential Christian preachers in history, Spurgeon was deeply concerned with the tendency in his time (and arguably in ours) to misconstrue grace as something to be earned or purchased. His message was radical in its time and remains so today: that all human attempts to earn God’s favor are futile. Salvation cannot be obtained through good deeds, moral uprightness, or religious rituals. It is a gift of God, freely given and freely received.

In “All of Grace,” Spurgeon sets out to dispel misunderstandings, counter legalism, and offer a clear path to understanding what it means to be saved by grace through faith. The book is a sequence of carefully crafted chapters that consider the different facets of grace. Starting from its general conception and delving into its specific applications—such as the role of faith, the importance of repentance, and the assurance of salvation—Spurgeon makes a compelling case for the transformative power of divine grace. Each chapter serves as a spiritual waypoint, guiding the reader closer to the heart of God.

This work is not merely theological; it is deeply pastoral. It is as if Spurgeon is extending his pulpit beyond the walls of the Metropolitan Tabernacle in London, reaching out to each reader individually. The tone is conversational but earnest, akin to a heart-to-heart talk between a wise pastor and a curious, perhaps troubled, parishioner. Spurgeon addresses the questions, fears, and doubts that often plague those who grapple with the issues of sin, salvation, and eternal destiny. He does so with the clarity, empathy, and wisdom of someone who himself has experienced the transforming power of God’s grace.

The book also serves as a guide for those who are either on the fence about Christianity or have perhaps backslidden in their faith. It’s a clarion call to return to the simplicity and purity of the Gospel message. For those who are already believers, it offers deep theological insights that fortify faith and provoke thoughtful reflection. It reaffirms the core belief that at the heart of Christianity is a God of love who offers grace abundantly and unconditionally.

So, as you embark on this spiritual journey through the pages of “All of Grace,” prepare for both an intellectual and emotional odyssey. This isn’t just a book; it’s an invitation—an invitation to examine your beliefs, confront your fears, and ultimately, to experience the boundless grace of God. Whether you are a skeptic looking for answers, a believer seeking to deepen your understanding, or a seeker on the threshold of faith, this book has something for you. By its conclusion, you are likely to find that you’ve not merely gained information but have encountered grace itself—an encounter that could well change your life for eternity.

Part One

Charles Spurgeon’s classic work, “All of Grace,” begins with a chapter that serves as a compelling invitation into the world of Christian faith, setting the foundational tone for the entire book. In this opening chapter, Spurgeon aims to reach those who feel distant from God, estranged by their own failures and imperfections, or intimidated by the complexities of religious doctrine. He wastes no time in getting to the heart of the Christian message: grace.

The section can be seen as an elaborate tapestry, woven with threads of theology, personal invitation, and profound empathy. Spurgeon acknowledges that many people view God as a harsh judge, keeping score of human shortcomings. But he counters this image with the biblical understanding of God as a loving, compassionate Father who offers salvation freely through His grace. He argues that grace is not something that can be earned; it’s a free gift from God. It is, in essence, unmerited favor, offered to all who would receive it.

Spurgeon crafts his words to be as inclusive as possible. He wants the reader to understand that grace is available to everyone, not just a select few who have attained some level of spiritual or moral excellence. In doing so, he breaks down complex theological constructs into simple, relatable terms. The point is clear: if you think you’re unworthy of God’s love, then you’re precisely the person God wants to extend His grace to.

The chapter serves as a rebuttal to the notion that we can earn our way into heaven through good deeds or moral living. Spurgeon points out the futility of such efforts. Even if one were to live a relatively righteous life, it would still fall short of God’s perfect standard. Thus, the only pathway to salvation and a reconciled relationship with God is through accepting His grace, which was made possible through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross. God’s offer is simple and straightforward; it’s humans who often make it complicated. Therefore, he encourages the reader to come with a humble, open heart and to receive the gift that God offers freely.

Spurgeon achieves a rare balance between theological depth and accessible simplicity. He invites the reader into a relationship with God that is both deeply spiritual and intensely practical. He reframes our understanding of God from a stern taskmaster to a loving Father, eager to extend His grace to all, regardless of their past or present circumstances.

“All of Grace” serves as both an invitation and a foundation. It invites the reader to step into a relationship with God based entirely on His grace, not on human merit. And it lays the theological groundwork for the rest of the book, where Spurgeon explores the many facets of this grace that is so central to the Christian faith. It’s a chapter designed not just to inform, but to transform, steering the reader away from legalism and moralism, and directing them toward the open arms of a gracious God.

Part Two

“All of Grace” deepens the conversation initiated in the opening chapter, moving from the broad concept of grace to the specifics of faith. Spurgeon is acutely aware that the notion of grace alone, without human merit, is not just theologically complex but also emotionally charged. Many people struggle with the idea that something so monumental as eternal salvation could be given freely, without conditions. Spurgeon addresses this by elaborating on the critical role of faith in the process of receiving God’s grace.

Spurgeon begins the chapter by reiterating the urgency of the subject matter. He reminds the reader that the stakes are incredibly high: we are talking about eternal life or eternal death. Yet, the crux of his message is reassuring. Salvation, he insists, comes by faith, and faith is not a work; it is not something we do but rather something we receive.

Spurgeon goes on to deconstruct misunderstandings about faith. Faith is not, he explains, a complicated theological concept that requires intellectual gymnastics to understand. Neither is it a quality that only a select few can muster. Faith is simple trust in the promises of God and the work of Jesus Christ. Spurgeon argues that just as a drowning man would grasp a lifebuoy thrown toward him, so too does faith grasp the salvation offered by God. The key, he points out, is not the strength of one’s grip but the effectiveness of the lifebuoy itself. In the same way, the efficacy of faith lies not in our ability to believe strongly but in the object of our faith: Jesus Christ.

Throughout the chapter, Spurgeon employs vivid metaphors and analogies to make his point. He likens faith to the open hand that receives a gift or the open mouth that consumes nourishment. Faith, he says, is as natural and essential as breathing, yet people often complicate it by conflating it with works or making it a pre-condition for God’s grace.

Spurgeon also directly addresses the skeptic and the self-doubting individual. To those who say they cannot muster faith, Spurgeon posits that the very recognition of one’s inability is the beginning of faith. The realization that one cannot save oneself and needs a Savior is the first step in receiving grace through faith. He assures readers that faith is not an enormous task; it is not scaling the heights but merely looking to Jesus, the author and finisher of faith. Moreover, Spurgeon reiterates that faith and grace are inextricably linked. Faith is the mechanism by which we receive the grace that God has freely given. It is both the simplest and the most profound act, stripping away human pretensions of merit and acknowledging total dependence on God for salvation. It is a humble act, but it leads to the unimaginable glory of eternal life.

“All of Grace” serves as a comprehensive treatise on the nature and role of faith in the Christian doctrine of salvation. It removes the barriers and misunderstandings that often make faith seem complicated or elusive, presenting it instead as a simple yet profound act of trust in the promises of God and the redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Spurgeon guides the reader from the abyss of human inadequacy to the pinnacle of divine grace, making it clear that while the meaning of faith may be a mystery, it is not an impossibility. It’s an invitation to rest in the assurance that salvation is, indeed, all of grace.

Part Three

Charles Spurgeon continues to build on the themes of grace and faith, delving into the transformative power of repentance. While the initial sections focus on the simplicity and accessibility of God’s grace, this section examines the role of repentance as a pivotal moment that bridges the human soul with divine grace. Spurgeon argues that repentance is not a meritorious act that earns God’s favor but is itself a grace-infused experience leading to a transformed life.

Spurgeon opens the section by acknowledging a common misconception: that repentance is a sorrowful, almost punishing act, rooted in guilt and shame. He reframes it as not merely a feeling but an action—a turning away from sin and a turning toward God. It’s a profound change of mind, a reorientation of the soul, catalyzed and sustained by God’s grace. Repentance is not merely feeling bad about one’s sins, but decisively moving away from them and toward God. He emphasizes that repentance is not an isolated event but a journey, an ongoing process that continues throughout the Christian life. Yet, the genesis of repentance often comes in a moment of deep conviction, where the sinner realizes their separation from God and the destructiveness of their ways. This conviction, Spurgeon clarifies, is not human-generated; it is a work of the Holy Spirit who convicts of sin in the life of a believer.

The section also addresses those who might feel they’re too sinful to repent or who fear their repentance is insincere. Spurgeon reassures them that the very desire to repent is evidence of God’s grace working in their hearts. One cannot even wish to repent without the prompting of the Spirit, he argues. Therefore, any inclination toward repentance should be seen as an invitation from God to come closer, to enter into a life-transforming relationship with Him.

One of the most poignant aspects of this section is how Spurgeon connects repentance to faith. He argues that the two are like two sides of the same coin; you cannot have faith without repentance and vice versa. To believe in Jesus as the Savior implicitly requires turning away from one’s sins. Repentance and faith are not sequential but simultaneous experiences that occur in the heart touched by grace. Repentance, then, is not merely negative (turning away from sin) but also positive (turning toward God in faith).

As Spurgeon winds up this section, he reiterates that repentance is not something to be dreaded but to be desired. It’s not a one-time act but a perpetual orientation of the soul toward God. It’s not a human work but a divine gift, infused with grace from start to finish. Spurgeon writes of a rich, nuanced understanding of repentance. He dispels myths, addresses fears, and invites the reader into a fuller, grace-filled experience of turning from sin and turning to God. He continues his overarching theme that every aspect of salvation, including the repentance that often confuses or scares people, is entirely a work of God’s overwhelming grace. Thus, even repentance, often misunderstood as a work we perform, becomes yet another manifestation of God’s grace in the believer’s life.

Conclusion

The concluding narrative of “All of Grace,” covers a range of insights from illuminating the nature of grace to exploring the complexities and simplicities of faith and repentance. Spurgeon has offered a theological and spiritual journey designed to bring the reader into a deep relationship with God. Furthermore, Spurgeon’s conclusion serves as a spiritual crescendo, pulling together all the themes discussed into a harmonious and poignant call to meet him in heaven. He reiterates the central point that salvation is not earned, bought, or achieved through human merit, but is a free gift from God that anyone can receive through faith and repentance. This gift is offered universally, transcending barriers of class, race, and social standing, and it provides not only eternal life but a present reality of peace, hope, and transformation.

As he wraps up the work, Spurgeon addresses the skeptic, the seeker, and the believer alike. To the skeptic, he offers the reasonable argument that the weight of eternity should at least warrant a sincere investigation into the claims of grace. To the seeker, he extends a heartfelt invitation to respond to the God who is already reaching out in love and mercy. And to the believer, he provides encouragement and admonition to continue in the journey of faith, abiding in grace while also extending it to others.

Spurgeon also tackles some final concerns that a reader might have: What if I don’t feel worthy? What if my faith is weak? What if I falter and fall? His answer is consistent with the message that runs through the entire book—look to Jesus, the author, and finisher of our faith. God’s grace is sufficient for all our weaknesses, doubts, and fears.

Moreover, he stresses the immediacy of the decision. The grace of God is available now, at this very moment. It is not a distant theological concept but a present reality that demands a response. And this grace is transformative; it changes lives, breaks chains of sin, and liberates the soul.

In a final appeal, Spurgeon calls upon the reader to take that step of faith, to reach out and accept the freely offered grace of God. He likens rejecting this gift to turning away from a feast set before a starving man. The tragedy of rejecting grace is eternal, but the joy of accepting it is also everlasting.

Spurgeon’s “All of Grace” thus comes full circle, ending as it began—with a powerful, compassionate, and urgent invitation to enter into the life of grace. He leaves the reader not with an ending but a beginning, the beginning of a life lived in the rich, transforming grace of God. Through a blend of sound theology, practical wisdom, and heartfelt narrative, Spurgeon offers not just a book but a spiritual experience that has the potential to change lives for eternity.

So as the last words are read, the overarching message reverberates in the heart: Come, taste, and see that the Lord is good. All is indeed of grace, and that grace is sufficient for you, for me, and for all who will believe.

Continue Reading ·

Gentle & Lowly by Ortlund

“Gentle and Lowly: The Heart of Christ for Sinners and Sufferers” is a book by Dane Ortlund that delves into the character and heart of Jesus Christ. Published in 2020, the book provides readers with an exploration of Jesus’s compassion, grace, and love, especially for those who are burdened by their sins or undergoing suffering. Ortlund bases his exploration primarily on the Bible, particularly the Gospels, as well as insights from Puritan writings.

Here’s a summary and review of the book:

  1. Introduction: Ortlund begins by emphasizing how Christians, while knowing about Jesus’s love, often don’t plunge into the depths of His compassionate heart. He argues that understanding Christ’s heart is crucial for our relationship with Him. The title itself is derived from Jesus’s words in Matthew 11:29, where He describes His heart as “gentle and lowly.”

  2. Jesus’s Heart for Sinners: Throughout the Gospels, Jesus often moves toward, rather than away from, those who are outcasts and sinners. Ortlund points out that Christ’s heart is drawn to our sins not to condemn us but to offer grace and redemption. This pattern can be observed in numerous New Testament stories, from the woman caught in adultery to Zacchaeus.

  3. Suffering and the Savior: Beyond sin, Jesus also has a profound heart for those who suffer. Whether it’s physical ailments, societal rejection, or spiritual torment, Christ’s response to human suffering is not detachment but deep, heartfelt compassion. This can be observed in the stories of Him healing the sick, raising the dead, or comforting the distressed.

  4. Insights from the Puritans: Ortlund frequently cites Puritan writers to reinforce and elaborate on his points. The Puritans, despite sometimes being seen as strict or joyless, had a profound understanding of the grace and love of Christ. Their writings often dwell on the inexhaustible depths of Christ’s mercy and His ever-welcoming heart.

  5. The Heart of God the Father: While the primary focus of the book is on Jesus, Ortlund also addresses the heart of God the Father. The Father’s heart is not different from that of Jesus. They are in perfect unity. Thus, God the Father also deeply loves and is moved by the plight of sinners and sufferers.

  6. The Role of the Holy Spirit: The Holy Spirit is the one who applies the work of Christ to believers. Ortlund points out that the Spirit, too, is gentle with believers, slowly and patiently molding them into Christ’s image, sealing them for redemption, and assuring them of their place in God’s family.

  7. Living in the Light of Christ’s Heart: Towards the end, Ortlund discusses the implications of understanding Christ’s heart. Believers are called to rest in Christ’s love, to approach Him without fear or hesitation, and to extend the same grace they’ve received to others.

In “Gentle and Lowly,” Dane Ortlund offers a refreshing and deeply comforting portrayal of Christ, challenging believers to move beyond a mere intellectual acknowledgment of Jesus’s love to a heartfelt embrace of His compassion. For those feeling distant from God because of sin or suffering, the book serves as a reminder that Jesus’s heart is most strongly drawn to them in those very moments.

Continue Reading ·

Where the Bells Toll

Tollhouses, in Eastern Orthodox theology, refer to a somewhat controversial and debated concept about the soul’s journey after death. The term “tollhouse” is a bit of a metaphor, suggesting that just as one might have to stop at various toll stations along a road, the soul encounters various spiritual “stations” after departing from the body, where it is tested or judged for its deeds, sins, and virtues before reaching its final destination.

Here’s a general overview of the Eastern Orthodox perspective:

  1. Theology and Origin: The concept is rooted in various patristic writings, liturgical texts, and the lives of the saints. Descriptions of the tollhouses are often allegorical or symbolic, highlighting the soul’s encounters with demons who accuse it of various sins. The prayers of the Church, the intercessions of the saints, and the merits of one’s own life can assist the soul as it journeys through these tollhouses.
  2. Number and Nature: There are often said to be 20 tollhouses, each corresponding to a particular sin or vice. The demons at each tollhouse try to capture the soul, pointing out the sins it committed in life. If the soul is found wanting or unprepared, it can be dragged down to Hell.
  3. Controversy: The concept of tollhouses is not universally accepted within the Eastern Orthodox Church. Some view the teaching as a useful allegory or pedagogical tool that underscores the seriousness of sin and the need for repentance. Others see it as a literal depiction of the afterlife. Still, others find it problematic or non-canonical and reject it outright. The degree of acceptance varies among different Orthodox jurisdictions, theologians, and laity.
  4. Modern Debates: The subject has sparked debates in modern times, especially with the advent of the internet where theological discussions can spread rapidly. Some argue that the tollhouses have been an accepted part of Orthodox teaching for centuries, while others believe that they have been given undue emphasis or misinterpreted in contemporary discussions.

It’s essential to understand that the tollhouses, whether taken literally or allegorically, represent just one aspect of the rich tapestry of Eastern Orthodox eschatology and soteriology. If you’re interested in diving deeper into this topic, it would be beneficial to consult both primary sources (like the Church Fathers and liturgical texts) and secondary discussions (contemporary Orthodox theologians and scholars) to get a comprehensive understanding.

Concept of Tollhouses

The concept of the tollhouses in Eastern Orthodox theology, as mentioned previously, is not universally accepted or standardized across the entire Orthodox world. However, the concept often describes a journey through 20 tollhouses, each representing a specific sin.

Here’s a list of the 20 tollhouses, based on various sources that describe them:

  1. Murder: This concerns not only physical murder but also includes anger and hatred.
  2. Adultery: This includes not just the physical act but also lustful thoughts.
  3. Theft: Greed, stealing, and unlawful possessions.
  4. Lying: Dishonesty in all its forms.
  5. Bribery: Love of money and the willingness to compromise integrity for gain.
  6. Slander: Speaking ill or falsely about others.
  7. Pride: An inflated sense of self and disdain for others.
  8. Boasting: Excessive pride in one’s achievements.
  9. Scoffing: Mocking or deriding others, especially concerning faith.
  10. Unbelief: Lack of faith or trust in God.
  11. Witchcraft: Invoking or dealing with evil spirits or practices.
  12. Envy: Jealousy of others and their accomplishments or possessions.
  13. Gluttony: Overindulgence in food or drink.
  14. Laziness: Avoiding work or spiritual duties.
  15. Usury: Unfair financial practices, especially charging excessive interest.
  16. Injustice: Unfair treatment of others.
  17. Ruthlessness: Cruelty or the desire to harm others.
  18. Mindlessness: Neglect of one’s duties, especially spiritual ones.
  19. Robbery: Taking from others unlawfully.
  20. Fornication: Illicit sexual relations.

This sequence might slightly differ depending on the source, but these are the commonly cited sins associated with the tollhouses. It’s worth noting again that while some believers might consider the journey through the tollhouses to be a literal event that souls undergo after death, others view it allegorically, symbolizing the spiritual challenges and consequences of sin in this life.

Patristic Sources of Tollhouses in Orthodox Theology

The concept of the tollhouses, as found in Eastern Orthodox theology, has patristic roots, although the precise nature and interpretation of these sources remain subjects of debate among scholars and theologians. Here’s a brief overview of some of the patristic sources that have been associated with the tollhouse concept:

  1. St. Athanasius the Great: In his work “On the Incarnation,” St. Athanasius describes how Christ’s incarnation saves humans from the powers of the air and the fear of death.
  2. St. John Chrysostom: He spoke about demons accusing souls of sins as they ascend to heaven. However, his descriptions don’t lay out a specific system of tollhouses.
  3. St. Cyril of Alexandria: He wrote about the aerial spirits that seek to hinder the ascension of souls.
  4. St. Basil the Great: In his homilies, St. Basil makes reference to fearsome powers that challenge souls after death.
  5. St. Gregory the Dialogist (Pope Gregory the Great): In his “Dialogues,” he tells of the vision of a certain soldier who saw souls being tested by various demonic challenges as they ascended.
  6. St. Macarius of Egypt: In his homilies, St. Macarius speaks of the soul’s journey after death and the spirits it encounters.
  7. The Shepherd of Hermas: This early Christian work, while not considered canonical Scripture, was widely read in the early Church. It contains visions and revelations, including depictions of spirits and challenges faced after death.
  8. The Vision of St. Theodora: This is one of the more detailed and specific patristic sources that describe the tollhouses. St. Theodora’s vision outlines a sequence of tollhouses and the sins associated with each one.
  9. St. Ephrem the Syrian: His writings also contain references to the soul’s ascent and the demonic challenges it faces.

It’s crucial to note a few things:

  • These references often do not explicitly describe a structured set of “tollhouses” in the way that later Orthodox tradition sometimes depicts them. Instead, they offer more general images of aerial spirits or demons accusing or challenging souls.
  • Interpretation varies. Not all Orthodox theologians or scholars agree on the exact meaning or importance of these patristic references concerning the tollhouse concept.
  • The tollhouse concept is part of a broader tapestry of teachings about the afterlife, judgment, and the soul’s journey. It should be studied in the context of Orthodox soteriology and eschatology as a whole.

If you are interested in the patristic foundations of this concept in depth, it would be wise to read these sources directly and consult Orthodox theological studies on the subject.

Who Were the Patristics?

The term “Patristics” refers to the study of the Church Fathers (or “Patres” in Latin), who were influential Christian theologians and writers primarily from the 1st to the 8th century AD. The Church Fathers played a critical role in shaping Christian doctrine, defending the faith against heresies, and articulating theological concepts in the early Church. They are highly respected in various Christian traditions, including Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and certain Protestant denominations.

The Church Fathers can be generally categorized into several groups based on time periods and regional contexts:

  1. Apostolic Fathers (Late 1st to Early 2nd century): These are the earliest Christian writers who are believed to have had direct or indirect connections to the Apostles. Key figures include:
    • St. Clement of Rome
    • St. Ignatius of Antioch
    • St. Polycarp of Smyrna
    • The author(s) of the Didache
    • The author of the “Shepherd of Hermas”
  2. Ante-Nicene Fathers (2nd to early 4th century): These are the Church Fathers who lived before the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. They defended the faith against early heresies and began formulating theology in a more systematic way.
    • St. Justin Martyr
    • St. Irenaeus of Lyons
    • Tertullian
    • Origen
    • St. Cyprian of Carthage
  3. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (4th to 8th century): These theologians lived after the First Council of Nicaea and during the subsequent ecumenical councils. They dealt with the Arian controversy and other theological challenges.
    • St. Athanasius the Great
    • The Cappadocian Fathers: St. Basil the Great, St. Gregory of Nazianzus, and St. Gregory of Nyssa
    • St. John Chrysostom
    • St. Ambrose of Milan
    • St. Jerome
    • St. Augustine of Hippo
    • St. Cyril of Alexandria
    • St. John of Damascus (often considered the last of the Greek Fathers)
  4. Desert Fathers: These were early Christian monks and ascetics who lived in the deserts of Egypt, Palestine, and Syria. They are known for their teachings on Christian spirituality and asceticism. Notable figures include:
    • St. Anthony the Great
    • St. Pachomius
    • Evagrius Ponticus
    • St. John Cassian
  5. Western Fathers and Eastern Fathers: The Church Fathers can also be divided based on their geographical and linguistic contexts. Latin-speaking theologians from the Western Roman Empire are often termed “Western Fathers,” while Greek-speaking theologians from the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) are termed “Eastern Fathers.”

The writings and teachings of the Church Fathers have been fundamental in shaping Christian doctrine, liturgy, spirituality, and exegesis. They are frequently cited in theological discussions and remain a vital part of the Christian tradition.

Continue Reading ·

The Institutes: Prolegomena

In the turbulent backdrop of the 16th-century Reformation, a profound voice emerged that would shape the contours of Protestant theology for generations to come. In his seminal work “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” John Calvin (1509–1564) embarked on an ambitious journey to elucidate the Christian faith in its entirety. “Institutes of the Christian Religion” is Calvin’s magnum opus and represents one of the most comprehensive and systematic presentations of Protestant theology during the Reformation. Initially published in 1536, Calvin revised and expanded it in several editions, with the final version appearing in 1559.

Introduction

The narrative of the “Institutes” begins with the human quest for knowledge. Calvin underscores that knowledge of oneself and knowledge of God are intertwined. But how can finite humans comprehend the infinite? The magnificence of creation, for Calvin, acts as a mirror, reflecting the divine attributes of the Creator. Yet, this reflection is marred by humanity’s fallen state. Sin clouds our natural faculties, leading us to suppress or distort this knowledge. Still, Calvin delves into the profound tragedy of the Fall. Adam and Eve’s rebellion in the Garden of Eden plunged humanity into a state of total depravity. Every facet of the human being—mind, will, emotions—is now tainted by sin. We are alienated from God, ensnared by death, and incapable of achieving righteousness by our efforts.

But the story doesn’t end in despair. Into this bleak tableau enters Jesus Christ—the Redeemer. Calvin paints Christ as the mediator, bridging the Holy God and sinful humanity. Christ atones for sin, defeats death, and offers reconciliation through His sacrificial death on the cross and triumphant resurrection. It’s a cosmic redemption story where love, justice, and mercy converge. So how does one partake in this redemptive act? Calvin emphatically speaks of faith – Not just intellectual assent, but a deep, heartfelt trust in Christ’s redemptive work. It’s through faith that we are justified—declared righteous before God. This is the heart of Calvin’s soteriology: justification by faith alone, apart from works. Yet, faith isn’t stagnant; it’s the starting point of sanctification—the lifelong process where believers gradually conform to Christ’s image.

Calvin’s work ventures into the communal dimension of faith. For Calvin, faith isn’t merely an individual endeavor; it thrives within the community of believers—the Church. Described as the body of Christ, the Church is where the Word of God is proclaimed, and the sacraments (baptism and the Lord’s Supper) are celebrated. These sacraments act as visible signs of invisible grace, anchors that tether believers to the promises of God. So as the believer journeys through life, Calvin emphasizes the importance of prayer as a means of communion with God. Moreover, he acknowledges the challenges and tribulations that believers often face. However, with the assurance of God’s providence, believers can navigate these challenges, confident that everything, even suffering, is under God’s sovereign control.

The narrative concludes with a reflection on the Christian’s role in society. While church and state are distinct realms, both are divinely instituted. The Christian, therefore, has duties toward both. Calvin envisions a harmonious relationship between the two, with civil government maintaining societal order and the church nurturing spiritual life. So, in the vast tapestry of the “Institutes,” Calvin weaves a grand narrative of creation, fall, redemption, and consummation. Through meticulous exegesis and profound theological insights, he invites readers on a transformative journey to the heart of the Christian faith—a journey that transcends the annals of history and beckons souls toward eternity. Through the “Institutes,” Calvin didn’t merely pen a theological treatise; he crafted a narrative that encapsulates the Christian odyssey from the depths of sin to the heights of glory. Its echoes of grace continue to resonate in the corridors of time, beckoning every reader to the boundless love of God.

Background

Born Jean Cauvin in Noyon, France, Calvin grew up in a devout Catholic family. He was initially groomed for a career in the Church and went on to study Latin and humanities at the Collège de la Marche in Paris. Later, Calvin shifted his focus to law at the behest of his father, studying in Orléans and Bourges. While in Paris, Calvin was introduced to Renaissance humanism, which emphasized the value of classical learning and the study of the original biblical texts.

John Calvin’s father, Gérard Cauvin, was an attorney and a notary who worked for the local cathedral in Noyon, France. Gérard played a pivotal role in Calvin’s early education, intending for John to enter into the priesthood. He secured a chaplaincy for his young son, which funded John’s education. However, due to a conflict with the local bishop, Gérard advised John to study law instead of theology. Calvin’s mother, Jeanne le Franc, was known for her piety. Little is documented about her, but she bore several children before her premature death. John was very young at the time of her death, and the loss may have profoundly impacted him.

While John Calvin had several brothers and sisters, a few are noteworthy here. Charles Cauvin, one of Calvin’s brothers, followed a career in the church but faced excommunication due to his alignment with Protestant beliefs. He died in 1537. Another brother, Antoine Cauvin, joined John in Geneva and played a supportive role in his life. He worked in various capacities in the city, including as a clerk. While not much is known about Calvin’s sisters, it’s known that Marie Cauvin, one of his sisters, took refuge in Geneva following the rise of Protestant persecution in France.

In 1540, after residing in Strasbourg, Calvin married Idelette de Bure, a widow with children from her first marriage. Idelette was originally an Anabaptist but converted to Calvin’s Reformed theology. Their marriage was described as affectionate and supportive, with Idelette often aiding refugees and being actively involved in the life of the church. The couple had one child together, but the child died in infancy. Idelette’s passing in 1549 deeply affected Calvin, and he never remarried. While the exact number of Idelette’s children from her first marriage is not well-documented, it’s known that she had children from her first marriage, whom Calvin adopted as his own after their union.

Understanding Calvin’s familial ties and personal relationships offers a more holistic view of the man. His relationships, particularly the deaths of close family members, may have shaped his theological understanding of suffering, God’s providence, and the human condition. Although often overshadowed by his public persona, Calvin’s family and personal life provide a poignant backdrop against which his immense theological contributions can be more deeply understood.

In the early 1530s, Calvin was forced to flee Paris due to rising anti-Protestant sentiment in France. After a brief stay in Basel, Switzerland, Calvin intended to settle in Strasbourg. However, political and military obstacles led him to Geneva. In Geneva, Calvin was soon recruited by local reformer Guillaume Farel to assist in the city’s nascent Protestant Reformation. Though Calvin initially resisted, he eventually agreed and quickly became a leading figure in the movement. His time in Geneva was not without challenges. Differences in religious and social views led to Calvin’s expulsion from the city in 1538. However, he returned in 1541 and remained there for the rest of his life, during which he established a theocratic governance system.

Calvin’s influence persisted long after his death. The Reformed churches and various Protestant denominations can trace their roots to his teachings. Though often associated primarily with his doctrine of predestination, Calvin’s thought encompasses a wide range of theological, ecclesiastical, and social issues, making him one of the most influential Christian theologians in history.

Roman Catholicism

The Christian reform movement in the 16th century challenged the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrines and practices. Calvin’s thoughts on theology, ecclesiology, and social issues have profoundly influenced Protestantism, shaping a tradition known as Reformed theology. And by the mid-1530s, Calvin experienced what he described as a “sudden conversion.” The exact nature of this conversion remains a matter of debate among historians, but its result was clear: Calvin embraced the Protestant cause, distancing himself from the Roman Catholic Church. His theological views, crystallized in his magnum opus, “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” placed him squarely at odds with Catholic doctrine. Theological disagreements on topics like the nature of the Eucharist, the role of Church tradition, the authority of the Pope, and the doctrine of justification, to name a few, were foundational to his break with the Church.

Calvin’s association with the city of Geneva exemplified his definitive break from the Roman Catholic Church. In Geneva, Calvin aimed to create a godly city-state where every aspect of life, both public and private, aligned with Scriptural teachings. His ecclesiastical ordinances instituted a form of church government and discipline sharply distinct from the Catholic model. Calvin’s rigorous moral and doctrinal standards sometimes put him at odds even with the city’s residents, but they unmistakably distinguished Genevan Protestantism from Roman Catholicism.

Throughout his ministry, Calvin engaged in polemical writings against the Catholic Church. He criticized what he viewed as superstitious practices, corrupt clergy, and erroneous doctrines. His stance made him a significant target for Catholic apologists. The Council of Trent (1545-1563), the Catholic Church’s answer to the Reformation, denounced several Protestant teachings, including many of Calvin’s key doctrines. Calvin, not one to remain silent, responded with his writings, defending the Reformed faith against Catholic hostilities. Calvin’s relationship with the Roman Catholic Church was undoubtedly adversarial. Yet, viewing it within the broader context of the 16th-century religious upheaval is essential. To Calvin, his disagreements with the Church were not about mere theological nitpicking; they were about the essence of the Gospel and the salvation of souls. The Roman Catholic Church, on the other hand, viewed Calvin (and other Reformers) as schismatics, challenging the unity of Christendom and leading many astray with their teachings.

In the end, John Calvin’s status with the Roman Catholic Church can be summarized as that of a profound reformer, a staunch critic, and an unwavering advocate for what he believed was the pure, apostolic Christianity—a Christianity he argued had been obscured by the Roman Catholic Church of his day.

Eastern Orthodoxy

In contrast to Calvin’s historical background with the Roman Catholic Church, his relationship with the Eastern Orthodox Church (often called the Orthodox Church) is less pronounced in his writings and actions. The Protestant Reformation primarily unfolded in Western Europe, where the Roman Catholic Church dominated. Eastern Orthodoxy was primarily in the eastern regions of Europe and the Near East. Thus, there was less direct contact between Reformation leaders like Calvin and the Orthodox Church than the Roman Catholic Church.

Calvin and the Orthodox Church had some overlapping criticisms of the Roman Catholic Church, especially concerning certain late medieval practices and the role of the papacy. While both Calvin and the Orthodox tradition held a high view of the early church councils and the Nicene Creed, there were still significant theological differences. The Orthodox Church did not adhere to the Reformed emphases on doctrines like predestination or sola scriptura in the way Calvin articulated them. Also, the nature of the Eucharist, liturgical practices, and church governance would have been points of divergence.

Calvin’s writings contain relatively few explicit references to the Eastern Orthodox Church. Where references exist, they are often lumped in with broader discussions about the “ancient church” or early church fathers rather than a distinct engagement with Orthodoxy as a separate tradition. It’s worth noting that later Reformed theologians and representatives interacted with the Orthodox Church. For instance, in the early 17th century, Cyril Lucaris, the Patriarch of Constantinople, showed a strong interest in Reformed theology. However, his views and subsequent declarations were highly controversial within the Orthodox context and were ultimately condemned by the Orthodox Church.

While Calvin’s primary theological and ecclesiastical engagements were with the Roman Catholic Church and other Protestant groups, his relationship with the Eastern Orthodox Church was more peripheral. His limited engagement with Orthodoxy was a function of geography, historical context, and the pressing religious debates of his day.

Prefatory Address – 1536

In the opening to Calvin’s “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” he wrote an address to King Francis I of France in 1536. This introductory letter is more than just a simple introduction; it is a profound defense of the Reformed faith and an appeal for religious tolerance. In its historical context, the address should be understood against the backdrop of the religious tensions of the time. The Protestant Reformation had been spreading rapidly across Europe, and in France, those who subscribed to Reformed views (often pejoratively called “Huguenots”) faced severe persecution. King Francis I, while initially showing some leniency towards the Lutherans, began to take a harder stance against Protestantism as the movement grew in influence and as political pressures mounted.

Calvin’s primary aim in writing to Francis I was twofold. First to defend the Reformed faith against accusations of heresy and sedition, and second to appeal to the king for protection and fair treatment of the French Protestants. As the purpose of his appeal was comprehensive, he wrote of specifics concerning various misunderstandings, the true church, the authority of Scripture, accusations against believers in Christ, religious tolerance, and personal respect.

Calvin expressed concern that the king had been misinformed about the beliefs and intentions of the Reformed believers. He sought to clear up misunderstandings and to counteract the negative propaganda spread by their adversaries. Calvin asserted that the true Church is where the Word of God is rightly preached and the sacraments are rightly administered. By this definition, he argued, the Reformed believers should be recognized as a legitimate part of the Church, not as heretics. A cornerstone of Calvin’s argument is the supreme authority of Scripture. He emphasized that the doctrines he and other Reformers teach are rooted in the Bible, not innovations. This was in contrast to the Roman Catholic Church, which Calvin argued had deviated from scriptural truths.

Calvin refuted accusations of sedition and political revolt. He emphasized that the Reformed faith teaches obedience to rulers and authorities, and the goal of the Reformers is spiritual reformation, not political upheaval. So Calvin implored Francis I to show leniency and protect the Protestants from unjust persecutions. He argues that the use of force in matters of faith contradicts the spirit of Christianity and appeals to the king’s sense of justice. Throughout the address, Calvin maintained a tone of respect for the king. While he firmly defended the Reformed faith, he acknowledged Francis I’s authority and position. While Calvin’s appeal was eloquent and impassioned, it did little to change the immediate situation for French Protestants. Persecutions continued, and the divide between the Roman Catholic Church and the burgeoning Reformed movement in France deepened. However, from a broader historical perspective, Calvin’s address to Francis I stands as a testament to the Reformers’ commitment to their faith and their willingness to defend their beliefs before the highest earthly authorities. It’s a snapshot of the larger struggles of the Reformation era, encapsulating the courage, convictions, and challenges of those tumultuous times.

Epistle to the Reader – 1539

In 1539, John Calvin prepared a new edition of his Institutes. This edition was more extensive than the first, representing a significant expansion and restructuring of his initial ideas. To introduce this work, Calvin wrote an “Epistle to the Reader,” which serves as an introduction to his expanded work and a summary of his theological aims and intentions. The “Epistle to the Reader” is Calvin’s introduction and contextualizes the revised “Institutes.” Having released the first edition of the Institutes in 1536, just three years prior, Calvin had already seen the need for more comprehensive teaching due to feedback and the further clarification he believed was necessary to counter various misunderstandings about Protestant beliefs.

Calvin wrote of the “Institutes,” even in its 1536 version, as a work of extensive labor. And it was not a hastily prepared document but was a product of careful reflection and engagement with Scripture. Aware of the myriad misconceptions and misrepresentations of Protestant doctrine, Calvin emphasized that a principal motive behind the revision was to clarify and systematically present the faith. His effort aimed to benefit those curious about Protestant beliefs and those who might be hostile to the Reformation. Calvin underscored that the “Institutes” was intended to be a comprehensive summation of the Protestant faith, an organized presentation of doctrines drawn from and aligned with the Bible. It wasn’t just about highlighting disagreements with the Roman Catholic Church but more about affirming a positive, scripturally-grounded theology.

Throughout the “Epistle,” Calvin alluded to the many accusations and misrepresentations about the Reformers. He hoped that this clarified and expanded edition would serve as a defense against such charges, demonstrating the scriptural fidelity and intellectual rigor of Reformed beliefs. Beyond just theological precision, there’s a pastoral undertone in Calvin’s letter. He expressed a deep concern for the spiritual well-being of his readers. Calvin desired that through understanding the true Christian doctrine, believers would grow in their faith and draw closer to God.

John Calvin's Church in Geneva Switzerland - St. Pierre Cathedral
John Calvin’s Church in Geneva Switzerland – St. Pierre Cathedral

In summary, John Calvin’s 1539 “Epistle to the Reader” is a window into the Reformer’s heart and mind as he presented a more mature version of his Institutes. It reflects Calvin’s dedication to Scripture, his desire for clarity in presenting the gospel, his defense against misconceptions, and, importantly, his pastoral concern for his readers’ spiritual health and growth. The “Epistle” sets the stage for the reader, preparing them for the deep theological exploration that follows in the body of the “Institutes.”

Preface to the French – 1545

John Calvin’s 1545 preface to the French edition of the Institutes is a particularly notable piece of Reformation literature. This preface is often referred to as the “Dedication to King Francis I” or simply the “Preface to King Francis,” as it is directed towards the King of France. This preface is different from the original one penned in the 1536 Latin edition, and its significance lies not just in its theological exposition but also in its political and cultural implications. In the mid-16th century, Protestants in France, who came to be known as Huguenots, were experiencing increasing persecution. King Francis I, initially somewhat tolerant of Protestant views due to political reasons, began taking a harder stance against them as they grew in influence. This preface can be seen as Calvin’s attempt to advocate for French Protestants, seeking a reprieve from their mistreatment.

In defense of the Protestant faith,Calvin again asserted that the beliefs of the French Protestants were neither seditious nor heretical. He emphasizes the Biblical foundation of their doctrines and disputes the charges of novelty frequently levied against them. He recognized that the king had been surrounded by advisors who maligned the Protestants, and Calvin endeavored to correct the misconceptions. He argued against the idea that the Reformers were stirring up political rebellion or that their teachings were radically new or dangerous. While he acknowledged the king’s authority in civil matters, Calvin subtly challenged the idea that civil rulers should control individual consciences or dictate religious beliefs.

One of the primary aims of this preface was to urge King Francis I to show leniency to the Protestants. Calvin made a case for religious freedom, implying that threats or violence could not force true faith. Despite his disagreements and implicit criticisms, Calvin maintained a respectful tone. He again addressed the king with deference, recognizing his authority and hoping to sway him through reasoned argument rather than confrontation. In addressing the king, Calvin also offered a brief overview of Protestant beliefs. This served as a defense and an evangelistic effort, hoping perhaps to convince the monarch of the truth of the Reformed faith.

The 1545 preface to the French edition of the “Institutes” is a masterful blend of theology, apologetics, and diplomacy. While Calvin’s immediate plea for tolerance was not heeded (persecutions continued and even intensified), this document remains a testament to the Reformers’ commitment to their faith, their willingness to defend their beliefs even before the highest earthly authorities, and their passion for the clarity and truth of the Gospel.

Epistle to the Reader – 1559

John Calvin’s 1559 “Epistle to the Reader” is his final and most comprehensive edition of the “Institutes.” By this time, the “Institutes” had become not only the foundational text for Reformed Protestantism but also one of the most significant theological works of the Protestant Reformation. This final version is more extensive, detailed, and polished than the preceding versions.

Calvin acknowledged how the Institutes have grown over the years. Initially intended as a basic manual for those unfamiliar with the faith, it transformed into a thorough compendium of Reformed doctrine. Calvin spoke about the multiple editions and expansions, with the 1559 version culminating his efforts. His ongoing objective was to elucidate the beliefs of the Reformation in contrast to the misunderstandings and misconceptions propagated against them. By 1559, the Institutes had become an exhaustive defense and exposition of Reformed beliefs rooted in Biblical interpretation. Calvin consistently reflected upon pastoral concerns throughout his writings. His primary goal was always the spiritual edification of his readers. He wanted Christians to deeply understand their faith, leading to a closer relationship with God. This pastoral impulse is evident in the 1559 “Epistle,” where he underscores the practical application of theology.

The 1559 edition was carefully structured to provide a more systematic presentation of Reformed theology. Calvin highlighted this structure, guiding the reader through the logical progression of topics, which mirrors the Apostle’s Creed’s structure. This structure comprises knowledge of God the Creator, knowledge of God the Redeemer in Christ, the means of receiving Christ’s grace, and the effects of Christ’s redemption. Calvin wrote in this “Epistle” that the 1559 edition was the final version of the Institutes. While he never ceased studying and reflecting on God’s Word, this edition represented his mature and considered theology. Throughout his ministry, Calvin faced opposition from various quarters, including Catholics, Anabaptists, and other Protestant factions. The Institutes, particularly this final edition, served as a robust defense of Reformed doctrine against these detractors.

The 1559 epistle encapsulated Calvin’s purpose and hopes for the Institutes. While he was a systematic theologian of the highest order, Calvin was also a pastor at heart, deeply concerned with the spiritual well-being of Christians. This dual focus on rigorous theology and pastoral concern is evident throughout the Institutes, and the epistle serves as a fitting introduction to this monumental work. Calvin’s dedication to clarity, Biblical fidelity, and the edification of the Church has ensured that the Institutes remains a significant theological work to this day.

Credal Alignment

As John Calvin’s “Institutes” underwent several editions during his lifetime, the final and most comprehensive edition was published in 1559. This edition was systematically structured to mirror the Apostles’ Creed, which is a concise statement of the Christian faith. Calvin didn’t necessarily intend for the “Institutes” to be a direct commentary on the Apostles’ Creed, but the thematic connection is clear. A prominent Reformed theologian, Caspar Olevianus (or Olevian), recognized this structural alignment with the Apostles’ Creed in Calvin’s “Institutes.”

To understand the alignment, let’s first look at Calvin’s organizational structure:

  1. Book I – The Knowledge of God the Creator
  2. Book II – The Knowledge of God the Redeemer in Christ, First Disclosed to the Fathers Under the Law, and Then to Us in the Gospel
  3. Book III – How We Receive the Grace of Christ: What Benefits Come to Us from It, and What Effects Follow
  4. Book IV – The External Means or Helps by Which God Invites Us Into the Society of Christ and Holds Us Therein

Now, aligning this with the Apostles’ Creed:

  1. “I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth.” This corresponds with Book I of the “Institutes,” focusing on the knowledge of God as Creator.
  2. “And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary,” And so on through the sections on Christ’s death, resurrection, and ascension – This can be seen in Book II, which concentrates on Christ as Redeemer.
  3. “I believe in the Holy Spirit,” Leading into the benefits of Christ’s work – This aligns with Book III, exploring how believers receive the grace of Christ and its benefits.
  4. “The holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting.” This fits with Book IV, which deals with the external means (like the Church and sacraments) that God employs to keep believers in communion with Christ.

While Calvin didn’t write the “Institutes” as a direct exposition of the Apostles’ Creed, the alignment is evident. Olevianus, familiar with the “Institutes” and the Creed, would have recognized this thematic and structural parallelism. This observation is crucial because it illustrates how Reformed theology, as articulated by Calvin, was deeply rooted in the broader Christian tradition. The Creed served as a foundational touchstone of orthodoxy, and Calvin’s alignment with it in the “Institutes” underscores his commitment to the essential truths of Christianity.

Continue Reading ·

In the Lord I Take Refuge

In the book “In The LORD I Take Refuge,” the author, Dane Ortlund, wrote a commentary alongside each chapter of the book of Psalms. As a Presbyterian pastor with a Ph.D., he offers reflections and observations of substantive value about the Psalter one chapter at a time. The book is with the ESV text of the Psalms prepared in a format where 150 devotions are presented to readers with the author’s encouragement, exhortation, rebuke, and the occasional call to repentance. He often echoes the Psalmists’ sentiments about the lovingkindness of the LORD through song and poetry. He also explores the range of literary meaning as the Psalms are sometimes imprecatory, messianic, prophetic, and musical in lyric and instruction. The range of inspired material prepared throughout the Psalms is covered in a practical way made relevant to readers immersed in everyday life.

The consistent pattern throughout the text is to bring practical application to the lives of believers. In a sense, this book is a work of ministry from the author to comfort readers, challenge them, and remind them of what God meant through the writers of Scripture. This book is not an academic work of interest but a personal journey of the heart and mind. To reflect on what God says to the reader about highly relevant and pertinent topics of interest. Praise, hardships, enmity, comfort, assurance, and promise are touched upon without scripture references elsewhere but are kept to the message within each Psalm at hand. The title chosen for the book is appropriate because it anchors the reader into the thread of meaning throughout the devotional commentary. In The LORD I Take Refuge covers a lot of ground as it is a call and response, or inform and response way to which the material is absorbed day by day. The book’s central point that the author returns to is the refuge of the LORD as the only true and lasting means of safety, protection, and peace from the issues of life with deep spiritual relevance.

The book’s title draws upon Psalm 11:1 phrase, “In the Lord I Take Refuge.” While the majority text, KJV and NKJV, reference the term “trust” instead of “refuge,” the critical text makes use of the translation rendering “refuge” from the original Hebrew Word defined as a place of safety or shelter. This poetic language brings to mind an image of withdrawal and separation to a place of security for protection. The title aligns with what the author intended to convey as he sought to capture what the Psalmists wrote as a body of work. There wasn’t attention placed on the structural or technical features of the text, as the book is intended as a daily companion of both practical and spiritual messages.

The author also uses the writings of historical figures within early Christianity, including the Reformers and the Puritans, to highlight substantive meaning about perspectives rendered by the Psalmists. In support of the author’s reading and comprehension of the subject matter, with its authoritative scriptural weight, correlating and pertinent perspectives from historical people of influence help drive home the points he continues to offer. The wide array of perspectives Ortlund presents from these historical people of God goes a long way to substantiate the credibility of his observations and perspective. The author likely has much to say about the scriptural references, prayers, and reflections of the Patristic fathers, the Reformers, and the Puritans. The wide use of influential people throughout history isn’t for analytical purposes but for their unique perspectives from a time and setting set apart from post-modern society.

As Crossway is the publisher of this devotional book (ISBN: 978-1-4335-7770-3; hardcover, 409 pages), it is suitable for use among numerous people within the Reformed and Renewed traditions of the universal church. While the reflections about each Psalm are from a Reformed perspective, it is evangelical in tone and delivery without compromising the truth and intended meaning of Scripture. While it isn’t recommended that devotional time should be dedicated exclusively to the Psalter, it is a valuable companion to Scripture during personal time in the Word, during family worship and reading, or as a component of private liturgy.

Continue Reading ·

Mere Christianity

Mere Christianity is a profound work of theological literature written by British writer and lay theologian C.S. Lewis. First published in 1942, the book is a timeless and influential work in Christian apologetics. Much of its content originated from a series of BBC radio talks made by Lewis during World War II, from 1941 to 1944. The book is a compelling testament to Lewis’s thoughtfulness, creativity, and ability to articulate complex theological concepts in a manner that is engaging and accessible to everyone.

Having completely read through this book, it is obvious how it came to be a foundational text for many individuals exploring Christian belief. Especially as its significance lies not only in its clear, inviting prose but also in the scope and depth of its thought. Lewis’s intellectual approach to the Christian faith and his rational arguments for its principles and tenets are aimed at a broad audience. He hoped to describe a “mere” Christianity, a set of core beliefs that all Christians, regardless of their denominational background, could agree upon.

Introduction

Mere Christianity is divided into four parts, each addressing a distinct area of Christian belief and practice. The first section, titled “Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe,” proposes the existence of a universal moral law that all humans innately understand. Lewis argues that this moral law cannot result from biological or social evolution but must come from a divine source, thereby providing a moral argument for the existence of God.

The second part, “What Christians Believe,” delves deeper into Christian doctrine. Here, Lewis explores the nature of good and evil, the concepts of free will, and the Christian understanding of God and the universe. He discusses the concept of dualism and then introduces the Christian understanding of God’s nature, presenting Jesus not merely as a good moral teacher, but as the Son of God, thereby addressing the crux of Christian belief.

“Christian Behavior,” the third part of the book, elaborates on the practical application of Christianity in daily life. Lewis talks about Christian morality in terms of personal ethics and the broader context of justice, charity, forgiveness, and the importance of love, amongst others. He illuminates the concept of ‘the cardinal virtues,’ the theological virtues, and discusses topics like sexual morality, marriage, forgiveness, and the love of God.

In the final section, “Beyond Personality: Or First Steps in the Doctrine of the Trinity,” Lewis explores the concept of the Trinity and explains the transformation process of a human becoming a part of the “Body of Christ.” This section presents some of Christian doctrine’s more complex theological aspects, which Lewis simplifies with brilliant and relatable analogies.

Throughout Mere Christianity, Lewis’s style is conversational yet scholarly, with a thought-provoking approach that invites believers and skeptics to examine their beliefs. The book uniquely blends philosophical argumentation, theological instruction, and spiritual encouragement. With his literary talent and depth of understanding, Lewis provides a persuasive case for the Christian faith.

At the same time, Lewis carefully avoids delving into the divisive specifics of different Christian denominations, focusing instead on the shared tenets of the faith. This is the ‘mere’ Christianity he proposes – a vision of faith that aims to be inclusive rather than exclusive. This focus on shared belief has helped the book gain wide acceptance among Christians of many different traditions.

Mere Christianity is more than just a book; it is an immersive experience in understanding one’s faith. Whether you are a devoted believer, a skeptic exploring the Christian faith, or someone interested in religious philosophy, this classic work provides deep insights and promotes thoughtful reflection. Regardless of your perspective, Mere Christianity invites you on a journey of exploration and discovery that has the potential to transform your understanding of Christianity and the world. 

Book I

RIGHT AND WRONG AS A CLUE TO THE MEANING OF THE UNIVERSE

Book One of Mere Christianity begins with Lewis’s exploration of morality and the concept of right and wrong, which he uses as a clue to discerning the existence and nature of God. He argues that moral law, the internal code of conduct recognized universally by humans, points to a lawgiver—God.

The first chapter, “The Law of Human Nature,” introduces the notion that humans have an innate sense of right and wrong, an idea that transcends cultural differences. Despite varied societal norms and customs, people universally understand fundamental concepts of fairness, justice, and moral conduct. Lewis argues that this moral law or ‘Law of Human Nature’ suggests the existence of a moral lawgiver, or God.

In “Some Objections,” the second chapter, Lewis refutes the notion that morality is a social or biological construct. He suggests that while instincts may often guide our actions, the decisions we make when instincts conflict reveal a deeper moral law. He also contends that societal norms, though influential, don’t define morality because societies themselves can be corrupt or unjust.

“The Reality of the Law” is the third chapter. Here, Lewis discusses how people often fail to follow the moral code they recognize, a state he terms ‘quarreling.’ Quarreling, he argues, is an implicit recognition of a universal moral law because it entails appealing to an accepted standard of fairness when one feels wronged. Lewis implies that the regularity of quarreling in human interaction signifies the universal reality of moral law.

In the fourth chapter, “What Lies Behind the Law,” Lewis moves from discussing moral law’s existence to speculation about the universe’s nature. He proposes two views: the Materialist view, which states that the universe is a random occurrence without a higher power, and the Religious view, which argues that a mind orchestrates the universe. Lewis suggests that the existence of the moral law, which does not fit into the mechanics of the survival of the fittest, supports the religious view.

“We Have Cause to Be Uneasy” is the last chapter of the first book. Lewis concludes that God, as the moral lawgiver, must be righteous and just, implying that humans, who frequently disobey this moral law, have cause to be concerned. Despite this, he also points to the sense of comfort people find in recognizing this moral lawgiver, suggesting that the Christian journey provides hope.

By the end of Book One, Lewis lays a foundation for the Christian faith by arguing that humanity’s shared, universal morality indicates a shared source of this morality, a higher power or God. According to Lewis, moral law is not a creation of humanity but an indication of the divine within and beyond us. This line of reasoning establishes a context for Lewis’s subsequent discussion of Christian doctrine and beliefs in the remaining sections of this book.

Book II

WHAT CHRISTIANS BELIEVE

Book 2, titled “What Christians Believe,” elucidates key Christian doctrines, making them accessible to his lay readership. His central themes include the nature of God, the concept of the Trinity, the nature of good and evil, and the figure of Jesus Christ. Lewis begins this book by clarifying what God is not. He argues against the popular notion of God as a vague spiritual force, instead asserting the Christian belief in a personal God, the sort of God who has a will, can love, and can relate to us as individuals. This is the foundation of Lewis’s theistic view, where God is both the cause and the purpose of the universe.

From there, Lewis moves on to the question of the nature of good and evil, arguing against a dualistic interpretation of the universe. Dualists, according to Lewis, see the world as a battleground of equal opposing forces of good and evil. But Lewis maintains that evil is not a thing in its own right, but rather a perversion or corruption of good. Evil is parasitic on good and is only possible when good things go wrong. In this perspective, God is entirely good, and evil originated from free will when creatures chose to misuse their God-given freedom. Lewis stresses that, despite evil’s apparent power, it is ultimately subordinate to God’s goodness.

The problem of evil leads Lewis to the figure of Christ. He addresses the issue of why, if God is good, the world is filled with suffering. Lewis introduces the idea of the Fall, the moment when human beings first chose to turn away from God. According to Lewis, this choice introduced sin and suffering into the world. Yet, God, in his mercy, offered a solution to the problem of sin: Jesus Christ.

Lewis then takes on one of his most famous arguments: “Liar, Lunatic, or Lord,” often paraphrased as “Mad, Bad, or God.” Lewis argues against those who would relegate Jesus to the status of a great moral teacher but deny his divinity. Lewis points out that Jesus made claims that would, if not true, make him either a madman or a devil. He claims that he will forgive people their sins; he says that he has always existed; he says he is coming to judge the world at the end of time. No one who made such claims could be considered a great moral teacher but not divine. Thus, we are left with three options: Jesus was a liar (a deliberate fraud), a lunatic (a man of unsound mind), or he was who he said he was: Lord.

In the final chapters, Lewis grapples with the Christian concept of the Trinity. Lewis analogizes the Trinity with the dimensions of space. Just as a single dimension can contain an infinite number of lines, and two dimensions can contain an infinite number of lines and shapes, so too, he argues, can God be both three and one. The three persons of the Trinity – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – are distinct, but they are all contained within the oneness of God.

Lewis continues to use everyday language and familiar analogies to unpack the essential beliefs of the Christian faith. His approachable style and thoughtful arguments continue to make this book a valuable resource for both Christians seeking to deepen their understanding of their faith and skeptics exploring Christianity.

Book III

CHRISTIAN BEHAVIOR

The third book, “Christian Behavior,” lays out Lewis’s vision of what ethical conduct, under the influence of Christian teachings, should look like. In this book, Lewis explores different virtues and vices, the nature of morality, and the character of a ‘good man’ according to Christian morality. Here Lewis begins by suggesting that Christian morality is like a map. Just as maps help us navigate the physical world, so Christian morals help us navigate the spiritual world. He then proceeds to discuss the ‘Cardinal Virtues’, which are wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice. These virtues are not exclusive to Christianity and are recognized by various philosophical traditions as key aspects of good moral character.

The conversation then shifts to social morality. Lewis contends that Christianity does not dictate a specific political or economic system. Instead, it sets forth general principles that should guide human interactions. He argues that Christianity encourages a love that extends beyond personal affections. This is ‘Agape,’ an unconditional love that expects nothing in return, a love that should be extended to all, including enemies.

Lewis also emphasizes the importance of sexual morality, devoting a significant portion of this book to the subject. He clarifies that he does not see sex as evil, but argues that, like all powerful desires, it can be dangerous when not properly controlled. He is critical of the prudishness about sex and the modern casual attitude toward it. Lewis supports traditional Christian teachings about marriage and sexual purity, arguing that casual sex treats people as objects rather than as individuals with inherent dignity.

In subsequent chapters, Lewis explores a variety of other ethical topics. He argues that the Christian virtues of hope and charity should guide all aspects of life, including work, play, and even laughter. He explains that Christianity teaches the importance of individual morality and the necessity of a just and compassionate society.

He then moves to the topics of forgiveness and pride. Lewis contends that forgiveness is a crucial virtue for Christians, even when it’s hard. He acknowledges that forgiving those who’ve wronged us can be extremely difficult but asserts that it’s a necessary part of following Christ. He considers pride the ‘great sin,’ the root of all evil, and humility its antidote.

Book III concludes with a chapter on faith, in which Lewis distinguishes between the faith that affirms belief in Christian doctrines and the faith that continues to trust God even in the face of difficulties and doubts. Lewis presents the moral and ethical standards set forth by Christianity rationally and logically, aiming to demonstrate that these standards, while challenging, are designed for the good of individuals and societies alike. His discussions are not solely based on faith; they also integrate philosophical, psychological, and social perspectives to examine Christian morality comprehensively.

Book IV

BEYOND PERSONALITY; OR FIRST STEPS IN THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY

In this final book, Lewis investigates the nature of God as a trinity, a concept central to Christian doctrine but often difficult to understand. He admits that human language is inadequate to express this complex idea fully, but still, he uses accessible metaphors and analogies to give us a glimpse of the idea.

Lewis starts by discussing the distinction between begetting and making, which he uses to explain the relationship within the Godhead further. God the Father “begets” God the Son, but doesn’t “make” Him, in the sense that human parents beget their children, but a carpenter makes a table. In the former, the offspring share the same nature as the parents, while in the latter, the creation is fundamentally different from the creator. Hence, Jesus, the Son of God, shares the same divine nature as God the Father, and isn’t a created being.

Next, Lewis explores the idea of God as a timeless entity existing in the eternal present. God isn’t limited by past, present, and future constraints in the way humans are. As such, he explains that when Christians talk about Christ being begotten “before all worlds,” it doesn’t mean there was a time when He wasn’t. It means that Christ is eternally begotten, always coming from the Father but never separate from Him.

In addition, Lewis discusses the concept of the Holy Spirit and His role in the lives of Christians. Lewis presents the Holy Spirit as the very life of God living within believers, transforming them into the likeness of Christ. This transformative process, which he calls “good infection,” is the crux of Christian morality and spirituality.

Furthermore, Lewis addresses the importance of prayer and the Christian’s direct interaction with God. He emphasizes that prayer isn’t a way of making God do what we want but a process of learning to align ourselves with what He wants. He likens God to a new dimension of existence that humans can’t comprehend, and states that through prayer, a divine life enters and transforms us.

Toward the end of the book, Lewis discusses the paradoxical concept of surrendering to gain, arguing that a person can only find true life and self by giving it up to God. He also clarifies misconceptions about God’s omnipresence, asserting that God isn’t spread thinly across the universe, but entirely present at every point of it.

Lastly, he grapples with the idea of God’s joy, which results from our unity with Him. Our true nature, he says, is derived from God, and we are most ourselves when we align with His will. Lewis doesn’t aim to provide a comprehensive or exact explanation of the complex doctrine of the Trinity. Instead, he uses his unique approach to make these profound ideas more accessible and relatable, guiding readers to understand the Christian conception of God and the transformative nature of His relationship with humanity.

Continue Reading ·

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Having read The Pilgrim’s Progress by John Bunyan, it is helpful to understand Bunyan’s background as the author of this widely-known book. The Pilgrim’s Progress is a long-time classic about living as a Christian throughout one’s lifetime. Pilgrim’s Progress is a comprehensive allegorical look at believers’ physical and spiritual hardships en route to Heaven, or in the Pilgrim’s case, the Celestial City. From the time of conversion to entry into the Celestial City, numerous detours, afflictions, and setbacks involved captivity and suffering unique to the Pilgrims in the story but still relevant to believers today. While each stage of the Pilgrim’s Progress is meant to mirror a believer’s faith journey, numerous scriptural principles are interwoven throughout the narrative. While believers at the time of Bunyan have a better way of relating to the setting and primitive nature of the story, the protagonist encounters still offer timeless lessons, warnings, and examples to follow.

Introduction

John Bunyan was a prominent English Puritan writer and devoted follower of Christ who lived during the 17th century. He was born in 1628 in Elstow, Bedfordshire, England. Bunyan’s family was of modest means, and his father, Thomas Bunyan, worked as a tinker, repairing pots and pans. Bunyan’s early life was marked by the turbulent events of the English Civil War, which erupted in 1642. He was raised in a period of political and religious upheaval, with the country divided between the Royalists and the Parliamentarians. As a young man, Bunyan served briefly as a soldier in the Parliamentary army during the war. After the war, Bunyan struggled with a deep spiritual crisis and feelings of guilt over his moral failings. He eventually found peace in the Puritan faith and became a committed follower of Christ in their vein of devotion and worship. Puritans pursued personal holiness and a strong work ethic and held to the absolute authority of the Bible.

In 1653, Bunyan joined a Puritan congregation in Bedford, England, led by John Gifford. This congregation consisted of Protestant Christians who refused to conform to the unbiblical practices of the Church of England, which was the State established church at the time. Bunyan’s religious convictions and objections to tradition led him to become a preacher, and he began delivering sermons and exhortations to fellow believers. However, in 1660, the political climate shifted with the restoration of the monarchy under King Charles II. The new government’s anti-Christian views were propagated through the Church of England, and Bunyan faced persecution for fellowship with other believers without the consent of the Church of England. He was arrested in November 1660 and spent twelve years in prison. Bunyan wrote The Pilgrim’s Progress during his imprisonment, published in 1678. The book, an allegorical tale of a Christian’s journey toward salvation, became immensely popular and remains a classic of English literature.

After his release from prison in 1672, Bunyan returned to Bedford and resumed activities befitting a Christian. He continued to write numerous other highly regarded works, including theological treatises, fictional novels, and spiritual reflections. Bunyan’s works have been in circulation throughout Christendom for centuries. Moreover, John Bunyan’s contributions as a writer and preacher made him one of the most influential figures of the Puritan movement. His works continue to be studied and deeply valued for their biblical insights, spiritual wisdom, literary value, and historical significance.

Review – Part I

“The Pilgrim’s Progress from This World, to That Which Is to Come” is an allegorical novel written by John Bunyan and published in 1678. Part The book has been widely translated and is considered one of the most significant works of English literature. In part 1 of the book, the story is centered on a man named Christian and his journey from his hometown, the “City of Destruction” (representing earthly existence), to the “Celestial City” (representing Heaven). The story begins in the City of Destruction, where a man named Christian lives. One day, he finds a book (the Bible) that warns of the city’s impending doom. Tormented by this knowledge and burdened by a heavy load (representing his sins), Christian leaves his wife and children to set off on a pilgrimage to the Celestial City, the only place of safety.

Along his journey, Christian encounters various characters who either aid or obstruct his Progress. Evangelist, the first character he meets, instructs him to head for the Wicket Gate, and there he will be told how to reach the Celestial City. However, he first mistakenly follows the advice of a character named Mr. Worldly Wiseman and heads towards the village of Morality to seek relief from his burden from a man named Mr. Legality. However, after much distress endured by Christian, Evangelist redirects him, setting him back on the right path toward the Wicket Gate. At the Wicket Gate, Christian is admitted by Goodwill who instructs him to follow the straight path and not to deviate. He journeys onward and reaches the House of the Interpreter, where he is shown various pictures and scenes that symbolize spiritual truths.

The journey is fraught with peril, and Christian passes through places like the Slough of Despond, where he almost drowns in the mire of his guilt and doubts, and Vanity Fair, a place of worldly temptations, horrific abuses, and deadly persecution. He climbs the Hill of Difficulty, survives the Valley of the Shadow of Death, and later fights the monster Apollyon (allegorical of Satan or a demon figure).

Christian also meets several other characters, such as Faithful and Talkative, who either represent good qualities or pitfalls along the spiritual journey. Faithful is martyred in Vanity Fair, showing the price of faith in the face of worldly opposition. Eventually, Christian and his new companion, Hopeful, come to the Delectable Mountains, which the Lord of the Celestial City owns. Here they are refreshed and warned of coming difficulties. They are shown sights such as a man who could look no way but downwards and the land of Conceit, which is ruled by a tyrant named Despair who holds people captive.

Christian and Hopeful continue their journey and are trapped by the Giant Despair in the Doubting Castle. However, Christian remembers he has a key called Promise, which opens any door in Doubting Castle, and they manage to escape.

Ultimately, Christian and Hopeful reach the Celestial City, but it’s only accessible by crossing the River of Death. Christian is initially afraid to cross but is encouraged by Hopeful. As they cross, Christian is nearly drowned by doubts and fears, but he makes it to the other side, where he is welcomed into the Celestial City, shedding his burden once and for all.

In essence, “Pilgrim’s Progress” Part 1 is an allegory for the Christian journey of faith from the burden of sin and destruction to salvation in the Celestial City, a representation of Heaven. The narrative explores themes of faith, persistence, and redemption through various trials, tribulations, and encounters.

Review – Part II

The Pilgrim’s Progress Part II continues John Bunyan’s allegorical narrative, following the journey of Christiana, Christian’s wife, who is motivated by her husband’s successful pilgrimage and the invitation from Evangelist to follow in his footsteps. She decides to journey to the Celestial City, taking her four sons and a neighbor, Mercy, with her. Although the core allegorical structure remains similar to Part 1 — a journey from the City of Destruction to the Celestial City — the narrative is expanded upon by including new characters and incidents, providing a more nuanced perspective on the Christian faith. Part 2 begins with Christiana, who, after receiving a divine revelation in a dream, regrets not having embarked on the journey with her husband. Convinced by her dream and her neighbor, Mrs. Timorous, Christiana decides to follow in Christian’s footsteps, taking their four sons (Matthew, Samuel, Joseph, and James) along with her.

In Part II, Bunyan expands on many themes from the first part, providing additional nuance and depth. He also introduces several new characters and emphasizes the role of women in the Christian faith, reflecting meaningful contributions complementary to the religious and social landscape of his time. Christiana’s journey begins when Secret, a divine messenger, delivers a letter to her. Inspired by the letter and disturbed by dreams of Judgment Day, she decides to set off for the Celestial City with her children. Accordingly, Mercy, Christiana’s young neighbor, asks to join her, despite knowing the journey could be perilous. However, Christiana and her group remain resolute and continue. The journey is not easy, and they have to navigate several challenges and obstacles, such as the Slough of Despond and the Hill Difficulty.

Like Christian in the first part, Christiana and her companions also stop at the Interpreter’s House, where they are given guidance and shown various allegorical pictures and scenes. The House proves to be a place of learning and reflection, helping travelers understand their spiritual journey better. The journey continues, and the group visits several significant sites, such as the Cross, the Sepulchre, and the Hill of Difficulty.

Under Great-Heart’s guidance, the group overcomes many physical and spiritual challenges. These include the fight with Giant Despair at Doubting Castle and the crossing of the Enchanted Ground. Through these trials, the pilgrims learn about the power of faith and the importance of perseverance. In contrast to the first part, the second part greatly emphasizes community and fellowship. Christiana’s group grows throughout the journey, welcoming new members like Standfast and Valiant-for-Truth. These characters contribute their unique insights, reinforcing the idea that all believers have a role in the body of Christ.

Finally, Christiana, Mercy, and the remaining group reach the River of Death, the final barrier before the Celestial City. Christiana crosses first and is joyously welcomed into the City. The others follow each greeted with a similar celebration. The journey of each pilgrim ends in successful entry into the Celestial City, marking the completion of their spiritual journey. “Pilgrim’s Progress Part II” is a rich and complex allegory detailing Christiana’s spiritual journey. Bunyan uses the characters and obstacles Christiana encounters to explore deeper themes of faith, perseverance, fellowship, and the nature of the Christian journey. In contrast to the first part, it provides a broader picture of the Christian experience, reflecting diverse experiences and insights.

Pilgrims’ Locations

  1. The City of Destruction: The journey begins here, which represents the unenlightened world. Christian is distressed by the burden (sin) on his back and is seeking salvation.
  2. Slough of Despond: Christian falls into this swamp of despondency and despair, which represents feelings of guilt and fear due to the recognition of sin.
  3. House of the Interpreter: Here, Christian learns important lessons through several visions and allegorical figures that Interpreter shows him.
  4. Cross and Sepulchre: At this point, Christian loses his burden (sin) at the sight of the Cross, symbolizing the redemption and forgiveness of sins through Christ’s sacrifice.
  5. Hill Difficulty: Christian’s faith is tested when he needs to climb this difficult hill.
  6. Palace Beautiful: Christian receives hospitality, rest, and further instruction in the Christian faith at this place, symbolizing the Church.
  7. Valley of Humiliation: Here, Christian faces and defeats the monster Apollyon, representing Satan.
  8. Valley of the Shadow of Death: Christian continues his journey through this treacherous valley, enduring dangers and darkness.
  9. Vanity Fair: This town represents the worldly temptations. Christian and Faithful, his companion by this point, are put on trial for their beliefs.
  10. Doubting Castle and Giant Despair: Christian and Hopeful, another companion after Faithful’s death, are imprisoned and tortured by Giant Despair, but they escape using the key of Promise.
  11. Delectable Mountains: These represent the joys and comforts of the life of grace. Christian and Hopeful are refreshed and receive more instructions for their journey here.
  12. Enchanted Ground: A dangerous place where drowsiness and laziness threaten to halt the pilgrims’ progress.
  13. Land of Beulah: This land represents spiritual abundance and rest before the final leg of the journey. Here, Christian and Hopeful prepare themselves for their crossing of the River of Death.
  14. River of Death: Christian and Hopeful cross this river to finally reach the Celestial City, symbolizing the passing from life into eternity.
  15. The Celestial City (Heaven): Christian finally reaches his destination, the place of eternal salvation and joy. He and Hopeful are welcomed with trumpets and a chorus of angels.

Continue Reading ·

Confessions by Saint Augustine

A couple of weeks ago, I finished reading Confessions by Augustine. It was the first written work of Augustine I read as a whole, and it is a classic on a personal reading list of patristics. I’ve read sections of Augustine’s more comprehensive work in the City of God for research purposes on topics of theological interest. So there weren’t expectations going into the reading, but only an impression about who Augustine was and what others said and wrote about him. He is cited a lot and followed closely by devoted followers of Christ Jesus among all traditions of Christianity. Catholics often claim Augustine as an early Catholic church father for a time as he served within its early traditions.

The following is a synthesis of Confessions, a book-by-book summary produced by personal research that corresponds to my first reading of Augustine’s entire work.

INTRODUCTION

Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD), also known as Saint Augustine, was a theologian, philosopher, and bishop of the North African city of Hippo Regius, located in present-day Annaba, Algeria. He is one of the most significant figures in the development of Western Christianity and a key figure in the history of Western philosophy. Augustine was initially a follower of Manichaeism and later Neoplatonism. Still, after converting to Christianity in 386 AD, he became a prominent Christian theologian and eventually the Bishop of Hippo in 396 AD.

Augustine’s writings, including his autobiographical work “Confessions” and his magnum opus “The City of God,” have profoundly impacted the development of Christian doctrine and the Western intellectual tradition. He tackled various theological issues, such as original sin, predestination, the nature of the soul, and the relationship between faith and reason. Augustine’s ideas have influenced many subsequent philosophers and theologians, including Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, and John Calvin.

In addition to his theological works, Augustine made important contributions to the fields of ethics, epistemology, and political philosophy. His ideas on the relationship between church and state, the nature of the just war, and the role of government in maintaining peace and order have had a lasting impact on Western political thought.

BOOK I – Childhood

In Book 1 of Confessions, Augustine begins his spiritual autobiography by addressing God and reflecting on the nature of sin and human frailty. The book primarily focuses on his early childhood, exploring how even as a young child, he was prone to sin and driven by desires that led him astray.

Augustine describes his early years in the Roman African city of Thagaste (present-day Souk Ahras, Algeria). He notes that he was born into a Christian family, but was not baptized as an infant due to the cultural practice of waiting until later in life. He also provides an account of his education, recounting his learning of Latin, reading, and writing, as well as his exposure to Roman literature.

Throughout Book 1, Augustine frequently returns to the theme of sin, illustrating it with anecdotes from his childhood. He mentions instances of selfishness, deceit, and disobedience, highlighting the sinful nature inherent in humans. A famous example he provides is the story of stealing pears from a neighbor’s tree, not out of hunger or necessity, but simply for the thrill of doing something forbidden.

Augustine also delves into the topic of human desire and its role in leading people away from God. He explores the idea of “concupiscence,” which he defines as disordered desires or lusts that distract individuals from pursuing God.

Overall, Book 1 of Confessions serves as an introduction to Augustine’s life and thought, setting the stage for his journey towards faith and his eventual conversion to Christianity. It highlights themes of sin, desire, and the human inclination towards wrongdoing, all of which will be further explored in subsequent books.

Book I Synopsis

  1. He admires God’s Majesty and is inflamed with a deep desire to praise him
  2. Man hath his being from God; and that God is in man, and man in God
  3. God is wholly everywhere and is not by parts contained by the Creature
  4. An admirable description of God’s Attributes
  5. He prays for the forgiveness of sins and the Love of God
  6. That he hath received all blessings from God: and how he hath been preserved by him
  7. That even his infancy was subject to sin
  8. A description of his childhood
  9. The hatred that children bear for Learning, and their Love for Playing
  10. How, for his play, he neglected his Parents’ Commandments
  11. How he fell sick and how recovering, his Baptism was deferred
  12. He is forced to his Book: which God turned for good purpose
  13. With what studies he was chiefly delighted
  14. Of the Greek and Latin Tongues
  15. His Prayer to God
  16. Against lascivious fables
  17. The way of exercising youth in repeating and varying verses
  18. That Men care more about observing the Rules of Grammar than the Laws of God
  19. How he was more careful to avoid Barbarisms of Speech than the corruption of Manners
  20. He thanked God for his Benefits

BOOK II – Teen Years

In Book 2 of Confessions, Augustine continues his spiritual autobiography, shifting his focus to his teenage years and examining the nature of lust, the consequences of sinful behavior, and the longing for God’s grace.

During this period of his life, Augustine admits to being heavily influenced by his sensual desires, driven by lust and the impulses of his youth. He recounts the story of stealing pears from a neighbor’s tree, an act that has become emblematic of his exploration of sin. Augustine emphasizes that the theft was motivated not by hunger or need, but by the sheer enjoyment of wrongdoing, which reveals the depths of human depravity.

Augustine also discusses his education and his early interest in literature and rhetoric. Although he acknowledges the value of acquiring knowledge, he criticizes the fact that his studies were often guided by ambition and the pursuit of worldly success, rather than by a desire for truth or closeness to God.

Throughout Book 2, Augustine reflects on the role of human will and its susceptibility to temptation. He recognizes that even though he was aware of the difference between right and wrong, he often chose to act against his better judgment, succumbing to temptation and sin. This realization leads him to contemplate the need for God’s grace to guide and transform human will, allowing individuals to overcome their sinful inclinations.

In summary, Book 2 of Confessions delves into Augustine’s teenage years, examining the pervasiveness of sin, the weakness of human will, and the necessity of God’s grace. It reveals how Augustine’s early experiences with desire and ambition eventually led him to seek a deeper understanding of God and the nature of human existence.

Book II Synopsis

  1. He enters upon the Years and Sins of his Youth
  2. He accuses his youth spent in the heat of Lustfulness
  3. Of his Travels for his Studies’ sake and his Parents’ Purpose in it
  4. How he robbed a Pear-tree
  5. No man sins, but provoked by some Cause
  6. All those things which under the show of Good invite us to sin, are in God alone, to be found True and perfect
  7. He returns thanks to God for remitting these sins, and for keeping him from many others
  8. What he loved in that his theft
  9. Bad Company is infectious
  10. Whatsoever is good, is in God

BOOK III – Teen Years and Early Adulthood

In Book 3 of “Confessions,” Augustine recounts his time as a young man in Carthage, where he pursued his education and grappled with the seductions of worldly desires. This book explores Augustine’s intellectual and moral development, highlighting the influence of Manicheism, a dualistic religion he embraced for nearly a decade, and his struggle with lust.

Upon arriving in Carthage, Augustine is confronted with a city filled with temptations and distractions. He becomes entangled in a passionate love affair and struggles with the allure of lust and sexual desire, which he later sees as a significant obstacle to his spiritual journey.

Augustine also encounters Manicheism, a religious movement that offers an appealing explanation for the existence of evil in the world. Manicheism posits a dualistic cosmos in which two opposing forces, Good (the spiritual realm) and Evil (the material realm), are engaged in an eternal struggle. Augustine is initially drawn to this religion, as it seemingly addresses his concerns about the problem of evil and provides a framework for understanding the human condition. However, over time, he becomes disillusioned with Manicheism due to its intellectual inconsistencies and the inability of its adherents to answer his deeper philosophical questions.

Despite his preoccupation with worldly desires and his involvement with Manicheism, Augustine never loses sight of his thirst for truth and wisdom. He continues to study and explore various intellectual disciplines, including rhetoric, philosophy, and the works of Cicero. His search for truth eventually leads him to discover the beauty and depth of the Christian faith.

In summary, Book 3 of “Confessions” narrates Augustine’s experiences in Carthage, as he wrestles with the temptations of worldly desires, grapples with the allure of Manicheism, and pursues his passion for knowledge. This period of his life lays the groundwork for the profound intellectual and spiritual transformations that await him in the years to come.

Book III Synopsis

  1. He is caught with Love, which he hunted after
  2. Of Stage Plays
  3. His conversation with young Lawyers
  4. How Tully’s Hortensius provoked him to study Philosophy
  5. He sets lightly by the Holy Scriptures because of the simplicity of the style
  6. How he was ensnared by the Manichees
  7. The absurd doctrine of the Manichees
  8. Heinous offenses what be, and how punished
  9. The difference that is betwixt Sins, and betwixt the Judgment of God and Men
  10. He speaks again of the Fig-tree, and derides the Manichees’ foolish conceits about it
  11. His Mother’s Dream
  12. The answer his Mother received from a Bishop, concerning his Conversion

BOOK IV – Early Adult Years

In Book 4 of Confessions, Augustine focuses on his early adult years, specifically his time as a teacher of rhetoric in Carthage and his growing dissatisfaction with the Manichaean religion. He also addresses themes such as ambition, pride, and grief as he delves into his personal relationships and professional life.

During this period, Augustine’s ambition and desire for worldly success drive him to become a successful teacher of rhetoric. However, he acknowledges that his pursuit of material wealth and fame often distracts him from seeking deeper truth and genuine wisdom.

Augustine discusses his continued involvement with Manichaeism, revealing that he began to find inconsistencies in its teachings and became increasingly disillusioned with its explanations of good and evil. As his skepticism grows, he starts to search for a more satisfying spiritual framework.

One of the central events in Book 4 is the death of a close friend, which deeply affects Augustine and causes him to reflect on the impermanence of life and the nature of human attachment. He confronts his own grief and recognizes that his attachment to temporal, earthly things ultimately leaves him unfulfilled and unsatisfied. This realization further motivates him to seek lasting truth and happiness beyond the material world.

Book 4 of Confessions portrays Augustine’s growing awareness of the limitations of worldly ambitions and the inadequacies of the Manichaean religion. Through his personal experiences and his exploration of loss, he becomes increasingly aware of the necessity for a more profound understanding of life and a closer relationship with God. This period in his life marks an important turning point in his spiritual journey, setting the stage for the subsequent phases of his conversion.

Book IV Synopsis

  1. How long, and what ways he seduced others
  2. He teaches Rhetoric, and despiseth a Wizard who promised him the Victory
  3. Giving himself to Astrology, he is reclaimed by an ancient Physician
  4. He relates the sickness and Baptism of his Friend, whom himself had affected with Heresy: he grievously laments his Death
  5. Of Tears in our Prayers for, and Bewailing of, the Thing Beloved
  6. He tells with what great Affection he loved his Friend
  7. The impatientness of grief constrains us to shift our dwellings
  8. Time cures Sorrow
  9. The comparing of Human Friendship with Divine
  10. All Beauty is from God, who is to be prayed for all
  11. All things are created mutable in themselves, and immutable in God
  12. Love of the Creatures is not forbidden, provided that in those which please us, God be loved
  13. Love, whence it comes
  14. Of his Book of Fair and Fit
  15. How his Understanding being overshadowed with corporeal images, he could not discern the spiritual
  16. The admirable Aptness to Learning, and the great Understanding St. Augustine had

BOOK V – Rome, Milan, and Manichaeism

In Book 5 of Confessions, Augustine recounts his departure from Carthage to Rome and then his appointment as a teacher of rhetoric in Milan, Italy. This period in his life is marked by significant events and encounters that play a crucial role in shaping his intellectual and spiritual development.

One key event during this time is Augustine’s disillusionment with Manichaeism. While teaching in Rome, he meets a famous Manichaean bishop named Faustus, hoping to find answers to his doubts about the religion. However, Augustine becomes disappointed when he realizes that Faustus cannot provide the intellectual depth or satisfying explanations he is seeking. This meeting further erodes Augustine’s confidence in Manichaeism and accelerates his journey toward Christianity.

Upon moving to Milan, Augustine encounters the influential Bishop Ambrose, a renowned theologian and preacher. Ambrose’s eloquence, intelligence, and deep understanding of the Christian faith greatly impress Augustine. His exposure to Ambrose’s sermons and teachings, as well as his interpretation of the Scriptures, begins to dismantle Augustine’s previous objections to Christianity. Additionally, Ambrose’s personal kindness toward Augustine fosters a relationship that serves as a significant catalyst for Augustine’s conversion.

While in Milan, Augustine also becomes acquainted with Neoplatonism, a school of philosophy that synthesizes elements of Plato’s thought with other philosophical and religious traditions. Neoplatonism helps Augustine gain a new perspective on the nature of evil, which he comes to understand as the absence of good rather than a positive force in itself. This insight aids in reconciling his previous struggles with the problem of evil in Christian doctrine.

Book 5 of Confessions depicts crucial moments in Augustine’s spiritual journey, as his disillusionment with Manichaeism leads him to engage more deeply with Christian thought. His encounters with Ambrose and Neoplatonism provide him with a new understanding of Christianity, setting the stage for his eventual conversion in Book 8.

Book V Synopsis

  1. He stirs his own Soul to praise God
  2. God’s presence can no man avoid, seeing he is everywhere
  3. Of Faustus the Manichee: and of Astrologies
  4. Only the Knowledge of God makes happy
  5. The rashness of Faustus, in teaching what he knew not
  6. Faustus was eloquent by Nature, rather than by Art
  7. He falls off from the Manichees
  8. He takes a Voyage to Rome, against the will of his Mother
  9. Of a shrewd Fever that he fell into
  10. His Errors before his receiving the Doctrine of the Gospel
  11. How he compared the Manichees’ Tenets with the Catholics
  12. The cunning Tricks put at Rome by Scholars upon their Masters
  13. He goes to Milan to teach Rhetoric, and how St. Ambrose there entertains him
  14. Upon his hearing of St. Ambrose, he by little and little falls off from his errors

BOOK VI – Milan

In Book 6 of Confessions Augustine further explores his time in Milan, focusing on the development of his relationships and the spiritual progress he made while grappling with his attachment to earthly desires.

During this period, Augustine’s mother, Monica, joins him in Milan. Monica is a devout Christian who has long prayed for her son’s conversion. She seeks advice from Bishop Ambrose, who assures her that Augustine will eventually find his way to Christianity. Her faith and prayers play a significant role in Augustine’s spiritual journey.

Augustine also forms friendships with fellow seekers of truth, who engage in discussions about philosophy, religion, and the nature of happiness. These friendships provide intellectual stimulation and foster a sense of community that helps him in his quest for understanding.

Despite his growing attraction to Christianity, Augustine continues to struggle with his desires, particularly lust and ambition. He is involved in a long-term relationship with a woman who has borne him a son, Adeodatus, but he is hesitant to commit to a life of celibacy, which he believes is necessary for genuine conversion.

Augustine’s attachment to material success and worldly ambitions also hinders his full acceptance of Christianity. He finds it difficult to reconcile his desire for professional achievement with the humility and self-denial that he perceives as essential to the Christian life.

In summary, Book 6 of Confessions portrays Augustine’s increasing engagement with Christian thought and the obstacles he faces as he moves closer to conversion. His struggles with lust, ambition, and his attachment to worldly success serve as the backdrop for the deepening of his relationships and his ongoing search for spiritual truth.

Book VI Synopsis

  1. How St. Augustine was neither Manichee, nor good Catholic
  2. His Mother is turned from her country Superstitions
  3. The Employments and Studies of St. Ambrose
  4. Of the Letter and the Spirit
  5. Of the Authority and necessary Use of the Holy Bible
  6. The Misery of the ambitious, shewn by the example of a Beggar
  7. He dissuades Alypius from his excessive delight in the Circensian Games
  8. Alypius is taken with a delight of the Sword-plays, which before he hated
  9. Alypius was apprehended for suspicion of thievery
  10. Of the great Integrity of Alypius, and of Nebridius’ coming
  11. He deliberates what course of life he were best to take
  12. A Contention between Alypius and Augustine, about Marriage and Single Life
  13. Augustine lays out for a Wife
  14. A new Plot is laid and broken
  15. How his old Concubine goes away from him, and he gets another
  16. Of the Immortality of the Soul

BOOK VII – Neoplatonism

In Book 7 of Confessions, Augustine recounts a crucial period in his intellectual and spiritual journey, as he delves deeper into Neoplatonism and comes closer to embracing Christianity. This book details the intellectual breakthroughs that bring him to the threshold of conversion, while also exploring his internal struggles and the obstacles he still needs to overcome.

Augustine’s engagement with Neoplatonism provides him with new philosophical perspectives that help clarify his understanding of the nature of God, evil, and the soul. Through Neoplatonism, he comes to see evil as a privation of good rather than an independent force, which helps resolve his long-standing struggles with the problem of evil. He also gains a deeper understanding of the immaterial nature of God and the human soul, allowing him to better appreciate the spiritual aspects of Christianity.

Simultaneously, Augustine becomes more familiar with the Bible, particularly the writings of Saint Paul, which resonate with his personal experiences and spiritual struggles. He finds solace in the message of divine grace, realizing that human beings are incapable of achieving salvation through their own efforts and need God’s assistance to overcome sin.

Despite these intellectual breakthroughs, Augustine still faces significant obstacles on his path to conversion. He continues to struggle with his desires, particularly lust, and finds it difficult to abandon his old habits and fully commit to a Christian lifestyle. He acknowledges his own internal conflict, expressing a longing for spiritual transformation, yet hesitating due to his attachment to worldly pleasures.

Book 7 of Confessions represents a pivotal stage in Augustine’s spiritual journey. As he grapples with Neoplatonic philosophy and deepens his understanding of Christian teachings, he is brought to the brink of conversion. However, his internal struggles and the lingering attachment to earthly desires still need to be overcome before he can fully embrace the Christian faith.

Book VII Synopsis

  1. How rejecting corporeal Images, he began to know God to be incorporeal
  2. Nebridius confutes the Manichees
  3. Free Will is the cause of Sin
  4. God cannot be compelled
  5. He pursues his enquiries after the root of sin
  6. Divinations made by the Mathematicians are vain
  7. He is miserably tortured in his Enquiry after the Root of Evil
  8. How the Mercy of God at length relieved him
  9. What he found in some Books of the Platonists, agreeable to the Christian Doctrine
  10. Divine things are more clearly discovered unto him
  11. How Creatures are, and yet are not
  12. All that is, is Good
  13. All created Things praise God
  14. To a sober Mind, none of God’s Creatures are displeasing
  15. How there is truth and falsehood in the Creatures
  16. All Things are good, though to some Things not fit
  17. What things hinder us of God’s Knowledge
  18. Only Christ is the Way to Salvation
  19. What he thought of Christ’s Incarnation
  20. Of divers Books of the Platonists
  21. What he found in the Holy Scriptures, which was not in the Platonists

BOOK VIII – Conversion to Christianity

In Book 8 of Confessions, Augustine reaches the climactic point of his spiritual journey – his long-awaited conversion to Christianity. The book focuses on his internal struggle to overcome his remaining barriers to faith, as well as the crucial events and encounters that ultimately lead to his surrender to God’s grace.

Augustine continues to wrestle with his attachment to worldly desires, particularly lust, which prevents him from wholeheartedly embracing the Christian faith. Although he has intellectually accepted the truth of Christianity, his will remains divided, unable to break free from his past habits and fully commit to a new life.

Several key events and encounters in this book play a significant role in Augustine’s ultimate conversion:

  1. The story of Victorinus, a prominent Roman rhetorician and philosopher who converted to Christianity late in life, serves as an inspiration for Augustine, demonstrating that it is possible to leave behind a life of worldly success for the sake of faith.
  2. Augustine meets Simplicianus, a wise and experienced Christian who shares the story of the conversion of St. Ambrose’s mentor, the Neoplatonist philosopher Marius Victorinus. This story further emphasizes the transformative power of Christianity and its ability to transcend philosophical differences.
  3. Augustine hears the account of the conversion of two officials in the imperial court, Ponticianus and his friends, who were deeply moved by the life of St. Antony, a renowned Egyptian hermit. Their transformation after reading the story of Antony challenges Augustine to reexamine his own priorities and confront the barriers that prevent him from embracing Christianity.

The culminating event in Augustine’s conversion occurs in a garden, where he hears the voice of a child singing, “Take up and read.” Interpreting this as a divine command, Augustine picks up a nearby copy of the Bible and reads a passage from St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans (13:13-14), which urges him to cast off his old ways and embrace the teachings of Christ. This powerful, transformative moment marks the beginning of Augustine’s new life as a Christian.

Book 8 of Confessions, captures the final stages of Augustine’s journey to Christianity, detailing the internal struggles, external influences, and divine interventions that culminate in his conversion. With this pivotal transformation, Augustine begins a new chapter in his life, dedicated to the pursuit of truth, wisdom, and holiness through the Christian faith.

Book VIII Synopsis

  1. How being inflamed with the Love of Heavenly Things, he goes to Simplicianus
  2. How Victorinus, the famous Orator, was converted
  3. That God and his Angels do rejoice the more, at the conversion of a greater Sinner
  4. Why we are more to rejoice in the Conversion of a great Sinner
  5. What hindered his Conversion
  6. Ponticianus relates the Life of St. Anthony
  7. He was out of Love with himself upon this Story
  8. What he did in the Garden
  9. Why the Mind is so slow to Goodness
  10. The Will of Man is various
  11. The Combat in him betwixt the Spirit and the Flesh
  12. How he was converted by a voice

BOOK IX – Baptism and Death of Augustine’s Mother

Book 9 of Confessions, marks the beginning of Augustine’s new life as a Christian, focusing on the immediate aftermath of his conversion, his baptism, and the death of his mother, Monica. This book explores themes of spiritual transformation, the power of grace, and the importance of community in his journey of faith.

Following his conversion in Book 8, Augustine decides to resign from his position as a teacher of rhetoric and dedicate his life to serving God. Together with his close friends and his son, Adeodatus, he forms a small Christian community where they devote themselves to prayer, study, and contemplation. This period of retreat allows Augustine to further deepen his understanding of Christianity and prepare for his upcoming baptism.

In Milan, Augustine, Adeodatus, and his close friend Alypius are baptized by Bishop Ambrose during the Easter Vigil. This significant event symbolizes the beginning of their new lives as Christians and their commitment to living according to the teachings of Christ.

One of the central events in Book 9 is the death of Augustine’s mother, Monica, which takes place shortly after his baptism. Augustine reflects on her life, faith, and the profound influence she had on his spiritual journey. He recounts a moving conversation they shared shortly before her death, in which they discussed the nature of eternal life and the joys of heaven. Monica’s passing prompts Augustine to contemplate the transient nature of earthly existence and the promise of eternal life in the presence of God.

In summary, Book 9 of Confessions, narrates the transformative experiences following Augustine’s conversion, including his retreat, baptism, and the death of his mother. This book emphasizes the importance of spiritual growth, the power of divine grace, and the role of supportive relationships in helping individuals navigate the challenges and joys of the Christian faith.

Book IX Synopsis

  1. He praiseth God’s Goodness; and acknowledgeth his own wretchedness
  2. He gives over his Teaching of Rhetoric
  3. Verecundus lends them his Country House
  4. What things he wrote with Nebridius
  5. Ambrose directs him what Books to read
  6. He is Baptized at Milan
  7. A Persecution in the Church miraculously diverted
  8. The Conversion of Euodius. A Discourse of his Mother
  9. His Mother Monica’s carriage towards her Husband. A description of a rare Wife
  10. Of a Conference he had with his Mother about the Kingdom of Heaven
  11. Of the Extasy and Death of his Mother
  12. He laments his Mother’s Death
  13. He prayed for his dead Mother

BOOK X- Theology of Memory, Nature of Prayer, Self Examination

In Book 10 of Confessions, Augustine shifts from recounting his personal narrative to offering a profound meditation on memory, self-examination, and the nature of prayer. He examines his current relationship with God and reflects on the human condition, exploring the various dimensions of human desire and the longing for divine union.

Augustine delves into the concept of memory, marveling at its vastness and complexity. He acknowledges the crucial role of memory in shaping his understanding of God, as well as its function in retaining knowledge and experiences. Augustine sees memory as a repository of his past sins and errors, but also as a space where he can encounter God’s grace and presence.

As he engages in self-examination, Augustine reflects on the nature of temptation and the ongoing struggle against sin, even after his conversion. He acknowledges that while he has made progress in his spiritual life, he still faces the challenge of resisting various forms of desire and attachment, such as the temptations of the senses, pride, and the allure of worldly success. He emphasizes the necessity of God’s grace in overcoming these temptations and maintaining the pursuit of holiness.

Throughout Book 10, Augustine offers a series of prayers and reflections on his relationship with God. He seeks divine guidance and assistance in his quest for spiritual growth, acknowledging his reliance on God’s grace to transform his desires and align them with the divine will. Augustine also meditates on the ultimate goal of human existence, which he sees as a longing for union with God, a state of perfect happiness and eternal fulfillment.

In summary, Book 10 of Confessions represents a departure from the autobiographical narrative of the earlier books, focusing instead on a profound exploration of memory, self-examination, and prayer. Through these meditations, Augustine deepens his understanding of his relationship with God and the ongoing challenges he faces in his spiritual journey, revealing the complexity and dynamism of the human desire for divine union.

Book X Synopsis

  1. The Confessions of the Heart
  2. Secret Things are known unto God
  3. The Confession of our ill deeds, what it helps us
  4. Of the great Fruit of Confession
  5. That Man knoweth not himself thoroughly: and knows not God but in a glass darkly
  6. What God is, and how known
  7. God is not to be found by any Ability in our Bodies
  8. The Force of the Memory
  9. The Memory of divers Sciences
  10. Our Senses convey things into our Memory
  11. The Forms of things are in the Soul
  12. The Memory of Mathematicians
  13. The Memory of Memory
  14. How, when we are not glad, we call to mind things that have made us glad
  15. We remember absent Things also
  16. There is a Memory of Forgetfulness also
  17. A threefold Power of Memory
  18. Of the Remembrance
  19. What Remembrance is
  20. All Men desire Blessedness
  21. We also remember what we never had
  22. True Joy, is this blessed Life
  23. A blessed life; what, and where it is
  24. That the Memory containeth God too
  25. In what degree of the Memory God is found
  26. Whereabouts God is to be found
  27. How God draws us to himself
  28. The Misery of this Life
  29. Our Hope is all in God
  30. The deceitfulness of Dreams
  31. The Temptation of Eating and Drinking
  32. Of our Delight in Smelling
  33. The Pleasures taken in Hearing
  34. The Enticements coming in by the Eyes
  35. Of our Curiosity in knowing
  36. The Sin of Pride
  37. Praise and Dispraise, how they move us
  38. Virtue is endangered by Vain-glory
  39. Of Self-love
  40. His Striving against Sin
  41. God and a Lie cannot stand together
  42. Angels cannot be our Mediators
  43. Christ only is the all-sufficient Intercessor

BOOK XI – Theological Inquiry on Time and Creation

In Book 11 of Confessions, Augustine transitions from an introspective examination of his own life to a broader inquiry into philosophical and theological questions. Focusing primarily on the nature of time and creation, Augustine reflects on the opening verses of the Book of Genesis and offers insights into God’s relationship with the temporal world.

Augustine begins by considering the nature of time, asking what it is and how it can be understood. He acknowledges the complexity and elusiveness of time, examining its properties and the difficulty humans have in grasping its true essence. He distinguishes between past, present, and future, asserting that only the present truly exists, while the past and future are mental constructs.

Turning to the subject of creation, Augustine contemplates the nature of God’s creative act as described in the Book of Genesis. He rejects the idea that God created the world in a temporal sense, as he believes that God exists outside of time, being eternal and unchanging. Instead, Augustine proposes that creation occurred simultaneously with time, both having their origin in God’s creative act.

Throughout his reflections on time and creation, Augustine emphasizes the limitations of human understanding when it comes to comprehending divine realities. He acknowledges that human language and concepts are insufficient to fully grasp the nature of God and the mysteries of creation.

Book 11 of Confessions, marks a significant shift in focus, as Augustine moves from a personal exploration of his own experiences to a broader philosophical and theological inquiry. By contemplating the nature of time and creation, Augustine deepens his understanding of God’s relationship with the temporal world and underscores the limitations of human knowledge in the face of divine mysteries.

Book XI Synopsis

  1. Why we confess unto God who knows all
  2. He sueth to be delivered from his Sins and Errors, and to be guided unto the true Knowledge
  3. He desires to understand the Holy Scriptures
  4. The Creatures proclaim God to be their Creator
  5. How the World was made of Nothing
  6. He disputes curiously what manner of Word the World was created by
  7. The Son of God is the Word co-eternal with the Father
  8. The Word of God is our Teacher in all
  9. How the Word of God speaketh unto the Heart
  10. God’s Will knows no Beginning
  11. God’s Eternity not to be measured by the parts of Time
  12. What God did before the Creation of the World
  13. That before those Times which God created, there was no Time
  14. Of the Nature and three Differences of Time
  15. No Time can be said to be long
  16. Of our measuring of Times
  17. Where Time past, and to come, now are
  18. How Times past, and to come, are now present
  19. He demands of God, how future Things be foreknown
  20. These three differences of Times, how they are to be called
  21. How Time may be measured
  22. He begs of God the Resolution of a Difficulty
  23. He clears this Question, what Time is
  24. Time it is, by which we measure the Motion of Bodies
  25. He prayed again
  26. The Measuring of the Feet and Syllables of a Verse
  27. He begins to resolve the former question, how we measure time
  28. We measure Times in our Mind
  29. How the Mind lengthens out itself
  30. He goes on in the same Discourse
  31. How God is known, and how the creature

BOOK XII – Theology of Creation, Scripture, and Tradition

In Book 12 of Confessions, Augustine continues his in-depth exploration of the Book of Genesis, focusing on the interpretation of Scripture and the theological implications of creation. He emphasizes the importance of humility and charity in approaching the study of Scripture and delves into various perspectives on the creation narrative.

Augustine acknowledges that Scripture can be interpreted in multiple ways, stressing the importance of embracing an attitude of humility and openness when engaging with the text. He suggests that different interpretations can be valid, as long as they do not contradict essential Christian teachings and are guided by the principles of charity and love.

To illustrate the range of interpretations, Augustine examines various understandings of the creation story in Genesis, particularly the phrase “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). He engages with multiple perspectives, including those that interpret creation as occurring in a literal sequence of days, as well as those that view it allegorically or symbolically.

Through his analysis of creation, Augustine emphasizes the distinction between God’s eternal, unchanging nature and the mutable nature of the created world. He asserts that all things find their origin in God, who transcends time and created everything from nothing (creatio ex nihilo). Augustine also explores the nature of God’s Word (the Logos) and its role in the creation process, recognizing that the Word is the means through which all things were made.

Book 12 of Confessions extends Augustine’s theological inquiry into the interpretation of Scripture and the nature of creation. His emphasis on humility, charity, and intellectual openness when approaching the Bible, as well as his exploration of various interpretations of the Genesis narrative, demonstrate the depth and complexity of Augustine’s thought and the richness of the Christian intellectual tradition.

Book XII Synopsis

  1. ’Tis very difficult to find out the Truth
  2. That the Heaven we see is but Earth, in respect of the Heaven of Heavens, which we see not
  3. Of the Darkness upon the Face of the Deep
  4. Of the Chaos, and what Moses called it
  5. That this Chaos is hard to conceive
  6. What himself sometimes thought of it
  7. Heaven is greater than Earth
  8. The Chaos was created out of nothing, and out of that, all things
  9. What that Heaven of Heavens is
  10. His Desire to understand the Scriptures
  11. What he learned of God
  12. Of two Creatures not within Compass of Time
  13. The Nature of the Heaven of Heavens described
  14. The Depth of Holy Scripture
  15. The Difference betwixt the Creator and the creatures. Some Discourses about the Heaven of Heavens
  16. Against such as contradict divine Truth: and of his own Delight in it
  17. What the Names of Heaven and Earth signify
  18. Divers Expositors may understand one Text several Ways
  19. Of some particular apparent Truths
  20. He interprets Genesis 1:1 otherwise
  21. These Words, the Earth was void &c., diversely understood
  22. That the waters are also contained under the names of Heaven and Earth
  23. In interpreting of Holy Scripture, Truth is to be sought with a charitable Construction
  24. The Scripture is true, though we understand not the uttermost Scope or Depth of it
  25. We are not to break Charity about a different Exposition of Scripture
  26. What Style was fit to write the Scriptures in
  27. The best Drawing at the fountain
  28. How diversely this Scripture is understood by others
  29. How many Ways a Thing may be said to be First
  30. The Scriptures are to be searched, with honorable Respect unto the Penman
  31. Truth is so to be received; whoever speaks it
  32. He prays to obtain right Meaning

BOOK XIII – Theology of Creation, Trinity, and Spiritual Formation

In Book 13, the final book of Confessions, Augustine continues his reflections on the Book of Genesis, focusing on the creation narrative, the nature of the Holy Trinity, and the process of spiritual renewal. Augustine also meditates on the role of Scripture and the Church in guiding individuals on their path to God.

Augustine explores the meaning behind the seven days of creation, offering both literal and allegorical interpretations. He sees the days as representing various stages in the spiritual development of human beings as they progress toward union with God. In his analysis, Augustine emphasizes the role of divine grace in transforming the human soul and enabling spiritual growth.

Throughout his reflections on Genesis, Augustine consistently refers to the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, contemplating the roles of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in creation and the process of redemption. He sees the Trinity as the source of all being, goodness, and truth, and highlights its importance in understanding the nature of God and the dynamics of the Christian faith.

Augustine also meditates on the Church as the body of Christ, emphasizing the importance of community and the role of the Church in nurturing spiritual growth. He views the Church as a vehicle through which individuals can receive divine grace, participate in the sacraments, and grow closer to God.

In the concluding passages of Confessions, Augustine offers a prayer of gratitude and praise to God, acknowledging the transformative power of divine grace in his own life and the lives of others. He reaffirms his commitment to a life of faith, seeking to deepen his relationship with God and share the insights he has gained throughout his spiritual journey. In summary, Book 13 of “Confessions” brings Augustine’s work to a close by reflecting on the creation narrative, the Holy Trinity, and the process of spiritual renewal. His emphasis on the importance of Scripture, the Church, and the role of divine grace in guiding individuals toward union with God provides a fitting conclusion to this deeply personal and profoundly theological work.

Book XIII Synopsis

  1. He called upon God
  2. Of the Creatures’ dependency upon their Creator
  3. All is of the Grace of God
  4. God needs not the Creatures, but they Him
  5. His Confession of the Blessed Trinity
  6. Of the Spirit’s moving upon the Waters
  7. Of the Effect or Working of the Holy Spirit
  8. How God’s Spirit cherishes feeble Souls
  9. Why the Spirit only moved upon the Waters
  10. All is of God’s Gift
  11. Of some Impressions or Resemblances of the Blessed Trinity, that be in man
  12. The Water in Baptism is effectual by the Holy Spirit
  13. His devout longing after God
  14. Our Misery is comforted by Faith and Hope
  15. By the word Firmament, is the Scripture meant
  16. God is unchangeable

Continue Reading ·

The Source of Eternal Salvation

There are various opinions and views about what it means to attain eternal salvation. And I am inclined to consult commentaries, Greek Lexicons, and other intertextual references about the meaning of the Hebrews 5:9 passage. However, the plain intended meaning from the author of the Hebrews is clear. While Christ Jesus’ redemptive work was salvific for those who believe by faith through grace, it is impossible to live a life of disobedience and attain eternal salvation. Salvation is not earned by works as commonly understood from Scripture (Eph 2:8-9), but a person who lives by authentic faith would obey. And the fruits of the Spirit in the life of a person who believes and lives by faith in Christ would demonstrate the willingness and intention to obey.

Although he was a son, he learned obedience through what he suffered. And being made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him, being designated by God a high priest after the order of Melchizedek.

– Hebrews 5:9

To bear fruit of righteousness, the first place to begin is the ten commandments. Obey those as an expression of a living faith because Christ is the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him.

The Ten Commandments

NumberVerse (ESV)Reference
1“You shall have no other gods before me.”Exodus 20:3
2“You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.”Exodus 20:4
3“You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain.”Exodus 20:7
4“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor, and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, you, or your son, or your daughter, your male servant, or your female servant, or your livestock, or the sojourner who is within your gates. For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day. Therefore, the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.”Exodus 20:8-11
5“Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the LORD your God is giving you.”Exodus 20:12
6“You shall not murder.”Exodus 20:13
7“You shall not commit adultery.”Exodus 20:14
8“You shall not steal.”Exodus 20:15
9“You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.”Exodus 20:16
10“You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male servant, or his female servant, or his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor’s.”Exodus 20:17


The Imperatives of Christ

NumberImperativeVerse (ESV)Reference
1Repent“From that time Jesus began to preach, saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”Matthew 4:17
2Let not your heart be troubled“Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?”John 14:27,
John 16:33Matthew 6:25-26Philippians 4:6-7
3Follow Me“And he said to them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.”Matthew 4:19
4Rejoice“Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. ‎Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you. “Matthew 5:11–12
5Let Your Light Shine“In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven. “Matthew 5:16
6Honor God’s Law“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. “Matthew 5:17
7Be Reconciled“So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison. “Matthew 5:23–25
8Do Not Lust“But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell. ‎And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell. “Matthew 5:28–30
9Keep Your Word“Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil.”Matthew 5:37
10Go the Second Mile“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. ‎And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you. “Matthew 5:38–42
11Love Your Enemies“But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, ‎so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. ‎For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? “Matthew 5:44–46
12Be Perfect“For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? ‎And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? ‎You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”Matthew 5:46–48
13Practice Secret Disciplines“Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven.”Matthew 6:1
14Lay up treasures in heaven“Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, ‎but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. ‎For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. “Matthew 6:19–20
15Seek first the kingdom of God“But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.”Matthew 6:33
16Judge not“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. “Matthew 7:1-2
17Do not throw your pearls to pigs“Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you. “Matthew 7:6
18Ask, seek, and knock“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened. “Matthew 7:7-8
19Do unto others“So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.”Matthew 7:12
20Choose the narrow way“Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few. “Matthew 7:13-14
21Beware of false prophets“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. “Matthew 7:15
22Pray for those who spread the word“Then he said to his disciples, “The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore pray earnestly to the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest.”Matthew 9:37-38
23Be as shrewd as serpents“Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves. “Matthew 10:16Romans 16:19
24Fear God. Do not fear man“And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”Matthew 10:28Luke 12:4-5
25Listen to God’s voice“He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”Matthew 11:1513:9,
13:43, Mark 4:23Luke 14:351 Kings 19:11-13
26Take my yoke“Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. ‎For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”Matthew 11:29-30
27Honor your parents“For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever reviles father or mother must surely die.’ “Matthew 15:4
28Beware of false teaching“How is it that you fail to understand that I did not speak about bread? Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” ‎Then they understood that he did not tell them to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees. “Matthew 16:6Matthew 16:11-12
29Deny yourself“And calling the crowd to him with his disciples, he said to them, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. “Luke 9:23Matthew 10:38Mark 8:34
30Do not despise little ones“See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that in heaven their angels always see the face of my Father who is in heaven. “Matthew 18:10
31Go to Christians who offend you“If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. “Matthew 18:15Galatians 6:1
32Forgive offenders“Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often will my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” ‎Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy-seven times.”Matthew 18:21-22Proverbs 19:11
33Beware of covetousness“And he said to them, “Take care, and be on your guard against all covetousness, for one’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.”Luke 12:15
34Honor marriage“So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”Matthew 19:6Matthew 19:9
35Lead by being a servant“It shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, ‎and whoever would be first among you must be your slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”Matthew 20:26-28
36Make the church a house of prayer for all nations“And he was teaching them and saying to them, “Is it not written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations’? But you have made it a den of robbers.”Mark 11:17
37Pray in faith“And Jesus answered them, “Truly, I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt, you will not only do what has been done to the fig tree, but even if you say to this mountain, ‘Be taken up and thrown into the sea,’ it will happen. ‎And whatever you ask in prayer, you will receive, if you have faith.”Matthew 21:21-22John 15:7
38Bring in the poor“He said also to the man who had invited him, “When you give a dinner or a banquet, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, lest they also invite you in return and you be repaid. But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you. For you will be repaid at the resurrection of the just.”Luke 14:12-14
39Render unto Caesar“Show me the coin for the tax.” And they brought him a denarius. ‎And Jesus said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” They said, “Caesar’s.” Then he said to them, “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”Matthew 22:19-21
40Love the Lord“And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment”Matthew 22:37-38
41Love your neighbor“And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. “Matthew 22:39
42Be born again“Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’”John 3:7
43Await my return“Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. But know this, that if the master of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. “Matthew 24:42-44
44Celebrate the Lord’s supper“Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” ‎And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, “Matthew 26:26-27
45Watch and pray“Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.”Matthew 26:41
46Keep my commandments“If you love me, you will keep my commandments. “John 14:15
47Feed my sheep“When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs.” He said to him a second time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Tend my sheep.”John 21:15-16
48Make and baptize disciples“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, “Matthew 28:19
49Teach disciples to obey“teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”Matthew 28:20
50Receive God’s power“And behold, I am sending the promise of my Father upon you. But stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high.”Luke 24:49
Continue Reading ·

Prayers through James

Over the past several weeks, I made my way through the Letter of James in the New Testament. While doing so, the various passages accompanied a personal prayer. In response to each message of James (the biological brother of Jesus), I wrote a prayer that corresponds to each. This was an effort to internalize his letter to the Diaspora of the first century, but for us today as well. The text is King James to include the entire letter.

James 1:1
“JAMES, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.”

Holy Father, just as your servant James loved and honored You, let my worship, prayers, devotion, and witness of You be eternally pleasing. Let my prayers of adoration be as the flickering flame of an everlasting candle that gives a light of remembrance before You.

James 1:2-4
“My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience (endurance). But let patience (endurance) have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing.”

LORD, my heart is often full and overflowing by your Holy Spirit. Yet, it is too often withdrawn by anxiety and fears that overwhelm me. With the pressures of this world, I become encumbered, but you are my joy and my peace. You are my high tower and my deliverer, and I trust You even while my thoughts and actions are not always as You would have them when I face hardships.

James 1:5-8
“If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed. For let not that man think that he shall receive anything of the Lord. A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways.”

Lord, you have my heart, and I fully rely on you for this course of life. I will do what you want me to do and go where you want me to go. Let me not get in the way of your interests with the decisions and initiatives I pursue. It is my highest desire first to honor You and what you would want for your glory and your kingdom.

James 1:9-11
“Let the brother of low degree rejoice in that he is exalted: But the rich, in that he is made low: because as the flower of the grass he shall pass away. For the sun is no sooner risen with a burning heat, but it withereth the grass, and the flower thereof falleth, and the grace of the fashion of it perisheth: so also, shall the rich man fade away in his ways.”

Lord, if or when life conditions change, please let the abundance and blessings you have given to me pass toward those you love and want to use for your purposes. I have earned and achieved nothing if not from You. When life conditions change, let my deepest joy remain in You as You are my lasting hope and peace.

James 1:12-15
“Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him. Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.’

Lord, I beg you for a heart of repentance all my days. I am a sinful man in thoughts, words, and behaviors. They are my fault, and I am sorry when sin is conceived within me against You. I am responsible as I have wronged You and others, and I desperately need Your mercy, cleansing, and renewal so I would not repeat that which causes alienation and death. After everything You’ve done, it is unacceptable that there would ever be any wickedness in me, and You are worthy of my full surrender.

James 1:16-18
“Do not err, my beloved brethren. Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.”

Lord, You are abundantly good, and I delight in worshiping You because of who You are. The witness and presence of Your Holy Spirit make clear how good You are and the good gifts You provide. You have my love, devotion, and affection; please let me see your glory in the good that You do and the good gifts You pour out.

James 1:19-20
“Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.”

Holy Father, by Your Spirit, let the fruits You desire become evident by what I think and speak. You are my hope, You are my strength, and You are my anchor, so over my inclinations, set aside my critical spirit and set within me an ability to better listen to You and others. Let all resentment and sources of anger dissipate within before they settle and take root. Let Your peace and joy within me abundantly overflow to insulate me from what harm I perceive.

James 1:21-25
“Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.”

Lord, I want to memorize Your imperatives. I want to hide Your Word within me. The worship that pleases You is my heart’s desire. The messages that are rooted in Your word are what I want to retain. Anything I hear or see that brings me close to You is what I want to remember and act upon. Let the men and women you place in my life be a meaningful and lasting source of sanctification as I desire to be permanently holy before You.”

James 1:26-27
“If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s religion is vain. Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.”

Lord, this is an area that brings me a lot of concern. I’m not doing enough for You and Your kingdom. I have given a lot of money in offerings, I have discipled people You love, I have given to missions, and I have served You in various ways, but You are far more worthy than the limits of my being. In exchange for all shortcomings, I would gladly exchange any crown or reward for your continued and eternal presence within. Just let me remain with You. I love You no matter what.

James 2:1-13
“My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts? Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called? If ye fulfill the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty. For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.”

Lord, I don’t just want to be good at the right things to say. Or to steer ideas, conversations, or preferences that are in the way and do not glorify you or edify others. Please develop within me the desire and mindset to readily encourage people. Help me empty my natural mindset and live out the Spirit within to bear the fruit You desire.

James 2:1-4
“My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?”

Father, You have given me a heart for the homeless, and by Your Spirit, You’ve enabled me to help them in various ways. By Your grace, and leading, please bring new opportunities to further help through my church and by the opportunity of personal effort. It seems there have been less access and opportunity in recent months and I need your guidance about what and where I could be of a continued blessing to those in need in this way.

James 2:5-13
“Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called? If ye fulfill the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty. For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.”

Lord Jesus, the abundance of Your Spirit within is what is needed to offer the spiritual service of worship that pleases You. The neglected, socially unfavored, weak, and undesired at church is who I want to love through You in a tangible, lasting, and meaningful way. Give me the eyes to see where I could better love and serve those that you honor.

James 2:14-19
“What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.”

My King, that Your brother would form these words is such an abundant act of mercy that my heart is full by reading them to living them out. Your instructions through Your brother are a blessing that brings gravity to the truth and value of your work. Living out your Word is my desire. All that I am and all that I have, are willingly transferred to all that You are.

James 2:20-26
“But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.”

Lord, it isn’t sufficient to be passive in my expression of love for You, Your Word, and who You are. I desire to have an active life full of the fruit of the Spirit. To live out the love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control that translates to interpersonal conduct among people I meet to help where needed. Please let your Spirit dwell richly within me to work the faith and grace You have given to me.”

James 3:1-2
“My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation. For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body.”

Lord, it is so apparent that the overflow of my heart and mind becomes present by what I say and write. It is my desire to be pleasing and holy in this way. Defilement by what is said is displeasing to you, and it’s my heart’s desire to keep my words in check. By Your Spirit, reform my heart and mind so that I would not sin against you or others by intentional or unintentional words spoken or written.

James 3:3-12
“Behold, we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body. Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth. Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell. For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind: But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be. Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter? Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.”

Lord, it is not enough to abstain from coarse talk. Rather, it is my desire to be completely surrendered to what is best according to your will. Let not my passions prevail over your Spirit, so that I would walk according to Your Word and that your Word would be on my lips.

James 1:14-15, 3:3-4, 11-12, 18, Matt 7:17, Ps 19:14
“Search me, O God, and know my heart. Try me and know my thoughts. And see if there be no wicked way in me and lead me in the way everlasting. Oh Lord, let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in Your sight, You who are my Rock and my Redeemer. Amen.”

Lord, I feel at times that I’ve gone too far and that my words are too many. Form within my heart and mind an attitude of discretion. I desire to become slower to speak and more graceful in what I write. This is my continued plea as I trust in You to walk according to Your word and by the fruit of the Spirit.

James 3:13-18
“Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show by good conduct that his works are done in the meekness of wisdom. But if you have bitter envy and self-seeking in your hearts, do not boast and lie against the truth. This wisdom does not descend from above, but is earthly, sensual, demonic. For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy. Now the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace.”

Lord, there is so much error and trouble in this world, it at times is tough to hold my tongue and set aside thoughts that are just unfruitful. The influences and pressures of this world weigh heavy, and I need your Spirit and instruction from Your Word to light my path. Your wisdom is what I desire, but so often I get in the way. Please be merciful to me Your neglectful servant.

James 4:1-6
“From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.”

Lord, Your Word pierces through to me on this because of my military and work background. This is a real sore spot, as You know, and I just ask for a softened heart and a mindset that my struggle with people is spiritual and not physical. Father, I really need help with this because I can’t manage it on my own. I surrender to your Spirit and trust in Your way and Your grace to strengthen me to live as You want.

James 4:7-10
“Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded. Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness. Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.”

Lord, Your Word through Your servant James tells me that this is an effort on me. It is my responsibility and effort to draw near to you. You know that is what I do each day. Your Word says you will draw near to me by doing so. I’m counting on You to make certain and effective the sanctifying work of Your Holy Spirit. Even while my efforts are hit-and-miss, I trust in you for ever-increasing consistency in thought, word, and deed.

James 4:11-12
“Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge. There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?”

Lord, I don’t want even the appearance of slander to be named of me. Both directly or indirectly, it is my desire to be blameless before you and others in this way. Knowing intentional or unintentional verbal harm toward others is displeasing even in the slightest way, I want to be ever-sensitive out of a spirit of love and honor. Amen.

James 4:13-17
“Go to now, ye that say, Today or tomorrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that. But now ye rejoice in your boastings: all such rejoicing is evil. Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.”

Lord, it at times is alarming that I run my own course as a matter of urgency and expectations for desired outcomes. In this regard, I am an overachiever, but I confess not enough toward your kingdom. Only because I do love You and You know my affections for You. Who You are and Your presence is more valuable than anything to me, and I don’t want to squander our relationship from my own misguided pursuits.

James 5:1-6
“Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten. Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days. Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth. Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter. Ye have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you.”

Lord, You know my view that everything that You’ve given belongs to You. What You’ve given as mine is Yours because my heart is Yours. Everything that I have been entrusted to keep is a blessing as belongings and a source of safety, livelihood, and well-being. Let my tithes, offerings, and giving be an acceptable form of worship where You are glorified, and Your Church is well-formed.

James 5:7-11
“Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain. Be ye also patient; stablish your hearts: for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh. Grudge not one against another, brethren, lest ye be condemned: behold, the judge standeth before the door. Take, my brethren, the prophets, who have spoken in the name of the Lord, for an example of suffering affliction, and of patience. Behold, we count them happy which endure. Ye have heard of the patience of Job, and have seen the end of the Lord; that the Lord is very pitiful, and of tender mercy.”

Lord, I delight in the cry of Your saints, Maranatha! The hope of Your return brings joy to my heart and a lasting source of refreshment to my soul. How abundant are Your mercies and promises and that we should be named Your servants and friends brings within me an overwhelming gratitude for what you’re going to do.

James 5:12
“But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.”

Lord, may I not even reserve in the minds of others profane thoughts by what I imply. Purity in thought and verbal expression is my desire so that I might be a more effective witness to you. Either among your people, while in fellowship, or with people who don’t know you, it is my desire to speak in love and in confidence in an assertive way. Without passivity or abrasive speech, but gentle yet at times firm when necessary. Amen.

James 5:13-18
“Is any among you afflicted? Let him pray. Is any merry? Let him sing psalms. Is any sick among you? Let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he has committed sins, they shall be forgiven him. Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much. Elias was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months. And he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit.”

Lord, it is my heart’s desire that the church would feel safe for people who attend. For everyone, either planted or those who attend, both seasoned and new where Your love and Spirit are apparent throughout members and attendees at various levels. We need Your grace, and may it never be that I am a source of undue friction. Let what I say and think in the presence of others be edifying and encouraging to those who are seeking You.

James 5:16-18
“Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much. Elias was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months. And he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit.”

Lord, I ask that You hear my prayers as I go about my day and as I appear before you on my knees. Let not my sinful ways inhibit your hearing of my worship, praise, gratitude, confessions, and petitions. Let my prayers be heard as they are given voice from Your Word and from others’ needs that come before You. Amen.

James 5:19-20
“Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.”

Lord, it is my prayer that You would restore to You those who are close to me. Family, friends, and co-workers who have become distant from You need Your grace and mercy. As You are the source of life and well-being, may Your peace return to those who have sought You in the past. If there is any way in which I can be an instrument for that purpose, I am available and willing to serve in this way.


Continue Reading ·

The Narrow Road

This post examines how Puritans of the 17th-century thought and wrote about the biblical topics of sin and repentance. As this topic is explored from historical writings of well-known Puritans of their time, various additional perspectives from numerous sources also come into view. While the views and writings of Puritans Thomas Watson and John Owen are central to this post, their convictions about sin and repentance are of tremendous significance. Their teachings, lectures, sermons, and literary work are voluminous as these two men devoted themselves to God, family, and ministry. They shared a deep and abiding concern for the human condition as people separated from God by their sin were cause for alarm.

Introduction

Historically, the Puritans of England were a people who were protestant in faith with a biblically-centered view of life, faith, and practice. They were of the Reformed heritage of belief and confession, which had a bearing on their lifestyle, worship, faith, and practice. As people who sought and lived simple lives, they were an interconnected community of believers who valued education as they lived with a strong work ethic. Watson and Owen, who were leaders as pastors and theologians of their time, often engaged in culture against social pressures and were outspoken on the urgent message of the gospel. They were among numerous Puritans, common, notable, and well-known, who loved God’s word, the fellowship of believers, the sharing of their faith, the communion of the saints, devotion to prayer, and worship in church and among family. They were moved by the Spirit and inner motivation to live as spiritually anointed people consecrated from England’s and greater Europe’s society. They lived out the gospel’s implications to holy living and a commitment to love God and one another. The Puritans have a well-known reputation for an orderly life faithful to God by the authority of Scripture and the inner presence of the Holy Spirit.

Background

The history of the Puritans from the Reformer’s roots extending back to the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) involved the Church of England (COE) and its leadership. As this history was contentious, the specific issues and objections of the Puritans centered upon Catholicism as a whole system of belief. As Catholicism propagated the term “protestants” as a pejorative to non-Catholic Christians, the Puritans, in turn, wrote and spoke of Catholics as “papists.” The separation between the Catholics of tradition, which confer authority of the magisterium alongside the Scripture, and Christians, who place the supremacy of Scripture as the center of holy living, faith, and obedience, was squarely centered upon where authority rests. While the RCC and COE believed that ultimate spiritual authority is shared between Scripture, tradition, and the catechism of the magisterium, Puritans of the 17th century strenuously objected common to the doctrines and biblical beliefs of the Reformers.

Thomas Watson was a highly educated preacher and writer, having attended and graduated from Emmanuel College, among other Puritans of the time. John Owen, a highly popular author and speaker was thoroughly educated and influential before, during, and after serving as vice-chancellor of Oxford University. Watson and Owen were at the public’s service as ministers but never really were accepted in their own country as such, according to J.C. Ryle (1816 – 1900), a widely known Anglican Bishop of England. The Puritans, educated, influential, and fearless of men, greatly feared God in their life and work, as evidenced by their writing, preaching, and pastoral duties. English Puritan ministers numbered in the hundreds with far more congregant believers, including Scottish and Dutch populations served by men as non-conformists of the Church of England, the Church of Scotland, and the Roman Catholic Church.

The inner sense of Puritan devotion to God and His Word brought the ministers to a place of outspoken concern that urged people to know God, love Him, and serve Him from growing faith, devotion, and obedience. The Puritan interest in personal sanctification was intense, and their spiritual development involved lasting attention to holy living. The presence of sin in a believer’s life was intolerable. The presence of sin in an individual, the community, and the church was a frequent object of piercing attention, particularly among the leadership of Puritans, Watson, and Owen. Their views were spoken and written about at length concerning the specifics of sin and the urgent need for repentance. The immediate specifics about sin and repentance as a soteriological concern were pressing. Not purely as a general interest, as both Watson and Owen significantly contributed to Puritan theology and doctrine, but as a practical matter. To them, it just was not enough to write about the anthropological concerns about the sinful human condition. The prevailing concern was about what that meant to anyone who must repent for reconciliation to set a new course in pursuit of God and rebirth into a spiritual life of regeneration for the right standing of the growing converted.

17th Century Puritan Thought on Sin

To the Puritans, sin in the life of the regenerate and unregenerate alike was a major and lasting concern. The development of Puritan theology about the effects of sin arises from a biblical conviction that it is corruptive as it separates the soul from God, the Creator. The imputation of Adam’s guilt upon persons down through redemptive history is rooted in Puritan thought as it had explanatory power about its indwelling and inherently corrosive effects (Romans 5:12-21).1 Anthony Burgess (1600 – 1663), another Puritan of the 17th century, wrote in his Treatise of Original Sin about the necessity of Christ’s imputation of His righteousness in believers as developed within the Puritan doctrine of justification. His treatise examined the necessity of Christ’s imputation of His righteousness as Adam’s sin imputed his guilt upon humanity.2 Within Puritan thought, sin was imputed and inherent in persons, whether redeemed or not. Yet it was by mercy made necessary to redress that guilt through the “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5 NASB) by a covenant of grace that God implemented through the work of Christ Jesus. Puritan thought on the depth and profound meaning of the gospel continues to have a bearing upon soteriological doctrines in the church today as Scripture reveals Christ’s work inclusive of atonement “for the sins of many” (Hebrews 9:28).

The “atonement” concerning sin is often understood as “at” and “one” as it is derived from the English use of both terms and their meaning. The term “atonement” is an etymological marker that describes reconciliation between God and sinners made effective through the death of Jesus Christ on the cross.3 This definition of atonement has an explicit meaning that is thoroughly historical and biblical. From the earliest books of the Torah and throughout the canon of Scripture, readers can find acts of atonement as a redemptive matter to recover people from their sins. Whether through sacrificial offerings (Exodus 29:37, Leviticus 5:6), to the imagery of John’s revelatory vision (Revelation 5:9), readers recognize the atoning work of God through His incarnate presence to reclaim humanity from the separation of imputed and inherent sin. His work is a means of deliverance to return people to Himself for his glory and the salvation of a regenerated people He decides to bring to Himself. It is necessary to become regenerated from a corrupted nature and clothed with another to enjoy Christ eternally.4

Thomas Watson

Thomas Watson (1620-1686) was an English, Puritan preacher and author. He was among the thousands of Puritan ministers ejected from their parishes by the Church of England (COE). From the Restoration of Charles II, the monarch of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland, the State used its power to remove Puritan ministers from the COE to enforce conformity to its doctrines and liturgical practices. The State sought to assert its place within the COE under the pretense of Christian unity among the Anglo kingdoms. As the COE separated from the Roman Catholic Church in Europe, it sought to impose its form of prescribed worship throughout the kingdoms according to State dictates. The Church of England and the government of England under Charles II betrayed faithful ministers of Christ by instituting the Clarendon Code. The Clarendon Code was a State-enforced public “cancellation” of individuals who did not conform to the COE but instead held to emergent and formative Reformed traditions centered upon the exclusive authority of biblical meaning toward faith and practice.

Free Church Persons (“non-conformist protestants”) were actively persecuted by penal laws that involved forfeiture, civil penalties, criminal sanctions, and cultural isolation that excluded ministers from public life and society. For example, university degrees and access to public services were some of the fallout of the political dismissal and removal of ministers faithful to the gospel and holy living according to the imperatives of Christ and supremacy and sufficiency of God’s Word. Various historical figures of notable reputations have assailed the actions of the COE, and over time “England succumbed to a culture of liberalism, overrun with cold, dead churches awash in apostasy and spiritual darkness.”5

Among the thousands of other Puritans scattered after the Great Ejection of August 24th, 1662, Thomas Watson continued to minister privately without ordination within the Anglican church. After Thomas Watson was removed by dismissal, according to the Church of England and the State’s use of force, the COE never recovered, just as J.C. Ryle speculated. Three years after the Great Ejection, the bubonic plague struck England and killed over 100,000 people. Shortly after, London was engulfed in a large fire that destroyed over 13,000 homes, nearly one hundred churches, and St Paul’s Cathedral. The Church of England has been fraught with controversy and apostasy for centuries and has fallen out of communion with other Anglican churches in various countries. The Church of England continues to self-assert its authority over Scripture as it grows into an ecclesial agency for public interests in service of the State. The Anglican church today is nothing close to what it once was with its historically influential members (C.S. Lewis, John Stott, J.C. Ryle, N.T. Wright, and others).

Thomas Watson continued ministry after being removed from his London parish after the Great Ejection but continued to preach privately. He was educated at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, where he was noted for remarkably intense study. In 1646 he commenced a 16-year pastorate at St. Stephen’s, Walbrook. While Watson held strong Presbyterian views during the civil war; however, in 1651, he was imprisoned briefly with some other ministers for his share in Christopher Love’s plot to recall Charles II of England. He was released on June 30th, 1652, and was formally reinstated as vicar of St. Stephen’s Walbrook. He obtained great fame and popularity as a preacher until the Great Ejection, when he was removed from the Church of England for nonconformity. Notwithstanding the rigor of the acts against dissenters, Watson continued to exercise his ministry privately as the opportunity presented itself. After preaching there for several years, his health declined, and he retired to Barnston, Essex, where he died suddenly while praying in private. He was buried on July 28th, 1686.

The Effects of Sin Upon Persons

Watson offers nine specific considerations concerning the effects of sin on persons. Beginning with the shame it causes, across the pages of his questions and discourse, his verbatim thoughts from the 1600s are outlined as follows:6

1.   Every sin makes us guilty, and guilt usually breeds shame.

2.   In every sin, there is much unthankfulness, and that is matter of shame.

3.   Sin hath made us naked, and that may breed shame.

4.   Our sins have put Christ to shame, and shall not we be ashamed?

5.   Many sins which we commit, are by the special instigation of the Devil, and will not this cause shame?

6.   Sin, like Cyrcies enchanting cup, turns men into beasts, and is not that matter of shame?

7.   In every sin, there is folly (Jeremiah 4:22).

8.   That which may make us blush, is, that the sins we commit are far worse than the sins of the Heathen (Indian): we act against more light

9.   Our sins are worse than the sins of the Devils.

a.   The angels never sinned against Christ’s blood

b.   The devils never sinned against God’s patience

c.   The devils never sinned against examples made for them by any fallen before

Watson further points out that sin is not an offense as a singular one-off as it often is, but a condition prevalent within as a whole. He clarifies that before a person can come to Christ, he must first come to himself, as persons are veiled by ignorance and self-love and cannot see the deformity of their souls. It darkens the intellect and reasoning. Moreover, justification of sin, indifference to it, and crafting a theology to suit one’s interests from socially loaded interpretations of Scripture forms iterative self-deluded thought about sin and its consequences.

To further understand the effects of sin within the Puritan mind, it is helpful to recognize it as a personified enemy (Genesis 4:7). To review the theological meaning or definition of sin without secular taint or influence requires a summary of historical doctrine rooted in Scripture. To thoroughly hate and loathe sin, it is necessary to attempt a meager view of what it is as a personified enemy. As sin in all its forms is an enemy to believers, it is enough to only see it as evil thoughts, feelings, words, actions, and omissions that violate the moral standard of God. Sin is the transgression of something forbidden, or it ignores something required by God’s law or character. Yet, Apostle Paul’s understanding of sin involves an analysis of anthropology and soteriology from his written letter to the church in Rome (Rom 7-8). While he writes of sin as an echo personified, actual human sinning always remains in full view of resistance against God. To this extent, its personification helps us recognize sin as the totality of human failure and depravity.7 Moreover, to quote Puritan Ralph Venning (1622-1674), “Sin is worse than Hell.… There is more evil in it, than good in all the Creation.”8 He elaborates further to explain that there is more evil in sin that hurts people than all of the good within Creation that does us good.

To Watson, the absence of shame among the impenitent places them farther from repentance. The unjust know no shame (Zephaniah 3:5), and many sin away the capacity to know or feel shame. Historically, the LORD branded His people, the Israelites, due to their shame. That they had no shame was their shame. They were branded that way (Jeremiah 6:15). Worse yet, Watson observes that those without shame grow to become proud of their sins and glory in them (Philippians 3:19). More plainly, those without shame can come to parade their offenses against God and become proud of them. To the believer, Watson urges the penitent to blush, as described by Ezra (Ezra 9:6). Believers who claim Yahweh as their God without shame stemming from personal sin live or think by the hypocrisy that affects their view of His grace.

To further recognize the severity of sin, Watson observed that the frequency of sin a person commits has a bearing upon the difficulty in which it is possible to repent. Watson compares the Angel with a flaming sword and a person’s conscience to contrast the severity of succumbing to temptation. Finally, to make his point scripturally grounded, he references Job 24:13, where there is the prospect of sinning against the light. As light is necessary for the growth of trees to produce fruit, it cannot, as sin darkens the soul against it. As Watson vividly illustrates, sin within an impenitent bears a fruitless, barren, and desolate heart and cannot intake the grace, mercy, and provision to recover. While Apostle Paul informs his readers, “where sin increased, grace abounded all the more” (Romans 5:20),  Watson illustrates the blacksmith’s metal plunged into the fire, where it does not melt or become refined and has little hope. The tree cannot produce fruit as it is darkened and whithered by sin. It becomes cursed and does not bear fruit (Mark 11:15-21). Watson clearly distinguishes the condition of persons affected by sin as those who sin for want of the light compared to sinning against the light (Job 24:13). However, Watson does not offer a written rationale here about Christ Jesus’s urging for forgiveness up to seventy-seven times (ESV, NIV, NRSV, NRSVCE, NABRE) or seventy times seven (LSB, NASB, ERV, KJV, NKJV, HCSB, RSV, ASV, AV1873, RSV2CE, ESV-CE, CSB, NLT, LEB) in Matthew 18:21-22 to render forgiveness to the penitent.

Persons’ Proper View of Sin

From the Puritan perspective, it is necessary to understand that numerous evils explain what sin truly is. The scope and depth of offense concerning sin are immeasurable, but its effects help readers understand what it is by what it does. At least from a human perspective, sin has tangible effects as it has a bearing on people at various levels. However, as the view of sin is from a horizontal perspective, it is urgent to recognize it as a vertical matter between God and people, which is of grave importance. While sin estranges people from God (Isaiah 1:4, Jeremiah 2:5), it is a matter of walking contrary to God and His intentions. To Watson, with every step the soul goes further from God, the nearer it approaches misery and darkness.

Theologically, sin is described in Scripture as having wages. When Apostle Paul wrote to Romans that “the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23), he chose the term “wage” to convey the idea of payment for sin. The semantic range of the Greek term for wages (opsōnia) is very limited, but it refers to the idea of payment or compensation for a rendered act of a worker or soldier.9 Where a person who sins renders payment for it, and its currency comes in the form of death. For both imputed guilt of sin through Adam and inherent sin in a person’s life, death is an inevitable consequence, and it serves as a payment for rendered wrong against God, oneself, and others. While the first sin we know about originates from Satan as attempting to elevate himself above God, the effects of sin on humanity extend back to Eden. As the spiritual death of Adam and Eve accompanied their decay and death, so does it to everyone without Christ.10

The theological topic of hamartiology is the study of sin. It is a biblical and systematic theology topic with numerous intertextual references rendered within Scripture throughout revelatory history. With numerous fields of thought among historical Puritan writings and theologians today, a contemporary and popular systematic theology defines sin as follows: “Sin is any failure to conform to the moral law of God in act, attitude, or nature. Sin is here defined in relation to God and his moral law. Sin includes not only individual acts, such as stealing, lying, and committing murder, but also attitudes that are contrary to the attitudes God requires of us.”11 Sin more explicitly understood as disobedience to the ten commandments (Exodus 20:1-17) extended more broadly from Christ Jesus’ sermon on the mount found within the gospel of Matthew, chapters 5 through 7 reveal to us that the intentions of the thoughts and heart also constitute sin. In the New Testament context and throughout Scripture, God incarnate reveals the spirit of the law and grace through all covenants. Particularly from the protoevangelion to the eschaton, Christ Jesus fulfills the law (Matthew 5:17-20) and renders His righteousness to sinners saved by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9).

To the Puritan way of thinking about sin, it is a manner of being that must be “mortified.” The old English term “mortification” is a Puritan way of saying “put to death.” As old English translators interpreted Apostle Paul, “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live” (Romans 8:13 KJV). It is this reference that “putting to death” the deeds of the flesh are widened to mean “putting to death sin,” or as phrased by Puritan John Owen and John MacArthur Jr., “the mortification of sin”12 to convey the proper gravity of the total message.

John Owen

John Owen (1616 – 1683) also wrote about the “Mortification of Sin” to aid the reader’s views about sin and the severity of its effects and what it does. Before beginning with Owen’s views representing Puritan thought on sin, a brief introduction of him is in order. As John Owen was called the “prince of the English divines,” “a genius with learning second only to Calvin’s,” and “indisputably the leading proponent of high Calvinism in England in the late seventeenth century,”13 he demonstrated at an early age his trajectory to become an astute theologian, speaker, author, and pastor. Owen was an effective advocate for Reformed theology and Puritan piety. His life was remarkable as a shepherd, manager of university groups, statesman, chaplain, minister, and author of numerous works. His speaking drew numerous people to him as his messages were impressive and of considerable influence to people of political and religious power. He was also a chaplain to thousands of soldiers involved in harrowing conflicts who pleaded for Parliament’s mercy upon the Irish from English soldiers trained and ministered to around Puritan piety.

Owen’s family and career were difficult with trials and hardships compared to others during the Puritan era. Of 11 children born to him and his wife Mary Rooke, ten did not survive past their infancy. Their daughter, who did survive into adulthood, did not live a full life and died of tuberculosis (consumption) just after marriage. His career in ministry was fruitful but often was accompanied by uncertainty, instability, and disappointment. While interpersonal relationships from early in Owen’s career for years into midlife were characteristically productive and rewarding, he eventually became estranged from the fellowship of colleagues related to the Great Ejection imposed by the Church of England.

During his later years, he was without interpersonal influence, even while invited to serve in ministry elsewhere and support fellow ministers where he could. Instead, he wrote volumes that were published and remain in print today. His work ranges from more theological topics that further develop doctrines within the Church. He wrote a Biblical Theology, treatises, expositional commentaries, and practical guides to godly living. His many sermons were later transcribed and published for church development, instruction, and advancement.14 The following correspondence quoted verbatim gives the reader a sense of sentiment and scale.

TO MRS COOKE OF STOKE NEWINGTON

MADAM,—Four years ago the world was favoured, through your means, with a volume of Dr. Owen’s sermons which never before appeared in print; and it is at your instance that the following Sacramental Discourses of that same venerable divine are now made public. Hereby, madam, you at once express your high value and just esteem for the memory and works of that incomparable author, with your generous concern and prevailing desire of being serviceable to the cause of Christ;—a cause much more dear to you than all the worldly possessions with which the providence of God has blessed you.

With the greatest sincerity it may be said, your constant affection to the habitation of God’s house,—your steady adherence to the peculiar doctrines of Christianity,—your kind regards to the faithful ministers of the gospel,—your extensive benevolence to the indigent and the distressed,—your affability to all you converse with,—and, in a word, your readiness to every good work, are so spread abroad, that, as the apostle says to the Thessalonians, “There is no need to speak any thing.”

That the Lord would prolong your valuable life, daily refresh your soul with the dew of his grace, and enable you, when the hour of death approaches, to rejoice in the full prospect of eternal life through our Lord Jesus Christ, is the prayer.

Madam,

Of your affectionate and obedient servant,
RICHARD WINTER

TOOKE’S COURT, CURSITOR STREET
March 4, 1760.

From among the numerous volumes and sermons that originated from Owen, this segment of the post captures some of his thoughts on the subject of sin just as it concerned Watson and various other Puritans. Aside from Owen’s work entitled Indwelling Sin, an exposition of Psalm 130, he wrote The Mortification of Sin, as earlier indicated in this post, to correct the “dangerous mistakes” of various ministers who had fallen into error.15 While Owen’s treatise on the mortification of sin is embedded deep within this volume of work, it is also separated out as informative subject matter for modern readers to process personal understanding and application.

Sin as a Mortal Enemy

John Owen wrote his treatise on killing sin many years before its publication in 1862. Still, the subject matter was carried forward differently and directly for a more thorough understanding within the Puritan church in England. Owen’s effort included a comprehensive message concerning what Apostle Paul wrote to the churches in Rome and Colossae. Specifically, the 17th-century Puritan was highly concerned about the presence of sin in the lives of believers, and he wrote a widely read examination of what putting sin to death looks like. While the mortification of sin was John Owen’s pressing concern, he offered encouragement, exhortation, clarity, and guidance to understand what sin is and does. He had specific thoughts about what it is to eradicate its root by the Spirit and the involvement of the believer’s intentional will. In old English parlance familiar to Owen:

“For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.” – Romans 8:13 KJV

“Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things’ sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience.” – Colossians 3:5-6 KJV

Sin is so grave that it eternally damns people, according to Scripture. Owen, just as Paul did, wrote of “mortifying” it. As mortification is an old English translation rendering, it corresponds to “putting to death” among modern translations (ESV, NIV, NKJV, HCSB, and more). The term “mortify” is translated the same in both references in Romans 8:13 and Colossians 3:5, while their Greek root terms are different.

Furthermore, to Owen, mortification, or to mortify, is understood from multiple perspectives, all consistent in meaning. The act of self-denial or the “putting to death” of sinful instincts or cravings is to render a person free from sin to live in the power of the Holy Spirit. The NT stresses that this act of humiliation comes about through the grace of God. It is the result of, not the condition for, conversion. The key passages Paul wrote correspond to numerous principles Owen stressed as they support the Reformed tradition together.

To further elaborate, mortification is “the process of ‘putting to death’ one’s sinful nature as the old self continually struggles because of the reality of indwelling sin. This process takes place in the lives of believers who, while they have been set free from sin’s dominion by the indwelling Holy Spirit who unites them to Christ, are called to live in light of God’s grace.”16 As persons actively work out their salvation, “if it is truly part of sanctification, it must be accomplished through the Spirit of Christ in dynamic interplay with a believer’s response of repentance; mere human effort does not result in increased freedom from sin, even if it changes outward behavior.”

To Owen’s discourse in his volume on mortification, while a person could successfully overcome sinful behaviors, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the instincts and cravings were put to death. Compared to Reformed theology, Catholicism also emphasizes Galatians 5:24, where it is necessary to “crucify the flesh.”17 As some English translations render “consider as dead” (NASB, LSB) in a passive sense, many other translations (including various Catholic translations) are active with the “put to death” language. For example, the “Little Rock Catholic Study Bible,” “New American Bible: Revised Edition” (NABRE), “The Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition” (RSVCE), “Douay-Rheims Bible” as mortify (D-R), and the “Ignatius Bible: Revised Standard Version, Second Catholic Edition” (RSV2CE) all express the same meaning. When delving further into the definition of the terms nekroō (νεκρόω) in Colossians 3:5 and thanatoō (θανατόω) in Romans 8:13, they both correlate to the “put to death” sense of meaning. The Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament ties both terms together as figurative in suggestive meaning where intended readers understood the original root manuscripts as conventional figures of speech to communicate the same idea.18

Owen is clear in his volume that mortification is not a passive posture of sin in the flesh as mere recognition or consideration from a believer. He stresses that it is an active conscious effort of someone as a converted person who became a believer by faith and repentance. However, he also recognizes that the process of mortification is lifelong, and it depends solely upon the Spirit of Christ to definitively accomplish the continued crucifixion of sin in the life of a believer. The believer is participative by necessity but is not the practical and final means of mortification. The Spirit of Christ is who does the work. As sin was put to death in the sacrifice and resurrection of Christ Jesus, the law of death is applied to sin itself in the lives of believers. Where there Spirit lives within believers, there is the law of life by the Spirit as long as there is no yield to sin. That sin is persistently, iteratively, and ruthlessly killed actively about particular offenses. Mortification is “the slaying of the disease of the soul, and by slaying this disease, it restores and invigorates the soul’s true life.”19 Still, mortifying the flesh is an intentional effort of faith, necessary to sanctify believers who work out their salvation with fear and trembling (Phil 2:12-13).

Sin in the Life of a Believer

As it is impossible to earn salvation through works or efforts that yield positive outcomes and the removal of sins, if efforts of mortification are not by faith, they are of no spiritual value. Owen asserts that such progress involves the replacement of sins with others in the absence of necessary faith through the heart of a believer concerning the treacherous and destructive nature of sin. Under the authority of God’s Word as written by the Holy Spirit through the Apostle Paul, those who live by the flesh will die. In contrast, those who live by the Spirit shall live. To be more explicit, regarding the term “flesh” (Rom 8:13 KJV), John Chrysostom (347 – 407 A.D., Archbishop of Constantinople) refers to it as follows: “what Paul means by the flesh in this passage is not the essence of the body but a life which is carnal and worldly, serving self-indulgence and extravagance to the full.”20

Owen’s readers might also remember Jesus’s parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31). And specifically, verse 25: “But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that you in your lifetime received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner bad things; but now he is comforted here, and you are in anguish (see Luke 6:24; Job 21:13; Ps. 17:14). The comparative man who fared “sumptuously” (Luke 16:19) was condemned. Where the rich man in the parable was delighted, glad, and enjoying himself in celebration and rejoicing by dining and merriment, there was apparent opulence that highlighted the disparity between him and Lazarus.

A surface reading of Owen’s treatise on sin to get a topical understanding of what he wrote doesn’t offer the best outcome for retention and application. More fully grasping what Owen wrote here concerning the killing of sin is challenging because it is a large and weighty subject. So this is a volume to iterate upon as John Owen is so widely read and studied for evident reasons. Nevertheless, his pressing concern about the lifelong urgency of killing sin within is not just a daily call to repentance but a persistent and ruthless inward campaign to find and destroy anything remotely innate or inherent that raises itself against God and the Spirit of Christ.

17th Century Puritan Thought on Repentance

Of particular interest during the Puritan era was the persecution of the Church of England while they were called to repentance by numerous people of the Reformed tradition. Numerous Puritan figures, such as Thomas Watson and John Owen, spoke and wrote of the urgency of persons to repentance. That effort extended to academic institutions, churches, parishes, and individuals in a desperate spiritual condition, estranged from God and proper worship for ongoing discipleship and sanctification befitting the Kingdom. The Puritan chorus of repentance was loud and clear, whether on a corporate scale or to individuals.

Thomas Watson

To include Watson’s work on repentance, he wrote correspondence to readers about its importance. He wrote that biblical repentance should not be spoken of as difficult and offered various influential people’s perspectives about what it does and why it is so necessary. He wrote that excellent things deserve labor, and it is better to enter Heaven with difficulty than to Hell easily. He inferred that repentance is difficult by comparison, but not to draw upon the reader’s attention or the impenitent to dissuade its necessity somehow. Watson used figurative illustrations often and one of digging for gold through ore to indicate that the effort of repentance is not worth discussion or concern by comparison because gold is the object of labor. The work of digging or smelting is not meant to dwell upon, contemplate, or resist. Repentance involves difficulty, but it is incredibly inappropriate and off-minded to think of it as such compared to what it yields. In so many words, Watson highlights that the absence of repentance in a person means a life of misery, scorn, and alienation from God.

Watson further stresses that accepting repentance as urgent and perpetual is of utmost necessity. Making peace with God on this side of the grave is putting sins to their death as a figurative act of drowning them in a deluge of water rather than having the soul burn in a symbolic unquenchable fire. Watson calls readers to consider what the Saints of old have done to imbitter themselves against sin, sacrifice their lusts, and put on sackcloth of the heart in the hope of the white robes of purity. Example after example, Watson’s reader is presented with historical figures who repented by bemoaning and humbling themselves to prevent and correct unacceptable thoughts and behaviors hideous before God.

Watson’s treatise on repentance is supported by a helpful understanding as it is biblically and confessionally defined. As Scripture carries the greatest and final weight of authority in terms of intended meaning rendered by the Holy Spirit through the biblical writers, the Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF) larger catechism offers the following (WLC Q76):

What is repentance unto life?
Repentance unto life is a saving grace, (2 Tim. 2:25) wrought in the heart of a sinner by the Spirit (Zech. 12:10) and word of God, (Acts 11:18,20–21) whereby, out of the sight and sense, not only of the danger, (Ezek. 18:28,30,32, Luke 15:17–18, Hos. 2:6–7) but also of the filthiness and odiousness of his sins, (Ezek. 36:31, Isa. 30:22) and upon the apprehension of God’s mercy in Christ to such as are penitent, (Joel 2:12–13) he so grieves for (Jer. 31:18–19) and hates his sins, (2 Cor. 7:11) as that he turns from them all to God, (Acts 26:18, Ezek. 14:6, 1 Kings 8:47–48) purposing and endeavouring constantly to walk with him in all the ways of new obedience. (Ps. 119:6,59,128, Luke 1:6, 2 Kings 23:25)21

The WCF is a confessional document that helps define individuals’ beliefs aligned with the biblical meaning of topics rooted in the Scriptures’ authoritative supremacy. Biblically, repentance is a critical element of conversion. To define and understand “conversion,” it must include faith and repentance, as commonly understood by the Greek term metanoia (μετανοέω).22

As the gospel reader first sees the term in the opening proclamation of Jesus’ ministry (Matt 4:17), it is defined through various cultural and Old Testament correlated references. Moreover, the term conveys the idea that it is about changing one’s mind with a feeling of remorse (Matt 3:2, 4:17, 11:21, Mark 1:15, 6:12, Luke 10:13, Acts 17:30, 26:20). While it is essential to recognize that repentance involves a change of mind, it also includes a changing of the will. It is the turning away from something as the conscious effort of a whole person away from personal self-destructive thoughts and behaviors offensive to God and people.

Unacceptable thoughts, words, and actions, biblically referred to as “sin,” are rejected as a whole toward a life commitment of faith to God through Christ. This is conversion. As one internally moves from one state of rejection (or indifference) involving a life of sin and selfishness to a faith commitment and devotion, Christ becomes Lord and King to a believer who chooses to surrender through grace. Conversion is by faith and a rejection of sin in part and as a whole, both retroactively and in the future, as defined through the pages of Scripture according to the intent of the biblical authors and not by reader-response interpretation.

Watson sets up a proposition within his treatise on repentance. He further makes biblically certain in his text, The Doctrine of Repentance, “Christ has purchased by His blood repenting sinners who shall be saved.” He reinforces that those who are made alive in Christ by a seed of faith have the spiritual capacity to repent, and as they do, they put to death sin as a prevailing matter of eternal consequence. Those who sin in the absence of the gospel of grace for repentance shall spiritually die without recourse (Galatians 3:10). Among the first and last words Jesus spoke from the pages of Scripture was “repent” (Matt 3:2, Luke 24:47). In fact, this was the urgency of the Apostles as they were sent out and preached, “people should repent” (Mark 6:12 ESV). They proclaimed that all should undergo a change of heart and mind. To abandon their former disposition with a new self, course of behavior, and regret over former life choices and dispositions. The abundance of their message concerning repentance was recorded in numerous locations throughout the New Testament (μετανοέω metanoeō repent (36x); Matt 3:2; 4:17; 11:20–21; 12:41; Mark 1:15; 6:12; Luke 10:13; 11:32; 13:3, 5; 15:7, 10; 16:30; 17:3–4; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 8:22; 17:30; 26:20; 2 Cor 12:21, Rev 2:5, 16, 21–22; 3:3, 19; 9:20–21; 16:9, 11).

Watson did not wish to argue whether or not faith or repentance comes first, while he was inclined to think that faith does precede repentance. He only sets the proposition that all people should repent, as conveyed by Christ Jesus and the urgency of the Apostles. The blood of Christ and the gospel of grace makes salvation to eternal life possible as people would repent. As persons repent and live by faith, they are saved by God’s doing, not their own. From grace and faith, people are saved through no other means (Ephesians 2:8-9). However, it is clear that without repentance, people will spiritually perish. Watson makes this point clear, as does Scripture. Watson wrote, “sin and die,” where the covenant of works (Mosaic law) offered no admittance through repentance. The law required personal, perfect, and perpetual obedience, where all eventually came under a curse. Under the new covenant of grace, Christians are solemnly urged to repent and be converted so that their sins may be blotted out (Acts 3:19).

Confession and Authentic Repentance

From Watson’s perspective, it is necessary to understand counterfeit repentance compared to authentic repentance, and to this end, he zeroes in on what false repentance is. He provides three critical specifics and examples that inform readers about what is necessary to recognize and understand what repentance is not. As a warning about what not to conclude concerning changes in behavior, attitudes, and motives, the absence of repentance remains in a person from three sources of false thinking about the matter. An unrepentant heart within a person represents no inward heart change about sin. As a person may delude himself with counterfeit repentance, these are the three warnings Watson wrote about:

Counterfeit Repentance: “Legal Terror”

Pain and trouble are not sufficient for repentance. Repentance requires a change of heart. If there is no change of heart, there is no repentance. An internal awareness of guilt that a person cognitively recognizes does not in itself mean that a change of heart has occurred. Watson contrasts self-aware guilt to an “infusion of grace” that infers the authenticity of repentance from Divine initiative and human reception. The differences between Reformed and Catholic doctrines of justification involve a change in the status of believers about how they are justified. While Reformed doctrine on justification holds to the principle of imputation of Christ’s righteousness to people of faith, Catholic doctrine decreed that justification involves an infused grace that changes a person’s internal nature and inclinations for sanctification and the remission of sins all at once (Council of Trent Decree concerning Justification, session 6, chapter 7).23 Whereas to Protestants, Christ’s righteousness is imputed into a believer once as a final justification (simul justus et peccator), to Catholics, infused righteousness is changed righteousness within the life of a believer as a result of faith and baptism.24 Here, Watson’s use of the phrase “infused grace” indicates a constituent gift of God that includes the ability of a believer to repent according to Divine intent and action (Ezek 36:27). More specifically, Watson wrote that infused grace breeds repentance.25

Counterfeit Repentance: “Resolution Against Sin”

To reject sin as a matter of self-determination and effort isn’t repentance. It is self-will that doesn’t accompany heart change from behaviors, thoughts, actions, or omissions offensive to God and contrary to what He expects. Counterfeit repentance in this form is a commitment to stop sinning, but for the wrong reasons. Resolutions against sin under these circumstances don’t hold, and some sins are replaced by others where the state of a person is the same or worse than before.

  • Resolutions against sin aren’t because sin is sinful but because it is painful. There remains no change of heart, conviction, remorse, or awareness of offended God, whom a person sins against.
  • Motivation to stop sinning from a position of alarm over judgment, evil, death, and Hell doesn’t win over a person’s love of sin. Love of sin will prevail over the dread of its consequences.

The sin of one type or another continues to surface because the old heart has not changed. New temptations continually overcome the old heart.

Counterfeit Repentance: “Leaving Sinful Ways”

A person who leaves numerous sins behind with a more righteous lifestyle doesn’t mean a person is repentant. Without a heart change, the person still in sin remains unrepentant. Watson wrote of leaving sin “from the strength of grace” compared to leaving on moral grounds. Selectively, some sins are retained while others are dropped and exchanged for others. The inclinations of the heart and its affections have not changed when a person remains captive to the appeal and love of sin. As Watson wrote that infused grace causes a cessation of sinful acts, grace is a gift and enablement of consistent holy living.

As it is necessary to understand what repentance is not, it is also essential to recognize what it is from Watson’s treatise. In comparison, Watson wrote more extensively on authentic repentance and the necessity of it than in all other chapters. He organized his thoughts into several categories where they must all be present for repentance to retain its virtue. He composed these categories as ingredients with Scripture references accompanying Watson’s points. Assertions and rationale about sin and the necessity of repentance resonate from his time to us who encounter his exhortations, rebukes, and encouragements. Beginning with these ingredients of repentance, we must fully grasp its meaning while checking our heart’s condition and motivations. All taken together, sin is the issue, and it bears acceptance that it is also a mortal enemy.

Watson wrote of the ingredients of authentic repentance as a mix of elements in contrast to counterfeit repentance. They are sequential or linear understandings to include the proper and correct view of sin, sorrow for it, the consequential experience of shame, personal hatred of sin, and finally, to turn from sin as a new life direction. Watson’s writings were formed from written lectures on the topic of repentance, including these categorical elements, and his materials were often presented pastorally. However, between all these points, Watson wrote at length about his views and verbal illustrations with Scriptural references to support his continued pressing argument. The inference was that readers were expected to retain the thread of rationale to hold together all ingredients without reinforcement and continued underlying support.

It is necessary to confess known sins before Lord when a believer becomes aware of them. This, too, is necessary for repentance. In confession, Watson makes the point that confession is self-accusation before God, where the adversary has no strength of argument against believers as they have already taxed themselves of pride, passion, and infidelity. Confession is a way to prove that we have judged and sentenced ourselves (1 Corinthians 11:31). Accusation of ourselves is, as Watson puts it, —me me adsum qui feci in me convertite ferrum26— (Me, I am here that I have done, turn the iron upon me). As Paul wrote to the church at Corinth, we will not be judged if we judge ourselves. By Cyprian, judicio, quod poenitentiae humanae severitas protulit, aliquid justitia coelestis apponit (to the judgment which the severity of human penitence brought forth, adds something of heavenly justice). Yet as we read various confessions within the biblical record, Watson makes a series of observations about what true confession is:

  1. Confession is voluntary as it acknowledges sin against God and Heaven.
  2. Confession is with deep resentment, burden, and compunction against sin.
  3. Confession must be sincere.
  4. Confession is without particularity.
  5. Confession is from an acknowledgment that the penitent is polluted by sin.
  6. Confession of sin is with all its circumstances and aggravations
  7. Confession is a charge upon ourselves so as to clear God that He has done no wrong.
  8. Confession is with a resolution never to act on them again.

To further understand the purpose of confession, Watson elaborates upon two areas of thought that demonstrate why rightful confession is necessary for repentance. In contrast, on the one hand, there is appeal and protest in prayer with partial confession, yet on the other, sincerity. So, as confession is a necessary ingredient in repentance, Watson wrote that four types of people do not fully accept the range and depth of it. And while Watson makes a compelling point about each, it does appear that they are not necessarily mutually exclusive from one another. Watson further frames his treatise around the idea of indictments. There are four of them against persons as if they were in a court of law to prosecute the abstention of full confessions that inhibit or block effective personal repentance.

  1. Hidden Sins – While it is possible to conceal sins from people, keeping them hidden from God is impossible.
  2. Partial Confessions – There is no expectation to confess a catalog of unknown sins but those we know about. All of them best we can where all sins shall be confessed, and nothing held back.
  3. Minced Words – Equivocations, Extenuating Circumstances, and Excuses (Genesis 3:12, 1 Samuel 15:24).
  4. Arguments  – Self-justification and special pleading efforts at vindication (John 4:9).

In contrast to “repentance” of self-determination, penitents are sincere in confessing the specifics of their sin to demonstrate the heart and mind of repentance fully. The uses of confession in these ways are magnificent as they are by design and redemptive intent. They are pleasing to God and cause angels to rejoice. To outline Watson’s views of favorable repentance, they are as follows:

  1. Confession gives glory to God.
  2. Confession is a means to humble the soul.
  3. Confession gives vent to a troubled heart.
  4. Confession purges out sin.
  5. Confession of sin endears Christ to the soul.
  6. Confession of sin makes way for pardon.
  7. Confession is reasonable and easy.

It is rational to reconcile with your Creator, who enables you to live peaceably with people who are hostile to you and who themselves consider you their enemy. While evil people of darkness live in enmity with people of faith, grace, and repentance, it is unreasonable for forgiven believers to reciprocate by hatred. As God forgives believers who confess their sins, He expects us to forgive others. Christ requires that we forgive others (Matt 6:14-15) and love those who live in enmity with people (Matt 5:43-45) who live by the authority of His Word.

The first covenant (Mosaic law) compared to the second covenant (covenant of grace) is night and day different. The first covenant required death and sacrifice. While in the second, Christ is the atoning mediator who redeems believers and makes possible the covenant of grace for the redemption of humanity (i.e., those who would call upon him and convert by faith and repentance). By humble confession, Christ is our surety. Watson wrote, only acknowledge your iniquity, indict yourself, and you will be sure of mercy.

To whom we confess sin is of concern, as Watson wrote about the papists and hearers of confessions from believers who turn to people rather than God, who promises them forgiveness and cleansing (1 John 1:9). While we are instructed to “confess sins one to another” (James 5:16), Catholic priests do not confess to the people as the people confess to the priests. Like the common man, Priests certainly confess their sins to one another, but confession is not reciprocal as a body of believers from one class structure to another. Priests do not confess specific sins to believers of a congregation or mass, as do believers who appear before priests at confession for absolution. The Catholic church and priests aligned with the State are ready to hear confessions of sins against God and others but also sins against social order and the contradictory interests of the State, which insists upon its citizens’ loyalty above God (Eph 6:12). Confession in this way is a form of State surveillance.

Watson made the point that confession to priests is a profitable endeavor. Opening the mouth of a parishioner through guilt and the admission of guilt renders a return on effort in the form of restitution for absolution. For a price, donation as penance is Watson’s point about the folly of confession to some Catholic priests disinterested in restoring one believer to God, people, and the church. Watson does not support confessions to priests as given by papist doctrine.

The Necessity and Conditions of Repentance

The call to repentance is not a request toward people inclined to hear a passing suggestion. Both Watson and Owen spoke of repentance as imperative, necessary, urgent, and salvific. Moreover, Watson offers specifics about why repentance is a necessity.

  1. God, with ultimate authority, instructs and directs all people to repent (Acts 17:30). This is a command. Yet, it is reminiscent of the famous quote from Augustine, “Thou commandest continency (self-control); give what Thou commandest, and command what Thou wilt.”27 The work of repentance is a sovereign work of God through the free will of people. Paradoxically, to the command to repent, it is a gift granted (2 Tim 2:25).
  2. God will not accept anyone unless there is repentance (Ex 23:7, Isa 1:16, 2 Cor 6:14).  
  3. People who continue in impenitence are not within Christ’s commission (see his commission, Isa. 61:1). He has been sent to the brokenhearted. As Watson puts it, “if ever Christ brings men to Heaven, it shall be through Hell’s gates” (Acts 5:31). It is Watson’s view that Christ will not save someone regardless of a person’s repentant heart.28
  4. We have, by sin, wronged God. By repentance, we humble and judge ourselves for the sin committed. We set to our seal that God is righteous if He should destroy us: thus, we give glory to God and do what is in us to restore his honor.

Watson further continues, “if God should save men without repentance, making no discrimination, then by this rule he must save all; not only men, but Devils, as Origen once held; and so consequently the decrees of Election and Reprobation must fall to the ground; which how diametrically opposite it is to sacred writ, let all judge.

At this point, it is necessary to make side observations about the role of Scripture in terms of its necessity toward repentance. It was Origen’s understanding that the Scriptural text is “sacramental,” according to Torjesen in her work, Hermeneutical procedure and theological structure in Origen’s exegesis (Patristische Texte und Studien). 29 She references de Lubac in her work about the literal and spiritual nature of interpretation. Henri de Lubac was a progressive Catholic priest early in life. Still, he later became accepted and admired after the second Vatican council and a lengthy period of alienation and censorship from the Catholic church.

While it is of interest to understand what de Lubac’s views were of Origen and the necessity of mysticism, there is significant thought and interest about the spiritually transformative nature of Scripture. The work and presence of the Holy Spirit are written as mystical to converted readers the text, and Gohl makes the following written assertion:

“For Origen, when Christians come into contact with the text, they are coming into contact with the Logos (Christ Jesus) Himself. Through this contact, the Logos instructs and transforms the Christian soul into His own likeness (2 Corinthians 3:18).”30 As this reference corresponds to Colossians 3:16 (“Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly…”), Origen’s views are better supported by James 1:21, which informs readers, “humbly accept the word God has planted in your hearts, for it has the power to save your souls.”

John Owen

The introduction of John Owen given earlier in this post offers some limited insight into his thoughts concerning sin. Yet further throughout his volumes are topics of justification and sanctification that involve the doctrines of repentance. Regeneration, saving faith, and conversion translate to the work of the Spirit, as repentance is given as a gift to believers who place their faith in Christ Jesus and draw near to Him in surrender. Owen makes clear the work of the Spirit within the believer to render the work of repentance and sanctification.

The Laboring of Repentance

Owen’s views about labor for repentance largely appear within his writings concerning apostasy. More specifically, concerning a departure from the holiness of the gospel, as warned about at length, to render an understanding of its consequences. To Owen, repentance was about abandoning sin for the right reasons and adopting holy living by forsaking known habitual sins. To overcome sin by continually striving against it until gone was to repent of it in Owen’s mind. The virtues of faith, love and various others intermingled with repentance as it is integral to remaining in a state of open-hearted confession and transparency before God as indwelling sin is perpetually put to death. While the Spirit is at work in the believer to mortify sin, the believer is mentally, physically, and spiritually exerting effort against the personal sin nature. Not merely by its actions or outcomes but to the source or root of it to cut off affections and inclinations from a changed heart that yields to the interests of God. The spirit is made alive with thoughts and intentions acted upon to recognize sin, and patterns of sin, that get attention to thwart it and cut it off. To Owen, this is an outworking of personal exertion and an inworking of the Spirit to judge and burn away what remains persistent (Isaiah 4:4). The cause and effect of mortification of sin and repentance are by the Spirit of God upon the spirit of a person. The Spirit, as the cause, presents affected outcomes to persons yielded to God through faith by grace.

Owen raises the question about how we are exhorted to repentance if it is to be the work of the Spirit alone. The question of obedience compared to the work of the Spirit appears as a paradox. On the one hand, He “works in us to will and to do of his own good pleasure” (Phil 2:13), while on the other hand, the Spirit works “all our works in us” (Isa. 26:12).

The Place of Granted Repentance

Owen is thoroughly clear and understood concerning his views about the work of Christ as a gift to believers who live by faith. He further reinforces this rationale from the John 15:5 passage: “Without Christ we can do nothing.” From the gift of repentance given to persons, the actual work of the Spirit is within and upon believers. Where the Spirit acts upon and within a person is the work of the Spirit alone. Incredibly, while Watson and Owen highlight the call to repentance, just as Christ Jesus did (Matthew 4:17), it is clear from Luke, “This One God exalted to His right hand as a Leader and a Savior, to grant repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins” (Acts 5:31 LSB). This giving of repentance extends from Christ as the Father has exalted Him. The Spirit that proceeds from the Father and Christ is the source of power to produce repentance and the killing of indwelling sin to assure personal sanctification.

The work of the Spirit as the helper is the gift of God from Christ the Son as God the Father has exalted Him to elevated stature and glory. In keeping with the rationale of repentance given as a gift, it is granted as an action that leads to knowledge of the truth (2 Timothy 2:25). When this question is asked of Owen concerning sanctification, “What is repentance?” He answers, “Godly sorrow for every known sin committed against God, with a firm purpose of heart to cleave unto him for the future, in the killing of sin, the quickening of all graces, to walk before him in newness of life.” He again follows up with a new question: “Can we do this ourselves?” With a definitive answer, “No; it is a special gift and grace of God, which he bestoweth on whom he pleaseth.” As it is written, it is God’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom (Luke 12:32), so it is with the gift of repentance to His pleasure, interests, and glory.

Conclusion

This research project was an exhilarating, sobering, and joyful experience. The Puritans of the 17th century offer a deep and rich perspective on godly living from the Reformed tradition we can all aspire to reach. There is much to learn from Puritan theology and their way of life. John Owen and Thomas Watson were gifted among numerous ministers of the Puritan era. They lived through an appointed time in history that God used to bring the message of sin and repentance to their generation and numerous others that extend across generations. The message to the people and the church of England concerning sin and repentance is just as relevant today as it was back during their time. Owen and Watson’s views are centered squarely on Scripture and not on tradition or a certain class of theology to which they are obligated to abide. The refreshing perspectives of careful and biblical thought from the Puritans of the 17th century offer a model of ministry, exposition, and work ethic that resonates strongly within the church today.

Citations

________________________________
1 Joel R. Beeke and Mark Jones, A Puritan Theology: Doctrine for Life (Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2012), 205
2 Anthony Burgess, A Treatise of Original Sin … Proving That It Is, by Pregnant Texts of Scripture Vindicated from False Glosses / by Anthony Burgess, Early English Books Online (London: s.n, 1658), 46.
3 Donald K. McKim, The Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2014), 22.
4 Stephen Charnock, The Complete Works of Stephen Charnock, vol. 3 (Edinburgh; London; Dublin: James Nichol; James Nisbet and Co.; W. Robertson; G. Herbert, 1864–1866), 15.
5 John MacArthur, “The Danger of Calling the Church to Repent,” April 11th, 2022, https://www.gty.org/library/blog/B181008/the-danger-of-calling-the-church-to-repent. Accessed 12/02/2022.
6 Thomas Watson, The Doctrine of Repentance, Useful for These Times by Tho. Watson, Early English Books Online (London: R.W. for Thomas Parkhurst .., 1668), 42.
7 M. de Jonge, “Sin,” ed. Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999), 782.
8 Ralph Venning, “Sin, the Plague of Plagues, or, Sinful sin, the Worst of Evil,” 1669, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A64834.0001.001/1:5?rgn=div1;view=fulltext. Cambridge University Library. Accessed 02/19/2023.
9 William Arndt et al., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 747.
10 John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue, eds., Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2017), 475.
11 Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine, Second Edition. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Academic, 2020), 619.
12 John F. MacArthur Jr., “Mortification of Sin,” Master’s Seminary Journal 5, no. 1 (1994): 4.
13 Joel R. Beeke and Randall J. Pederson, Meet the Puritans: With a Guide to Modern Reprints (Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2006), 455.
14 John Owen, The Works of John Owen, ed. William H. Goold, vol. 9 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, n.d.), 519.
15 John Owen, The Works of John Owen, ed. William H. Goold, vol. 6 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, n.d.), 2.
16 Kelly M. Kapic and Wesley Vander Lugt, Pocket Dictionary of the Reformed Tradition, The IVP Pocket Reference Series (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2013), 76.
17 Charles G. Herbermann, Edward A. Pace, et al., eds., “Mortification,” The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church (New York: The Encyclopedia Press; The Universal Knowledge Foundation, 1907–1913).
18 Johannes P. Louw and Eugene Albert Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (New York: United Bible Societies, 1996), 660.
19 Ibid. Herbermann.
20 John Chrysostom, “Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Romans,” in Saint Chrysostom: Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistle to the Romans, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. J. B. Morris, W. H. Simcox, and George B. Stevens, vol. 11, A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1889), 434–435.
21 The Westminster Larger Catechism: With Scripture Proofs. (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1996).
22 Ibid. William Arndt et al. 640.
23 Theodore Alois Buckley, The Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent (London: George Routledge and Co., 1851), 33-34.
24
Michael Glazier and Monika K. Hellwig, The Modern Catholic Encyclopedia (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2004), 453
25 Ibid. Watson, 9.
26 P. Vergilius (Virgil) Maro, “Bucolics, Aeneid, and Georgics Of Vergil,” ed. J. B. Greenough (Medford, MA: Ginn & Co., 1900).
27 Augustine of Hippo, “The Confessions of St. Augustin,” in The Confessions and Letters of St. Augustin with a Sketch of His Life and Work, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. J. G. Pilkington, vol. 1, A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Company, 1886), 155.
28 Ibid. Watson, 76.
29 Justin M. Gohl, “Origen,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).
30 Ibid.
31 John Owen, The Works of John Owen, ed. William H. Goold, vol. 6 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, n.d.), 20.
32 John Owen, The Works of John Owen, ed. William H. Goold, vol. 1 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, n.d.), 487–488.

Bibliography

  • Alois Buckley, Theodore. The Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent. London: George Routledge, 1851.
  • Arndt, William et al. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
  • Beale, G.K., and D.A. Carson. Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.
  • Beeke, Joel R, and Mark Jones. A Puritan Theology: Doctrine for Life. Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books, 2012.
  • Burgess, Anthony. A Treatise of Original Sin … Proving That It Is, by Pregnant Texts of Scripture Vindicated from False Glosses. London: Early English Books Online, 1658.
  • Charnock, Stephen. The Complete Works of Stephen Charnock, Vol. 3. Edinburgh; London; Dublin: James Nichol; James Nisbet and Co., 1864–1866.
  • Chrysostom, John. “Homilies of St John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Romans.” In A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, by Philip Schaff, J.B. Morris, W.H. Simcox, & George B Stevens, 434-435. New York: Christian Literature Company, 1889.
  • de Jonge, M. “Sin.” In Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, by Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking, & Peter W van der Horst, 782. Leiden, Boston, Koln, Grand Rapids, Cambridge: Brill, 1999.
    Glazier, Michael, and Monika K Hellwig. The Modern Catholic Encyclopedia. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2004.
  • Herbermann, Charles G, and Edward A Pace. “Mortification.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, 1907-1913.
  • Hippo, Augustine of. “The Confessions of St. Augustin.” In The Confessions and Letters of St. Augustin with a Sketch of His Life and Work, Vol. 1, by Philip Schaff, & J.G. Pilkington, 155. Buffalo: Christian Literature Company, 1886.
  • Kapic, Kelly M., and Wesley Vander Lugt. Pocket Dictionary of the Reformed Tradition. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2013.
  • Logos Research Systems, Inc. The Westminister Larger Catechism: With Scripture Proofs. Oak Harbor, 1996.
  • Louw, Johannes P, and Albert Eugene Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. New York: United Bible Societies, 1996.
  • MacArthur, John F. Jr. “Mortification of Sin.” The Master’s Seminary Journal 5, No.1, Spring 1994: 2-22.
  • Maro, P. Vergilius. Bucolics, Aeneid, and Georgics of Vergil. Medford: Ginn & Co. 1900, 1900.
  • McKim, Donald K. The Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2014.
  • Owen, John. The Works of John Owen, Vol. 1. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, N.D.
  • —. The Works of John Owen, Vol. 6. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, N.D.
  • —. The Works of John Owen, Vol. 9. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, N.D.
  • R, Beeke Joel, and Randall J Pederson. Meet the Puritans: With a Guide to Modern Reprints. Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books, 2006.
  • EEBO – Early English Books Online. 1669. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A64834.0001.001/1:5?rgn=div1;view=fulltext (accessed 02 19, 2023).

Continue Reading ·